How the Donna Wright Proficiency Evaluation Design ™ Decreases Top-Down Testing

14 November 2026

For numerous clinicians, proficiency season has a familiar feel. A package appears. A set of annual checkoffs gets appointed. Everybody, no matter role nuance or system reality, is routed through the exact same narrow procedure. Some subjects matter. Some do not. Personnel finish the requirement, managers document conclusion, and the organization can state package was checked.

That approach may please an administrative need, however it often misses the much deeper function of proficiency evaluation. It does not dependably show whether a nurse, therapist, professional, or other health care specialist can perform the most vital parts of the job safely and effectively in the setting where they actually work. It also tends to create a top-down environment, where leadership chooses what matters, staff comply, and the exercise becomes more about paperwork than development.

The donna wright proficiency evaluation design was developed to challenge that pattern. Developed by Donna Wright, a nurse and professional development specialist acknowledged for her operate in competency evaluation and leadership advancement, the design has been utilized in health care for more than 30 years and is described as tactical and outcomes-driven. Its practical value is not that it eliminates requirements or responsibility. It alters where the process begins and how proficiency is validated. Instead of presuming leaders alone ought to specify and evaluate everything, it produces a structure in which personnel and management collaborate to determine which competencies genuinely matter.

That shift sounds simple on paper. In practice, it can alter the whole tone of proficiency evaluation in health care. Donna Wright's method reduces unnecessary top-down screening due to the fact that it focuses on importance, shared https://troyeamt701.tearosediner.net/proficiency-evaluation-in-healthcare-donna-wright-approaches-for-nurse-residency-programs https://troyeamt701.tearosediner.net/proficiency-evaluation-in-healthcare-donna-wright-approaches-for-nurse-residency-programs ownership, and numerous ways of confirming practice, rather than counting on a consistent annual test for every single issue.
Why traditional top-down testing falls short
A centralized competency procedure generally grows from great intentions. Healthcare companies require consistency. They need proof that staff are prepared. They need a defensible process, particularly in high-risk environments. The problem begins when consistency ends up being sameness.

A medical-surgical unit, an emergency situation department, and an ambulatory center might all be asked to finish almost similar yearly competencies. Within those locations, skilled staff and recently transitioned personnel may receive the same validation tasks, even when their learning requires differ. A top-down system tends to flatten intricacy. It typically assumes that the easiest thing to assign is also the most meaningful thing to assess.

That creates three common issues. First, personnel time gets invested in low-yield activities. Second, the organization may ignore unit-specific threat or emerging practice changes. Third, competency evaluation ends up being something done to staff members rather than something developed with them. Once that takes place, participation might remain high on paper, however engagement generally drops.

Anyone who has actually operated in staff development has seen the signs. Individuals total modules because they have to, not because the content matches a pushing need. Supervisors rush to record return presentations for subjects that are not main to a person's day-to-day practice. The final proficiency assessment outcomes might look total, yet they use little insight into whether the ideal abilities were strengthened.

This is the space the competency donna wright approach attempts to close.
The core shift, from compliance event to strategic process
The Donna Wright Competency Assessment Design ™ is frequently referred to as collective and outcomes-driven. Those two words matter. Collaborative methods staff are not passive receivers of a testing plan. Outcomes-driven implies the procedure is not centered on tradition, convenience, or habit. It is centered on what impacts practice.

In the design, proficiency requirements are identified through dialogue between leaders and staff. That point alone lowers top-down screening. Instead of starting with a basic plan of yearly checkoffs, the process begins by asking what requires attention now. The focus is not on proving that everybody can duplicate a familiar skill in a synthetic setting. It is on recognizing the competencies probably to affect quality, security, and performance in a particular role or unit.

That is a major distinction. In a top-down system, management typically asks, "What should everybody be evaluated on this year?" In the donna wright proficiency evaluation design, the better concern is, "What demands validation due to the fact that it is new, altering, high-risk, or problematic in this practice environment?"

When companies make that shift, volume frequently reduces while importance improves. Staff may finish less useless jobs, yet the general competency process becomes more powerful because it targets the best issues.
The 4 questions that narrow the field
One of the most practical functions of proficiency assessment in health care Donna Wright is making use of four directing questions to determine competency requirements. These questions create discipline. They help teams move far from the practice of evaluating whatever and toward the practice of evaluating what matters most.
What is new? What is changing? What is high-risk? What is problematic?
These concerns are deceptively effective. "What is new?" captures fresh equipment, policies, products, or workflows. "What is changing?" highlights modified procedures and modified expectations. "What is high-risk?" accentuates parts of the task where failure carries major consequences. "What is troublesome?" concentrates on areas where errors, confusion, disparity, or efficiency concerns have currently surfaced.

This framework does 2 things at the same time. It makes proficiency selection more tactical, and it reduces the reflex to press broad annual screening onto everyone. A system no longer needs to validate why it is avoiding low-value checkoffs that have actually just been duplicated year after year. Rather, it can validate its competency priorities based upon danger, change, and real operational need.

That tends to improve buy-in. Personnel typically recognize whether a proficiency subject reflects their lived work. If a brand-new infusion pump has been presented, no one questions the need for recognition. If a treatment has actually changed, focused proficiency work feels affordable. If a location has been problematic, the reasoning is visible. The process feels less like imposed bureaucracy and more like responsible expert practice.
Staff ownership alters the culture
One factor top-down testing continues is that it feels manageable. Management can assign material, set deadlines, and produce reports. Yet control is not the like effectiveness. A competency system can be tightly managed and still inadequately aligned with practice.

The Donna Wright design is grounded in the concept that the learner or staff member is central to the recognition procedure. That can feel uncomfortable at first for companies utilized to command-and-control methods. Some leaders hear "staff-centered" and worry it means standards will loosen up. In strong application, the opposite takes place. Expectations stay clear, however ownership shifts.

When personnel are invited into the identification of competency needs, they bring information leaders may not see from a range. They know where workarounds have actually emerged. They know which tasks produce uncertainty for more recent team members. They know which policy updates have changed practice and which have simply altered phrasing. They know which aspects of the job carry quiet threat, the kind that rarely appears in a generic yearly module.

This is where discuss proficiency evaluation become especially valuable. In a top-down design, remarks often appear after the fact, normally as complaints about problem or irrelevance. In a collaborative design, feedback helps shape the process at the front end. Personnel input is no longer noise around the system. It becomes part of the system.

There is also a cultural result. Sources describing this model stress that leaders develop a culture of success that supports favorable staff member behavior and the organization's objective. That matters due to the fact that proficiency assessment is never ever just technical. It is relational. If personnel think the process is developed mainly to capture shortages or satisfy auditors, they get involved defensively. If they think the procedure is implied to support safe, outstanding practice, participation becomes more open and useful.
Validation is broader than testing
Traditional top-down competency systems typically depend heavily on one technique: test, test, or return presentation. Those approaches can be beneficial, however they are restricted. A person might carry out an ability in a staged setting and still battle with judgment in genuine workflow. Alternatively, an outstanding specialist may find official screening artificial while regularly demonstrating proficiency in day-to-day work.

A specifying strength of the donna wright proficiency evaluation design is that it uses numerous validation techniques. Some descriptions of the model note 11 validation approaches, and companies are encouraged to select techniques such as directed practice, evidence of day-to-day work, peer review, case research studies, and return demonstrations.

That versatility reduces top-down screening because it breaks the presumption that every proficiency should be verified in the exact same way. Different competencies require different evidence.
Guided practice Evidence of daily work Peer review Case studies Return demonstrations
A practical example makes the point clearer. If a system is resolving a modified policy that impacts scientific judgment, a case study may reveal comprehending better than a rote skills inspect. If a proficiency associates with a task performed repeatedly in routine practice, evidence of day-to-day work might be more meaningful than a separated annual demonstration. If a team is attempting to reinforce consistency in a collaborative process, peer review might use insight that a multiple-choice test cannot.

This does not indicate companies need to desert official testing totally. Some high-risk skills still call for direct presentation. Some knowledge areas may require structured assessment. The value of the Donna Wright technique is not that it turns down rigor. It picks rigor more intelligently.

That distinction matters in busy health systems. Personnel education resources are finite. Manager time is finite. Unit-based teachers, clinical leaders, and preceptors all run under pressure. When every proficiency is verified through the most labor-intensive method, the procedure ends up being bloated. When the approach matches the competency, the process ends up being both more credible and more sustainable.
The function of the Donna Wright proficiency worksheet
In discussions about execution, people frequently look for a donna wright competency worksheet, expecting a ready-made form that will solve the procedure problem. Tools can assist, however they just work if the underlying thinking is sound.

A worksheet in this context is most useful when it helps a group sort proficiencies according to the design's core questions and align them with suitable validation techniques. It should support judgment, not change it. If the worksheet ends up being simply another static template that staff are told to submit since "this is what we do every year," then the organization has recreated the extremely issue the model is suggested to solve.

The finest use of a competency worksheet is as a conversation tool. It can assist leaders and personnel determine what is new, changing, high-risk, or bothersome. It can record choices about why a subject was picked. It can likewise link the selected competency to the most suitable validation method. That makes the eventual proficiency assessment results much easier to translate because the procedure behind them is visible and deliberate.

The worksheet must not end up being the event. It must stay a support for better thinking.
What this looks like in genuine health care settings
The design has actually been adopted in health systems and scholastic programs, consisting of yearly proficiency programs and nurse residency contexts. That broad use makes good sense due to the fact that the design adapts well to various environments without losing its main logic.

In a residency setting, the collective focus helps emerging clinicians develop ownership early. Rather than soaking up the message that proficiency is something bied far and survived, locals can find out that proficiency evaluation is part of reflective expert practice. That is a healthier frame, particularly during shift to practice.

In an established annual program, the effect is often much more noticeable. Units that once ran everybody through the same generalized process can begin customizing concerns. A perioperative team may identify altered procedures and high-risk jobs as the year's focus. An outpatient specialty clinic might prioritize new products or devices. A medical system handling recurring paperwork issues may target a bothersome element of care that has actually shown inconsistency.

These are not hypothetical advantages in the abstract. They resolve ordinary functional disappointments. Less wasted time. Much better alignment in between competency and actual work. Clearer rationale for what gets assessed. More meaningful proficiency assessment results.
What leaders need to do differently
A design that decreases top-down testing still requires leadership, but it asks leaders to lead in a different way. Rather of controlling every information, leaders need to frame the procedure, protect its stability, and build trust around it.

That can be harder than it sounds. In lots of companies, the instinct is to standardize everything because standardization feels much safer. But overstandardizing competency assessment can produce superficial harmony instead of genuine assurance. Leaders implementing the Donna Wright model require enough discipline to keep expectations clear and enough restraint to avoid turning the process back into a centrally enforced checklist.

They also need to tolerate variation when variation is warranted. Not every system ought to have the same proficiencies. Not every competency ought to use the same recognition technique. Not every staff member needs the same developmental focus. Those realities can feel messy, but health care work is messy. A good competency system shows practice intricacy rather than pretending it does not exist.

The leadership task is to make that complexity manageable. Clear criteria assistance. The four-question structure helps. Thoughtful review of talk about competency evaluation assists. So does openness about how decisions are made. Personnel do not require unlimited freedom. They need a procedure that respects know-how and local reality.
Where companies in some cases get stuck
Even strong models can be compromised in implementation. One common mistake is adopting the language of partnership without changing the underlying routines. Personnel might be welcomed to meetings, however the proficiency list was already chosen. Leaders might request for feedback, however the yearly process remains fixed. In that situation, the design becomes cosmetic.

Another issue is trying to preserve every old competency while including the new framework on top. If a team states, "We will use the Donna Wright concerns, however we will also keep all previous annual checkoffs just in case," the problem remains high and the strategic advantage vanishes. Lowering top-down screening needs releasing low-value regular evaluations that no longer serve a clear purpose.

There is likewise the temptation to puzzle activity with accountability. A thick package, numerous checkoffs, and a long completion report can look outstanding. Yet a smaller, sharper set of proficiencies connected to real risk and change is typically far more defensible. More documents does not instantly suggest better oversight.

Organizations may also fight with analyzing competency assessment results. In a top-down system, the result is normally binary: finished or not finished. In a more thoughtful design, the outcome needs to say something more significant. It should reflect whether the selected validation technique showed readiness, consistency, understanding, or the need for support. That needs a little bit more professional judgment, but it produces info leaders can use.
Why this design tends to make trustworthiness with staff
Healthcare specialists are normally ready to engage deeply when the work feels authentic. The aggravation is not with competency assessment itself. The frustration is with procedures that feel detached from reality.

That is why the donna wright competency examples individuals discuss often resonate most when they are concrete and local. A changed procedure. A new piece of equipment. A high-risk task that everyone concurs deserves focused review. A troublesome workflow that has actually produced confusion. Those examples feel genuine due to the fact that they emerge from practice, not from a recycled calendar.

Credibility also grows when staff can see that competency is not synonymous with punishment. A collective, outcomes-driven process interacts that identifying a need is not an admission of failure. It becomes part of preserving safe practice. That message matters, especially in intricate care environments where work changes rapidly and no one can rely solely on preliminary training.

Over time, this creates a much healthier professional norm. Proficiency ends up being less about annual endurance and more about constant alignment in between what people do and what the organization needs them to do well.
A much better answer to a familiar problem
Most organizations do not set out to create puffed up, top-down competency systems. They acquire them, layer onto them, and ultimately normalize them. The result recognizes throughout health care: excessive generic testing, insufficient tactical focus, and restricted confidence that the procedure is determining what matters.

The Donna Wright Competency Evaluation Model ™ provides a better response due to the fact that it changes the style logic. It asks leaders and personnel to identify pertinent proficiencies together. It narrows the field through useful questions about what is brand-new, changing, high-risk, or problematic. It broadens recognition beyond one-size-fits-all testing. And it deals with competency assessment as a significant practice support process, not simply a yearly compliance ritual.

For companies trying to lower top-down testing without deteriorating accountability, that combination is the genuine strength of competency donna wright. It does not eliminate requirements. It makes requirements more connected to work. It does not lower expectations. It directs attention to the locations where expectations matter most. And in health care, where time is limited and danger is genuine, that kind of focus is not a high-end. It is the point.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm established in 1978 by nurse leader Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with nursing and clinical teams strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>