How Professional Governance Supports Meaningful Nurse Participation

14 September 2026

Meaningful nurse participation does not occur because an organization says it values frontline voices. It takes place when nurses have a real place to advance clinical judgment, shape standards of practice, and influence decisions that affect patient care. That is where Professional Governance, traditionally referred to as Shared Governance, makes its keep.

In nursing, shared governance describes a model in which nurses have an official voice in decisions about their professional practice, often through councils or similar structures. More just recently, nursing management groups have utilized the term Professional Governance to reflect a stronger emphasis on autonomy, accountability, significant decision-making, and management in practice. That change in language matters. It indicates that this is not simply about being requested for opinions. It is about acknowledging nursing as an occupation with knowledge, responsibilities, and authority.

When Professional Governance works well, involvement stops being symbolic. Personnel nurses are not welcomed into the room after options have actually currently been made. They are part of the procedure that specifies the issue, weighs the options, and owns the result. That shift affects more than spirits. It reaches quality, teamwork, retention, and the day-to-day integrity of care.
An official voice changes the nature of participation
Many health care companies state they want bedside nurses engaged. The harder concern is what that engagement looks like when a choice is uncomfortable, pricey, or most likely to interfere with old practices. Casual listening sessions have value, but they seldom hold enough weight by themselves. Nurses might speak openly one week and discover the next that absolutely nothing altered, nobody followed up, and the exact same concern is now back on the unit.

A formal governance structure changes that vibrant. Councils, representative bodies, and open forums give participation a home. They make it possible for practice issues and policy questions to move through a recognized procedure rather than through rumor, corridor advocacy, or individual impact. That difference is important. Without structure, participation tends to depend on who is confident, who has access to leadership, or who is willing to keep pressing. With structure, participation enters into expert life.

The practical effect is easy to see. A bedside nurse notices that a policy creates unneeded hold-ups during a high-risk moment in care. In a weak environment, that issue might remain regional, become a complaint, or disappear under the pressure of the next shift. In a Professional Governance environment, the very same concern can be evaluated in an online forum where practice requirements, workflow truths, and client effect are taken seriously. The nurse is not functioning as a dissenter. The nurse is serving as a professional contributor.

That is one reason the evolution from Shared Governance to Professional Governance is more than branding. The older term highlighted partnership and shared decision-making. The newer term keeps those components however locations sharper concentrate on the expert authority and accountability of nurses. Simply put, the goal is not just to share power politely. It is to utilize nursing expertise where it belongs, in the decisions that form nursing practice.
Why meaningful participation needs more than representation
Representation alone can be thin. A nurse might rest on a council and still have little influence if the role is uncertain, the program is controlled in other places, or suggestions vanish into a leadership vacuum. Significant involvement requires three conditions at the very same time: the nurse voice must be present, the forum should matter, and the decisions should link back to practice.

That 2nd point is where many efforts stall. It is possible to build a council structure that looks excellent on paper yet leaves nurses feeling more annoyed than in the past. The disappointment is predictable. Once individuals are invited into governance, they quickly recognize whether their function is genuine. If they invest hours examining problems, collecting peer feedback, and establishing recommendations just to view every considerable matter bypass the group, trust deteriorates fast.

Professional Governance is greatest when nurses can see a direct relationship in between participation and action. Not every suggestion will be accepted, and it should not be. Responsibility cuts both methods. However nurses must understand how choices were made, what trade-offs were considered, and what evidence or operational realities shaped the last call. Transparency belongs to respect.

This is likewise where management discipline matters. Nurse leaders who think in Professional Governance do more than encourage participation. They protect the procedure. They make room for argument. They resist the desire to pre-solve every issue before it reaches a council. They help personnel nurses develop governance skills, especially when somebody has scientific trustworthiness however minimal experience with policy conversation, consensus-building, or organizational strategy.

Meaningful participation often looks quieter than individuals anticipate. It is not always dramatic dissent or a sweeping vote. Often it is the regular work of practice evaluation, policy improvement, and thoughtful difficulty to assumptions that have actually gone unexamined for several years. That sort of participation is not fancy, but it is exactly how professional cultures mature.
The link between nurse participation and patient care
Professional Governance is often gone over as a workforce or leadership technique, which it is, but that framing can be too narrow. Its importance is medical. Nursing competence sits closest to much of the decisions that affect care delivery, patient experience, and coordination across disciplines. When that knowledge has no structured course into decision-making, the organization loses among its most practical sources of insight.

Leadership sources in nursing connect shared and professional governance with empowerment, engagement, retention, interprofessional partnership, teamwork, and more secure, higher-quality client care. Those relationships make good sense on the ground. Nurses understand where a procedure breaks down at 0300. They understand when a well-meant policy produces confusion in a real patient space. They know when interaction throughout teams is smooth in theory however inconsistent in practice. A governance model that use that viewpoint is not merely inclusive. It is operationally smart.

Consider something as common as modifying a practice standard. If the work is done primarily from a range, the end product may be technically sound however uncomfortable to apply. If personnel nurses are involved through Professional Governance, the discussion modifications. Individuals ask various concerns. How will this play out during handoff? What takes place when staffing is tight? Does this wording assistance or puzzle? Are we fixing the best issue? That level of useful examination secures both care quality and implementation.

There is also an ethical measurement. The nursing profession has long dealt with collaboration and shared decision-making as main to its work. Recent principles guidance clearly identifies shared governance amongst labor force sustainability efforts. That is telling. It puts nurse involvement not at the edge of professional life, but within the obligations of the profession itself. Supporting nurse voice is not a courtesy extended by management. It becomes part of structure conditions in which nursing can be practiced responsibly and sustained over time.
Participation enhances accountability, not simply autonomy
Some individuals hear Professional Governance and focus just on autonomy. That is reasonable, but insufficient. The design highlights autonomy and responsibility together. Those two concepts should travel as a pair.

When nurses have a formal role in forming expert practice, they also share obligation for the standards they help produce. That can be uncomfortable, particularly when decisions include trade-offs. It is easier to slam a policy developed in other places than to help write one that should hold up in a complex environment. Professional Governance asks more of nurses than simple feedback does. It expects judgment, preparation, and a willingness to own expert decisions.

That is one reason fully grown councils tend to produce a various sort of discussion than advertisement hoc complaint sessions. The concern shifts from "Why are they doing this to us?" to "What practice choice best serves clients, supports safe care, and can actually be carried out?" That is an expert concern. It does not erase argument, however it raises the level of discourse.

For leaders, this indicates involvement must not be framed as a favor. It needs to be framed as expert work. Nurses need time, orientation, and support to do it well. Governance duties can not merely be layered onto a full medical task with no secured attention and no development. When that occurs, involvement ends up being tiring, and just the most persistent individuals stay involved. With time, the structure begins representing endurance rather than the broader nursing voice.
The shift from Shared Governance to Expert Governance
The term Shared Governance still appears extensively, and it remains familiar across nursing. It catches an important truth: decisions about nursing practice ought to not be held exclusively by hierarchy. Yet the move toward Professional Governance shows a helpful refinement.

Professional Governance highlights that nursing practice is governed by the occupation, through the judgment and responsibility of nurses, rather than simply shared in between management and personnel in an unclear sense. That framing is stronger. It underscores that involvement is rooted in expert authority, not just employee engagement. It also clarifies that the point is not to create an additional committee layer, however to utilize nursing knowledge in manner ins which sustain the profession and support its growth.

That difference can alter how organizations act. In a Shared Governance design comprehended loosely, leaders may believe they have actually been successful by speaking with nurses. In a Professional Governance https://cashvpza997.hexaforgey.com/posts/how-professional-governance-promotes-responsibility-in-nursing https://cashvpza997.hexaforgey.com/posts/how-professional-governance-promotes-responsibility-in-nursing design, assessment is not enough. The expectation is that nurses have meaningful decision-making functions connected to their practice. The bar is higher, and it ought to be.

This language shift also assists explain why some older governance structures feel stale. If councils become detached from expert authority, they drift towards ritualistic participation. The meetings continue, minutes are recorded, and presence is tracked, however the work no longer forms practice in a meaningful method. Reframing around Professional Governance can revive the original function by asking a sharper question: where, exactly, do nurses work out expert leadership here?
What meaningful structures look like in practice
No single governance plan fits every setting, and the verified context does not recommend one. What it does make clear is that councils and representative online forums are common lorries for formal nurse voice. The essential point is not the name of the structure. It is whether the structure supports open discussion of practice and policy concerns and whether nurses can influence results that matter.

There are a couple of signs that a structure is supporting genuine involvement rather than performative involvement:
nurses can bring forward practice concerns through an acknowledged process representative bodies go over practice and policy issues in open forum nurse input impacts choices tied to professional practice leaders treat governance work as part of nursing management, not an extracurricular activity accountability for choices shows up, not hidden
Those markers might sound simple, but they are not easy to sustain. Open online forum only works when dissent is safe. Representation only works when agents are prepared and linked to their peers. Responsibility just works when feedback loops are reputable. In lots of organizations, the technical structure appears before the cultural readiness does.

That gap shows up in familiar methods. Staff might hesitate to speak if they think dispute will be kept in mind throughout scheduling, evaluation, or advancement discussions. Agents may struggle if they are anticipated to promote peers without any sensible method to collect unit-level feedback. Councils might lose momentum if meetings are controlled by one-way updates rather than active deliberation. None of these failures implies the idea is flawed. They mean the company has constructed a shell without enough substance inside it.
The function of nurse leaders in making governance credible
Professional Governance does not lower the significance of official management. It changes the task. Leaders are no longer the sole owners of practice decisions. They become stewards of a process that draws on the profession more fully.

That takes restraint. A leader who addresses every concern too quickly, even from good intentions, can flatten participation. So can a leader who sends problems to councils that are unimportant while booking important matters for closed-door decision-making. Personnel nurses see that pattern instantly. Once they do, presence might continue for a while, however belief begins to drain pipes away.

Strong leaders in a Professional Governance environment do something more demanding. They assist define choice rights clearly. They coach nurses on how to analyze practice concerns. They make sure governance bodies comprehend the operational context without allowing operations to swallow expert judgment. And when a suggestion can not be embraced as proposed, they describe why with sufficient honesty that individuals can respect the answer.

Collaborative management is not passive. It needs structure, follow-through, and the self-confidence to let expertise surface from places other than the executive office. Nursing governance products have long shown that collective intent, with representative bodies talking about practice and policy in open forum. The challenge is not composing that concept into bylaws. The challenge is living it when time is short, spending plans are tight, or stakeholders disagree sharply.
Participation, sustainability, and retention
It is hard to talk about nurse participation without discussing whether nurses wish to remain. Governance alone will not solve retention problems, and no serious leader must pretend otherwise. Payment, work, staffing, and organizational stability all matter. Still, it would be an error to deal with Professional Governance as peripheral to retention.

When nurses have no meaningful voice in practice decisions, aggravation accumulates in an unique way. People feel not just worn out, however expertly sidelined. They might still care deeply about patient care while feeling progressively detached from the systems around them. That sort of disengagement is destructive. It impacts team effort, rely on leadership, and willingness to invest extra effort in enhancement work.

By contrast, governance structures that really value nursing proficiency can support sustainability. They reinforce the idea that nurses are not simply carrying out care plans within a set system designed by others. They are assisting shape the expert environment itself. Principles assistance that puts shared governance amongst labor force sustainability initiatives shows that reality. Involvement is part of what makes practice bearable, accountable, and worth committing to over time.

There is also a developmental advantage. Nurses who participate in councils typically enhance abilities that are otherwise challenging to build in routine scientific circulation: policy analysis, professional dialogue, consensus-building, and systems thinking. Those abilities matter whether someone stays at the bedside, moves into advanced practice, or eventually pursues formal management. A healthy governance culture therefore supports today workforce and develops the future one.
Interprofessional respect grows when nursing talks with authority
Interprofessional partnership improves when nursing gets in shared discussions with arranged professional voice instead of fragmented individual issues. This is another reason Professional Governance matters beyond nursing alone.

In numerous care settings, patient results depend on collaborated decisions across disciplines. Yet collaboration is strongest when each profession takes part from a position of clarity and trustworthiness. A nursing voice that has already overcome issues in representative online forums can engage better with organizational partners. The conversation shifts from isolated choices to expertly grounded recommendations.

That has useful worth. Teams make much better choices when nursing concerns are articulated plainly, backed by practice knowledge, and executed recognized governance channels. It decreases the danger that nursing input will be perceived as anecdotal or inconsistent. It likewise develops more stable relationships between frontline clinicians and leadership since issues are processed through developed professional pathways.

This is one of the underappreciated strengths of Shared Governance and Professional Governance. They do not only empower nurses internally. They assist nursing participate externally, throughout the company, as a coherent professional force.
When organizations state they have governance, however nurses do not feel it
There is frequently a gap in between declared governance and skilled governance. A company might have councils, charters, and meeting calendars, yet personnel nurses might still say, with some justification, that choices occur in other places. That understanding deserves attention. It normally points to one of 2 problems: either the structure does not have authority, or the interaction around it is too weak to be believed.

Sometimes the concern is scope. A council may be asked to go over matters that are cosmetic while core practice concerns remain tightly centralized. Often the concern is feedback. Nurses contribute ideas but never hear what occurred next. Often the concern is turnover. New personnel inherit a governance structure without the history, mentoring, or self-confidence required to utilize it well.

Repairing that space starts with candor. If specific decisions are constrained by law, policy, or more comprehensive organizational obligations, say so clearly. If nurses do have actually authority in defined areas, make those locations noticeable and safeguard them. If a council recommendation changed a policy, interact that result plainly. Involvement ends up being significant when individuals can trace a line from discussion to choice to practice.

A governance design loses authenticity gradually, then at one time. For a while, people continue showing up since they think enhancement is still possible. Then attendance thins, agenda energy drops, and the structure becomes hard to revive. That is why reliability matters so much. As soon as nurses conclude that involvement is primarily symbolic, reconstructing trust takes far longer than creating the council in the first place.
What the greatest systems understand
The greatest organizations comprehend that Professional Governance is both a structure and a viewpoint. The structure matters because nurse participation needs official paths. The philosophy matters because no path works if the company does not really think nursing competence belongs in decision-making.

That mix is what supports meaningful nurse involvement. Nurses require online forums where practice and policy concerns can be discussed freely. They require management that deals with cooperation and shared decision-making as vital to nursing work. They need a model that recognizes autonomy without losing accountability. And they require to see, over time, that their professional voice modifications care, culture, and the conditions of practice.

Shared Governance opened the door to that concept. Professional Governance hones it. It advises healthcare companies that nurses do not participate meaningfully even if they are consulted. They get involved meaningfully when the profession has a genuine role in governing its practice, and when that role is visible in the choices that form client care every day.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a health care consulting and education firm established in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps health care organizations strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>