Magnet ® Consulting on New Knowledge, Developments, and Improvements

13 August 2026

The phrase New Understanding, Innovations, & Improvements brings unusual weight in the Magnet Recognition Program ®. It sounds broad in the beginning look, almost abstract, till a group sits down and needs to reveal what it implies in practice. Then the real work begins. The difficulty is not merely proving that individuals appreciate enhancement. Nearly every health care company states it does. The challenge is revealing, in reputable and disciplined ways, how nursing contributes to new understanding, how development is acknowledged and supported, and how improvements are translated into much better care.

That is where Magnet ® Consulting ends up being most important, not as a faster way, and not as a replacement for the work itself, however as a disciplined method to help a company see its own practice more plainly. Excellent consulting in this arena does not manufacture a story. It assists an organization determine the story that is currently there, determine where the proof is strong, and challenge where the evidence is thin.

For companies pursuing Magnet designation through the American Nurses Credentialing Center, or ANCC, this matters due to the fact that Magnet is not a general badge of quality. It is an official recognition awarded by ANCC to companies that fulfill Magnet requirements for nursing excellence and quality client outcomes. The program's roots go back to the 1983 research study of "magnet" healthcare facilities, and the name officially ended up being the Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® in 2002. In time, the framework developed also. What was once arranged around the 14 Forces of Magnetism was improved, after analytical analysis and conceptual redesign, into 5 parts of the existing empirical design: Transformational Leadership, Structural Empowerment, Exemplary Specialist Practice, New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements, and Empirical Outcomes.

That evolution matters since it changed the conversation. It asked companies not only to explain admirable nursing structures or expert worths, but likewise to show how those ideas live in measurable, enhancing systems. New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements is where goal satisfies evidence.
Why this element is typically harder than it looks
Among the 5 Magnet parts, this one frequently exposes the difference between an active organization and a reflective one. Many medical facilities and health systems are hectic. They pilot brand-new workflows, test documents modifications, revise staffing methods, check out interdisciplinary ideas, and encourage bedside problem solving. Yet busyness does not automatically become Magnet-ready evidence.

In useful terms, groups frequently encounter 3 foreseeable issues. Initially, they use the word innovation too loosely. A change is not always a development just because it is brand-new to an unit. Second, they assume enhancement is self-evident, even when the underlying data are fragmented or inconsistent. Third, they ignore how much effort it takes to link nursing action with broader organizational learning.

A consulting team that understands the Magnet structure will normally begin by slowing that conversation down. Just what altered? Why did it change? Who led it? What was discovered? How was the knowing shared? Did the change produce quantifiable improvement, or did it simply feel efficient? Those are not administrative questions. They are the concerns that separate anecdote from evidence.

In my experience, the hardest part is hardly ever the lack of activity. It is the lack of company around the activity. Nursing teams may have examples all over, but the examples are scattered across departments, tucked into committee minutes, embedded in presentations, or known just by the people who led the work. By the time an organization is preparing composed paperwork tied to ANCC proof requirements and Sources of Evidence, the scramble begins. Individuals remember outstanding work, but keeping in mind and documenting are not the exact same task.
What "new knowledge" actually requires from an organization
The first word in this part deserves more attention than it normally gets. Knowledge suggests more than attempting something brand-new. It recommends that the organization contributes to discovering, adopts discovering attentively, or advances professional practice in such a way that can be acknowledged and explained.

That expectation modifications how a nursing business need to consider regular project work. A unit-based effort to reduce hold-ups, for example, may be necessary and beneficial, however if the learning remains local and casual, it may never ever grow into something more powerful. The moment the company asks what was discovered, how the learning was validated, how it affected practice, and how it was spread out, the work takes on a different shape. It ends up being less about completing a task and more about constructing an expert environment where nursing knowledge is actively created and used.

This difference is simple to miss in everyday operations since functional leaders are under pressure to fix instant issues. They need to be. Health care is not a seminar room. Yet organizations pursuing Magnet recognition need a parallel discipline, one that records discovering while individuals are doing the work. Without that discipline, valuable practice modification can vanish into memory.

Magnet ® Consulting often helps by creating a bridge between nursing operations and proof advancement. That bridge may be as basic as clarifying what details needs to be retained from an effort, how job narratives should be framed, or where to line up unit-level work with the wider Magnet design. None of that is glamorous, however it is the kind of infrastructure that keeps genuine nursing achievements from being lost.
Innovation is not a slogan
The most common mistake with development is inflation. Every company wishes to be viewed as innovative, and every leader knows that the word carries favorable energy. However when everything is called innovation, the term loses its meaning.

In a Magnet context, a more disciplined view is handy. Development should suggest that nursing practice, management, or systems changed in such a way that was deliberate, thoughtful, and meaningfully various. It must likewise be connected to enhancement, because novelty without benefit is just disruption.

That sounds uncomplicated, but health care companies reside in a world where many modifications are externally driven. A new regulatory expectation gets here. A software application upgrade modifications workflows. A spending plan shift forces redesign. Personnel might do remarkable work adapting to those changes, yet adjustment alone is not constantly the exact same thing as innovation. The stronger examples are generally the ones where nurses shaped the reaction, solved a meaningful issue, and produced an outcome that mattered.

There is likewise a helpful edge case here. Sometimes the most remarkable innovation is not flashy. It is not a robotics story or a digital dashboard with sleek graphics. It may be a useful redesign developed by a nurse supervisor and bedside group who were trying to repair a persistent procedure that affected patients every day. Peaceful developments often make it through longer since they were built for reality instead of for presentation.

A seasoned expert understands this and does not chase the most significant story initially. Instead, the consultant searches for work that shows judgment, nursing ownership, and clear connection to practice. Those examples are typically more resistant when they are equated into formal documentation.
Improvements need to be visible, not merely asserted
Improvement is where many organizations feel great, and where lots of applications become susceptible. Health care professionals are trained to observe development. They understand when communication is better, when handoffs are smoother, when variation has fallen, or when staff self-confidence has actually enhanced. Those observations matter. They are typically the first signs that a good intervention is taking hold.

But Magnet appraisal does not rest on confidence alone. ANCC's design consists of Empirical Results as an unique part for a reason. Organizations are expected to reveal evidence. That expectation should affect how Brand-new Understanding, Developments, & & Improvements is approached from the start.

In practice, this suggests that enhancement efforts require clearer definitions than groups typically provide. Much better than what. Over what duration. Based on which procedure. Sustained the length of time. Interpreted by whom. An initiative that seems convincing in a committee meeting can fall apart rapidly when those concerns are asked late in the process.

The greatest companies construct this discipline before they require it. They decide early what success will appear like and how it will be tracked. They withstand the temptation to alter steps midway through unless there is a defensible factor. They document not just the outcome but likewise the approach, due to the fact that a result without context is tough to evaluate.

This is among the most practical areas for Magnet ® Consulting. External assistance can bring a sober eye to performance stories that internal groups have concerned love. That is not cynicism. It is quality assurance. If a task can not be clearly discussed to an educated outsider, it most likely needs more work before it can support a Magnet narrative.
The five-component design modifications how proof must be organized
One of the most beneficial shifts in the current Magnet structure is that it motivates organizations to stop treating nursing quality as a collection of detached achievements. The five-component empirical design works much better when leaders understand the relationships among the parts.

Transformational Management produces direction. Structural Empowerment produces conditions for participation and professional development. Excellent Expert Practice shows how nursing care is carried out. New Understanding, Innovations, & & Improvements shows that the organization does not stand still. Empirical Outcomes shows that the work matters.

That suggests a job in the New Knowledge, Innovations, & & Improvements domain ought to seldom be explained in isolation. The fuller and more precise story is normally cross-functional. A nurse-led effort may have depended upon leadership support, governance structures, professional practice councils, education, information review, and shared accountability. When those links are made well, the evidence feels authentic because it reflects how real companies function.

Consulting can assist groups see those connections without overcomplicating the story. A typical risk is to overbuild a story up until every committee and every leader appears in every paragraph. The result ends up being chaotic. Strong documents is selective. It consists of sufficient context to show the infrastructure that made it possible for the work, however it remains concentrated on the specific proof requirement being addressed.
Documentation is not the like paperwork
The Magnet procedure needs composed documentation aligned to ANCC evidence requirements, which truth alone can make individuals protective. They hear documentation and think about problem. They imagine binders, document demands, and rounds of edits that appear separated from patient care.

That reaction is reasonable, but it misses the point. Documentation in this setting is not mere paperwork. It is expert proof. It is how an organization shows that nursing excellence is methodical, reproducible, and embedded.

Still, the burden is real if the company waits too long. Groups pursuing the Journey to Magnet Quality ® frequently discover that they have more examples than evidence. Meeting minutes mention a job, but not its result. A discussion deck sums up success, but the underlying context is missing. The person who led the work changed roles. Information definitions were altered halfway through the year. None of these concerns suggest the work did not have value. They suggest the proof trail is weak.

That is why experienced Magnet ® Consulting often focuses as much on process discipline as on material selection. The goal is not to produce a prettier file. The goal is to develop a trustworthy method of event, confirming, and arranging proof before deadlines turn whatever into recovery work.

A useful internal test is easy: could somebody outside the project comprehend what happened, why it mattered, and how the company understands it worked? If the response is no, the job may still be excellent, but the paperwork is not ready.
Where consulting adds value, and where it ought to not
There is a healthy skepticism in nursing about specialists, and some of that suspicion is made. If consulting is treated as a cosmetic workout, it will dissatisfy people rapidly. The Magnet structure is too rigorous for image management to bring the day.

Where consulting does add real worth is in structure, analysis, and calibration. Structure implies helping a company construct an orderly method to evidence collection and narrative advancement. Analysis means translating day-to-day nursing accomplishments into language and formats that align with Magnet requirements. Calibration means testing whether the organization's greatest examples are in fact strong enough, clear enough, and total enough.

The finest consulting relationships also develop beneficial stress. Internal leaders naturally have loyalty to their teams and pride in their accomplishments. They should. A consultant's role is not to undermine that pride, but to ask the harder questions early, when responses can still improve the submission.

A useful engagement often centers on a few repeating jobs:
Identifying which examples truly fit New Understanding, Developments, & & Improvements Clarifying what paperwork exists and what spaces remain Testing whether claimed enhancements are quantifiable and defensible Helping leaders link job work to the broader Magnet model Keeping the effort paced so evidence advancement does not collapse into last-minute assembly
That sort of support is not dramatic, but it is effective. It appreciates the fact that Magnet acknowledgment is earned by the company, not outsourced.
Redesignation raises the basic internally
Organizations that already hold Magnet Acknowledgment pursue redesignation to continue being recognized. That easy fact alters the consulting conversation in important methods. A first-time applicant is attempting to demonstrate preparedness and continual quality. A redesignation organization should also reveal that excellence did not plateau after recognition.

For New Understanding, Innovations, & Improvements, redesignation produces a sharper internal expectation. An acknowledged company must not & be duplicating the exact same enhancement story in slightly upgraded type. It must be revealing ongoing learning, much deeper maturity, and proof that innovation belongs to the culture instead of an isolated campaign.

This is typically where complacency becomes noticeable. Not since individuals stopped working hard, however because the Magnet designation itself can create an incorrect complacency. Teams assume that due to the fact that the company has currently shown itself when, the systems behind evidence generation should still be adequate. Sometimes they are. Sometimes they have wandered. Secret champs might have left. Governance may have changed. Information ownership might be less clear than it used to be.

A sincere consulting evaluation can be particularly valuable here. Redesignation work gain from somebody who can distinguish between tradition pride and current strength. The earlier that difference is made, the easier it is to recuperate momentum.
Cost, timing, and organizational realism
ANCC releases different Magnet application and appraisal fee schedules, consisting of an online application fee and appraisal review costs due at written file submission. Precise numbers and timing can change, which is one factor companies need present program assistance rather than assumptions based upon old conversations.

Even without quoting figures, it is reasonable to state the procedure carries genuine financial and operational dedication. That makes New Knowledge, Innovations, & Improvements more than an intellectual workout. Leaders are choosing about where to spend time, whose work to focus on, & and how to align program preparation with everyday operations.

The trade-off is simple. If an organization starts too late, costs go up in covert methods. People are pulled into reactive file hunts. Information requests increase. Leaders begin reviewing narratives during the night and on weekends. Personnel aggravation rises since strong work has to be reconstructed instead of simply described.

By contrast, organizations that spread the effort gradually generally protect more accuracy and less tension. They can gather proof as tasks unfold, verify claims before they end up being institutional tradition, and make better judgments about which examples belong in the last body of documentation.

That pacing is frequently one of the least visible benefits of Magnet ® Consulting. A great consultant is not only encouraging on what to include. The consultant is assisting the company choose when to do which work, so the program stays manageable.
A practical requirement for leaders
If https://penzu.com/p/05c3730abf21c7ac https://penzu.com/p/05c3730abf21c7ac nursing leaders desire a simple way to examine whether their company is truly strong in this component, a brief set of concerns can be remarkably revealing:
Can we point to specific nurse-influenced examples of brand-new understanding, innovation, or enhancement without extending definitions? Do we have documents that describes the issue, intervention, finding out, and result clearly? Are our claimed enhancements supported by evidence that a notified customer would find credible? Can we show how the organization's structures allowed this work, instead of presenting separated heroics? If we are pursuing redesignation, do our examples show development instead of repetition?
A company that addresses these concerns confidently is usually in a far much better position than one that relies on broad statements about culture.
The deeper value of this work
What makes New Knowledge, Developments, & Improvements compelling is that it shows a living profession. Nursing quality is not fixed. It is not secured once and then maintained forever by credibility. It needs to keep learning, keep screening, & keep refining, and keep revealing that those efforts improve care.

That is why this element should have more respect than it often gets. It asks companies to prove that nursing is not only responsive but generative. Not only competent, however curious. Not only dedicated to requirements, but capable of advancing practice through disciplined change.

The companies that do this well normally share one trait. They do not wait for Magnet preparation to begin appreciating proof. They construct habits that make proof a byproduct of major practice. When that occurs, consulting ends up being less about rescue and more about improvement. The company currently knows who it is. The work is to provide that identity with precision.

At its finest, Magnet ® Consulting helps leaders secure the integrity of that procedure. It keeps the program from becoming a performance and returns it to its genuine function, acknowledgment of nursing excellence grounded in standards, outcomes, and demonstrated organizational knowing. For New Knowledge, Developments, & Improvements, that is exactly the point. The evidence should show not only that change took place, but that nursing assisted develop it, understand it, and improve care since of it.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps health care organizations strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>