Expires in 8 months
14 January 2022
Let's look at the benefits and drawbacks of rental and built-in webhard.
Rental webharders include Dacom Webhard, Ucloud, and KT Webhard. This refers to a service that shares idc's server resources with other users.
Built-in webhard solutions include Internet disks, linkhard, plus disks, ncs, and Ajaxplar.
The rental type gets the advantage of having a server on idc, so it doesn't have to be managed separately, and the initial setting cost is low.
However, you have to pay monthly maintenance for capacity and traffic, purchase capacity and traffic costs, and move files to other servers.
There are disadvantages such as for example dual subscription to internal services (homepages, intranet) and other domains.
Built-in Webhard leverages specific hardware (internal resources) to build services, freeing up capacity and traffic.
It has the burden of initial setting costs. Large companies do not use rental solutions. Webhard is not just a Webhard, it is a company.
It is because it really is confidential and knows the power of strategic sharing and well-managed data.
Link hard solutions have emerged in line with the intention that small and medium-sized businesses should build webhard without the burden.
It does not have to purchase H/W separately, and the answer alone allows users to create Webhard by utilizing the desired pc, NAS, and server equipment.
If you already had an internet site or intranet, it is possible to stop unnecessary work which used to run the site.
OK to create installed blogs or bulletin boards.
By increasing utilization through intranet, groupware, kms, and the company's homepage in addition to the Webhard's original function, the thought of developing a use-oriented product makes one anticipate the expansion of the perfect solution is.
웹하드 순위 The price can be from 300,000 won for 30 people, and this can be fully built in Soho, therefore the parts which were agonizing over setting and maintenance costs will be solved a lot.
It is now essential for Soho to establish a web hard system.
Rental vs. Construction.
Webhard reminds you of an extremely useful and convenient Internet service that allows you to download files over the Internet at a set monthly cost. This means that the application of web hard is becoming common.
But it's not just recently that this concept arrived, and it's true that it's been a long time. As soon as it came out, lots of people used it, and there have been many workers in offices who didn't join it or even covered their personal expenses because of lack of capacity, and there are probably still some now.
The biggest background of the phenomenon may be the rapidly growing file capacity of materials such as for example work used, while there are lots of burdens and inconveniences to cover monthly expenses predicated on limited capacity. Furthermore, the service is provided against the backdrop of a big portal, which also results in security concerns concerning the leakage of confidential information, which explains why the company won't adopt it.
In some cases, there are also many implementations of SI projects that build installation-only webhard that meet the needs of users' needs. The deployment of a standalone server consists of a server (HW)+ operating system (Server OS)+ webhard solution (high-priced licenses using the number of users), that is prohibitive in comparison to using monthly webhard when maintenance services are included.
NAS offers a highly cost-effective, easy-to-install and easy-to-operate webhard for anyone with significantly reduce the needs of the webhard users. Webhard is very innovative because it supports uploading files automagically. It's a excellent feature because DDNS, etc. can be accessed from the outside without needing to buy an authorized IP.
Unfortunately, you can find functional limitations because the basic webhard contained in these NAS is basic. Because the word "basic" implies, it's not a webhard solution developed at a high cost. Consequently, webhard modules for NAS mounts are recently available with the capabilities and peaks of expensive, built-in webhard solutions. Of course, it's a paid option, but it's a very low-cost, very useful solution that's significantly less than a tenth of the expense of building a single server.
Now, NAS and Webhard meet to integrate Intranet & Extranet at low cost, creating a small but powerful collaborative file server. I'll take a look at the rough top features of Webhard and guide you. You can go over it and choose the right one according to the reality and needs.
Here's my website: https://www.streetfile.co.kr