Magnet ® Consulting on the Origins of Magnet Hospitals

20 August 2026

Ask a room of nurse leaders where the idea of a Magnet health center began, and you will usually hear some version of the same answer: it began with nursing excellence. That holds true, but it leaves out the part that matters most to organizations pursuing classification now. Magnet did not begin as a marketing label or a generic quality badge. It began with a serious attempt to comprehend why some medical facilities were able to bring in and keep nurses when others struggled.

That origin still forms the program. It describes why Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® remains so carefully connected to professional nursing practice, management, and measurable results. It also explains why the work of Magnet ® Consulting can not be minimized to modifying a file or preparing for a website see. Excellent consulting in this space starts with history, due to the fact that the program's history informs you what ANCC is really trying to recognize.
The starting point was not branding, it was a question
The roots of Magnet medical facilities trace back to a 1983 study of "magnet" health centers. The American Nurses Association's Magnet products still indicate that study as the origin of the principle. The core idea was uncomplicated: some companies seemed able to draw nurses in and keep them. Those hospitals had a type of pull. The term "magnet" recorded that pull in a vivid way.

That matters due to the fact that it premises the program in labor force truth. Nursing lacks, retention pressure, and the day-to-day experience of practice were not side problems. They were central. The initial idea was observational before it became programmatic. People saw that certain health centers were various, then asked why.

For leaders thinking about the Journey to Magnet Excellence ®, that history provides a useful corrective. Magnet was never ever meant to reward refined language alone. It outgrew an effort to determine what excellent nursing environments in fact look like. If a company treats the program as an interactions exercise, it usually misses the point. If it deals with the program as a disciplined method to align management, professional practice, and outcomes, it is working much closer to the program's roots.

This is where Magnet ® Consulting tends to be either important or wasteful. Prized possession consulting assists an organization link existing proof to the initial intent of the program. Wasteful consulting focuses on surface discussion while overlooking whether the nursing environment truly reflects Magnet standards.
From an early principle to a formal acknowledgment program
The phrase "Magnet hospital" existed before the program name took its current type. Over time, that early principle grew into an official acknowledgment structure administered by the American Nurses Credentialing Center, or ANCC. ANCC is the credentialing body through which the American Nurses Association provides these programs, and Magnet status is granted by ANCC.

In 2002, the program name formally altered to Magnet Acknowledgment Program ®. That modification was more than cosmetic. It signaled a fully developed acknowledgment program with requirements, appraisal procedures, and trademark protections. At that point, the field had moved beyond casual references to hospitals that seemed desirable locations for nurses to work. The designation had actually become a specific accomplishment approved through an established process.

That distinction frequently gets blurred in daily conversation. People still use "magnet medical facility" loosely, sometimes to imply a well regarded institution, sometimes to mean a healthcare facility that is pursuing designation, and in some cases to imply one that has already earned it. ANCC's framework is more accurate. An organization is Magnet designated when it has actually satisfied ANCC's Magnet requirements and been recognized for nursing quality. That precision matters operationally, lawfully, and reputationally.

It also matters in interaction method. Organizations that make designation may utilize main Magnet logos under trademark guidelines. The logo designs and the phrase Journey to Magnet Quality ® are protected. That informs you something important about the program's maturity. It is not an informal seal of approval. It is a specified recognition with requirements, evaluation, and managed use of its marks.
Why the origin story still matters to current applicants
Some historical stories are great to understand however irrelevant to present operations. This is not one of them. The origin of Magnet healthcare facilities still affects how strong applications are developed and how weak applications get exposed.

A health center can put together a large volume of product and still stop working to inform a Magnet story if it can not show the conditions that support nursing excellence. The initial "magnet" idea helps leaders ask much better questions. Are nurses empowered in significant ways, or are they just represented in a few committees on paper? Is leadership transformational in practice, or just aspirational in tactical language? Are results being kept track of due to the fact that the program needs them, or since the organization uses them to enhance care?

Those are not rhetorical questions. They shape staffing conversations, governance structures, expert development priorities, and quality evaluation practices. They likewise shape the kind of support an expert ought to offer. Strong Magnet ® Consulting does not overwrite organizational reality. It helps leaders see whether their reality fits the requirements and where the proof is thin, inconsistent, or immature.

That is one factor the most trustworthy Magnet preparation work often begins with listening instead of drafting. Before anybody speak about proof product packaging, there has to be a sober take a look at how the nursing enterprise really functions.
The design progressed, however the purpose stayed recognizable
One of the most important developments in the program's history came later, when ANCC improved how Magnet standards were arranged. The existing Magnet framework is developed around 5 components of the empirical design. That design progressed from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism after a 2007 analytical analysis of appraisal ratings. In 2008, the conceptual design organized those forces into 5 more comprehensive components.

Those five components are:
Transformational Leadership Structural Empowerment Exemplary Expert Practice New Understanding, Innovations, & & Improvements Empirical Outcomes
This evolution is worth pausing over. Programs mature by learning what is most useful, measurable, and meaningful. Moving from 14 Forces of Magnetism to the five-component empirical model did not abandon the original concepts. It reorganized them into a structure that better supports appraisal and clearer interpretation.

That helps discuss why experienced consultants in Magnet ® Consulting invest so much time on alignment. The five parts are not separated silos. An organization can not reasonably excel in Empirical Results if it is weak in management, empowerment, and professional practice. At the same time, strong culture narratives without outcomes will not carry an application really far. The design insists on relationship. Management should support structures, structures need to support practice, practice needs to produce outcomes, and results should direct further enhancement and innovation.

Seen through that lens, the history of Magnet is a history of increasing rigor. The program moved from determining attractive nursing environments to specifying, organizing, and assessing the attributes of nursing quality in a more systematic way.
Written documentation altered the work of preparation
Every Magnet age has actually had its own preparation challenges, but modern applicants deal with one that is worthy of sincere attention: the problem of evidence. Organizations submit written paperwork using Sources of Evidence, or evidence requirements, tied to the Application Manual. ANCC crosswalk materials explain those written paperwork proof requirements for applicants.

That sentence sounds administrative, but anybody associated with a Magnet journey knows it lands in genuine operations. Evidence has to be found, verified, interpreted, and woven into a coherent presentation of requirements. The process reveals whether an organization has actually been living its values regularly or just discussing them.

In useful terms, the composed paperwork stage frequently forces management groups to confront three truths at the same time. Initially, good work might be taking place without being well recorded. Second, information might exist without a clear story connecting them to expert nursing practice. Third, some gaps are not documents gaps at all. They are performance spaces, governance spaces, or culture gaps.

This is one location where Magnet ® Consulting earns its keep when done well. The job is not to produce evidence that does not exist. It is to help an organization differentiate among missing files, weak interpretation, and real structural deficiencies. Those are extremely different issues. A missing file can be discovered. A weak analysis can be enhanced. A structural deficiency requires functional work, and often more time than leaders hoped.

That difference can save companies from pricey self-deception. If a healthcare facility assumes every problem is a writing problem, it will usually discover late at the same time that some concerns required to be dealt with upstream.
A designation is not the like staying designated
Another point that gets lost when people focus just on the eminence of the label is that classification and redesignation are distinct. ANCC explains that organizations that currently made Magnet Recognition must pursue redesignation to continue being recognized.

That requirement states something essential about the viewpoint behind the program. Magnet is not set up as a life time accomplishment award. It is a continuing expectation. Nursing quality has to be sustained, not just declared as soon as. For companies, that alters the posture from project mode to operating mode.

This is frequently the dividing line in between a brief lived push and a durable Magnet culture. If leaders see Magnet as a one-time project, groups will rush, put together evidence, and after that unwind into old routines as soon as acknowledgment is protected. If leaders understand from the beginning that redesignation becomes part of the life process, they are most likely to build systems that can hold up over time.

That affects whatever from document management to conference discipline to how outcomes are examined. A healthy redesignation posture does not indicate residing in continuous stress and anxiety. It indicates incorporating Magnet standards into routine nursing operations so that proof emerges from practice instead of from last-minute reconstruction.
Digital tools and the contemporary appraisal environment
ANCC now supplies digital tools and guides to support the appraisal procedure and interim monitoring throughout designation. On one level, that is a practical modernization. On another, it reflects how the program has ended up being more structured and data-aware over time.

The old picture of Magnet preparation as stacks of binders and heroic manual collation no longer informs the entire story. Digital assistance produces opportunities for much better organization, cleaner tracking, and more disciplined monitoring. It can likewise develop an incorrect sense of security. Tools assist manage procedure, however they do not resolve issues of substance.

That is a familiar pattern in complicated acknowledgment work. When dashboards and repositories enhance, weak groups sometimes mistake enhanced visibility for enhanced readiness. Seeing a gap more clearly works, however it is not the same as closing it. Mature Magnet ® Consulting acknowledges that innovation is an enabler, not a substitute for management judgment.

There is another practical point here. Interim tracking matters because designation is not merely an endpoint. Tracking keeps attention on requirements in between major turning points. That follows the program's larger logic. Excellence needs to be observed in an ongoing method, not only narrated at submission time.
The charges tell their own story
ANCC posts different Magnet application and appraisal charge schedules, including an online application fee and appraisal evaluation fees due at written file submission. Particular amounts can alter, and companies ought to constantly utilize present ANCC products, but the presence of staged charges is worth noticing.

Programs tend to expose their seriousness through their procedure style. An online application cost followed by appraisal review charges signals that the journey has stages and commitments. It asks companies to move from interest to application to official review with increasing investment.

That creates a healthy discipline for executive teams. Before significant submission expenses are triggered, leaders should be truthful about preparedness. A specialist who merely encourages immediate filing without testing proof maturity is not serving the company well. In practice, strong preparation frequently indicates slowing down at the front end so that the composed documentation and appraisal stages are supported by stronger internal performance.

There is no glamour in that advice, however it is usually the best suggestions. Acknowledgment programs reward substance over urgency regularly than people expect.
Common misconceptions about Magnet's origins and meaning
A couple of misconceptions appear again and again in healthcare facility discussions, particularly amongst stakeholders who understand the track record of Magnet but not its history.

First, Magnet did not stem as a broad hospital quality label divorced from nursing. Its roots are particularly in comprehending companies that could bring in and retain nurses.

Second, Magnet status is not self-declared. It is granted by ANCC after an organization meets ANCC's Magnet standards.

Third, the existing design did not appear out of no place. It progressed from earlier Magnet thinking, including the 14 Forces of Magnetism, and was reorganized into the five-component empirical design after analysis and design development.

Fourth, earning designation is not completion of the story. Redesignation is part of how ongoing recognition is maintained.

Fifth, the path is evidence based in a really useful sense. Written paperwork requirements, appraisal review, and monitoring are not ritualistic layers. They are the system through which excellence is demonstrated and judged.

These points may sound elementary, yet they form executive expectations in manner ins which directly impact resourcing, timelines, and morale. When leaders misunderstand the nature of the program, they tend to either oversimplify the work or inflate it into something mystical. Neither helps.
What Magnet ® Consulting should really do
Because the keyword sits at the center of this conversation, it deserves appearing about the role of Magnet ® Consulting. The field sometimes gets caricatured in two opposite methods. One caricature states experts are glorified editors. The other states they can in some way provide Magnet through force of procedure alone. Both are wrong.

The most beneficial consulting work generally beings in a narrower, more disciplined lane. It assists organizations interpret the requirements, evaluate preparedness, organize proof, and identify where operational reality does not yet match the claims the organization intends to make. That sounds modest, but it is hard work, because it needs both respect for the company and adequate self-reliance to inform unpleasant truths.

A reliable expert should be able to assist leaders different 4 kinds of jobs:
Understanding the ANCC structure and terminology Mapping existing evidence to Sources of Evidence requirements Identifying spaces that are documentary versus operational Preparing the company for a procedure that consists of application, composed documentation, and ongoing monitoring Planning with redesignation in mind instead of dealing with designation as a one-time sprint
Even here, care matters. A specialist does not provide recognition. ANCC does. A consultant does not replace nursing management. The specialist's function is to hone the organization's capability to present and sustain what it has actually built.

That difference is especially important for boards and finance leaders. They often wish to know whether outside support will speed up the journey. The truthful response is yes, often, however just if the company is ready to hear the difference in between a writing requirement and a practice requirement. If leaders anticipate speaking with to cover for weak alignment, they tend to be disappointed.
Why the history keeps coming back throughout preparation
The longer an organization spends on the Magnet journey, the more the origin story returns. Teams start by asking procedural concerns. What is due, when, and in what format? Those are needed concerns. Later, better concerns emerge. What exactly makes our environment one that supports nursing quality? What is the proof that nurses are empowered here? How do our outcomes show the strength of our expert practice?

Those deeper questions are historic concerns as much as functional ones. They pull the company back to the initial challenge that generated Magnet in the very first location. Why do some hospitals develop conditions where nurses can thrive and patients advantage? The modern program answers that question through an official empirical model, paperwork requirements, appraisal approaches, and monitoring tools. However the core questions is still recognizable.

That is why the best Magnet work typically feels less like going after a badge and more like clarifying identity. The designation matters. The trademarked language matters. The fees, manuals, proof requirements, and appraisal tools matter. But they are all built around a central idea that precedes the present mechanics: nursing excellence shows up in the method an organization leads, empowers, practices, improves, and performs.

For companies seeking classification now, that is the most useful lesson from the origins of Magnet medical facilities. The program's history is https://elliottnoxy242.nexorafield.com/posts/magnet-r-consulting-and-the-standards-behind-magnet-classification https://elliottnoxy242.nexorafield.com/posts/magnet-r-consulting-and-the-standards-behind-magnet-classification not a sidebar. It is the clearest guide to what ANCC is attempting to recognize today, and it is the standard against which any Magnet ® Consulting effort ought to be judged.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a nursing consulting and education company serving hospitals since 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps hospitals, health systems, and care teams strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>