How Shared Governance Supports Better Teamwork in Nursing

10 September 2026

Teamwork in nursing is typically discussed as if it starts and ends at the bedside. That view is too narrow. Strong teamwork does appear in handoffs, rounding, staffing discussions, and the countless small changes nurses make together throughout a shift. But the conditions that make team effort possible are normally constructed earlier, in the method an organization makes decisions about practice, requirements, workflows, and accountability.

That is where Shared Governance, progressively described as Professional Governance, matters. In nursing, this model offers nurses a formal voice in choices about their expert practice, often through councils or comparable structures. More than a meeting format, it is a way of organizing authority, responsibility, and expertise so that nurses are not only anticipated to carry out choices, however likewise to form them.

When that occurs well, teamwork enhances for a simple factor. Individuals work together better when they have clearness, ownership, and a legitimate channel for influence. Nurses do not need to rely solely on workarounds, corridor persuasion, or manager-by-manager variation. They have a shared forum for talking about practice concerns, weighing trade-offs, and choosing how care must be delivered.
Why team effort in nursing depends on decision-making, not simply goodwill
Most nursing teams currently comprehend the importance of shared regard. They know communication matters. They know trust matters. Yet lots of team effort issues persist even in systems where people really like and respect one another. The friction typically originates from something much deeper than interpersonal style.

A team has a hard time when frontline nurses are expected to execute changes they had no part in developing. It struggles when policies feel disconnected from the realities of client care. It struggles when one shift analyzes a practice basic one method and another shift analyzes it in a different way since no shared process exists for resolving the problem. Under those conditions, teamwork becomes reactive. Nurses invest energy clarifying, compensating, and working out around the system rather of working within one they trust.

Shared Governance addresses that gap by making nursing input part of the structure of decision-making. AONL has actually described Professional Governance as both a structure and a philosophy. That distinction matters. The structure develops designated places for discussion and choices. The viewpoint recognizes that nursing know-how is not peripheral to operations, quality, or patient care. It is central.

Once a team sees that its know-how brings weight, the tone of collaboration changes. Nurses are most likely to bring issues forward early. Leaders are more likely to hear unit-level insight before a problem becomes prevalent. Coworkers are more likely to view difference as part of expert judgment rather than as resistance or negativity.
The shift from shared governance to professional governance
The term Shared Governance is still extensively utilized, and numerous nurses acknowledge it right away. More recently, nursing management has actually highlighted Professional Governance. That shift in language is not cosmetic. It places more weight on nurses' autonomy, accountability, significant decision-making, and management in practice.

This is very important for team effort because healthy teams do not operate on unclear permission. They run on specified expert functions. When governance is framed professionally, the message is not simply that leadership wants to listen. The message is that nurses have a legitimate, continuous obligation to participate in forming practice.

That produces a stronger structure for cooperation. Teams end up being less depending on individual characters and more grounded in professional expectations. The bedside nurse, charge nurse, educator, manager, and executive leader each have a function, however nursing judgment is not confined to one level of the hierarchy. It is dispersed, noticeable, and expected.

In practical terms, this assists groups move away from a typical failure pattern. In many companies, decisions are stated to be collective, however the partnership is informal and inconsistent. A singing few might influence outcomes while quieter, similarly skilled nurses remain unheard. A council-based or representative structure does not solve every problem, but it offers the team a more trusted procedure. It can turn "someone ought to bring this up" into "this is the online forum where we examine and choose."
What better team effort actually looks like under shared governance
When Shared Governance is working well, team effort in nursing ends up being more disciplined and less accidental. The enhancement is often noticeable in several ways at once.

First, communication ends up being more purposeful. Nurses have formal opportunities to talk about practice and policy issues rather than relying just on shift-to-shift discussions. That matters because many care issues are not one-person concerns. They are repeating system problems. A formal governance structure assists teams separate immediate functional repairs from wider professional practice decisions.

Second, cooperation becomes less hierarchical in the unhelpful sense. Nursing has clear leadership functions, and those roles are needed. However effective groups need more than top-down instruction. They require reciprocal exchange. Professional Governance supports that by acknowledging that the people delivering care hold knowledge that ought to notify standards, workflows, and policy decisions.

Third, accountability sharpens. This is sometimes missed out on in casual conversations of Shared Governance. A more powerful voice for nurses does not suggest looser expectations. It generally means the opposite. When groups participate in forming practice decisions, they likewise have a clearer basis for owning those choices. Standards feel less imposed and more collectively upheld.

Fourth, trust deepens over time. Trust is not constructed only through generosity or team-building exercises. It is constructed when individuals see that input results in meaningful consideration, that issues are dealt with in open forum, which professional differences can be overcome without penalty or dismissal.

These modifications are not abstract. They affect the normal work of nursing, consisting of how teams manage competing top priorities, adapt to altering client needs, and respond when a process is not serving patients or staff well.
Councils, representation, and the value of a genuine forum
Shared Governance normally operates through councils or similar representative bodies. That style can seem procedural on the surface area, however it fixes a useful team effort issue. On busy systems, crucial concerns can stay scattered. One nurse notifications a documents concern. Another sees a recurring concern with workflow. A 3rd acknowledges that a client care standard is translated inconsistently. Without a formal online forum, these observations may never connect.

A representative structure gives those concerns a path. It allows nursing groups to bring practice issues into a setting where they can be talked about honestly, compared across roles or systems, and considered as part of professional decision-making. ANA governance materials reflect this collaborative intent, revealing representative bodies discussing practice and policy problems in open online forum. That openness is not incidental. It is among the factors governance supports team effort rather than merely including another committee to the calendar.

The quality of that online forum matters. A council that only passes details downward will not improve teamwork very much. A council that invites genuine consideration can. Nurses need space to ask difficult concerns, determine trade-offs, and test whether a proposed modification will work in practice. Teams end up being stronger when those discussions happen before application rather of after frustration sets in.

I have actually seen versions of this vibrant play out in numerous scientific settings, even when the names of the structures vary. When staff nurses know where to take a concern, and when they believe the discussion will be severe rather than symbolic, they come prepared. They bring examples. They compare what is happening across shifts. They determine where requirements are uncertain. That level of engagement is teamwork in a really real sense. It is the team thinking together about practice.
How nurse empowerment changes daily collaboration
Leadership sources regularly connect Shared Governance and Professional Governance to nurse empowerment and engagement. Those terms can sound broad, but their impact on teamwork is concrete.

An empowered nurse is most likely to speak up early. That can mean raising a security issue, questioning a procedure that produces unnecessary delays, or determining a policy that does not fit current practice realities. Groups benefit when those observations surface quickly and are managed through acknowledged channels.

A disengaged nurse typically does the opposite. Not out of indifference, however out of experience. If previous issues were overlooked, or if choices always show up fully formed from somewhere else, personnel learn to conserve energy. They stop purchasing unit-level improvement. The group still operates, however the cooperation ends up being thinner. Individuals focus on getting through the shift rather than developing better practice.

Professional Governance pushes against that erosion. By emphasizing autonomy and meaningful decision-making, it tells nurses that their function consists of forming the environment of care, not simply enduring it. Engagement then ends up being more than spirits. It ends up being a working ingredient of group performance.

This likewise affects more recent nurses. In companies with healthy governance structures, professional voice is designed early. A more recent nurse can see that practice concerns belong in expert conversation, not private disappointment. That lesson is powerful. It teaches teamwork as a participatory discipline, not simply a behavioral expectation.
Better team effort does not indicate faster agreement
One of the more mature signs of Shared Governance is that groups stop corresponding teamwork with immediate consensus. Real nursing teams manage contending demands. Efficiency matters. Client safety matters. Workflow matters. Personnel capacity matters. Sometimes these pull in different directions.

A weak governance design can hide dispute until rollout. A stronger one makes argument discussable. That can feel slower in the minute, but it typically results in tougher choices. Teams that are permitted to appear issues early are less most likely to sabotage a change passively, less likely to develop casual exceptions, and less most likely to divide into "leadership" and "personnel" camps.

This is where Professional Governance earns its name. It treats nurses as experts capable of judgment, debate, and responsibility. It does not ask them to agree on everything. It asks to engage seriously with practice choices and work toward requirements the occupation can own.

There is also a human advantage here. When nurses see that associates can disagree respectfully in official settings, social trust often improves. An argument over practice no longer has to become a personal dispute. It can remain what it should be, a professional conversation about how best to deliver care.
The connection to retention and labor force sustainability
AONL and other nursing management sources connect shared or professional governance with retention and the sustainability of the occupation. That relationship makes sense from a team effort perspective.

Teams become unsteady when experienced nurses leave and take local understanding with them. Every departure alters the unit's informal coordination, mentorship capability, and self-confidence. New personnel can definitely enhance a team, but constant turnover makes it more difficult to construct trust and shared norms.

Shared Governance supports retention in part since people are most likely to stay where they can influence practice. Voice alone is insufficient, naturally. Staffing, settlement, management quality, and workload still matter. Governance ought to never be utilized as an alternative for those fundamentals. However significant participation in decisions can make the work environment feel more expert, more considerate, and more sustainable.

ANA's 2025 Code of Ethics determines partnership and shared decision-making as important to nursing's work and explicitly consists of shared governance amongst workforce sustainability initiatives. That is a noteworthy point. It puts governance not at the margins of administration, but within the ethical and expert framework of sustaining the nursing workforce.

From a team effort standpoint, retention matters because excellent teams are cumulative. They become competent not only through private proficiency, however through repeated shared practice. Nurses discover one another's habits, strengths, and communication patterns. They develop effective methods to collaborate under pressure. Governance supports that accumulation by developing an environment where expert voice has a home.
Where organizations get it wrong
Not every effort identified Shared Governance enhances teamwork. Some structures exist mainly on paper. Others begin with strong intent but lose trustworthiness when choices appear predetermined.

The common failure points are typically easy to acknowledge:
Nurses are invited to discuss issues, however not to affect outcomes. Councils concentrate on small subjects while larger practice choices remain inaccessible. Representation exists, however interaction back to units is weak or inconsistent. Leaders utilize governance language, however accountability for acting on recommendations is unclear. Participation becomes an additional problem rather than a supported expert role.
When those patterns take hold, groups often end up being more cynical, not less. The company says nursing voice matters, but the daily experience suggests otherwise. That gap can harm teamwork due to the fact that it deteriorates rely on both the procedure and the people connected with it.

There is also a subtler risk. Some companies assume that since a council exists, team effort issues will solve themselves. They will not. Governance develops conditions for much better partnership, however teams still require experienced assistance, transparent communication, and leaders who can tolerate truthful expert dialogue.
What nurse leaders can see for
Leaders who want Shared Governance to support team effort must focus not only to attendance or conference frequency, however to the texture of participation. Are nurses advancing substantive practice concerns? Are conversations staying connected to bedside realities? Do personnel believe the procedure leads to significant decisions? Are councils assisting https://felixjjvv533.nexorafield.com/posts/shared-governance-in-nursing-advancing-teamwork-and-engagement https://felixjjvv533.nexorafield.com/posts/shared-governance-in-nursing-advancing-teamwork-and-engagement standardize practice where suitable while still respecting scientific judgment?

Several indications normally indicate the design is assisting instead of simply existing:
nurses can describe how a practice issue moves from concern to conversation to decision unit staff hear back about council operate in plain language disagreements are surfaced freely rather of circulating as rumor practice decisions show nursing input in identifiable ways participation is viewed as part of professional nursing, not extracurricular activity
These are not flashy steps, however they are revealing. They show whether Professional Governance is woven into the working life of the team.
A useful example of how governance enhances teamwork
Consider a typical type of problem, described here in general terms rather than as a single case. A nursing system notifications growing disappointment around a care procedure that touches numerous shifts. The process is technically functional, but in practice it creates duplicated clarifications, irregular workarounds, and stress during handoff. Nurses are making up for the same issue over and over.

Without Shared Governance, the team may adapt informally. One charge nurse develops a preferred workaround. Another prevents it. Day shift and graveyard shift develop various practices. Supervisors hear pieces of the concern, but no clear cross-unit or cross-role conversation occurs. Teamwork suffers due to the fact that nurses are investing relational energy on a system problem.

With a functioning governance structure, the issue has a route. Agents collect examples, bring the concern into a council or open online forum, compare how the process is affecting care, and go over options through the lens of professional practice. The resulting decision may not satisfy every choice, but it is most likely to be visible, reasoned, and jointly owned. The team now has a typical requirement and a shared explanation for it.

That is the surprise strength of governance. It transforms recurring aggravation into organized expert analytical.
Why this matters for client care as well as culture
It would be a mistake to treat team effort as only a workplace culture problem. Nursing management sources link shared and professional governance with much safer, higher-quality client care. That connection is reputable since team efficiency affects how dependably care is delivered.

When nurses team up well, they capture inconsistencies earlier, collaborate more smoothly, and promote practice requirements with less friction. When they assist form those standards, adoption tends to be stronger because the standards make clinical sense to individuals using them. The result is not excellence. Nursing work is too dynamic for that. But the team acquires coherence.

That coherence matters particularly in complex settings where care depends on tight coordination. A workforce that is officially included in decision-making is much better placed to recognize what supports care and what undermines it. Shared Governance does not replace scientific ability, staffing, or leadership. It supports all three by providing nursing know-how a location to run collectively.
The much deeper reason teamwork improves
At its core, Shared Governance supports better team effort in nursing due to the fact that it aligns voice, duty, and practice. Nurses are asked every day to work out judgment, team up throughout roles, and promote standards that impact patient outcomes. It is tough to do that well in an environment where choices about practice remain remote from the occupation itself.

Professional Governance closes that range. It provides nurses an official role in shaping the work they are liable for. It frames leadership as collaborative rather than purely regulation. It enhances engagement, trust, and retention not through slogans, however through participation that has professional weight.

When a nursing team has that foundation, teamwork becomes more than a set of interpersonal abilities. It becomes a method of governing practice together. That is a more powerful, more resilient form of cooperation, and it is one the profession has every reason to protect.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm established in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside nursing and clinical teams transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>