Magnet ® Consulting and the Magnet Application Manual

20 August 2026

For many nursing leaders, the Magnet Recognition Program ® carries a particular weight. It is not just an award, and it is not merely a branding workout. It is an ANCC program created to acknowledge healthcare companies for nursing quality and quality client results. That purpose matters since it alters how the work must be approached. When a hospital or health system begins its Journey to Magnet Quality ®, the strongest efforts are generally grounded in practice, evidence, discipline, and organizational sincerity, not in glossy language.

That is where Magnet ® Consulting typically gets in the conversation. Not due to the fact that a consultant can produce Magnet status, and not because a consultant can change nursing management, but since the procedure is demanding. The documentation needs to line up with the Magnet Application Manual and its Sources of Evidence, the organization must demonstrate the requirements ANCC needs, and the internal story should be informed with accuracy. If that sounds straightforward on paper, it rarely feels that method in live operations where staffing truths, contending priorities, data variation, and management turnover can complicate every page.

The organizations that manage the procedure finest tend to comprehend an easy fact early. The handbook is not a writing timely alone. It is a disciplined framework for revealing how nursing quality is led, supported, practiced, enhanced, and measured.
What the Magnet program is actually asking an organization to show
ANCC awards Magnet status, and Magnet classification indicates an organization has fulfilled ANCC's Magnet requirements and is acknowledged for nursing excellence. Gradually, the program has turned into a clear design instead of a loose set of goals. Its roots return to a 1983 research study of "magnet" medical facilities, and ANA traces the official program name modification to Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® to 2002. That history still matters because the main idea has remained remarkably consistent. High carrying out nursing organizations do not count on a single charismatic leader or one standout unit. They build systems that support expert nursing practice and produce strong outcomes.

The existing Magnet framework is organized around 5 elements of the empirical design. ANCC's design progressed from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism after analytical analysis of appraisal scores, and the 2008 conceptual model grouped those forces into the structure lots of leaders now understand well:
Transformational Leadership Structural Empowerment Exemplary Expert Practice New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements Empirical Outcomes
Those 5 parts look compact on a slide. In practice, each one pushes a company to prove something substantive. Management should show up and active. Structures need to support nurses in meaningful methods. Professional practice can not be minimized to slogans. Innovation should be more than separated enthusiasm. Results should be measurable and credible.

That last point, empirical results, is often where enjoyment satisfies truth. Lots of companies feel great about their culture long before they are positive about their documentation. They know they have strong nurses, engaged leaders, and meaningful quality work. Yet when they begin equating that into evidence, they find spaces. The problem is not always that the practice is weak. Often, the company has actually not regularly caught, organized, or framed what it is currently doing.
Why the Magnet Application Handbook deserves more regard than it in some cases gets
The Magnet Application Manual is often treated as a technical requirement to be overcome after the "genuine work" is done. That is typically a mistake. The manual functions more like a map of ANCC's expectations. It arranges the composed documents requirements through Sources of Proof and associated evidence expectations. If leaders read it only as an administrative difficulty, they miss what it is asking to demonstrate.

A well used handbook can sharpen an organization's self evaluation. It can reveal where a nursing division has mature structures and where it is still depending on casual practice. It can expose weak handoffs between quality, expert governance, education, and executive leadership. It can also prevent a common failure mode, which is producing a big volume of material that does not in fact answer the evidence requirement.

I have actually seen groups invest months collecting examples, fulfilling minutes, celebration images, and policy excerpts, just to find that the main story was still thin. The handbook does not reward accumulation for its own sake. It rewards alignment. A tidy, direct example connected to the right evidence requirement is far more powerful than fifty pages of loosely related material.

That is one reason Magnet ® Consulting can be helpful when it is succeeded. The specialist's highest value is often editorial and strategic instead of ritualistic. Good guidance assists a company translate the handbook properly, prioritize the strongest proof, and avoid losing time on documents that looks impressive internally but does not meet ANCC's standard.
The difference between assistance and substitution
Some companies hire external aid prematurely and ask the wrong concern. They ask, "Can someone write this for us?" The much better question is, "Can someone help us understand what we must show, and how to show it honestly and efficiently?"

That difference matters. A specialist can assist leaders structure the work, develop a realistic timeline, pressure test stories, and determine weak evidence. An expert can not produce nursing excellence where the structures are not there. ANCC recognizes companies that meet the requirements. No quantity of polished prose modifications that.

The healthiest specialist relationships generally have three qualities. Initially, internal leadership remains liable for the material. Second, the manual drives the process rather than personalities. Third, difficult findings are appeared early. If a system for shared governance is inconsistent, if results are uneven, or if supporting evidence is thin, it is far much better to challenge that in year one than in the last push before submission.

There is likewise a useful management advantage here. When internal teams stay close to the handbook, they find out the discipline of Magnet thinking. That understanding does not vanish after submission. It enhances redesignation efforts later on, and redesignation is not optional for companies that want to continue being recognized. ANCC identifies clearly between initial classification and redesignation. A hurried, outsourced technique may get a team through a short-term scramble, however it leaves little internal capability behind.
Where consulting can add real value
Not every organization needs the exact same type of support. A system with skilled Magnet leaders might just desire targeted review of selected stories. A first time applicant might require help developing the entire facilities for documents, governance tracking, and timeline management. The worth of Magnet ® Consulting depends less on the expert's polish than on whether the support fits the company's phase of readiness.

The greatest assistance often shows up in ordinary but substantial work. It appears in choices about how to line up examples to particular Sources of Proof. It appears in the discipline of not overclaiming. It appears in the ability to tell the difference in between a compelling internal success story and a submission ready example. Those are not attractive tasks, however they matter.

A specialist can likewise offer distance. Internal teams live with their culture every day. Due to the fact that of that, they may assume particular practices are obvious to an outdoors customer when they are not. I have actually viewed gifted nurse leaders explain a strong professional practice design in discussion with great clearness, then send a composed story that leaves the reasoning primarily implied. An experienced reviewer can identify that gap rapidly. The organization does not need more passion in that moment. It requires sharper translation.

There is a 2nd sort of range that matters too. Sometimes an expert is the only individual in the room who can say, calmly and credibly, "This is not yet a proof prepared example." That can save months of effort. It can likewise protect spirits. Groups become frustrated when they strive on material that later gets disposed of. Clear guidance early is kinder than appreciation that creates incorrect confidence.
The handbook is a test of organizational discipline, not just nursing aspiration
Because Magnet is related to quality, teams in some cases presume the submission must check out like an event. Event fits, but the manual asks for proof, not homage. This is where numerous very first time applicants feel tension. They want to honor their personnel and tell a powerful story. At the exact same time, they should write to a structured set of requirements.

Those objectives are not in conflict if the work is managed well. The strongest submissions usually sound grounded. They discuss what the organization did, why it did it, how nursing led or influenced the work, and what results resulted. They resist exaggeration. They do not hide intricacy. If results enhanced in one period and later on plateaued, that context might belong to the honest story. Credibility is built through precision.

ANCC's written paperwork expectations are tied to the manual, and that implies every narrative choice should be made with the evidence requirement in mind. A common weak pattern is writing a broad narrative first and hoping pieces of it will fit numerous requirements later on. That technique tends to produce overlap, repeating, and spaces. A much better technique begins with the Source of Evidence itself. What exactly is being requested? What evidence is greatest? Which example best demonstrates the point? What supporting context is essential, and what is just extra?

That method sounds nearly mechanical, yet it typically provides the composing more life instead of less. When the team understands what need to be revealed, it can choose examples that really bring weight. A succinct, well chosen example from a system based effort that led to measurable results can reveal more about expert practice than ten pages of generic description.
Common pressure points in the journey
Every Magnet effort has its own character, however the same problem spots appear typically adequate to should have attention. The majority of are not dramatic failures. They are sluggish build-ups of ambiguity.
Treating the manual as a last stage task rather of an early planning tool Collecting too much product without testing whether it satisfies the proof requirement Assuming internal language and acronyms will make good sense to outdoors reviewers Confusing a strong anecdote with a strong recorded example Waiting too long to attend to irregular information or inconsistent structures
The first issue is particularly expensive. As soon as groups delay serious manual evaluation, the task begins to run on memory, interest, and inherited assumptions. Then somebody opens the documents requirements in detail and realizes the evidence path is incomplete. By that point, leaders may need retrospective data event, extra internal evaluations, or a reset in area ownership.

The acronym problem sounds minor, however it can derail clearness quick. Inside any healthcare facility, particular committee names, function titles, and governance structures feel self explanatory. Outside that context, they are opaque. Excellent specialists are typically relentless about this, and for excellent reason. Reviewers should not need to decode the organization's internal dialect to understand the significance of a nursing action or result.

There is likewise a spirits concern that deserves mention. Magnet work is frequently included on top of already complete operational needs. Nurse leaders, directors, teachers, and assistance staff might be bring client care obligations, quality concerns, study readiness work, and labor force pressures while building the submission. If the procedure becomes disorganized, fatigue appears quickly. A disciplined technique to the handbook is not only a https://chcm.com/about/ https://chcm.com/about/ quality problem. It is an individuals issue.
Fees, timing, and the need for practical planning
One of the more grounded aspects of the Magnet process is that ANCC releases different application and appraisal fee schedules, consisting of an online application cost and appraisal evaluation fees due at composed file submission. That fact has a practical implication. Organizations should plan for the process as a staged dedication, not as a vague aspiration that can be moneyed and staffed later.

This is another location where seeking advice from support can be useful, though not due to the fact that it alters the costs or timing. Rather, it can assist the organization line up its internal work to those turning points with less surprises. Submission readiness is not accomplished by calendar pressure alone. If anything, forcing a date before the evidence is mature can increase cost in less noticeable methods through rework, staff strain, and diverted executive attention.

A reasonable timeline usually appreciates 3 realities. Evidence event takes longer than expected. Narrative refinement takes several rounds. Executive evaluation often surfaces tactical concerns that no one anticipated when the drafting began. None of that means the process should drag. It implies severe planning ought to start before individuals start composing at speed.
Initial designation and redesignation do not feel the same
Organizations that pursue redesignation typically bring a really various mindset to the handbook. They know that Magnet recognition is not long-term and that continued recognition needs redesignation. That tends to hone attention in practical ways. Groups are often less charmed by the status itself and more concentrated on sustaining structures, outcomes, and proof over time.

Still, redesignation has its own trap. Familiarity can develop presumptions. Leaders may think that because a process worked well in the last cycle, the same framing will work once again. Yet evidence requirements need to still be fulfilled clearly, and every cycle asks the company to reveal it continues to embody the requirements. Previous classification is significant, however it is not a replacement for existing proof.

Consulting relationships typically alter here. First time applicants may seek broad assistance. Redesignation teams might want a more selective partner, someone to challenge complacency, test stories, and compare the organization's present proof to the discipline the manual needs. That can be a much healthier use of outdoors knowledge than broad dependency.
The function of ANCC tools in keeping the work alive between milestones
ANCC likewise supplies digital tools and guides to support the appraisal process and interim tracking throughout designation. That is essential because Magnet should not become a burst of effort followed by silence. The greatest organizations deal with the work as ongoing practice management. They keep track of, fine-tune, and stay near to the standards instead of awaiting the next major deadline.

This point frequently gets overlooked when teams focus just on submission. The application manual is main, however it sits within a broader procedure of appraisal and tracking. That more comprehensive structure reinforces the concept that Magnet is about continual nursing quality, not a one time file exercise.

A specialist who understands that dynamic will typically guide leaders far from a binge and purge model of preparation. The better pattern is constant ownership. Capture evidence as it happens. Keep governance records organized. Evaluation stories for strength and importance before they are urgently required. Secure institutional memory when leaders transition. None of that is attractive, however it decreases danger considerably.
Choosing a consulting method without losing your own voice
The article would be incomplete without a note of caution. Magnet ® Consulting is handy just when it assists the company noise more like itself, not less. A submission must be clear, disciplined, and aligned to the manual, but it needs to also reflect the genuine practice environment of the applicant. When every narrative begins sounding interchangeable, something has gone wrong.

Organizations are at their best in this procedure when they can describe specific work plainly. A leadership action was taken. A structural support was built or strengthened. A nursing practice altered. Results were tracked. Knowing occurred. That level of plainness typically reads as confidence. It recommends the company is not trying to impress by design alone. It is showing its work.

That might be the best test for any speaking with assistance. After numerous months of cooperation, are internal leaders more efficient in analyzing the manual, selecting evidence, and describing their own nursing excellence with accuracy? If the response is yes, the assistance is probably doing its task. If the procedure has developed reliance, confusion, or a thick layer of language that obscures the actual practice, the organization must reassess.
A practical standard for judging readiness
By the time a team is deep in preparing, it helps to ask a few difficult concerns before interest takes over:
Does each story plainly respond to the specific proof requirement it is meant to address? Would an outside reviewer understand the value of the example without insider translation? Is the evidence current, organized, and defensible? Do the examples show the 5 Magnet elements in a balanced way? Can nursing management discuss the submission options confidently without reading from the page?
Those concerns cut through a surprising quantity of noise. They also keep ownership where it belongs. Magnet is awarded by ANCC, however preparedness is created inside the organization. The manual offers the structure. Consulting can improve execution. Neither can replace the requirement for real positioning in between nursing practice, leadership, and outcomes.

The companies that browse this well generally do not look fancy from the within while they are doing it. They look methodical. They debate phrasing because phrasing reveals significance. They decline examples that are cherished but weak. They spend time on proof trails that no outside audience will ever praise. Then, when the submission comes together, it feels coherent since the underlying work was coherent.

That is the real relationship in between Magnet ® Consulting and the Magnet Application Manual. The specialist can help a group checked out the map properly and prevent wrong turns. The manual can tell the team what the path requires. However the company still needs to make the journey with integrity, discipline, and enough self awareness to know when a story is strong, when a space is real, and when quality is in fact ready to be shown.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting organization founded in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside nursing and clinical teams strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>