Why Shared Decision-Making Is Important in Nursing Governance

05 September 2026

Walk into any hospital system where nurses feel heard, and the difference is visible before anyone states a word. The environment is steadier. Problems get emerged early. Practice concerns are talked about with less defensiveness and more ownership. Staff nurses do not seem like individuals waiting to be informed what to do. They seem like professionals shaping the conditions of care.

That is the heart of shared decision-making in nursing governance.

In nursing, shared governance has long referred to a model in which nurses have a formal voice in decisions about expert practice, often through councils or comparable structures. More recently, https://jsbin.com/jokoxatise https://jsbin.com/jokoxatise numerous leaders and organizations have moved toward the term professional governance. That shift matters. It positions less focus on the idea of management "sharing" authority downward and more focus on nursing's own autonomy, responsibility, meaningful decision-making, and management in practice. Whether a company uses the expression Shared Governance, Shared Governance (Professional Governance), or Professional Governance, the main question is the very same: do nurses have a real, structured function in choices that form nursing practice?

If the response is no, governance turns performative really quickly. Nurses are requested feedback after choices are efficiently made. Councils end up being symbolic. Meetings produce minutes however not motion. Frontline know-how, often the clearest view of what will assist or hurt patient care, gets removed before it can influence policy. That is not just frustrating. It is risky.

Shared decision-making is necessary since nursing practice is too intricate, too immediate, and too substantial to be directed exclusively from a distance. The people closest to patient care need an official location in the decisions that govern it.
Governance is not a side project
One of the most persistent misconceptions in healthcare is the belief that governance sits apart from scientific work. It does not. Governance chooses how medical work is specified, supported, examined, and enhanced. It shapes practice requirements, workflows, interaction channels, role expectations, and the response when something is not working. For nurses, those choices land directly at the bedside.

That is why governance in nursing can not be decreased to a reporting chart or a committee calendar. Professional Governance is both a structure and a viewpoint. The structure matters because people require clear paths to raise concerns, review practice concerns, and influence decisions. The approach matters due to the fact that no structure can make up for a culture that treats frontline input as optional.

In the strongest designs, shared decision-making is not confused with agreement on every point. An unit does not require every nurse to agree on every problem for governance to work well. What matters is that nurses can contribute know-how, take a look at trade-offs openly, comprehend how decisions are made, and see that their expert judgment brings weight. That is a very different experience from being notified after the fact.

The difference sounds subtle on paper. In practice, it alters everything.
Why bedside know-how must shape policy
Nursing work has a useful intelligence that is simple to underestimate if you are far from the point of care. Policies might look meaningful in a conference room and break down on a graveyard shift. A procedure can appear efficient in a slide deck and develop hold-ups once it satisfies the truths of admissions, staffing stress, household interaction, and client acuity. Nurses are typically the very first to spot these gaps since they live inside them.

Shared Governance produces an official system for that insight to matter. Instead of depending on informal problems, corridor discussions, or specific acts of work-around, companies can bring frontline knowledge into structured decision-making. That enhances the quality of the choice itself. It likewise improves the odds of effective implementation since the people carrying out the practice have actually assisted shape it.

This is where the move toward Professional Governance ends up being especially beneficial. The more recent language makes a clearer claim: nurses are not merely individuals in somebody else's management procedure. They are stewards of professional practice. That means they are not only entitled to speak, they are accountable for bringing judgment, evidence, responsibility, and ethical concern to the table.

When that occurs, councils and forums stop being performative and start operating as expert areas. The conversation changes from "What are we being asked to do?" to "What standard of care do our company believe is right, practical, and sustainable?"
The client care connection is direct
It is appealing to go over governance in abstract terms, however the stakes are concrete. Management sources in nursing have linked shared and professional governance to much safer, higher-quality client care, together with stronger teamwork, collaboration, nurse empowerment, and retention. Those results are interconnected.

Safer care depends upon speaking up, discovering weak signals, and remedying course before issues spread out. Higher-quality care depends on standard-setting, reflection, and consistency. None of that flourishes in a culture where nurses are expected to comply without influence. Nurses need enough authority and mental footing to state, "This workflow is causing delays," or "This policy looks good on paper however is developing confusion at the bedside," or "We require a various technique if we desire this to work for clients and staff."

Shared decision-making supports that footing.

It also reinforces the moral fabric of nursing work. The nursing code of principles now clearly keeps in mind that collaboration and shared decision-making are necessary to nursing's work, and it identifies shared governance amongst workforce sustainability initiatives. That reflects something many nurses have understood for many years. Practice decisions are not just functional choices. They are ethical choices. They impact the nurse's capability to act properly, supporter effectively, and keep expert stability under pressure.

A nurse who has no meaningful voice in practice choices is still responsible for outcomes. That mismatch, duty without influence, is one of the fastest methods to develop disappointment and erosion of trust.
Engagement is not developed with slogans
Healthcare companies typically talk about engagement as though it can be improved with recognition campaigns, pulse studies, or better internal messaging. Those things may belong, however they do not substitute for authority. Nurses become engaged when they experience themselves as experts whose judgment matters in real decisions.

That is why shared decision-making is one of the strongest practical expressions of respect. Not symbolic regard, but functional regard. It says that nursing know-how belongs in the design of nursing practice. It acknowledges that individuals doing the work understand its needs in ways that can not constantly be recorded by high-level planning.

This matters immensely for retention. Management sources connect shared and professional governance with nurse empowerment and retention, and the relationship is not hard to understand. Individuals remain where they can affect their environment, grow as specialists, and trust that management will not make practice choices in seclusion. They leave, or disengage while staying, when every crucial problem feels predetermined.

The retention question is often mishandled since companies focus only on payment or work volume. Those are genuine issues, but they are not the entire story. Expert life likewise depends upon company. A nurse might endure requiring work more readily in a setting where concerns can move through a genuine governance pathway, where councils function, and where decisions feature description and accountability.
Collaboration gets better when nursing arrives with structure
Interprofessional partnership is frequently discussed as a matter of tone, however tone is just part of it. Partnership improves when each occupation is arranged enough to bring coherent input into shared discussions. Shared Governance helps nursing do that.

Without an official governance structure, nursing concerns can become fragmented. One system raises a concern one method, another unit raises it in a different way, and individual managers soak up issues unevenly. The outcome is inconsistency and hold-up. With professional governance, nursing can ponder internally, elevate concerns through representative bodies, and take part in broader organizational choices from a position of clarity.

That is one reason ANA governance materials stress collaborative leadership with representative bodies discussing practice and policy concerns in open forum. Open forum does not indicate unlimited debate. It means policy and practice questions can be appeared, tested, and refined in a setting where representation exists and where discussion is expected instead of tolerated.

This also improves team effort within nursing itself. A working council structure can connect bedside nurses, educators, managers, and executive leaders around the same practice problems. That does not get rid of disagreement, nor ought to it. Nursing governance need to be robust enough to hold disagreement without collapsing into rank-based decision-making. The point is not to prevent dispute. The point is to transport it productively.
What fails when decision-making is only nominally shared
Many organizations say they have Shared Governance since they have councils on the calendar. That is insufficient. A council without authority is primarily decoration.

The typical failure pattern recognizes. Staff are welcomed to take part, but conference agendas are crowded with updates instead of decisions. Recommendations move upward and vanish. Council members are anticipated to do governance deal with top of complete assignments with little secured time. Management asks for input however reserves meaningful choices for a smaller administrative circle. With time, nurses notice the space in between language and reality. Participation drops. Cynicism rises.

Once that takes place, restoring trustworthiness is harder than building it properly in the very first place.

There are a couple of warning signs that shared decision-making is weak, even when the structure exists:
nurses are consulted late, after significant decisions are already framed councils can discuss concerns however can not affect outcomes feedback loops are irregular, so staff never discover what took place to recommendations participation depends upon individual interest instead of secured organizational support accountability is emphasized more than autonomy
Those patterns drain pipes the life out of Professional Governance since they preserve the look of inclusion while withholding the substance.

The deeper issue is not simply ineffectiveness. It is professional dissonance. Nurses are informed they are responsible experts, however the system limits their power to shape the practice environment. No occupation thrives under that plan for long.
Shared does not suggest easy
It is necessary to be sincere about the trade-offs. Shared decision-making requires time. It can slow particular choices in the short-term. Open forums surface argument that some leaders would choose to keep quiet. Representative structures can become uneven if some locations are much better staffed or more experienced in council work than others. Not every nurse wants to serve on a council, and not every exceptional clinician is naturally prepared for governance work.

These are not arguments against shared decision-making. They are factors to treat it seriously.

A rushed top-down choice might appear effective, however if it triggers resistance, confusion, or impracticable execution, the time cost savings vanish. A governance procedure that consists of nurses early might need more conversation upfront, yet often prevents the rework that follows poor adoption. In practice, a lot of the "much faster" techniques are only faster until truth catches them.

There is likewise a leadership challenge here. Shared decision-making requires leaders who can endure not being the sole authors of the answer. That can be uneasy, particularly in high-pressure environments where speed and certainty are treasured. However nursing governance is not strengthened by control masquerading as partnership. It is strengthened by disciplined involvement, clear authority, and noticeable follow-through.
The distinction between input and influence
One of the most useful questions any nurse leader can ask is basic: where does nursing input in fact change decisions?

If the answer is uncertain, governance requires attention.

Input by itself is affordable. Organizations can gather comments endlessly. Influence is more requiring since it requires leaders to specify what decisions sit at what level, who has authority, what need to be consulted, and how recommendations are managed. It needs transparency when a suggestion can not be adopted, together with an explanation grounded in organizational realities instead of vague reassurance.

That openness is crucial. Shared decision-making does not suggest every nursing recommendation will prevail. There are budget limitations, regulative constraints, competing operational needs, and times when one priority has to pave the way to another. Mature Professional Governance does not hide that. It assists nurses understand the choice context while protecting the authenticity of their role.

In reality, nurses typically accept tough choices more readily when the procedure is reliable. What types wonder about is not hearing "no." It is being requested for input in a procedure where the answer was constantly no.
Accountability ends up being more powerful, not weaker
Some leaders stress that wider participation will blur accountability. In well-designed nursing governance, the opposite is true. Shared decision-making ties authority to ownership. Nurses are not passive receivers of policy. They are active participants in shaping requirements of practice and, for that reason, more bought upholding them.

This is another area where the term Professional Governance includes clearness. Professional autonomy is not independence from duty. It is duty exercised through professional judgment. Nurses who help specify practice expectations are also better positioned to promote them, inform peers, and identify when changes are needed.

That sort of accountability is more difficult to build through command alone. Compliance can be required. Commitment can not. The greatest practice environments depend on both requirements and ownership. Shared decision-making is one of the couple of systems that strengthens both at once.
Making governance visible at the system level
For numerous staff nurses, governance feels far-off unless its work is equated into unit life. A council suggestion that never ever reaches the floor in easy to understand type does little to build trust. The exact same holds true when staff see modifications but do not know where they came from or how nurses affected them.

That is why communication matters so much. Not polished branding, however useful communication. What issue was raised? Who discussed it? What alternatives were considered? What was decided? What takes place next? When nurses can trace that line, governance ends up being real.

The system level is also where professional identity takes shape. A nurse may never serve on a hospital-wide council and still feel the impacts of strong Shared Governance if local leaders create channels for questions, feedback, and representation, and if those channels link to decision-making above the system. The structure does not need to feel grand to be significant. It has to function.

A beneficial test is whether a bedside nurse can respond to, in plain language, how a practice issue relocations from the floor into governance and back again. If that pathway is murky, participation will narrow to a small group of insiders.
What strong shared decision-making usually includes
While every company constructs governance differently, efficient designs tend to share a few qualities. They produce official voice, not just casual access. They clarify functions and authority. They support representative participation. They deal with nursing proficiency as a resource for the organization, not a hurdle to management efficiency. Many of all, they link decisions to accountability and patient care instead of to optics.

In useful terms, that frequently means attention to a handful of operational realities:
clear forums where practice and policy issues can be gone over openly representative participation rather than relying just on designated voices from leadership visible feedback loops so suggestions do not disappear support for nurse participation, including time and leadership follow-through an explicit expectation that nursing judgment informs expert practice decisions
None of that is glamorous. Governance hardly ever is. However these are the mechanics that separate a living design from an aspirational one.
Why the language shift matters now
Some people deal with the relocation from shared governance to professional governance as a branding workout. It is moreover. Words form expectations.

Shared Governance was, and stays, an important idea because it recognizes the need for official nursing voice. Yet the expression can inadvertently imply that authority stems in other places and is being partly dispersed. Professional Governance makes a more powerful claim about nursing itself. It stresses that nurses, as experts, exercise autonomy and accountability in choices about practice. It centers nursing management in practice rather than placing nurses generally as consultees.

That shift can help organizations analyze whether their structures match their specified values. If they declare Professional Governance, nurses must be able to see evidence of significant decision-making and leadership in practice. The title ought to show reality.

The term likewise lines up with a more comprehensive understanding of sustainability. A profession remains strong when its members can affect requirements, take part in policy discussions, collaborate freely, and develop as leaders throughout functions. Governance is among the places where that sustainability becomes tangible.
The genuine test
The real procedure of nursing governance is not whether councils exist, or whether laws look impressive, or whether conference attendance is decent for a quarter. The real test is whether shared decision-making changes the experience of practice.

Do nurses have an official voice in decisions that form care? Are they relied on as experts in their own work? Can they see how expert judgment relocations through the company? Does the structure support cooperation, responsibility, and open conversation of practice problems? Do decisions reflect bedside reality in addition to administrative need?

When the response is yes, nursing governance ends up being more than an organizational design. It ends up being a professional protect. It secures the integrity of nursing practice, enhances the labor force, and produces much better conditions for client care.

That is why shared decision-making is not optional in nursing governance. It is the system that gives governance legitimacy. Without it, Shared Governance is just a label. With it, Professional Governance becomes what it is implied to be: a method for nurses to lead the practice they are accountable to deliver.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization serving hospitals since 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside health care organizations transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>