Magnet ® Consulting Guide to Interim Keeping An Eye On During Classification

23 August 2026

Pursuing Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® classification is not a documentation workout. It is an organizational test of discipline, consistency, and follow-through. ANCC awards Magnet status to organizations that fulfill Magnet standards for nursing quality, and the requirements are anchored in a design that anticipates more than intent. A strong application needs to show genuine efficiency, real structures, and genuine outcomes.

That is why interim monitoring matters so much throughout classification. In practice, the duration in between early planning and last appraisal evaluation can expose every weak seam in an organization's approach. Teams frequently begin the Journey to Magnet Quality ® with energy and optimism, then face a more difficult phase where momentum fades, ownership blurs, and data components start drifting out of positioning. Good Magnet ® Consulting assists organizations avoid that middle-stage depression. It develops a method to keep the work live while the designation procedure is underway.

ANCC provides digital tools and guides to support the appraisal process and interim tracking throughout classification. That matters since monitoring is not an optional additional. It becomes part of managing the designation effort with sufficient rigor to protect the integrity of the composed documents and the organization's readiness overall. The very best consulting assistance does not change internal ownership. It sharpens it.
What interim monitoring actually implies in a Magnet setting
Interim monitoring is best comprehended as an organized method to confirm that the designation effort remains accurate, current, and defensible gradually. It is not merely a development meeting. It is a disciplined review of whether the evidence an organization plans to present still reflects real practice, actual management structures, and real empirical outcomes.

That distinction becomes important really rapidly. A health center may have done excellent preparatory work, mapped proof to Sources of Proof requirements, and assigned content owners for each area of the written documentation. Then leadership modifications. A service line rearranges. A council charter is revised. Outcome trends improve in one area and weaken in another. If no one notices those modifications early enough, the last submission can end up being a patchwork of outdated story and incomplete information logic.

Experienced Magnet ® Consulting teams tend to look for exactly that issue. They know the concern is seldom effort. Regularly, it is drift. People presume the structure is steady since the project strategy exists. In reality, classification work is dynamic. If the company is evolving, the designation story must develop with it.

The official Magnet framework helps describe why. The present empirical design is arranged around five parts: Transformational Management; Structural Empowerment; Exemplary Specialist Practice; New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements; and Empirical Outcomes. These are not isolated chapters. They connect. A modification in leadership structure can affect professional practice. An innovation effort can shape outcomes. A council redesign can affect structural empowerment and empirical reporting. Interim monitoring gives teams a structured chance to see those linkages before they end up being inconsistencies.
Why the middle of the journey is normally the hardest part
Early designation work often feels clear. There is a kickoff. Roles are assigned. Leaders and nursing teams are introduced to the structure. People are energized by the possibility of acknowledgment for nursing excellence. The challenge emerges later, when the work moves from aspiration to maintenance.

In that stage, organizations deal with several typical pressures at once. Daily operations remain demanding. Leaders accountable for Magnet-related work are also bring staffing concerns, budget plan pressure, quality top priorities, and system efforts. The designation timeline can begin to feel abstract compared with urgent functional requirements. At the very same time, written documents advancement demands precision. Teams need to keep realities existing, keep a constant story, and make sure that proof still links logically to the applicable standards and documents requirements.

I have seen strong organizations lose important time because they dealt with the middle phase as a waiting period rather than an active management duration. They presumed the core work was done once significant examples had been determined. Months later, they discovered that a crucial outcome story no longer held together since the trend changed, a practice council had actually combined, or a nurse-led improvement task had shifted ownership. None of those concerns suggested the company was weak. They just suggested no one was monitoring the classification story carefully enough while regular organizational life continued.

Interim monitoring is how fully grown teams keep that from happening.
The consulting function, support without overreach
The phrase Magnet ® Consulting can indicate different things in different companies. Often it refers to professional evaluation of composed paperwork. Sometimes it includes project management assistance, training for nurse leaders, or tactical suggestions on readiness. During interim tracking, the most beneficial consulting role is normally one of structured external perspective.

Internal groups often understand excessive. That sounds unusual, however it holds true. They comprehend the history, the characters, the achievements, and the workarounds. Due to the fact that of that, they can miss out on the gaps in between what they know and what the composed record really shows. An experienced specialist sees the designation effort the method an external customer would see it, searching for continuity, clarity, and evidence discipline instead of depending on institutional memory.

That type of support is especially important when companies are stabilizing pride with realism. A health center may be doing exceptional nursing work however still require sharper paperwork reasoning. Another might have compelling leadership examples but weaker empirical result framing. Another might have strong outcome data yet irregular ownership of Magnet proof throughout departments. Interim monitoring is not the time for flattery. It is the https://chcm.com/contact-us/ https://chcm.com/contact-us/ time for honest assessment provided in a way that secures morale and improves execution.

The most reliable consultants take care here. They do not produce a parallel job structure that sidelines nursing leadership. Magnet classification belongs to the company, not to a vendor or consultant. The specialist's job is to help leaders see what is stable, what is susceptible, and what needs action before submission or appraisal review.
What ought to be kept an eye on, regularly and without drama
A practical monitoring procedure does not need to be theatrical. In fact, the calmer it is, the better it typically works. The point is not to create a continuous sense of audit. The point is to preserve confidence that the classification file remains precise and coherent.

Most companies benefit from routine evaluation in a couple of core locations:
alignment of existing organizational structures with the written classification narrative status of evidence connected to Sources of Evidence requirements in the Application Manual integrity and instructions of empirical outcomes over time ownership and timelines for updates, modifications, and approvals readiness to utilize ANCC tools and guidance appropriately during the appraisal process
Those categories sound simple, however each has practical complexity. Structural positioning, for instance, is not just about an organizational chart. It includes councils, leadership roles, shared decision-making systems, and the practical way nursing influence shows up in the organization. If those structures modification, the narrative needs to alter with them.

Evidence status sounds administrative, yet it frequently exposes deeper concerns. Teams might find that a flagship example is persuasive in discussion however inadequately documented. Or they might understand two separate areas are utilizing the very same story to prove different points, which can compromise both if not managed attentively. Monitoring catches duplication, weak linkage, and stagnant examples before they end up being larger problems.

Empirical results require specific care because they sit at the heart of reliability. ANCC's design consists of Empirical Results as one of its 5 core elements for a factor. Acknowledgment for nursing quality can not rest on story alone. Throughout interim tracking, companies need to keep asking a disciplined question: does the outcome story stay clear, present, and constant with the broader proof being presented? That is not an information vanity workout. It is a reliability exercise.
The five-component design is not just a structure, it is a tracking lens
The present Magnet design did not appear by mishap. ANCC's design developed from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism after statistical analysis of appraisal scores, and the 2008 conceptual model grouped those forces into the 5 elements used today. For consulting work, that development matters since it advises groups to think in integrated systems instead of separated examples.

Interim monitoring works best when every review asks how the proof still reflects those 5 elements in a well balanced way. An organization can be lured to lean too greatly on noticeable management stories since they are simpler to tell. Another might count on structural examples and underplay enhancements and innovations. A 3rd might have outstanding outcome reports however weak articulation of how professional practice supports those results.

The 5 components provide a practical corrective. They help teams evaluate whether the designation story is proportionate. If Transformational Management is strong, can the company also show how that leadership translated into empowerment and practice? If there is an innovation story under New Understanding, Developments, & & Improvements, is it simply intriguing, or is it incorporated into care and connected to outcomes? If Structural Empowerment is described as a strength, do the structures still exist in the exact same form and function declared in the documentation?

These are keeping track of questions, not just writing concerns. That is an essential difference. A narrative can sound refined while hiding weak positioning beneath the surface. Interim review is the minute to examine substance before style solidifies around outdated assumptions.
Written documents is where lots of companies either tighten up or lose ground
ANCC needs written paperwork tied to evidence requirements in the Application Manual, typically gone over through Sources of Proof and related crosswalk materials. That implies the composed submission is not a broad essay about organizational culture. It is an accurate body of evidence. During classification, interim tracking should continually ask whether the evidence stays present and whether the file still reflects how the company really operates.

This is where a knowledgeable writer's discipline ends up being helpful. Strong documents usually has three qualities. It is precise, selective, and internally consistent. Precision means every statement can be defended. Selectivity suggests the company selects examples that carry real weight rather than trying to include whatever. Internal consistency implies a claim made in one area does not quietly oppose another section.

A typical failure point is over-collection. Groups gather mountains of product since they fear leaving something out. Six months later on, they are buried in examples, versions, attachments, and old files. Interim monitoring ought to minimize, not broaden, confusion. If the procedure is healthy, each evaluation leaves the team clearer about which evidence still matters and which evidence should be retired.

I as soon as viewed a nursing management group spend an entire afternoon disputing whether to preserve a precious anecdote in a draft section. It was meaningful to the people in the space, and it represented a real minute of development. The issue was that it no longer matched the present structure being described. Keeping it would have introduced confusion. Eliminating it felt unpleasant, but it reinforced the final story. That is what efficient tracking frequently looks like, less romantic than people anticipate, more editorial than ceremonial.
Interim monitoring protects against the most expensive sort of error
Not every threat in classification is monetary, however some are. ANCC posts separate Magnet application and appraisal cost schedules, consisting of an online application fee and appraisal review fees due at written file submission. Due to the fact that of that, weak interim monitoring can have effects beyond inconvenience. If a company reaches a major submission point with avoidable spaces or preventable inconsistencies, the cost is not simply aggravation. It consists of time, personnel effort, chance cost, and the stress placed on leadership credibility.

That is why major companies do not wait up until completion to check readiness. They develop checkpoints throughout the classification duration when someone asks the tough concerns early enough to matter. Is the narrative current? Are duties clear? Have organizational changes been incorporated? Does the evidence still support the claims being made? Is the team depending on memory instead of paperwork in any essential area?

These are not glamorous questions, but they are the ones that secure the journey.
Designation is not redesignation, and the monitoring frame of mind ought to show that
ANCC compares classification and redesignation. Organizations that have actually already made Magnet Recognition pursue redesignation to continue being recognized. That difference matters because interim tracking should fit the company's stage.

A novice applicant often requires monitoring that emphasizes develop, positioning, and proof of maturity. The group might still be discovering how to translate excellent nursing practice into Magnet-ready documentation. A redesignation effort, by contrast, might require more scrutiny of continuity, sustainment, and development. The challenge there is frequently not whether structures exist, but whether they have been kept, enhanced, and showed truthfully over time.

Consulting assistance needs to not flatten those distinctions. A skilled adviser understands that a novice classification group might need more help developing file governance and evidence choice discipline, while a redesignation team may require sharper analysis of what has genuinely advanced given that the previous acknowledgment period. The monitoring cadence, conversation design, and evaluation top priorities can all move based on that context.
A useful rhythm for monitoring
Interim tracking works best when it is routine enough to capture drift and focused enough to produce decisions. It should not end up being a vast conference where everybody reports whatever they know. The better model is a disciplined review cycle with clear owners, present materials, and particular follow-up.

A useful checkpoint usually answers a brief set of questions:
what altered since the last review what proof or story now requires revision what remains strong and stable what is at danger if left untouched who owns the next action and by when
That structure keeps the conversation operational. It also reduces a common temptation, which is to use Magnet meetings as broad online forums for organizational storytelling. Storytelling has value, but monitoring conferences need to produce choices. Otherwise the team leaves feeling busy and achieved while the real paperwork remains untouched.

One practical sign of a healthy procedure is variation control. Not the software application side, however the behavioral side. Everybody needs to understand which draft is existing, who can modify it, and how modifications are authorized. Another indication is that leaders do not wait to surface issues. If an empirical pattern softens, if a structural change impacts a narrative section, or if an example no longer fits, the concern should come forward instantly. Excellent tracking lowers defensiveness. It makes revision feel regular rather than embarrassing.
The most underrated part of readiness is organizational honesty
Organizations pursuing Magnet classification often have much to be proud of. They should. The program exists to recognize nursing quality and quality client results, and the work that supports those outcomes should have serious respect. But pride can disrupt monitoring if it makes teams reluctant to challenge their own assumptions.

The strongest designation efforts I have actually seen were not the ones that declared excellence. They were the ones ready to say, clearly and without panic, this area has actually ended up being outdated, this result story needs stronger framing, this leadership example no longer fits the current structure, this evidence is significant however not probative enough. That level of sincerity saves time and improves quality.

It also strengthens the relationship in between experts and internal leaders. Magnet ® Consulting is most beneficial when it offers decision-makers language for what they currently think however have actually not yet called. Sometimes the ideal suggestions is to improve. In some cases it is to cut. In some cases it is to stop briefly and let the company's actual work catch up with the story being drafted. Judgment matters there. So does restraint.
What organizations must get out of a solid consulting partnership throughout monitoring
A trustworthy consulting relationship during designation need to feel clarifying, not theatrical. The company needs to expect clearer concerns, sharper alignment to ANCC expectations, and more self-confidence that the designation effort shows current reality. It ought to not expect a consultant to produce quality or mask instability.

The best partnerships normally share a couple of characteristics. Nursing management remains noticeably responsible. The consultant brings external perspective and procedure discipline. Paperwork is reviewed versus the recognized structure and proof requirements, not versus personal preference. Organizational changes are dealt with as workable truths, not as catastrophes. And everybody comprehends that the goal is not simply submission. The objective is a submission that properly represents the company at the time it is appraised.

That is the genuine value of interim tracking throughout classification. It keeps the Journey to Magnet Excellence ® grounded in proof, responsive to alter, and deserving of the recognition being pursued. For organizations investing time, money, and professional reliability in Magnet status, that is not a small advantage. It is the difference between a designation effort that looks arranged and one that really is.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting organization established in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside hospitals, health systems, and care teams improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>