How Shared Governance Supports Safer Patient Care

13 September 2026

Patient security seldom depends on one dramatic decision. Regularly, it increases or falls on numerous smaller options made near the bedside, inside handoffs, throughout staffing discussions, within policy reviews, and in the minutes when a nurse chooses whether a procedure still makes good sense for the client in front of them. That is where Shared Governance, significantly framed as Professional Governance, matters most.

In nursing, Shared Governance describes a model in which nurses have a formal voice in decisions about their expert practice, typically through councils or similar structures. The newer language, Professional Governance, positions sharper emphasis on autonomy, responsibility, meaningful decision-making, and management in practice. That shift in phrasing is not cosmetic. It shows a deeper expectation that nurses are not just individuals in care shipment, however also stewards of the standards, policies, and practice environments that shape care.

Safer patient care depends upon that stewardship.

When safety conversations occur just at the executive level, important details can be missed out on. Frontline nurses are typically the very first to discover that a policy sounds clear on paper however develops confusion at 3 a.m. Throughout a complicated admission. They see where hold-ups take place, where devices placement increases danger, where documents burdens crowd out evaluation time, and where interaction in between disciplines needs tightening. A structure that captures those insights, examines them seriously, and turns them into practice choices is not a great extra. It is among the useful methods companies reduce avoidable harm.
Safety improves when decision-making moves more detailed to care
The main strength of Shared Governance is simple: it puts expert judgment where it belongs. Not every functional decision ought to be made by committee, and not every practice question can wait on a prolonged process. However when nurses have a formal role in forming standards of care, client education techniques, workflow modifications, and practice expectations, the quality of those choices usually improves.

That happens for a couple of reasons. Initially, nurses contribute direct understanding of how care is in fact provided. Second, they can test whether proposed changes are sensible throughout shifts, skill blends, and client populations. Third, involvement develops ownership. A policy that is created with personnel nurses rather than handed to them tends to be comprehended more clearly and implemented more consistently.

Consistency matters for safety. Even strong scientific guidance can fail if groups analyze it differently from one system to another. Councils and representative bodies can help line up practice by bringing issues into open conversation, clarifying standards, and recognizing where variation is proper and where it is risky. That type of disciplined discussion often prevents 2 typical security failures: silent workarounds and fragmented implementation.

I have seen the distinction between a rule that staff comply with reluctantly and a standard they think in since they assisted form it. In the very first case, individuals do the minimum needed to make it through an audit. In the second, they notice exceptions, raise issues early, and assist newer colleagues understand the function behind the procedure. The client receives more reliable care, not since the policy became longer, but since the people utilizing it acknowledged it as sound practice.
Shared Governance is not just a committee structure
Many organizations make the exact same early error. They introduce a set of councils, appoint members, schedule meetings, and assume they now have actually Shared Governance. What they might have is a calendar.

AONL explains Professional Governance as both a structure and an approach. That distinction is critical. Structure offers people a path for involvement. Viewpoint figures out whether involvement has significance. If frontline nurses advance recommendations but leadership reserves all real authority, the design becomes performative. Staff notification that rapidly. Engagement fades, and trust opts for it.

For Shared Governance to support more secure client care, nurses must have an authentic voice in matters affecting professional practice. That does not imply every idea is embraced. It does suggest suggestions are examined transparently, decision rights are clear, and accountability runs in both directions. Councils need to be anticipated to examine problems thoroughly, weigh trade-offs, and own the results of their choices. Leaders need to be expected to produce the conditions in which that work can affect practice.

This is where the language of Professional Governance helps. It advises organizations that the objective is not shared feelings about governance. The goal is professional authority worked out properly. Nurses are trusted to evaluate, focus on, educate, supporter, and react in changing clinical conditions. It follows that they ought to also help govern the standards and systems that frame that work.
The link between nurse voice and more secure care
The verified management literature connects shared and professional governance to nurse empowerment, engagement, retention, interprofessional collaboration, teamwork, and safer, higher-quality patient care. Those concepts are related, and in practice they strengthen one another.

An empowered nurse is more likely to speak out when something feels hazardous. An engaged nurse is more likely to take part in enhancing a process rather of working around it in isolation. A stable team, supported by retention, protects local understanding about what works, what stops working, and where patient threat tends to conceal. More powerful interprofessional partnership enhances coordination, which is typically the difference between an organized plan of care and a preventable miss.

Safety events are seldom triggered by someone alone. They emerge from conditions: uncertain duties, poor interaction, rushed shifts, weak escalation pathways, policies that conflict with workflow, or practice expectations that were never ever totally interacted socially. Shared Governance helps organizations examine those conditions with the people who understand them best.

This is especially crucial in nursing due to the fact that nurses sit at the center of continuity. They connect physician orders, patient reactions, household issues, discharge planning, education, and continuous monitoring. When that main function is omitted from practice choices, organizations lose among their greatest safety properties. When that role is formally incorporated into governance, patterns end up being visible sooner.

A bedside nurse may see that a documents requirement is triggering hold-ups in a time-sensitive routine. A charge nurse might see that a person handoff tool works well on day shift however breaks down throughout admissions during the night. A teacher might determine a recurring confusion point among brand-new staff. Through Shared Governance, those observations can move from private aggravation to organizational learning.
Where Professional Governance changes the everyday security climate
Safety culture is frequently talked about in broad terms, however personnel experience it in regular ways. They feel it when they ask a question and get a severe answer. They feel it when practice concerns can be raised without shame. They feel it when an unit basic modifications since individuals listened to those doing the work.

Professional Governance adds to that environment by normalizing shared decision-making. The ANA's Code of Ethics identifies cooperation and shared decision-making as important to nursing's work, and it explicitly lists shared governance amongst workforce sustainability initiatives. That matters due to the fact that sustainability and security are not different concerns. A workforce that has no voice, little impact, and low trust will struggle to sustain safe practice under pressure.

There is a useful side to this. Nurses who are involved in decisions about their practice are most likely to understand why requirements exist and where versatility ends. They can compare thoughtful adjustment and unsafe drift. That distinction is important. Healthcare settings always require judgment, but judgment becomes much more powerful when the occupation has actually talked about and specified its standards together.

Professional Governance also sharpens accountability. Often individuals assume that providing staff more voice indicates loosening oversight. In truth, efficient governance normally makes accountability more exact. If a council suggests a practice change, it should likewise think about education needs, implementation barriers, and how the modification will be monitored. That is professional accountability, not symbolic participation.
A quick example from genuine operations
Consider a common circumstance, described at a high level rather than connected to any one organization. A system struggles with uneven adherence to a patient education procedure. Management might react by sending another pointer e-mail and auditing harder. That might produce short-term compliance, but it might not fix the underlying issue.

A Shared Governance council may approach the exact same issue differently. Personnel nurses could examine when education is expected to occur, what parts are most often missed out on, whether the products fit the client population, and whether workflow makes the expectation practical. A teacher may identify where staff need clearer assistance. A supervisor might clarify nonnegotiable standards. Together, they might revise the process so it matches real care circulation while still securing the patient.

The safety benefit comes from fit. A procedure that fits practice is most likely to be performed dependably. Reliability, more than rhetoric, is what keeps clients safe.
Why partnership across disciplines gets stronger
Shared Governance is centered in nursing practice, however its effects are not limited to nursing. When nurses have actually organized, representative forums for going over policy and practice, they become stronger partners in interprofessional work. Issues are communicated more plainly. Recommendations step forward with more preparation and more legitimacy. Discussion shifts from specific grievance to expert analysis.

That alters the tone of cooperation. Physicians, pharmacists, therapists, and administrators are typically more able to engage constructively when nursing input has actually been gathered, debated, and improved through a governance procedure. The nursing perspective is not minimized to separated anecdotes. It exists as a thought about position grounded in practice.

Safer care depends upon this type of team effort. Clients move across settings, disciplines, and shifts rapidly. Misalignment between expert groups produces openings for error. Shared Governance helps close a few of those openings by strengthening how nursing adds to organizational decisions.

The ANA's governance products highlight collective management and representative bodies discussing practice and policy issues in open https://zanearra579.brightsora.com/posts/how-professional-governance-supports-meaningful-nurse-involvement https://zanearra579.brightsora.com/posts/how-professional-governance-supports-meaningful-nurse-involvement online forum. Open online forum sounds basic, but in a medical environment it is effective. It means issues can be emerged before they solidify into animosity or unsafe workarounds. It means dispute can be taken a look at rather than buried. It indicates policy can be informed by the people expected to bring it out.
What good governance appears like when security is the priority
Not every governance structure is equally efficient. Some become slowed down in minor concerns. Some overreach into choices that belong in other places. Some attract strong individuals but fail to spread interaction back to the units. The most helpful models typically share a few practical characteristics:
Clear choice rights, so personnel understand which concerns councils can influence straight and which require leadership action. Representative participation, so input shows practice truths rather than the views of a little, familiar group. Visible feedback loops, so nurses can see what happened to suggestions and why. Connection to patient care outcomes, so governance does not wander into abstract discussion. Shared accountability, so autonomy is matched with duty for application and follow-through.
These are not decorative functions. They protect reliability. If nurses take the time to engage in Shared Governance however can not tell whether anything modifications, the structure compromises. If recommendations are accepted without thoughtful review, quality can suffer in a various way. Safety benefits when governance is active, disciplined, and transparent.
The compromises leaders require to respect
Shared Governance is not the fastest way to make every decision. That is one of its trade-offs, and mature organizations admit it openly.

Bringing more voices into practice decisions can slow the front end of change. Meetings require time. Consensus is manual. Staff need release time to participate well. Questions might end up being more complicated once frontline realities are on the table. For leaders under pressure to execute rapidly, this can feel frustrating.

Yet speed is not the only value in safety work. A decision made quickly but inadequately adopted might cost more time later on through rework, confusion, or repeated correction. A choice formed with meaningful nursing input may take longer to create and less time to stabilize. The net impact can be much safer and more durable.

There are also edge cases. Throughout urgent scenarios, leaders might require to act before a complete governance cycle can take place. That does not invalidate Professional Governance. It suggests organizations need judgment about what can be governed prospectively, what should be managed instantly, and how retrospective review will occur when the instant need passes. Shared decision-making is vital, but it ought to never ever be mistaken for paralysis.

Another trade-off involves representation. Council members acquire deep knowledge, but they can slowly end up being less connected to everyday staff issues if interaction is weak. That is why good governance needs disciplined reporting back to systems, not just upward reporting to executives. Security suffers when councils end up being isolated from individuals they represent.
Retention and sustainability are safety issues too
It is appealing to deal with retention as an HR issue and patient security as a medical issue. In practice, they overlap constantly.

Leadership sources link shared and professional governance to retention and the sustainability of the nursing occupation. That connection matters since stable groups carry memory. They know where prior procedure modifications prospered or stopped working. They keep in mind why a basic exists. They acknowledge subtle signs that a system is beginning to drift. Regular turnover can deteriorate that institutional memory and increase the concern on those who remain.

Shared Governance supports retention in part because it verifies expert dignity. Nurses are more likely to stay in environments where their expertise influences practice, where they can participate in resolving issues, and where management treats them as partners in care quality instead of recipients of directives. That is not simply a spirits advantage. It is a safety investment.

A workforce that feels unheard typically becomes quiet in the incorrect minutes. A workforce that is used to meaningful dialogue is most likely to raise concerns before they end up being events.
Building trust takes more than launching councils
If an organization is attempting to reinforce Shared Governance, trust should be the very first metric leaders think of, even if it is not the simplest to determine. Nurses can usually tell within a few months whether a new structure is serious.

Trust grows when leaders request for nursing input early, not after decisions are already functionally total. It grows when council recommendations receive direct reactions. It grows when staff can trace a line from conversation to action. It likewise grows when leaders are honest about restraints. Nurses do not anticipate every suggestion to be approved. They do anticipate candor.

One of the most damaging patterns is selective listening, accepting personnel voice when it supports a preferred strategy and sidelining it when it makes complex the strategy. That sort of inconsistency undermines the very conditions Shared Governance is meant to create. Much safer patient care depends upon speaking out, and individuals speak up more when they believe the forum is real.

A useful beginning point frequently looks less significant than companies anticipate. It might involve clarifying the function of each council, revisiting subscription to improve representation, specifying which practice problems belong where, and making outcomes visible to the systems. Safety gains often begin with this type of operational house cleaning due to the fact that it turns governance from a concept into a reputable working process.
Signs the model is assisting patients, not simply meetings
Organizations do not need grand language to know whether Professional Governance is becoming helpful. They can look for practical signs in daily work. Personnel start bringing forward better-defined concerns. Policies are talked about in regards to patient care effect rather than individual preference. Interprofessional discussions become less reactive. Unit interaction enhances due to the fact that agents report back consistently. Practice changes arrive with more context and meet less quiet resistance.

A healthy governance design frequently alters the quality of discussion before it changes any formal metric. Nurses start to say, in impact, "Let's take this through the best forum and work it through appropriately." That sentence shows something important: a shift from private aggravation to expert ownership.

When that ownership takes hold, client care becomes more secure because less concerns stay casual, surprise, or unresolved. Problems move into view. Standards end up being clearer. Groups work together with more structure. Nurses work out both voice and obligation. That is the heart of Shared Governance and Professional Governance alike.
The larger expert meaning
There is a factor the language has evolved from Shared Governance toward Professional Governance. Shared Governance stresses involvement. Professional Governance stresses involvement with authority, accountability, and identity. It acknowledges nursing as a profession that need to assist govern its own practice.

That concept aligns naturally with client safety. Safer care is not produced by compliance alone. It is produced by specialists who can believe, question, work together, and form the systems in which they work. The nurse at the bedside is not merely performing care inside a repaired machine. The nurse is likewise one of the people who can improve the machine.

When companies honor that truth with genuine structures, real discussion, and genuine decision-making power, security work ends up being smarter. It becomes closer to the client. And it becomes more sustainable because the people most accountable for continuous care are no longer outside the space when care requirements are being set.

Shared Governance supports safer patient care because it treats nursing competence as operationally required, not ceremonially appreciated. That is the distinction between hearing nurses and being governed, in part, by nursing understanding. For patients, that distinction can be profound.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a health care consulting and education firm established in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside nursing and clinical teams strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>