How Shared Governance Assists Align Leadership and Nursing Practice

02 September 2026

Hospitals and health systems often say they want nursing voices at the table. The more difficult concern is whether those voices carry genuine authority, shape day-to-day practice, and impact decisions before they are settled. That is where Shared Governance, progressively discussed as Professional Governance, matters. At its best, it is not a committee pattern or a branding exercise. It is a long lasting method to connect executive top priorities with bedside reality, so decisions about care, staffing methods, practice standards, and expert expectations show nursing knowledge instead of bypass it.

In nursing, shared governance describes a model in which nurses have a formal voice in decisions about their expert practice, typically through councils or similar structures. More recently, the term professional governance has actually gained traction since it much better emphasizes autonomy, responsibility, meaningful decision-making, and leadership in practice. That shift in language is more than cosmetic. It moves the discussion far from the vague idea that leadership is merely "sharing" authority and toward a clearer recognition that nursing practice is an expert domain with responsibilities, judgment, and standards that nurses themselves assist govern.

That distinction matters when leadership groups are attempting to align organizational goals with what really occurs on systems, in procedural areas, and across care shifts. Alignment is not produced by a memo. It is constructed when the people closest to patient care understand the direction of the company, believe their point of view impacts it, and see a practical course from policy to practice.
Where alignment normally breaks down
Misalignment in between management and nursing practice rarely starts with bad intentions. More frequently, it grows from distance. Senior leaders are liable for quality, security, labor force stability, and financial performance. Nurse leaders at the unit level are liable for functional circulation, staff assistance, and client outcomes in real time. Frontline nurses are liable for the actual delivery of care, minute by minute, with all the disturbances, dangers, and competing demands that come with that work.

Without a structured way to connect those levels, each group can wind up fixing a various problem. Management may prioritize a systemwide effort and presume regional adoption will follow. System groups may receive the initiative after crucial decisions have actually already been made and recognize, right away, where it clashes with workflow or scientific judgment. The result recognizes: disappointment, unequal adoption, and a sense on both sides that the other does not understand the pressure under which they work.

Shared Governance assists because it creates an official path for nursing input before choices solidify into requireds. It offers management a system to hear where technique and practice fit together, and where they do not. Simply as crucial, it offers nurses a professional avenue to take responsibility for practice decisions instead of remaining in the role of passive recipients.

That is one factor AONL and other nursing leadership voices have connected shared and professional governance to empowerment, engagement, retention, interprofessional collaboration, teamwork, and much safer, higher-quality patient care. When nurses have a significant function in forming the standards and expectations that govern their work, the organization gains something better than compliance. It gets notified commitment.
The structure matters, however the approach matters more
Many companies start by building councils. That is a sensible location to begin, because councils supply the visible architecture of Shared Governance. They can concentrate on practice, quality, education, or other domains connected to expert nursing work. But the simple existence of councils does not produce positioning. A room loaded with nurses satisfying regular monthly can still have little impact if decisions are symbolic, suggestions disappear up, or participation is detached from actual priorities.

Professional Governance is described as both a structure and a philosophy. That combination is essential. The structure gives nursing a location to deliberate, recommend, and decide within defined limits. The viewpoint clarifies that nurses are not participating as a courtesy. They are contributing expert know-how and assuming responsibility for practice.

This is where numerous companies either enhance the design or silently deteriorate it. If leaders welcome nurse participation however reserve all substantial choices for a little executive circle, personnel quickly see the gap. The language of empowerment remains, but the lived experience is various. On the other hand, when leaders are explicit about which choices belong in expert nursing councils, which require wider interdisciplinary input, and which need to stay executive decisions, trust tends to improve. Clear authority is more credible than vague promises.

Alignment depends on that trustworthiness. Nurses need to know where they can affect practice, what evidence or reasoning will be thought about, and how decisions move from discussion to action. Leaders require confidence that nursing councils are not just online forums for complaint, however bodies that can weigh compromises, consider functional truths, and help steward the profession responsibly.
Why management need to want this, not just endure it
Some executives at first view shared governance as something they support due to the fact that expert nursing anticipates it. A better view is that it resolves a real leadership issue. Healthcare organizations are complicated. Policies can be well designed on paper and still stop working when they come across the speed, judgment calls, and coordination demands of scientific care. Leaders who rely only on top-down communication frequently do not learn that a decision is unworkable until implementation stalls.

Shared Governance shortens that feedback loop. It provides management access to useful intelligence from the bedside and from the middle of the company, where policy meets workflow. That intelligence is not simply anecdotal resistance. It often consists of the details that identify whether an effort will hold up under pressure: how handoffs happen on nights, where replicate documents slows care, which role limits are uncertain, or why an education strategy does not match real staffing patterns.

That makes positioning more realistic. Instead of asking nurses to retrofit their work around a predetermined decision, leaders can form the decision with nursing input from the start. Even when the last answer does not match every staff choice, the process is more powerful since the expert concerns were surfaced early.

There is likewise a workforce reason to take this seriously. Leadership sources have actually connected professional governance with engagement and retention, and that connection makes sense. Individuals stay where their judgment matters. Nurses can handle hard work, modification, and accountability. What uses teams down is being held responsible for practice without significant influence over it. Official governance does not remove pressure from the function, however it can reduce the destructive sensation that major practice decisions take place somewhere else, by people who do not comprehend the implications.
Why nursing practice ends up being stronger under expert governance
From the nursing side, Professional Governance reinforces something main to the discipline: practice is not merely job execution. It is expert work that needs judgment, requirements, collaboration, and ethical responsibility. The 2025 ANA Code of Ethics highlights that cooperation and shared decision-making are important to nursing's work, and it clearly includes shared governance among labor force sustainability initiatives. That is an essential signal. Shared decision-making is not an optional management design layered onto nursing. It is tied to how the profession sustains itself and how nurses uphold their responsibilities.

When nurses participate in governance, the conversation changes. Rather of responding only to instant functional pain points, they are asked to consider broader questions. What does safe and premium care need in this setting? What requirements should direct practice? How should education, proficiency, and policy evolve? What trade-offs are acceptable, and which compromise professional integrity?

Those are management concerns, but they are likewise practice concerns. Shared Governance aligns leadership and nursing practice precisely due to https://franciscoribh199.theburnward.com/professional-governance-leveraging-nursing-knowledge-in-practice https://franciscoribh199.theburnward.com/professional-governance-leveraging-nursing-knowledge-in-practice the fact that it treats frontline and unit-based nurses as factors to both.

That stated, the design is not simple and easy. It asks more of nurses than presence at conferences. It asks preparation, discernment, and a determination to believe beyond one's own schedule or specialty. A healthy council does not merely promote for its members in the narrowest sense. It weighs what is finest for patients, the nursing profession, and the company's mission. That is where autonomy and accountability meet.
The useful mechanics of alignment
Alignment becomes noticeable in regular decisions, not simply in tactical plans. Think about how a practice change moves through an organization with and without a governance model.

Without official governance, a change might begin with a leadership choice, travel through supervisory interaction, and land on systems as an expectation. Concerns occur after rollout. Workarounds appear. Compliance varies. Leaders ask why adoption is sluggish. Personnel marvel why apparent concerns were ignored.

With Shared Governance or Professional Governance in location, the series can be different. The issue still might stem with leadership, quality top priorities, or external requirements, but nursing councils have a role in examining implications for practice. They can identify barriers, recommend revisions, and help form how the change is introduced. Personnel nurses hear about the rationale from peers who were part of the consideration, not just from a chain of command. Leaders get more grounded feedback, and implementation has a much better opportunity of fitting real care delivery.

This does not guarantee contract. Nor needs to it. There will be moments when management need to make challenging calls, and there will be moments when nursing councils must accept restrictions they did not choose. Alignment is not unanimity. It is a disciplined relationship in between authority, knowledge, and accountability.

One of the most helpful signs of maturity in a governance design is whether nurses and leaders can disagree productively. If every council recommendation is automatically authorized, the process may be superficial. If every recommendation is obstructed, the process is hollow. The healthier middle is a system in which suggestions are taken seriously, decisions are transparent, and both sides can explain their reasoning.
What this looks like when it is working
You can normally inform when a governance model has moved beyond look and into function. The environment modifications initially. Nurses discuss practice issues with more ownership. Leaders request for nursing input earlier. Interprofessional discussions improve since nursing has a clearer internal process for forming and interacting its position.

A couple of signs tend to stand apart:
Nurses have a recognized forum to talk about practice and policy concerns, not simply staffing frustrations. Leadership responds to suggestions with noticeable follow-through or a clear rationale when it can not proceed. Councils link their work to patient care, quality, teamwork, and expert standards. Staff start to see participation as part of nursing management, not an additional activity for a small group. Decisions move more efficiently from policy into practice because frontline realities were thought about early.
None of these signs requires perfection. In real organizations, governance structures wax and subside with turnover, completing priorities, and operational pressure. What matters is whether the procedure remains trustworthy enough that people continue to use it.
The language shift from shared to professional governance
The move from "shared governance" to "professional governance" deserves more attention than it often gets. Shared governance has a long history in nursing, and many organizations still use the term. It remains commonly comprehended and still names a crucial design. But the more recent language assists correct a typical misunderstanding.

The old phrasing can leave space for the idea that authority is being lent to nurses from management. Professional governance locations nursing where it belongs, as an occupation with its own proficiency, responsibilities, and management role in practice. It signals that nurses are not simply sought advice from. They govern elements of professional practice within an organizational structure that acknowledges both autonomy and accountability.

That framing can strengthen positioning because it clarifies expectations on both sides. Leaders are not merely opening a microphone. They are developing mechanisms through which nursing know-how notifies organizational decisions. Nurses are not merely voicing choices. They are working out professional judgment in a manner that ought to be disciplined, representative, and connected to outcomes.

In lots of settings, the useful structures may look similar whether the organization utilizes the older or more recent term. The difference depends on how seriously the model is taken. When professional governance is comprehended as a viewpoint in addition to a structure, it tends to bring more weight.
Common obstacles, and why they are predictable
Even well-intentioned companies face familiar problems. Governance work can drift into low-stakes topics while major decisions stay elsewhere. Councils can end up being overpopulated with info sharing and underpowered for real decision-making. Involvement can narrow to the same trustworthy individuals, leaving wider personnel disengaged. Management turnover can interfere with assistance. Clinical pressure can make meeting time feel like a luxury.

None of those obstacles is surprising. They are what happen when organizations try to build participatory structures inside environments already extended by operational demand.

The greatest action is not to glamorize the model. Shared Governance has limitations, and it should. Not every choice can move through a council. Emergency conditions, regulative obligations, and enterprise-level restrictions are real. The point is not to route all authority far from management. The point is to specify where nursing proficiency must form choices about practice, then secure that process regularly enough that it becomes part of the culture.

Organizations that struggle frequently take advantage of going back to a couple of basic questions:
Which decisions about nursing practice belong in governance structures? How will recommendations relocate to leadership and back? What accountability do councils hold for the quality of their consideration and decisions? How will staff nurses know their participation changed something concrete? Where does interdisciplinary collaboration fit when issues extend beyond nursing alone?
Those questions sound standard, however they cut through a surprising quantity of confusion. They also keep the design grounded in purpose instead of ceremony.
The link to cooperation and labor force sustainability
It deserves remaining on the connection in between governance, collaboration, and labor force sustainability. Nursing does not run in isolation. Care depends upon teamwork throughout disciplines, and nursing management is planned to be collective, with representative bodies discussing practice and policy problems in open forum. That kind of open online forum matters due to the fact that numerous nursing choices have causal sequences beyond nursing, touching medicine, rehab, case management, assistance services, and patient flow.

Professional Governance provides nursing a meaningful method to get in those conversations. It reinforces nursing's internal alignment initially, which frequently enhances interdisciplinary work second. Groups team up better when nursing has a clear, expertly grounded position rather than a collection of private frustrations.

There is also a sustainability dimension that ought to not be ignored. Labor force stability is not sustained by recruitment campaigns alone. It is supported by environments where nurses can practice with voice, responsibility, and regard for their know-how. Shared governance is not a cure-all for turnover or burnout, and no truthful leader ought to provide it that method. However it can attend to one of the conditions that presses skilled nurses away: the sense that their knowledge counts least in the decisions that shape their work most.

That is why the model stays appropriate even as terminology develops. Whether an organization uses Shared Governance, Professional Governance, or both, the underlying need is the exact same. Nursing practice is too main, too complex, and too substantial to be governed without nursing.
What leaders and nurse managers can do next
The most reliable leaders do not ask whether they have a council structure on paper. They ask whether nurses really have a formal, meaningful role in decisions about professional practice. If the answer is uncertain, the next step is generally less dramatic than individuals anticipate. It starts with clarifying scope, authority, and follow-through.

A practical method frequently includes a couple of disciplined relocations. Leaders can identify which practice choices should be formed through governance, make decision pathways visible, and close the loop regularly when councils make suggestions. Nurse managers play an especially essential role here. They frequently sit at the seam in between technique and bedside care, equating both directions. If they treat governance as optional or ritualistic, staff will do the very same. If they treat it as part of professional nursing leadership, the culture shifts.

This is likewise where persistence matters. Positioning does not appear after one charter revision or one recruitment push for council membership. It grows through repeating. Nurses participate, recommendations are thought about, decisions are discussed, practice modifications enhance, and trust collects. Gradually, governance ends up being less of an initiative and more of a normal way the company thinks.

When that takes place, the benefits are concrete. Management choices land with better context. Nursing practice shows more powerful ownership. Cooperation improves since nursing has a genuine online forum for expert judgment. And the company moves closer to something every health system desires however couple of achieve by command alone: a genuine connection between what leaders mean and what nurses can perform safely, efficiently, and with expert integrity.

Shared Governance, or Professional Governance, assists produce that connection due to the fact that it respects a fundamental fact of nursing leadership. The people accountable for care need an official function in forming the practice of care. When that concept is taken seriously, alignment stops being a slogan and begins becoming functional reality.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting and education firm established in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside health care organizations strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>