Source: https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/ **Pages referenced are in [brackets] below**
The Free Speech Coalition started after a court trial for of hardcore pornography '87 (People v Freeman). Here's what the FSC fully supports:
:::Legalizing Pedophilia [Advocacy and Lobbying]:::
"A recent win by FSC against 2257 ... requires a judge to issue a warrant under strict scrutiny before inspections could take place."
----FSC fought for lengthy warrant processes making it more difficult to legally aid the abused
:::"... ending the criminalization of HIV in California" by decriminalizing HIV [FSC Affiliations]:::
----Gay/Bi men have a 1/6 chance of contracting it, 1/4 if Latino, 1/2 if Black, or 1/2 if Transgender; 33% death rate over 10 years - it's just as deadly as cancer. They claim it has a much lower rate thanks to meds.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/index.html
https://www.vice.com/da/article/mvnj3q/the-gift-of-hiv
:::Legalizing ALL sex work including prostitution [About FSC]:::
:::Allowing public sexual behavior by guys & girls (destigmatizing sexual expression) [About FSC]:::
:::Encouraging and assisting pornstars into the industry [Newcomer and Support Program]:::
:::Self-admittedly breaking the law (30 warrants from feds) making illegal porn [About FSC]:::
:Ian Timothy O'Brien [FSC Team And Board]: ".... working to combat pseudo-scientific concepts like porn addiction and the porn public health crisis,"
~Their usage of the term "pseudo" (fake) is classifiable "legal fraud" and sue-able unless research/source is provided. Real peer-reviewed studies suggest otherwise: https://bit.ly/2XpXDhN
Their lobbying has allowed for actions like the following to increase :
washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/interactive/2021/vegas-child-sex-trafficking-victims-jailed/
================================
They seemingly ignore peer-reviewed studies then use the word "moralist" against their oppositions [Advocacy and Lobbying], meaning "a person who teaches or promotes morality." They dislike those with morals; by their own wording, they are not moralists, therefore some form of immoral. Here's the CA law (they are California based) on Good Morals specifically:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=PEN§ionNum=311
I would give their pages a good look; it appears most of their members are the biggest porn industries in CA and Vegas. As-is, most of these seem to break various pieces of law, especially the Nevada-based companies considering public displays of anal are blatantly illegal as sodomy according to NRS 201.190
https://www.shouselaw.com/nv/defense/laws/sodomy/
https://www.freespeechcoalition.com/industry-priorities/public-health-crisis-rhetoric
"That’s why we’re making sure the Free Speech Coalition is the leading voice against morals-based initiatives, and working with health departments and medical associations to discuss the facts around sex and sexuality in a clear, reasoned, fact-based manner. Because a health policy based in outdated morality isn’t just bad for the adult industry, it’s bad for public health."