Professional Governance and Collaborative Nursing Leadership

02 September 2026

Nursing leadership is at its strongest when authority is not confused with control. The healthiest practice environments are not built on top-down instructions alone. They are built when nurses closest to client care have a formal voice in choices about practice, standards, workflow, and the conditions needed to deliver safe care. That is the heart of Shared Governance, and increasingly, the heart of what many leaders now call Expert Governance.

The shift in language matters. Shared Governance has a long history in nursing, and the term still carries genuine significance throughout medical facilities and health systems. At the very same time, Professional Governance reflects a sharper focus on nursing autonomy, accountability, significant decision-making, and management in practice. It frames governance not simply as a committee structure, but as a professional obligation and a method of working. For leaders trying to reinforce culture, retention, and quality, that distinction is more than semantics. It changes what gets developed, what gets measured, and what nurses experience at the bedside.

Collaborative nursing management lives inside that area. It is the day-to-day work of developing forums where nurses can affect practice, obstacle weak procedures, shape policy, and assistance set top priorities with colleagues throughout disciplines. It needs structure, however it likewise requires restraint. Leaders have to know when to direct and when to go back. They have to endure slower discussion in exchange for better decisions, stronger ownership, and a practice environment that people want to stay part of.
Where Shared Governance began to evolve
In nursing, Shared Governance is commonly comprehended as a model in which nurses have an official voice in choices about their expert practice, often through councils or similar representative bodies. That structure stays sound. It recognizes a standard reality of scientific work: practice choices are much better when the people bring the responsibility for care can affect how that care is arranged and improved.

Over time, many nurse leaders discovered that the expression Shared Governance could be translated too directly. In some organizations, it became connected with standing committees that satisfied routinely however held little genuine authority. In others, it was treated as a symbolic exercise, useful for engagement optics but disconnected from actual operational decisions. That is one reason the term Professional Governance has gained traction. It puts the focus back on the occupation itself, on the judgment of nurses, on the accountability that includes autonomy, and on significant involvement in decisions that shape practice.

That reframing is necessary due to the fact that governance in nursing is never ever almost meetings. It is about who gets to choose, who owns the standards of care, and who is expected to lead improvement. When governance is healthy, bedside nurses do not simply get changes after they are settled. They help develop them. Managers do not bring the whole problem of interpreting every issue and creating every service. They work in collaboration with nurses who comprehend the realities of client flow, staffing stress, handoff failures, paperwork concern, and the subtle ways culture affects care.
Professional Governance is both structure and philosophy
One of the most helpful methods to comprehend Professional Governance is to see it as both a structure and a philosophy. The structural side is easier to recognize. It includes councils, representative groups, and online forums where nurses talk about and influence practice and policy issues. These structures matter because they formalize participation. Without formal pathways, input frequently depends on character, regional relationships, or whether a specific leader takes place to welcome discussion. An official structure says that nursing voice is not optional.

The philosophical side is harder to develop and a lot easier to fake. It rests on the idea that nurses are not only caregivers but also stewards of the profession. They are anticipated to exercise judgment, add to decisions, and accept accountability for the outcomes. A council can exist on paper without changing culture. A governance approach changes what individuals anticipate from one another. Staff nurses start to see involvement as part of expert practice rather than an additional job. Leaders start to see their role less as gatekeepers and more as facilitators of competence. Senior executives begin to understand that nursing sustainability and development depend upon treating nursing knowledge as a governing force instead of a downstream operational concern.

I have actually seen companies utilize the word empowerment so often that it loses all practical meaning. Real empowerment in nursing has clear signs. Nurses understand where to take practice issues. Their recommendations are heard in a prompt method. Decisions are transparent. There is follow-through. Responsibility is shared rather than selectively assigned after something fails. Professional Governance offers those expectations a home.
Why collaborative leadership makes or breaks governance
A governance model can be magnificently designed and still fail if management habits undermines it. Collaborative nursing management is what turns the model into lived reality. That kind of leadership does not mean leaders abandon authority or avoid difficult calls. Hospitals are complex, heavily managed environments, and there are minutes when leaders must move rapidly. But even in those minutes, collective leaders distinguish between what should be chosen instantly and what must be shaped with expert input.

The distinction is typically visible in simple operational moments. Consider a repeating client care problem that annoys personnel across several units. In one setting, a little group of leaders writes a new process, reveals it at huddle, and expects compliance by the following week. In another, nurse leaders bring bedside nurses, educators, and appropriate partners into conversation through developed councils or open online forums. The problem is named clearly, the practice implications are examined, and the resulting changes carry the weight of shared understanding. The 2nd path usually takes more time at the front end. It often saves time later on due to the fact that it minimizes resistance, surface areas useful issues early, and produces more powerful adherence.

This is among the compromises leaders need to accept. Collaborative management can feel slower than command-and-control management, particularly during periods of pressure. Yet companies that skip cooperation often spend for it through rework, disengagement, and turnover. Nurses can tell the difference in between being informed and being included. They can likewise inform when governance bodies are expected to authorize decisions that have actually already been made elsewhere.

The greatest leaders do not ask, "How do I get buy-in?" They ask, "Who should assist form this before it reaches a last form?" That question signals regard, and in nursing, respect is not abstract. It affects participation, trust, and the willingness to stay.
The connection to workforce sustainability
Professional Governance is closely tied to nurse engagement, empowerment, retention, and teamwork. Those links are not surprising. Most nurses do not get in the occupation wishing to become passive recipients of policy. They wish to practice well, influence care, and work in environments where scientific insight matters. When that does not take place, frustration accumulates. It appears as cynicism, silence, workarounds, or departure.

Retention conversations often focus initially on staffing levels, payment, scheduling, and workload. Those issues are genuine and pressing. However experience has taught numerous nursing leaders that people rarely leave for one factor alone. They leave when difficult conditions integrate with low influence and low trust. A nurse who feels extended but appreciated, heard, and involved might stay and assist enhance the unit. A nurse who feels stretched and dismissed is much more likely to disengage.

That is where Shared Governance, or Professional Governance, ends up being useful rather than theoretical. It gives nurses a way to take part in shaping the environment they work in. It reinforces that practice concerns are worthy of organized attention. It likewise supports the occupation's sustainability by assisting organizations develop leadership capacity beyond official titles. The nurse who finds out to bring a policy issue to a council, gather peer feedback, take part in open discussion, and help move a recommendation forward is not simply serving on a committee. That nurse is developing as a professional leader.

This matters particularly in companies attempting to grow future nurse leaders. Not every exceptional nurse desires a management role, and governance provides another pathway for impact. It allows medical competence to remain visible and important without requiring every leadership contribution into a supervisory ladder. In my experience, that matters a good deal to high-performing nurses who want impact but do not always want to leave practice for administration.
Patient care is the genuine test
Any management design can sound outstanding in strategic language. The serious concern is whether it improves patient care. Professional Governance is related to much safer, higher-quality care, and that connection makes sense when you take a look at how care in fact occurs. Patients experience systems through lots of little interactions: medication administration, handoff quality, escalation pathways, teaching consistency, clearness of functions, and responsiveness when something does not go as prepared. Nurses sit at the center of many of those interactions.

When nurses have significant decision-making authority around practice, issues are most likely to be recognized where they begin, not where they lastly end up being visible in a dashboard or problem. A handoff procedure that looks appropriate on paper might stop working throughout shift overlap. A documentation expectation might accidentally pull attention far from client education. A policy composed with excellent intentions might create confusion in situations that are common after midnight however rarely discussed throughout daytime meetings. Bedside nurses often identify these issues early since they live them repeatedly.

Collaborative leadership creates the conditions for those observations to become action. That does not imply every recommendation must become policy. Excellent governance is discerning. It compares local preference and wider practice requirement. It asks whether a modification supports quality, security, consistency, and expediency. But the procedure still matters. Nurses are even more likely to support requirements they assisted shape and even more likely to challenge hazardous drift when they understand their voice brings legitimate weight.

There is also an interprofessional benefit. Professional Governance in nursing does not isolate nurses from the remainder of the care team. It strengthens nursing's contribution within collaborative environments. Teams operate better when each profession brings clarity about its knowledge and accountability. A nursing voice that is organized, notified, and officially represented is much easier for other disciplines to partner with than a voice that is fragmented or routed totally through individual managers.
What genuine governance looks like in practice
The expression significant decision-making deserves attention since it separates genuine governance from ornamental governance. Nurses do not need more conferences for the sake of look. They need forums where discussion can influence results. Agent councils and open forums can support that, however just if the organization is honest about what those bodies can decide, what they can suggest, and how choices move forward.

Authenticity often comes down to a few practical conditions. The very first is clarity. Nurses need to comprehend the function of each council or representative body, how members are picked, what concerns belong there, and how suggestions reach leaders who can act on them. The 2nd is presence. Staff need to know what has actually been talked about, what choices were made, and what stays unsettled. The third is responsiveness. Nothing weakens governance quicker than issues that vanish into silence.

A fourth condition is leader discipline. Collective leaders can not bypass governance whenever a concern becomes troublesome or politically delicate. If governance is welcomed just for low-stakes matters, staff rapidly acknowledge the pattern. Trust is challenging to reconstruct once nurses conclude that their input is welcome just when it aligns with decisions already favored by leadership.

At the exact same time, fully grown governance acknowledges limitations. Not every concern can be fully open-ended. Some choices include external requirements, spending plan restraints, or time-sensitive threat. Strong leaders specify those restrictions plainly. Nurses usually tolerate hard realities better than nontransparent decision-making. What they withstand, frequently with excellent reason, is being requested input in settings where the boundaries were never truthful to start with.
Common failure points
Professional Governance is simple to back and hard to sustain. A number of failure points appear consistently throughout organizations, even when the intent is sound.
Councils exist, however authority is vague or minimal. Participation is limited to a little repeating group, which deteriorates representation. Leaders look for endorsement after choices are basically complete. Feedback loops are weak, so staff never hear what happened to their concerns. Governance work is dealt with as additional labor instead of part of expert practice.
Each of these concerns wears down confidence for a various factor. Unclear authority develops aggravation due to the fact that people invest time without seeing impact. Narrow involvement produces the appearance of addition while leaving large parts of the workforce unblemished. Late-stage assessment feels performative. Weak communication breeds report and indifference. Treating governance as volunteer labor sends out an unfortunate message that professional voice matters just when nurses can spare overdue energy after a demanding shift.

The much deeper problem in all 5 cases is misalignment between message and experience. Organizations state they want nursing voice, however the functional signals say speed, hierarchy, or optics matter more. Nurses are quick to spot that inequality. Once they do, reengagement needs more than relaunching a council charter. It requires noticeable evidence that practice competence changes decisions.
Leadership behaviors that enhance Professional Governance
Structures support governance, but behaviors sustain it. The nursing leaders who do this well tend to share a recognizable set of habits.
They state plainly which decisions require nursing input and why. They include difference without treating it as disloyalty. They connect governance conversations to patient care, not simply to administration. They close the loop consistently, even when the response is no. They establish new voices rather than counting on the very same confident contributors every time.
That last point should have more attention than it normally gets. In numerous organizations, governance becomes based on a few articulate, experienced nurses who understand how to speak in meetings and browse institutional language. Their contribution is important, but overreliance on them can unintentionally narrow the leadership pipeline. Collective leaders welcome quieter personnel into the process, coach them in how to frame issues, and stabilize participation from nurses across functions and experience levels.

This is where governance begins to feel less like a program and more like an expert culture. Individuals learn that knowledge is expected to https://rentry.co/roa36ahu https://rentry.co/roa36ahu surface. They learn how to challenge respectfully, how to bring evidence from practice, and how to believe beyond specific disappointment towards unit-wide or system-wide solutions. Those are management abilities, even when no title changes.
The ethical dimension of shared decision-making
There is likewise an ethical case for this work. Nursing is not simply a set of appointed tasks. It is an occupation with responsibilities to clients, to one another, and to the conditions that make safe care possible. Collaborative decision-making reflects that professional obligation. It honors the concept that nurses ought to have a voice in matters that impact their practice and their capability to care for clients well.

The existing ethical language in nursing enhances this point by recognizing cooperation and shared decision-making as necessary to nursing's work and by identifying Shared Governance among labor force sustainability initiatives. That matters due to the fact that it positions governance in a wider frame. This is not simply an engagement method for challenging labor markets. It is part of how the occupation organizes itself responsibly.

When leaders approach Professional Governance from that ethical perspective, the conversation modifications. Involvement is no longer framed as something good to offer personnel when time permits. It becomes part of what accountable nursing management needs. That shift has useful consequences. It influences budget plan choices, conference design, interaction expectations, and the severity with which nursing suggestions are handled.
A more long lasting model of nursing leadership
Professional Governance uses something nursing requires for a very long time: a resilient method to connect bedside expertise, management responsibility, and organizational decision-making. It maintains the initial strength of Shared Governance while clarifying that the goal is not shared attendance, but professional ownership. It asks more of nurses, and it should. It also asks more of leaders, especially those accustomed to controlling every important decision.

Collaborative nursing leadership grows under this design due to the fact that it has a clear location to operate. It is not reduced to character or goodwill. It ends up being visible in representative councils, open online forums, transparent discussions of practice and policy, and a consistent pattern of meaningful nurse participation. Gradually, that consistency shapes culture. Nurses start to anticipate that their practice voice matters. Leaders begin to anticipate that nursing expertise will direct choices rather than merely react to them. Clients benefit from systems shaped by the individuals who know care most intimately.

The organizations that sustain this work usually comprehend an easy truth: nursing quality can not be mandated into existence. It has to be governed, professionally, collaboratively, and with enough humbleness to rely on the judgment of nurses themselves.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a nursing consulting and education company founded in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside hospitals, health systems, and care teams improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>