How Shared Governance Motivates Interprofessional Cooperation

02 September 2026

Interprofessional partnership hardly ever improves because someone posts a brand-new motto in the break room or asks groups to "communicate much better." It enhances when the people doing the work have a genuine way to shape how the work is done. That is where Shared Governance, frequently now discussed as Professional Governance, ends up being especially important.

In nursing, shared governance refers to a design in which nurses have an official voice in decisions about their expert practice, often through councils or similar structures. That sounds simple, but its practical effect is larger than the definition suggests. Once nurses participate in significant decisions about practice, requirements, workflow, and policy, the conversation shifts. They are no longer dealt with as passive receivers of functional modification. They become active partners in how care is designed and delivered.

That modification matters far beyond nursing. Interprofessional partnership depends upon clear roles, mutual regard, timely input, and accountable decision-making. Shared Governance creates conditions that support all four. It gives nursing proficiency a defined location in organizational choices, which makes partnership with doctors, pharmacists, therapists, case supervisors, and other disciplines more substantive. Instead of reacting after choices are made, nurses help shape choices while they are still forming. In real practice, that is frequently the distinction in between shallow teamwork and long lasting collaboration.
Collaboration works in a different way when nursing has an official voice
Many healthcare teams already believe they work together well. On a good day, they most likely do. They round together, message one another, clarify orders, and resolve immediate patient problems in genuine time. That is one type of cooperation, and it matters. But it is not the whole picture.

The harder kind of partnership happens upstream. It takes place when the organization is choosing how care shifts will work, how escalation pathways must be dealt with, what documentation modifications make sense, how quality concerns must be set, or what practice concerns need attention. If one occupation dominates those choices while others are welcomed in only after the structure is completed, collaboration becomes performative. People might be spoken with, but they are not truly participating.

Shared Governance changes that dynamic by formalizing nursing input. According to leadership sources in nursing, Professional Governance is both a structure and an approach. That difference is useful. The structure might be councils or representative bodies. The philosophy is the much deeper belief that nurses' expertise need to be leveraged in significant decision-making, with autonomy and accountability connected. Interprofessional partnership benefits from both. A structure without belief can become a checkbox exercise. An approach without structure tends to vanish under functional pressure.

When nurses have a recognized location to raise practice issues and add to policy discussion, other disciplines acquire a clearer partner. They understand where decisions are being taken a look at, how issues can be intensified, and who represents bedside truths. That decreases the typical issue of fragmented interaction, where every problem is handled through side discussions, hallway clarifications, or e-mails that go nowhere.
The difference in between consultation and partnership
A lot of organizations puzzle requesting input with sharing governance. They are not the very same. Consultation is frequently episodic. A leader or committee asks nursing personnel to talk about a proposal, generally late while doing so. Collaboration is ongoing and built into the system. It presumes nursing judgment belongs in the space from the start.

That distinction has direct consequences for interprofessional work. Think about a typical pattern. A multidisciplinary group wishes to improve discharge coordination. Case management sees hold-ups connected to recommendations. Physicians see hold-ups in discharge preparedness. Nursing sees something else completely: client education is often compressed into the last hours, household questions surface late, and handoff expectations are inconsistent across units. If nursing input gets here just after the proposed solution is mainly total, the last procedure may address timing and orders but miss out on the real points of friction that impact patients and staff.

Under Shared Governance or Professional Governance, nursing concerns are less most likely to look like afterthoughts. They get in the conversation through recognized channels, with sufficient legitimacy to shape decisions instead of embellish them. That alters the quality of cooperation. Other occupations are not just hearing nursing objections. They are engaging nursing analysis.

In practice, that frequently results in better concerns. Not simply "Can nursing do this?" however "What would make this practical across disciplines?" That is a much healthier starting point. It moves the group from job project to shared analytical.
Why councils matter, even to individuals who dislike meetings
The word "council" can make skilled clinicians brace for ineffectiveness. Fair enough. Inadequately run councils can end up being exactly that. However the presence of councils or similar structures is not the real issue. The problem is whether there is a resilient system for expert voice.

Interprofessional partnership tends to compromise when choices rely too heavily on casual influence. Informal impact favors the loudest personality, the most senior title, or the department with the greatest functional utilize. It does not necessarily prefer the discipline with the clearest view of client care at the bedside. Formal governance structures create a counterweight. They make involvement less depending on charm and more depending on professional responsibility.

This is one reason the shift in language from "shared governance" to "professional governance" matters. The more recent term stresses autonomy, responsibility, meaningful decision-making, and management in practice. That framing can reinforce interprofessional collaboration due to the fact that it indicates that nursing participation is not symbolic. It brings obligation. Nurses are not there simply to endorse or resist somebody else's strategy. They are expected to lead within their scope of expertise and remain accountable for the practice choices they help shape.

That expectation improves the tone of cooperation. Teams typically work much better together when each profession concerns the table with both authority and ownership. Without ownership, involvement becomes commentary. With ownership, participation ends up being co-leadership.
Respect grows when know-how is visible
One of the quieter benefits of Shared Governance is that it makes nursing expertise more noticeable across the company. Exposure matters because interprofessional stress is typically rooted less in hostility than in misunderstanding. People presume they comprehend one another's work since they communicate daily, however everyday interaction can be deceptive. Clinicians may see one another constantly while still missing out on the intricacy of each role.

When nurses take part in governance conversations about practice and policy, their thinking becomes noticeable. Other disciplines hear how nurses analyze workflow, patient readiness, security concerns, household characteristics, and useful barriers to execution. That direct exposure can change assumptions.

A doctor who sees nursing just through bedside interactions may value the labor of care however not constantly the depth of systems thinking behind nursing recommendations. A pharmacist may comprehend medication security concerns however not recognize how staffing patterns or paperwork design make complex medication education. A rehabilitation therapist may understand discharge movement problems inside out but be unaware of how over night nursing assessments form day-shift priorities. Governance online forums do not eliminate those blind spots overnight, however they produce repeated chances for professions to encounter one another's expertise in a more strategic way.

Respect is rarely constructed by statements. It is constructed when individuals consistently witness competent judgment. Professional Governance develops more chances for that to happen.
Shared decision-making changes the quality of conflict
Every interprofessional group has conflict. The concern is whether dispute is dealt with as a turf fight or as a practice problem. Shared Governance helps move it towards the second.

That matters since collaboration is not the lack of difference. In healthy groups, difference typically signifies that people are taking the work seriously. The danger comes when difference has no trusted route for resolution. Then teams draw on hierarchy, personal alliances, or avoidance.

With representative bodies discussing practice and policy concerns in open online forum, concerns can be aired in a more disciplined method. Nursing leadership products have long pointed towards collaborative governance, and the practical value is simple to see. If a recurring problem affects several disciplines, such as interaction around modifications in client status or uncertainty in unit-based protocols, it can be treated as a shared functional issue instead of a character dispute in between individuals on a shift.

That does not make conflict painless. It does make it more efficient. Individuals are more going to overcome friction when they believe the process is reasonable, their viewpoint will be heard, and the resulting decision will not merely be bied far from above.

In organizations without that trust, interprofessional cooperation frequently ends up being breakable. Groups may work adequately throughout regular work and after that fracture under tension, specifically throughout periods of staffing pressure, client surges, or policy change. Shared Governance does not remove those pressures, but it gives teams a much better framework for managing them.
The link to engagement, retention, and care quality
Leadership organizations in nursing link Shared Governance and Professional Governance to empowerment, engagement, retention, team effort, and much safer, higher-quality patient care. That is a crucial set of relationships, particularly for interprofessional collaboration.

Engagement is not just a spirits concern. Engaged clinicians are more likely to take part in cross-disciplinary problem-solving, speak up when procedures fail, and invest effort in improvement work that extends beyond their instant assignment. Retention matters too. When a group turns over continuously, cooperation gets reset over and over. Shared routines vanish. Informal trust never fully establishes. The best-designed interprofessional procedure still depends upon steady expert relationships.

If Shared Governance helps nurses feel that their know-how matters and their voice has weight, it can support the workforce conditions that cooperation needs. The ANA's Code of Ethics highlights that cooperation and shared decision-making are necessary to nursing's work, and it explicitly identifies shared governance among workforce sustainability initiatives. That point is worthy of attention. Sustainability is not only about staffing numbers or spending plans. It is likewise about whether professionals think the system enables them to practice with stability and influence.

People remain more engaged in collective work when they can see that raising issues leads someplace. They remain less engaged when every cross-disciplinary concern develops into a workaround.
What efficient interprofessional cooperation looks like under Expert Governance
The benefits of Professional Governance become much easier to recognize when you look at how groups behave, not simply how committees are organized. In settings where governance is working well, particular patterns tend to appear.
Nursing input is invited early in decisions about practice, policy, and workflow, not only after implementation strategies are drafted. Cross-disciplinary issues are talked about in recognized online forums instead of delegated advertisement hoc escalation and personal frustration. Nurses take part with both voice and responsibility, which makes collaboration more balanced and more credible. Practice concerns are framed as shared care issues, not as failures of one occupation to accommodate another. Teams can link bedside truths to organizational choices, which helps solutions hold up in genuine scientific conditions.
None of this requires ideal positioning. In fact, the greatest interprofessional groups are typically the ones that can tolerate argument without losing cohesion. Shared Governance assists since it supports a more fully grown kind of collaboration, one that deals with occupations as interdependent factors rather than completing https://angeloztmi394.trexgame.net/how-shared-governance-assists-nurses-forming-professional-practice https://angeloztmi394.trexgame.net/how-shared-governance-assists-nurses-forming-professional-practice silos.
Where companies get it wrong
For all its guarantee, Shared Governance can dissatisfy if it is adopted as a label instead of a discipline. The most typical failure is offering nurses an official seat without meaningful authority. If councils can go over however not influence, personnel quickly acknowledge the gap. Once that happens, cynicism spreads quick, and interprofessional partnership suffers with it. Other disciplines notice when nursing representation is tokenized. They learn, purposely or not, that the process is mostly ceremonial.

Another failure point is straining the governance structure with minor functional noise while keeping larger tactical decisions in other places. Nurses might spend energy on small process concerns while significant concerns about practice, requirements, or care style are settled without them. That plan damages the entire function of Professional Governance, which is to link professional proficiency to meaningful decision-making.

There is also a more subtle risk. Often companies interpret partnership so broadly that accountability gets blurred. Interprofessional work does not indicate every profession chooses whatever. Excellent partnership requires clarity about where nursing leads, where another discipline leads, and where choices are truly shared. Professional Governance assists when it reinforces nursing autonomy and accountability, not when it dissolves them.

That balance can be challenging. If every problem is treated as a universal committee topic, decision-making slows and duty ends up being unclear. If too few concerns are truly shared, collaboration narrows into parallel play. Judgment is needed. Strong teams understand the difference in between asking for awareness, requesting assessment, and requesting co-ownership.
The useful routines that make the design believable
No governance design makes trust through terms alone. Personnel choose whether Shared Governance is real by watching what occurs after issues are raised and recommendations are made.

A few routines make an outsized distinction:
Leaders noticeably act on council suggestions when suitable, or plainly explain why a different course is necessary. Representatives bring bedside issues forward in functional kind, with adequate context to support decision-making. Interprofessional partners deal with nursing online forums as genuine sources of practice insight, not optional side input. Feedback loops stay open, so groups can see whether a choice enhanced workflow, cooperation, or client care. Accountability is shared freely, including when a service needs revision after implementation.
These routines sound modest, however they are typically what separates a respected governance culture from one that staff endure pleasantly and neglect privately.
Why language matters: Shared Governance and Professional Governance
Some experts still choose the term Shared Governance because it recognizes and widely acknowledged. Others prefer Professional Governance since it much better records autonomy, responsibility, and leadership in practice. In lots of companies, both terms are utilized, often interchangeably.

The distinction is worth noting due to the fact that language shapes expectations. "Shared" can be heard as inclusion, which is valuable, however it can also be misheard as generalized participation without clear ownership. "Professional" highlights that governance is connected to the commitments and authority of a discipline. For interprofessional cooperation, that nuance matters. Strong collaboration does not require every occupation to talk to one blended voice. It needs each profession to bring its competence fully, then work with others in a structured and responsible way.

That is one reason the more recent framing has traction. It safeguards the concept that nursing governance is not just about being heard. It is about exercising expert judgment in a way that enhances care and supports the sustainability of the occupation. Those aims are completely suitable with partnership. In truth, they enhance it.
The wider ethical and cultural effect
There is also an ethical dimension to this conversation. Nursing's expert standards highlight cooperation and shared decision-making as necessary components of practice. That is not simply a management choice. It shows a view of care in which competence, obligation, and patient requirements are too intricate to be managed well by isolated professions.

Shared Governance supports that ethic by offering nurses an opportunity to affect the conditions of care, not just the delivery of care in a single encounter. When nurses can assist form policy and practice, they are better placed to advocate for safe, workable, and patient-centered approaches. That advocacy naturally converges with the work of other disciplines, because most significant care problems cross professional lines.

Over time, this can improve culture. Teams begin to anticipate dialogue instead of unilateral regulations. They begin to value open online forum conversation of practice problems instead of personal workarounds. They become more happy to share accountability for results. None of that gets rid of hierarchy from health care, nor needs to it. Major scientific environments need clear authority. But authority functions better when it is notified by expert voice rather than insulated from it.

The companies that acquire the most from Shared Governance are typically the ones that comprehend this point. They do not deal with governance as a side project for nursing engagement. They treat it as part of how the institution finds out, chooses, and enhances. As soon as that occurs, interprofessional partnership stops being a goal posted on an objective statement and ends up being a working method.

Shared Governance encourages interprofessional partnership due to the fact that it gives partnership someplace solid to stand. It formalizes nursing voice, enhances accountability, makes knowledge visible, and creates more trustworthy paths for shared decision-making. In its stronger form, Professional Governance does much more. It frames nursing involvement not as optional addition, however as an expert obligation and leadership function.

That shift changes how teams interact. It helps move collaboration from courtesy to partnership, from response to design, and from separated effort to shared responsibility for care. For companies attempting to develop more powerful teamwork, much safer care, and a more sustainable workforce, that is not a small structural option. It is a useful foundation.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization founded in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside health care organizations transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>