Magnet ® Consulting: What the Magnet Recognition Program ® Recognizes

16 August 2026

Hospitals and health systems typically discuss Magnet Acknowledgment as if it were a broad seal of approval for being an excellent location to work. That shorthand is understandable, however it misses out on the point. The Magnet Recognition Program ® is not a basic credibility contest, and it is not just an award for strong nurse recruitment. It is an ANCC program that recognizes health care companies for nursing excellence and quality client results. Those words matter, because they tell leaders where to focus and where not to drift.

That difference becomes specifically crucial when companies look for Magnet ® Consulting support. The most helpful consulting discussions are hardly ever about appearances. They are about whether the company can reveal, in a disciplined and defensible way, that its nursing structures, leadership, expert practice, innovation, and outcomes align with Magnet requirements. In practical terms, this means a lot of work occurs long in the past anybody sends paperwork. A polished story can not save weak evidence, and interest alone does not alternative to empirical results.

The Magnet program has history behind it. ANA's Magnet products trace its roots to a 1983 research study of "magnet" healthcare facilities, and the program name officially changed to Magnet Recognition Program ® in 2002. That history assists discuss why the classification still carries weight. It did not appear over night as a branding exercise. It emerged from an effort to identify what identified organizations that were able to attract and retain nursing talent and assistance exceptional practice. In time, the model ended up being more official, more evidence-based, and more clearly connected to quantifiable outcomes.
What the designation is, and what it is not
At its core, Magnet designation suggests an organization has actually satisfied ANCC's Magnet requirements and is recognized for nursing excellence. ANCC, the American Nurses Credentialing Center, is the credentialing body through which ANA offers these programs, and Magnet status is granted by ANCC.

That sounds straightforward, however numerous management groups still overcomplicate it. They presume Magnet is primarily about having the best committees, the best language in policies, or an engaging strategic plan. Those things may support the work, but they are not the heart of acknowledgment. ANCC describes the program as both acknowledgment and a roadmap to nursing excellence. The phrase "roadmap" is worth sitting with. A roadmap suggests direction, structure, milestones, and evidence that the path is genuine, not imagined.

The companies that have a hard time the majority of are frequently those that interpret Magnet as a document production task. They gather binders, pull anecdotes, and hope the story sounds strong enough. The stronger organizations start from a various location. They ask whether the nursing environment really reflects the standards, whether leaders can show how practice is supported, and whether outcomes show that the structures are doing what they are supposed to do.

That is where thoughtful Magnet ® Consulting tends to include value. Not by making a story, but by checking whether the story the organization wishes to inform can actually be supported by evidence requirements connected to the application manual.
The program recognizes more than aspiration
One of the most helpful methods to understand Magnet is to see it as acknowledgment of performance in context. The program does not reward companies merely for saying the ideal features of expert nursing. It recognizes organizations that can link what they say to what they build, what they support, and what results they achieve.

This is why so many internal Magnet efforts end up being turning points for nurse leadership teams. Once the requirements are taken seriously, they require a more disciplined discussion. Leaders can no longer stop at declarations like "our nurses are empowered" or "we value innovation." They require to show how structural empowerment in fact operates, how innovation is urged and equated into enhancements, and how empirical outcomes show the organization's expert practice.

In real functional settings, that shift alters the discussion. A chief nursing officer may currently think the culture is strong. System leaders might feel shared governance is active. Staff may explain professional pride. Those impressions matter, but Magnet recognition requests for something more durable. It asks whether those strengths are embedded enough that they can be shown plainly and examined versus ANCC standards.
Why the 5 components matter
The current Magnet structure is arranged around five elements of the empirical design. That model did not arrive by mishap. ANCC describes that it evolved from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism. After a 2007 analytical analysis of appraisal scores, the 2008 conceptual design grouped those forces into five parts. That development matters since it reveals the program's approach a more integrated and empirical framework.

The 5 parts are:
Transformational Leadership Structural Empowerment Exemplary Expert Practice New Understanding, Developments, & & Improvements Empirical Outcomes
A great deal of Magnet preparation becomes simpler once leaders stop dealing with those elements as separate boxes. In strong organizations, they strengthen one another. Transformational management without empirical results is rhetoric. Structural empowerment without exemplary professional practice becomes activity without impact. Development without continual enhancement can drift into scattered pilot work that never ever alters client care. The model works since it asks organizations to link leadership, systems, practice, learning, and results.
Transformational leadership
Transformational management is often discussed in lofty terms, however on the ground it is remarkably concrete. It speaks to whether nursing leaders can assist the organization through complexity, align practice with technique, and produce conditions where professional nursing can thrive.

In numerous organizations, the space here is not vision. Many nursing leaders can articulate where they want to go. The more difficult concern is whether that vision equates into action that personnel can feel. Do choices show nursing priorities in manner ins which matter to care delivery? Can nurse leaders browse modification while preserving trust? When companies work toward Magnet standards, https://jaidenmvbr586.capitaljays.com/posts/magnet-r-consulting-on-written-paperwork-for-magnet-applicants https://jaidenmvbr586.capitaljays.com/posts/magnet-r-consulting-on-written-paperwork-for-magnet-applicants transformational leadership becomes less about speeches and more about visible stewardship.

The strongest examples are frequently not remarkable. A well-led reaction to a staffing difficulty, a consistent method to professional development, or a clear nursing technique that holds up under pressure can reveal even more than an objective statement ever will. What Magnet acknowledges is not charisma. It is management that shapes culture, supports practice, and produces results.
Structural empowerment
Structural empowerment is among those phrases that sounds abstract up until you see its absence. In organizations without it, decisions bottleneck, staff input is symbolic, and professional growth depends too heavily on individual managers. In companies that are more powerful here, the structures themselves help nurses participate, establish, and influence practice.

That does not mean every council or committee immediately represents empowerment. Many companies have official structures that exist mainly on paper. Magnet requirements push a more severe concern: can the company show that its structures support nursing practice in significant ways?

This is where internal sincerity matters. If involvement is restricted, if gain access to is irregular, or if governance mechanisms are irregular throughout departments, those are not small concerns. They impact how credible the organization's narrative will be. Excellent Magnet ® Consulting typically helps leaders recognize the difference in between activity and real empowerment, due to the fact that the two are not interchangeable.
Exemplary professional practice
Exemplary expert practice is where numerous companies start to recognize the complete severity of Magnet work. Nursing practice needs to be more than qualified. It needs to be coherent, supported, and demonstrated at a high level across the organization.

That can be difficult due to the fact that practice excellence is not caught by one policy or one success story. It lives in how care is delivered, how teams work, how standards are upheld, and how the nursing function is worked out in everyday clinical truth. Organizations often discover that they have pockets of excellence however uneven consistency. One service line might have fully grown professional practice structures, while another is still establishing. Magnet acknowledgment asks the company to account for that intricacy instead of hide it.

From a consulting viewpoint, this is frequently where the very best work occurs. Not because consultants develop quality, but due to the fact that they can help companies see where their expert practice design is really strong and where local variation compromises the wider case.
New understanding, innovations, & & improvements
This component is often misinterpreted. Some organizations presume they need continuous novelty, as though Magnet rewards development for its own sake. That is not a helpful reading. New understanding, innovations, and improvements indicate an environment where knowing causes much better practice and where organizations engage improvement in a disciplined way.

The word "enhancements" is particularly crucial. Not every significant advance comes from a headline-grabbing innovation. In some cases the most trustworthy proof comes from sustained enhancements built through nursing insight, careful application, and quantifiable impact. What matters is that the organization can reveal a real relationship between knowing, change, and better performance.

In real practice, this component frequently exposes a familiar problem. Teams might be doing outstanding improvement work, however not tracking or explaining it in a manner that lines up with official proof expectations. The work exists, yet the company has a hard time to present it clearly. That is one factor Magnet preparation can feel so demanding. It asks institutions to be both effective and disciplined in how they record effectiveness.
Empirical outcomes
Empirical outcomes are where the program becomes clearly concrete. ANCC's model does not stop with management viewpoint or professional suitables. It requests for outcomes. That is one of the factors Magnet classification remains distinct. It acknowledges nursing excellence and quality patient results, not simply the intent to pursue them.

Experienced leaders usually comprehend this intuitively. Every health center has stories, however outcomes tell you whether the system is working dependably. They likewise reveal where self-perception and reality diverge. An unit may believe it has a strong practice environment. Outcome information might confirm that, or it may show instability that requires attention.

This emphasis changes the tenor of Magnet readiness work. The discussion becomes less about how to sound like a Magnet company and more about whether nursing systems are consistently producing the type of outcomes that can stand up to external review.
From the 14 Forces of Magnetism to the empirical model
The program's advancement from the 14 Forces of Magnetism to the five-component model is more than a historical footnote. It assists discuss why contemporary Magnet work needs synthesis. In the earlier framework, organizations might become focused on specific elements. The later conceptual design organized those forces into more comprehensive elements after analytical analysis of appraisal scores. That shift motivated a more integrated view of what nursing excellence appears like in operation.

For leadership teams, this is frequently a relief. The framework is still extensive, however it is easier to understand as a living system. Strong management feeds empowerment. Empowerment supports professional practice. Expert practice produces conditions for improvement and development. All of that need to be visible in empirical results. When the pieces align, the Magnet story gains credibility due to the fact that it reflects organizational truth instead of assembled fragments.
The written documentation is not a formality
ANCC applicants send written documentation utilizing Sources of Proof, or evidence requirements, connected to the application manual. That information may sound procedural, however it is main. The written submission is where lots of organizations discover whether they truly understand the standards they have been discussing.

Documentation work has a method of exposing weak assumptions. A team might believe it has sufficient proof under a component, then understand much of what it has actually collected is detailed instead of evidentiary. Another team might have strong functional examples but stop working to connect them plainly to the pertinent requirement. Neither issue is unusual.

What matters is understanding that the composed documents process is not simply administrative product packaging. It is a test of organizational discipline. The ability to collect, arrange, and present evidence states something about the maturity of the Magnet journey itself. ANCC's crosswalk materials describe the manual's composed documentation evidence requirements for applicants, which enhances that the requirements are structured, not informal.

This is why companies typically ignore timeline pressure. The obstacle is not simply composing. It is validating claims, lining up proof to requirements, and making sure the story being told is both precise and supported. That is challenging even in organizations with excellent nursing practice, since outstanding practice does not instantly produce outstanding documentation.
Designation is not irreversible, and that matters
One of the most ignored points in Magnet planning is the distinction between designation and redesignation. ANCC states that organizations that currently made Magnet Acknowledgment should pursue redesignation to continue being recognized.

That might appear apparent, but it alters the tactical posture of the work. Organizations can not treat Magnet as a one-time project followed by an extended period of inactivity. If recognition is to continue, the systems behind it must continue too. That implies evidence gathering, interim tracking, and leadership attention can not disappear once a designation is achieved.

ANCC likewise provides digital tools and guides to support the appraisal procedure and interim tracking during classification. That detail is essential due to the fact that it reveals the program expects continuous stewardship, not episodic performance. Fully grown companies understand this. They do not stop at the event phase. They develop methods to monitor, discover, and prepare for the next cycle of accountability.

In practice, redesignation can be more difficult than the first journey since expectations feel less theoretical. Leaders know what the requirements demand. Customers will expect continuity, development, and evidence that the company has actually sustained or advanced its nursing quality. The greatest systems are normally those that start redesignation thinking early, long before deadlines require the issue.
The "Journey to Magnet Quality ® "is a genuine journey
ANCC uses the trademarked expression "Journey to Magnet Excellence ®" for the course toward classification. That wording is apt, and not just because the procedure takes time. It likewise captures the truth that companies are hardly ever starting from the very same place.

Some begin with highly developed nursing leadership structures and strong results, however fragmented documents. Others have devoted leaders and strong pockets of practice, but require more consistency throughout the enterprise. Some are pursuing recognition for the very first time and still finding out the language of the program. Others are returning for redesignation and trying to sustain momentum while handling management turnover, operational strain, or competing institutional priorities.

That variation is precisely why one-size-fits-all Magnet ® Consulting frequently falls flat. A health center that needs help analyzing Sources of Evidence is in a various position from one that needs to strengthen the facilities behind empowerment or results. The best support is diagnostic before it is directive. It begins by clarifying what the program recognizes, then evaluates whether the company's current state can credibly fulfill that standard.

A simple method to frame preparedness is to ask whether the organization can clearly demonstrate the following:
Nursing management that is visible, tactical, and effective Structures that truly empower nurses Professional practice that corresponds and strong Improvement and innovation that produce significant modification Outcomes that support the claim of excellence
Those concerns sound fundamental, however they are frequently the ones teams avoid because they require sincerity. If the answer is blended, that does not indicate the company should stop. It means the work must be targeted at compound initially, submission second.
Fees, timing, and the useful side of planning
For present charges and submission timing, ANCC posts different Magnet application and appraisal fee schedules, consisting of an online application fee and appraisal review charges due at written file submission. Even without pricing estimate specific numbers, that tells leaders something important. Magnet pursuit has functional and financial repercussions that must be planned, not improvised.

The practical error I see usually is dealing with charges as the primary budget question. They are not. The more considerable preparation concern is organizational capacity. Who will manage the evidence process? Just how much nursing management time will be diverted into preparation? What assistance will unit-level teams need? Where are the paperwork bottlenecks? None of those questions are solved by paying the application fee.

Serious preparation needs a realistic view of workload. Not since Magnet is administrative for its own sake, but due to the fact that the requirements demand proof and proof takes effort to put together responsibly. If executives comprehend that from the start, the work is less likely to end up being hurried, politicized, or disconnected from nursing operations.
What organizations often get wrong
The same misconceptions appear again and once again, particularly early while doing so. They deserve calling plainly because remedying them can save months of wasted effort.

First, Magnet is not a marketing workout. Designation might enter into how an organization presents itself, and ANCC states that designated companies may utilize official Magnet logo designs under hallmark guidelines, however branding is a result of recognition, not the basis for it.

Second, Magnet is not merely about nurse fulfillment or retention, even though those concerns often sit near the edges of the conversation. The program acknowledges nursing quality and quality client outcomes. Any preparedness method that forgets the outcomes side of that formula is off course.

Third, Magnet is not made by isolated quality. One super star unit can not bring a weak business narrative. The company needs to show coherence throughout the standards.

Fourth, documents does not develop reality. It reveals it. If a hospital is having a hard time to produce convincing proof, the problem might be writing, but it might likewise be that the underlying structures or outcomes require work.

Finally, redesignation is not automatic. It requires ongoing recognition through ANCC's procedure, which implies sustainability belongs to the standard, whether organizations like that reality or not.
Where consulting fits, if it fits well
The phrase Magnet ® Consulting can imply numerous things in the market, but the best variation of it is not magical. It helps organizations check out the program precisely, evaluate readiness truthfully, organize proof successfully, and prevent complicated aspiration with proof.

A capable consultant does not assure faster ways. Magnet has excessive structure for that, and ANCC's framework is too explicit. What reliable assistance can do is sharpen judgment. It can help leaders compare a compelling example and a usable one, between activity and proof, between a short-term task and a sustainable nursing structure.

That outside viewpoint is frequently most useful when internal teams are deeply bought the process. Internal dedication is necessary, however it can blur objectivity. People near to the work might overestimate strength in one area and underestimate danger in another. A good consulting lens brings calibration. It asks whether the organization's claims line up with the requirements, whether the narrative is coherent throughout the five elements, and whether empirical results genuinely support the broader story.
What the recognition ultimately signals
When a company makes Magnet designation, the signal is specific. It says the organization has actually met ANCC's Magnet requirements and is acknowledged for nursing quality and quality patient outcomes. It also recommends the organization has actually done the tough, less noticeable work of lining up management, expert practice, documents, and outcomes in such a way that can endure external scrutiny.

That is why Magnet still matters. Not since it provides a simple prestige marker, but because the standards ask organizations to prove something real about nursing. The recognition reflects a disciplined environment, not simply an enthusiastic one. It shows systems that support nurses in doing outstanding work and results that reveal the work is making a difference.

For leaders considering Magnet ® Consulting, that is the clearest location to begin. Ask not how to appear like a Magnet organization, but what the Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® in fact acknowledges. As soon as that answer is comprehended, the remainder of the journey becomes more honest, more concentrated, and even more useful.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm serving hospitals since 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps health care organizations transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>