Shared Governance as a Tool for Nursing Labor Force Support

16 September 2026

The discussion about nursing workforce support typically wanders quickly towards staffing ratios, salaries, scheduling, and recruitment pipelines. Those concerns matter, and no severe leader would pretend otherwise. Still, numerous organizations miss a less noticeable chauffeur of workforce stability: whether nurses have an authentic voice in the choices that form their day-to-day practice.

That is where Shared Governance, frequently now talked about as Professional Governance, becomes highly useful. In nursing, shared governance refers to a model in which nurses have an official voice in decisions about expert practice, frequently through councils or similar structures. Professional Governance is often used to highlight not just involvement, however autonomy, accountability, significant decision-making, and management in practice. It is both a structure and a viewpoint, which distinction matters. A hospital can develop councils on paper and still stop working to support nurses. By contrast, when the approach is real, those structures end up being a method to enhance the labor force from the inside out.

This is not a soft cultural job. It is an operational one. Nurses stay longer, engage more deeply, and practice more confidently when their know-how is treated as vital to decision-making instead of optional commentary after a decision has actually already been made. Workforce assistance is not only about relief from pressure. It is likewise about restoring impact, professional dignity, and a sense that the work can be formed by the individuals who understand it best.
Why governance belongs in a labor force strategy
Nursing leaders sometimes different governance from workforce planning, as if one belongs to expert practice and the other comes from human resources. In genuine settings, they overlap constantly. When nurses feel heard on practice problems, policy modifications, workflow style, client care standards, and unit-level priorities, the impacts are not abstract. Morale shifts. Trust in management modifications. Partnership throughout disciplines ends up being much easier. The work feels less imposed and more owned.

That idea is shown in national nursing leadership conversations. Professional Governance has actually been linked to empowerment, engagement, retention, team effort, interprofessional collaboration, and more secure, higher-quality client care. The ANA's 2025 Code of Ethics also recognizes collaboration and shared decision-making as important to nursing's work, and explicitly consists of shared governance among workforce sustainability efforts. Those are necessary signals. They position governance not at the edges of nursing operations, but close to the center of what sustains the profession.

Support for the workforce is typically framed as giving nurses something, more resources, more flexibility, more assistance services. Shared Governance adds another dimension. It provides nurses standing. That alters the texture of the work. A nurse who can influence practice requirements, raise issues in a formal location, and see recommendations move into action is experiencing a different workplace from a nurse who is anticipated only to comply.

In durations of stress, this distinction becomes even more important. When change is frequent, whether because of client requirements, regulatory shifts, or internal restructuring, organizations need mechanisms that let nurses procedure, obstacle, refine, and help execute those modifications. Without that, leaders might still communicate thoroughly, but interaction alone is not governance. Governance requires decision-making authority that is meaningful enough to be felt at the bedside.
The useful significance of "official voice"
A formal voice is not the same as an open-door policy. The majority of companies state nurses can speak up. Far less build durable processes through which nursing input shapes practice decisions in a visible way. Shared Governance addresses that gap by creating representative bodies, frequently councils, where nurses go over practice and policy issues in an open forum.

That structure matters for two reasons. First, it safeguards involvement from becoming personality-dependent. In some offices, a few confident clinicians always speak and others stay silent. A formal design can expand representation so that governance does not depend upon who is most comfy challenging decisions in a conference. Second, structure creates memory. Concerns are tracked, recommendations are established, and decisions can be reviewed. Workforce support enhances when staff can see that their concerns do not vanish the minute a conference ends.

The viewpoint side matters simply as much. Professional Governance asks leaders to treat bedside nurses not simply as recipients of regulations, but as leaders in practice. That needs a shift in how authority is understood. It does not indicate every choice is made by committee, and it does not indicate leaders give up obligation. It suggests leaders recognize where nursing proficiency ought to drive decisions and where responsibility ought to be shared rather than concentrated at the top.

When that viewpoint settles, councils stop feeling ritualistic. They end up being places where standards of care, practice issues, workflow barriers, and policy implications can be debated by the individuals closest to the work.
What nurses experience when governance is real
The greatest case for Shared Governance as a labor force assistance tool is typically discovered in how nurses explain the distinction. In environments where governance is weak, disappointment tends to sound familiar. Policies arrive fully formed. Operational changes affect workflows that no bedside nurse was asked to review. Issues are intensified repeatedly without closure. Personnel start to assume that participation changes bit, so they conserve energy by disengaging.

Where Professional Governance is working well, the language modifications. Nurses talk about ownership, not just compliance. They might still disagree with choices, but they comprehend how the choice was reached, who contributed, and where their own voice fits in. That does not remove stress. Nursing stays requiring work. However it changes whether stress is compounded by powerlessness.

A basic example makes the point. Think of an unit where nurses are battling with a paperwork procedure that is increasing friction in client care. In a traditional top-down reaction, concerns might be missed through management channels, with little presence about next steps. In a governance-based action, the concern can move through a practice council or comparable body, be gone over by peers, be evaluated for client care impact, and generate a recommendation with nursing ownership. Even if the final modification is modest, the process itself communicates respect for professional judgment.

That experience supports the labor force in at least 3 methods. It reinforces skills, due to the fact that nurses are welcomed to apply their knowledge. It reinforces belonging, due to the fact that their participation matters to the group. And it strengthens trust, since the company has actually included nursing judgment in a formal, repeatable way.
Shared Governance is not a cure-all
It is worth being sincere about what Shared Governance can and can not do. It can not make persistent understaffing acceptable. It can not compensate for bad leadership habits. It can not fix every retention challenge, especially those tied to compensation, geographic pressures, or individual burnout. If leaders oversell governance as the response to all workforce pressure, personnel will translucent it quickly.

The value of Professional Governance lies in other places. It assists create the conditions in which nurses can practice with greater firm and influence. That can enhance engagement and retention, however only if the company likewise takes care of the product truths of the job.

This is where some organizations stumble. They launch a council structure during a tough duration and expect immediate enhancements in culture. Nurses, currently stretched, are then asked to attend meetings, review policies, and take on committee work without protected time or noticeable results. The intent might be sincere, however the outcome can feel like one more need layered onto a full workload.

Shared Governance needs to minimize pressure produced by exemption, not increase strain through symbolic participation. If nurses are asked to govern, the company needs to treat that work as genuine work.
The difference between activity and influence
One of the hardest judgments in Professional Governance is distinguishing between busyness and authority. Lots of councils fulfill frequently, review agendas, and produce minutes. That alone does not mean governance is operating. The better test is whether nurses can indicate decisions about professional practice that were materially formed by nursing input.

A helpful way to think of it is to ask a few direct concerns:
Are nurses included early enough to shape a choice, or just late sufficient to react to it? Do councils address matters that impact practice in significant methods, or mostly small problems with limited consequence? Is there noticeable follow-through when recommendations are made? Do leaders explain when a recommendation can not be adopted, consisting of the reasoning? Can bedside staff see a clear link in between governance discussions and changes in practice?
If the response to most of those questions is no, the structure may exist without much power. Personnel normally acknowledge this rapidly. They may still attend, however presence is not the same as belief. When participation feels performative, it ends up being challenging to restore trust.

By contrast, even a modest governance structure can make reliability when it deals with a couple of substantial practice problems well. Nurses do not require every recommendation accepted to feel highly regarded. They do need evidence that their competence carries weight.
Why language has shifted toward Professional Governance
The move from "shared governance" to "professional governance" is more than a branding update. It reflects a sharper focus on nursing autonomy and responsibility. The older expression can often be misconstrued to imply that power is merely distributed for the sake of addition. Professional Governance puts the profession itself in clearer view. Nurses are not simply sharing in organizational decisions. They are governing matters central to nursing practice as specialists with distinct competence and obligations.

That framing is useful for labor force support since it ties spirits to expert identity, not just to work environment satisfaction. Nurses often stay in hard roles not since the work is simple, however since it feels meaningful and lined up with who they are expertly. When governance enhances that identity, it enhances a source of resilience that is frequently overlooked.

It likewise clarifies duty. Professional Governance is not merely about having a seat at the table. It likewise asks nurses to take part in the hard work of practice management, peer responsibility, and thoughtful decision-making. That is a fully grown design. It appreciates nurses enough to include them in intricacy, not just in commentary.
Interprofessional impacts that matter to the workforce
Nursing workforce assistance is typically discussed as if it sits totally within nursing. In truth, nurses operate in highly interdependent systems. Cooperation with physicians, therapists, case supervisors, pharmacists, and administrators shapes the everyday experience of practice. Professional Governance can enhance that environment since it strengthens nursing's voice in interprofessional settings.

When nursing councils or representative structures are operating well, they produce clearer pathways for nursing concerns to be articulated, refined, and advanced. That can reduce a familiar source of friction, where concerns are raised https://privatebin.net/?b5f1ab1f5f7ff46f#BT5tWS9L8t1KdjhoTcMQnbQ8ZKhLdKCTWvcfXFPHFwDy https://privatebin.net/?b5f1ab1f5f7ff46f#BT5tWS9L8t1KdjhoTcMQnbQ8ZKhLdKCTWvcfXFPHFwDy informally, inconsistently, or just after tensions have constructed. An official governance procedure helps nursing get in cooperation with coherence and authority.

This matters for labor force assistance because interprofessional aggravation is exhausting. Much of office strain comes not just from patient acuity or workload, however from duplicated failures of coordination and respect. Governance does not eliminate those issues, yet it can provide a more steady platform from which nursing takes part in resolving them.

There is also a quality dimension here. Leadership sources have actually connected Shared Governance and Professional Governance to safer, higher-quality patient care. That matters deeply to workforce stability. Nurses do not separate their own wellness from the care they supply. Environments that consistently require clinicians to practice in ways they believe are suboptimal are demoralizing. If governance assists line up care processes more closely with nursing expertise, it supports both patients and individuals caring for them.
What execution gets wrong, and what it gets right
The organizations that struggle most with Shared Governance usually make one of 2 errors. Either they develop too little structure, leaving participation vague and inconsistent, or they create a lot structure that governance becomes troublesome and removed from frontline truth. The sweet area is disciplined but usable.

In practical terms, excellent application tends to share numerous features. Representation is clear enough that personnel know how problems move forward. Meeting work is tied to real practice concerns rather than generic updates. Management participation is present, however not managing. Most notably, feedback loops show up. Nurses can see where concepts went, what was chosen, and why.

Weak execution frequently has the opposite feel. Councils go over problems that never seem to land. Leaders request input but reserve decisions without explanation. Personnel rotate through governance roles without training or support. Over time, cynicism fills the gap left by great intentions.

A short anecdotal pattern appears in numerous settings. Personnel are passionate at launch due to the fact that the pledge of influence is energizing. Six months later, enthusiasm depends less on the existence of the council and more on whether anybody can indicate changed practice. That is the genuine reliability threshold.
Workforce assistance requires time, not just permission
One of the most ignored realities in Shared Governance is time. Telling nurses they are empowered to get involved methods very little if they should squeeze governance work into breaks, off-hours, or currently overloaded shifts. The message then ends up being inconsistent: your voice matters, but only if it costs us nothing operationally.

That approach damages the extremely labor force assistance governance is implied to supply. If Professional Governance is important enough to shape practice, it is important enough to be resourced. The specific model will differ by setting, however the principle is simple. Participation has to be practical, not merely endorsed.

This is particularly crucial for newer nurses and quieter employee. In numerous workplaces, individuals most likely to participate in additional governance work are those who currently have self-confidence, flexibility, or informal impact. That can unintentionally narrow representation. A labor force support tool is just as strong as its accessibility. If governance generally magnifies the currently visible, it misses out on a large part of the workforce.
Where leaders make the most significant difference
Shared Governance is often referred to as nurse-led, and it should be. Still, leadership behavior stays definitive. Leaders set the tone for whether governance is respected as a major forum or dealt with as a consultative formality. The hardest part for leaders is typically restraint. It takes discipline not to pre-solve every problem or override recommendations too quickly.

The most efficient leaders in governance-focused environments generally do 3 things well. They specify the scope of nursing influence plainly, they react regularly to suggestions, and they make room for disagreement without punishing it. That combination develops mental safety without slipping into ambiguity.

Leaders also need judgment about when a choice should be made through governance and when urgency requires a more direct technique. Not every problem can move through an extended process. Nurses comprehend that. Issues occur when seriousness ends up being the default explanation for bypassing governance completely. If bypass ends up being regular, trust erodes.

A strong leader will sometimes state, plainly, that a choice needed to be made quickly, describe why, and then bring the downstream practice implications back into a governance online forum. That maintains both openness and accountability.
A grounded way to evaluate whether it is helping
Because Professional Governance is both a philosophy and a structure, its impact is not measured by one indication alone. It appears in patterns. Are nurses more engaged in practice conversations? Are councils viewed as pertinent? Do staff believe their know-how matters? Is cooperation more powerful? Does the organization maintain more trust throughout periods of change?

Retention and engagement are frequently discussed in broad terms, however the local signs are usually more telling. Staff begin offering concepts instead of keeping them. Practice concerns are raised previously. System discussions shift from "they altered this" to "we worked on this." Those are significant differences in how a workforce connects to its organization.

That does not suggest every system will experience governance the very same way. Some teams are more prepared for it than others. Some managers are more knowledgeable at supporting it. Some issues provide themselves to council work better than others. The point is not uniformity. The point is whether the company is gradually building a culture in which nursing judgment is anticipated to form nursing practice.
The deeper factor this matters
At its finest, Shared Governance does something many labor force efforts fail to do. It treats nurses not as a problem to be managed, however as professionals whose understanding is indispensable to the work. That is a different posture, and nurses feel the distinction immediately.

Professional Governance will not erase tiredness or resolve every staffing challenge. It asks for time, consistency, and genuine management discipline. It can irritate people when it is underpowered, and it can disappoint when introduced as importance. Yet when it is taken seriously, it becomes one of the couple of labor force support methods that enhances both the conditions of practice and the profession itself.

That is why it is worthy of a central place in nursing workforce discussions. Nurses need resources, reasonable work, and competent management. They likewise need significant authority in the environment where they practice. Shared Governance uses a way to formalize that authority, secure it from being simply rhetorical, and link workforce support to the core of professional nursing.

When companies desire a more steady, engaged, and sustainable nursing labor force, they must pay very close attention to where choices are made, who has standing in those choices, and whether nurses can see their expertise showed in the life of the organization. Governance is not a side job. In numerous settings, it is among the clearest expressions of whether nursing is genuinely supported.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization established in 1978 by nurse leader Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with health care organizations strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>