How Shared Governance Supports Safer Client Care

03 September 2026

Patient security rarely depends on one dramatic choice. More often, it increases or falls on numerous smaller choices made near to the bedside, inside handoffs, throughout staffing conversations, within policy reviews, and in the moments when a nurse chooses whether a process still makes sense for the client in front of them. That is where Shared Governance, significantly framed as Professional Governance, matters most.

In nursing, Shared Governance describes a design in which nurses have an official voice in decisions about their professional practice, typically through councils or comparable structures. The newer language, Professional Governance, puts sharper emphasis on autonomy, responsibility, meaningful decision-making, and leadership in practice. That shift in phrasing is not cosmetic. It reflects a deeper expectation that nurses are not only individuals in care delivery, but likewise stewards of the requirements, policies, and practice environments that shape care.

Safer client care depends upon that stewardship.

When security conversations take place just at the executive level, important details can be missed. Frontline nurses are typically the first to discover that a policy sounds clear on paper however develops confusion at 3 a.m. During a complex admission. They see where hold-ups happen, where equipment positioning increases danger, where paperwork problems crowd out assessment time, and where interaction between disciplines requires tightening up. A structure that captures those insights, analyzes them seriously, and turns them into practice choices is not a great additional. It is among the useful ways companies minimize preventable harm.
Safety enhances when decision-making moves closer to care
The main strength of Shared Governance is simple: it puts expert judgment where it belongs. Not every operational decision should be made by committee, and not every practice concern can await a prolonged procedure. However when nurses have an official role in shaping standards of care, client education approaches, workflow changes, and practice expectations, the quality of those choices generally improves.

That takes place for a few reasons. Initially, nurses contribute direct understanding of how care is really delivered. Second, they can test whether proposed modifications are realistic across shifts, ability mixes, and client populations. Third, involvement creates ownership. A policy that is designed with personnel nurses instead of handed to them tends to be comprehended more plainly and carried out more consistently.

Consistency matters for safety. Even strong medical guidance can fail if teams analyze it differently from one unit to another. Councils and representative bodies can assist align practice by bringing concerns into open conversation, clarifying standards, and recognizing where variation is suitable and where it is risky. That sort of disciplined discussion often prevents two common safety failures: silent workarounds and fragmented implementation.

I have actually seen the distinction between a guideline that personnel adhere to unwillingly and a requirement they believe in since they helped form it. In the very first case, people do the minimum required to make it through an audit. In the 2nd, they notice exceptions, raise concerns early, and assist more recent coworkers comprehend the purpose behind the process. The patient gets more dependable care, not because the policy became longer, but due to the fact that the people utilizing it recognized it as sound practice.
Shared Governance is not just a committee structure
Many organizations make the same early mistake. They release a set of councils, appoint members, schedule conferences, and presume they now have Shared Governance. What they may have is a calendar.

AONL describes Professional Governance as both a structure and a philosophy. That distinction is crucial. Structure gives individuals a path for involvement. Approach determines whether involvement has meaning. If frontline nurses advance recommendations however management reserves all genuine authority, the design ends up being performative. Staff notification that quickly. Engagement fades, and trust goes with it.

For Shared Governance to support more secure patient care, nurses must have a real voice in matters affecting professional practice. That does not suggest every tip is adopted. It does suggest recommendations are assessed transparently, choice rights are clear, and accountability runs in both directions. Councils need to be expected to review issues carefully, weigh compromises, and own the results of their decisions. Leaders need to be anticipated to produce the conditions in which that work can influence practice.

This is where the language of Professional Governance helps. It reminds companies that the goal is not shared feelings about governance. The objective is expert authority worked out responsibly. Nurses are trusted to assess, focus on, educate, advocate, and respond in altering scientific conditions. It follows that they need to also help govern the requirements and systems that frame that work.
The link between nurse voice and much safer care
The verified leadership literature links shared and professional governance to nurse empowerment, engagement, retention, interprofessional cooperation, teamwork, and much safer, higher-quality client care. Those ideas relate, and in practice they reinforce one another.

An empowered nurse is most likely to speak up when something feels hazardous. An engaged nurse is more likely to participate in improving a procedure instead of working around it in isolation. A steady group, supported by retention, preserves regional understanding about what works, what fails, and where patient danger tends to conceal. Stronger interprofessional collaboration improves coordination, which is frequently the distinction in between an orderly plan of care and a preventable miss.

Safety occasions are hardly ever caused by one person alone. They emerge from conditions: unclear duties, poor communication, hurried shifts, weak escalation pathways, policies that contravene workflow, or practice expectations that were never fully mingled. Shared Governance assists organizations examine those conditions with the people who know them best.

This is particularly important in nursing since nurses sit at the center of connection. They link doctor orders, client responses, household concerns, discharge planning, education, and ongoing tracking. When that main role is left out from practice decisions, organizations lose one of their strongest security properties. When that function is formally incorporated into governance, patterns end up being noticeable sooner.

A bedside nurse may see that a documentation requirement is causing hold-ups in a time-sensitive routine. A charge nurse might see that a person handoff tool works well on day shift but breaks down during admissions at night. A teacher may determine a recurring confusion point amongst new personnel. Through Shared Governance, those observations can move from private disappointment to organizational learning.
Where Professional Governance changes the day-to-day security climate
Safety culture is frequently talked about in broad terms, however personnel experience it in common ways. They feel it when they ask a concern and get a severe response. They feel it when practice issues can be raised without shame. They feel it when an unit standard changes due to the fact that people listened to those doing the work.

Professional Governance adds to that environment by stabilizing shared decision-making. The ANA's Code of Ethics determines collaboration and shared decision-making as vital to nursing's work, and it clearly notes shared governance among workforce sustainability initiatives. That matters due to the fact that sustainability and security are not separate concerns. A labor force that has no voice, little influence, and low trust will struggle to sustain safe practice under pressure.

There is a practical side to this. Nurses who are involved in decisions about their practice are most likely to comprehend why standards exist and where flexibility ends. They can compare thoughtful adjustment and hazardous drift. That difference is indispensable. Health care settings constantly require judgment, but judgment ends up being much stronger when the occupation has talked about and defined its requirements together.

Professional Governance also hones accountability. Sometimes individuals presume that offering staff more voice means loosening oversight. In truth, efficient governance usually makes responsibility more precise. If a council recommends a practice modification, it needs to likewise think about education needs, implementation barriers, and how the change will be kept track of. That is professional accountability, not symbolic participation.
A quick example from real operations
Consider a common situation, explained at a high level rather than tied to any one company. A system battles with irregular adherence to a patient education process. Leadership might respond by sending another pointer e-mail and auditing harder. That may produce short-term compliance, but it may not fix the underlying issue.

A Shared Governance council might approach the same issue differently. Personnel nurses might take a look at when education is supposed to occur, what parts are frequently missed out on, whether the products fit the patient population, and whether workflow makes the expectation practical. A teacher may determine where staff need clearer assistance. A supervisor might clarify nonnegotiable requirements. Together, they could modify the process so it matches real care circulation while still safeguarding the patient.

The safety benefit comes from fit. A procedure that fits practice is most likely to be carried out dependably. Dependability, more than rhetoric, is what keeps clients safe.
Why partnership across disciplines gets stronger
Shared Governance is focused in nursing practice, but its effects are not limited to nursing. When nurses have arranged, representative online forums for talking about policy and practice, they become more powerful partners in interprofessional work. Issues are interacted more plainly. Suggestions step forward with more preparation and more authenticity. Dialogue shifts from specific complaint to expert analysis.

That changes the tone of cooperation. Physicians, pharmacists, therapists, and administrators are frequently more able to engage constructively when nursing input has been collected, discussed, and refined through a governance procedure. The nursing point of view is not reduced to isolated anecdotes. It exists as a thought about position grounded in practice.

Safer care depends upon this kind of team effort. Clients move across settings, disciplines, and transitions quickly. Misalignment in between expert groups develops openings for error. Shared Governance helps close a few of those openings by strengthening how nursing contributes to organizational decisions.

The ANA's governance materials emphasize collaborative management and representative bodies going over practice and policy problems in open online forum. Open forum sounds basic, however in a medical environment it is effective. It indicates issues can be emerged before they harden into resentment or risky workarounds. It means difference can be examined rather than buried. It implies policy can be informed by the individuals anticipated to carry it out.
What excellent governance looks like when security is the priority
Not every governance structure is equally effective. Some become slowed down in minor concerns. Some overreach into decisions that belong in other places. Some draw in strong individuals but fail to spread communication back to the units. The most beneficial designs generally share a couple of useful traits:
Clear decision rights, so personnel understand which questions councils can affect straight and which need management action. Representative involvement, so input reflects practice realities instead of the views of a small, familiar group. Visible feedback loops, so nurses can see what happened to suggestions and why. Connection to client care results, so governance does not wander into abstract discussion. Shared accountability, so autonomy is matched with responsibility for application and follow-through.
These are not ornamental functions. They safeguard trustworthiness. If nurses put in the time to engage in Shared Governance but can not inform whether anything changes, the structure compromises. If suggestions are accepted without thoughtful evaluation, quality can suffer in a various way. Security advantages when governance is active, disciplined, and transparent.
The trade-offs leaders need to respect
Shared Governance is not the fastest method to make every choice. That is among its trade-offs, and fully grown companies admit it openly.

Bringing more voices into practice decisions can slow the front end of change. Meetings require time. Consensus is manual. Staff need release time to get involved well. Concerns may end up being more complicated when frontline realities are on the table. For leaders under pressure to implement quickly, this can feel frustrating.

Yet speed is not the only worth in security work. A decision made rapidly however poorly embraced may cost more time later through rework, confusion, or repeated correction. A decision shaped with meaningful nursing input may take longer to develop and less time to support. The net impact can be safer and more durable.

There are likewise edge cases. During immediate circumstances, leaders may need to act before a complete governance cycle can happen. That does not invalidate Professional Governance. It indicates organizations require judgment about what can be governed prospectively, what must be handled right away, and how retrospective evaluation will take place as soon as the immediate need passes. Shared decision-making is essential, however it must never ever be misinterpreted for paralysis.

Another trade-off involves representation. Council members acquire deep understanding, but they can gradually end up being less linked to everyday personnel issues if interaction is weak. That is why good governance needs disciplined reporting back to units, not just up reporting to executives. Security suffers when councils become isolated from individuals they represent.
Retention and sustainability are security problems too
It is appealing to treat retention as an HR concern and patient safety as a clinical issue. In practice, they overlap constantly.

Leadership sources connect shared and professional governance to retention and the sustainability of the nursing profession. That connection matters because stable teams bring memory. They understand where previous procedure changes was successful or failed. They keep in mind why a standard exists. They recognize subtle signs that a system is starting to drift. Regular turnover can damage that institutional memory and increase the burden on those who remain.

Shared Governance supports retention in part due to the fact that it verifies professional self-respect. Nurses are most likely to remain in environments where their knowledge affects practice, where they can participate in fixing problems, and where management treats them as partners in care quality rather than recipients of instructions. That is not simply a spirits benefit. It is a security investment.

A workforce that feels unheard frequently becomes peaceful in the incorrect moments. A workforce that is utilized to meaningful discussion is more likely to raise issues before they end up being events.
Building trust takes more than launching councils
If an organization is trying to reinforce Shared Governance, trust ought to be the first metric leaders consider, even if it is not the simplest to measure. Nurses can generally inform within a few months whether a new structure is serious.

Trust grows when leaders ask for nursing input early, not after choices are already functionally total. It grows when council suggestions get direct actions. It grows when staff can trace a line from conversation to action. It likewise grows when leaders are truthful about restrictions. Nurses do not expect every suggestion to be approved. They do anticipate candor.

One of the most harmful patterns is selective listening, embracing staff voice when it supports a favored strategy and sidelining it when it complicates the plan. That sort of disparity weakens the very conditions Shared Governance is indicated to produce. Much safer client care https://brooksswzw495.yousher.com/how-shared-governance-advances-expert-nursing-practice https://brooksswzw495.yousher.com/how-shared-governance-advances-expert-nursing-practice depends upon speaking up, and individuals speak out more when they believe the online forum is real.

A practical starting point often looks less significant than companies expect. It might include clarifying the function of each council, revisiting membership to improve representation, specifying which practice concerns belong where, and making results noticeable to the units. Safety gains often start with this type of functional house cleaning because it turns governance from an idea into a trustworthy working process.
Signs the design is assisting patients, not just meetings
Organizations do not need grand language to understand whether Professional Governance is ending up being beneficial. They can watch for practical signs in day-to-day work. Staff start bringing forward better-defined questions. Policies are discussed in terms of patient care impact instead of personal choice. Interprofessional discussions become less reactive. Unit interaction enhances since representatives report back consistently. Practice changes show up with more context and fulfill less peaceful resistance.

A healthy governance model frequently alters the quality of discussion before it alters any formal metric. Nurses begin to state, in result, "Let's take this through the right online forum and work it through correctly." That sentence shows something crucial: a shift from specific aggravation to expert ownership.

When that ownership takes hold, patient care becomes safer due to the fact that less concerns remain casual, covert, or unsettled. Problems move into view. Standards end up being clearer. Teams collaborate with more structure. Nurses work out both voice and duty. That is the heart of Shared Governance and Professional Governance alike.
The larger professional meaning
There is a reason the language has actually developed from Shared Governance towards Professional Governance. Shared Governance highlights participation. Professional Governance emphasizes participation with authority, responsibility, and identity. It acknowledges nursing as a profession that should assist govern its own practice.

That concept lines up naturally with client security. Safer care is not produced by compliance alone. It is produced by experts who can believe, question, team up, and form the systems in which they work. The nurse at the bedside is not merely performing care inside a repaired maker. The nurse is likewise among the people who can improve the machine.

When companies honor that truth with real structures, real dialogue, and real decision-making power, safety work ends up being smarter. It becomes closer to the client. And it becomes more sustainable because individuals most accountable for continuous care are no longer outside the room when care standards are being set.

Shared Governance supports much safer patient care due to the fact that it treats nursing expertise as operationally required, not ceremonially valued. That is the difference between hearing nurses and being governed, in part, by nursing knowledge. For patients, that distinction can be profound.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by nurse leader Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside hospitals, health systems, and care teams strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>