Expires in 11 months
16 September 2021
Let's consider the pros and cons of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so that it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you will need to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, pay for capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It gets the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies usually do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it is a company.
p2p 순위 It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had a website or intranet, you can stop unnecessary work that used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the business's homepage as well as the Webhard's original function, the idea of creating a use-oriented product makes one look forward to the expansion of the answer.
The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, and this can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which have been agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.
It is now essential for Soho to determine a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of a very useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files on the internet at a set monthly cost. Therefore the usage of web hard is becoming common.
But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it is been a long time. As soon as it came out, many people used it, and there have been many office workers who didn't join it or even paid for their personal expenses due to lack of capacity, and you can find probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.
In some cases, additionally, there are many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server includes a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses based on the number of users), which is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly decrease the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files by default. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. could be accessed from the outside and never have to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. As the word "basic" implies, it isn't a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Subsequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Needless to say, it's a paid option, but it is a very low-cost, very helpful solution that's less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low priced, developing a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll check out the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. It is possible to go over it and choose the best one in line with the reality and needs.