This
meeting
ended
at
4:20,
and
preparations
for
the
attack
accelerated. Expecting
I
would
be
in
the
White
House
all
night,
I
went
home
at
about 5:30
to
get
a
change
of
clothes
and
return.
Dunford
had
confirmed
7:00
p.m. was
the
go/no
go
point
for
the
strike
against
the
three
Iranian
sites,
so
I figured
I
had
plenty
of
time
before
the
9:00
p.m.
hit.
I
called
Trump
from the
Secret
Service
SUV
at
about
5:35
and
told
him
everything
was
on
track. “Okay,”
he
said,
“let’s
go.”
I
talked
to
Shanahan
at
5:40
about
the
kind
of statements
he
and
Dunford
would
make
at
the
Pentagon
once
the
attacks concluded
and
whether
they
should
take
questions
or
just
read
written statements.
I
reached
home,
changed
clothes,
and
turned
around immediately,
running
into
heavy
inbound
traffic
on
the
George
Washington Memorial
Parkway.
As
I
was
riding
in,
Shanahan
called
with
what
turned out
to
be
an
erroneous
report
that
the
UK
embassy
in
Iran
had
been attacked,
and
that
he
and
Dunford
had
decided
to
delay
the
time-on-target point
to
10:00
p.m.
The
source
of
this
information
was
a
UK
liaison
officer at
the
Joint
Chiefs
of
Staff,
but
Shanahan
said
Pompeo
was
checking
(and determined
that
it
was
a
trivial
automobile
accident).
I
couldn’t
believe
the Pentagon
had
changed
the
time
of
attack
entirely
on
its
own,
especially based
on
the
scanty
information
involved.
I
called
Trump
to
say
we
might have
to
postpone
the
attack
for
an
hour,
although
we
were
still
checking things
out.
Trump
also
didn’t
understand
why
we
had
to
delay
things,
but
he didn’t
object.
I
called
Dunford
just
after
hanging
up
with
Trump
and
was
told
the
two of
them
were
talking.
Worried
now
that
perhaps
Shanahan
and
Dunford
had gotten
cold
feet,
I
called
Pompeo
(who
was
at
his
residence)
to
compare notes.
He
thought
Shanahan
and
Dunford
were
panicking,
and
were completely
out
of
line;
they
had
argued
to
him
we
should
wait
a
couple
of days,
in
light
of
the
“attack”
on
the
British
embassy,
to
see
if
we
could
get the
Brits
to
join
the
retaliation
(although
in
light
of
subsequent
events,
this idea
never
went
any
further).
It
got
worse.
As
Pompeo
and
I
were
talking, the
Sit
Room
broke
in
to
say
Trump
wanted
to
have
a
conference
call
with the
two
of
us,
Shanahan,
and
Dunford.
Trump
came
on
the
line
at
perhaps 7:20
(I
was
now
slowly
crossing
the
Roosevelt
Bridge
across
the
Potomac)
to
say
he
had
decided
to
call
the
strikes
off
because
they
were
not “proportionate.”
“A
hundred
fifty
to
one,”
he
said,
and
I
thought
perhaps
he was
referring
to
the
number
of
missiles
we
might
fire
compared
to
the
one Iranian
missile
that
had
brought
down
the
Global
Hawk.
Instead,
Trump said
he
had
been
told
by
someone
unnamed
there
might
be
a
hundred
fifty Iranian
casualties.
“Too
many
body
bags,”
said
Trump,
which
he
was
not willing
to
risk
for
an
unmanned
drone—“Not
proportionate,”
he
said
again. Pompeo
tried
to
reason
with
him,
but
he
wasn’t
having
it.
Saying
we
could always
strike
later,
Trump
cut
the
discussion
off,
repeating
he
didn’t
want
to have
a
lot
of
body
bags
on
television.
I
tried
to
change
his
mind,
but
I
got nowhere.
I
said
I
was
nearing
the
White
House
and
would
come
to
the
Oval when
I
arrived.
In
my
government
experience,
this
was
the
most
irrational
thing
I
ever
witnessed
any
President
do.
It
called
to
mind
Kelly’s
question
to
me:
what
would
happen
if
we
ever
got
into
a
real
crisis
with
Trump
as
President?
Well,
we
now
had
one,
and
Trump
had
behaved
bizarrely,
just
as
Kelly
had
feared.
As
I
arrived
at
the
White
House
entrance
on
West
Executive
Avenue,
shortly
after
seven
thirty
p.m.,
Kupperman
was
outside
to
greet
me
to
say
the
strike
was
off.
I
went
by
my
office
to
drop
off
my
briefcase
and
went
straight
to
the
Oval,
where
I
found
Cipollone,
Eisenberg,
and
a
Mulvaney
staffer.
I
had
a
thoroughly
surreal
conversation
with
Trump,
during
which
I
learned
that
Eisenberg,
on
his
own,
had
gone
into
the
Oval
with
the
“one
hundred
fifty
casualties”
number,
a
figure
drawn
up
somewhere
in
the
Defense
Department
(on
which
I
learned
more
the
next
day),
arguing
it
was
illegal
to
retaliate
in
such
a
disproportionate
way.
This
was
all
utter
nonsense,
both
the
so-called
casualty
figure,
which
no
senior
official
had
examined,
and
the
legal
argument,
which
was
a
grotesque
misstatement
of
the
proportionality
principle.
(After
the
event,
commentators
circulated
a
quotation
from
Stephen
Schwebel,
former
US
chief
judge
of
the
International
Court
of
Justice,
that
“in
the
case
of
action
taken
for
the
specific
purpose
of
halting
and
repelling
an
armed
attack,
this
does
not
mean
that
the
action
should
be
more
or
less
commensurate
with
the 51 attack.”
Trump
said
he
had
called
Dunford
(probably
the
point
where
I tried
to
reach
him)
after
Eisenberg
spoke
to
him,
and
Dunford
didn’t
dispute the
decision.
Dunford
told
me
the
next
day
this
was
incorrect,
but
the damage
was
already
done.
I
was
at
a
loss
for
words,
which
must
have
been apparent
to
everyone
in
the
Oval.
I
tried
to
explain
that
the
purported
“casualty” figures were almost entirely conjectural, but Trump wasn’t listening. He had in mind pictures of a hundred fifty body bags, and there was no explaining to be done. He offered no other justification, simply repeating his worry about television pictures of dead Iranians. Trump said finally, “Don’t worry, we can always attack later, and if we do it’ll be much tougher,” a promise worth exactly what I paid for it.