Shared Governance in Nursing: Reinforcing Autonomy and Leadership

19 September 2026

When nurses talk about having a voice, they normally mean something more particular than being heard in a corridor discussion or invited to a meeting after the decisions are already made. They suggest having an acknowledged, durable function in forming practice. That is the core guarantee of Shared Governance in nursing, and it is why the concept has actually remained appropriate even as the language around it has actually evolved.

Historically, numerous companies utilized the term Shared Governance to explain an official model in which nurses participate in choices about professional practice, typically through councils or similar representative structures. More just recently, the phrase Professional Governance has made headway. That shift in language matters. It moves the conversation far from the concept that authority is simply being shared downward from leadership, and toward the concept that nurses currently hold expert know-how, responsibility, and a legitimate claim to meaningful decision-making. To put it simply, Professional Governance is not a courtesy. It is a recognition of nursing as an occupation with its own standards, judgment, and management responsibilities.

That distinction is more than semantic. It alters how organizations develop involvement, how leaders act, and how bedside nurses understand their role. If the model is dealt with as a committee system with periodic input, it seldom transforms anything. If it is dealt with as both a structure and an approach, which nursing management companies progressively emphasize, it can strengthen autonomy, improve engagement, support retention, and contribute to safer, higher-quality client care.
Why the language shift matters
The move from Shared Governance to Professional Governance reflects a broader maturation in nursing management. Shared Governance remains widely comprehended and still helpful, specifically because many nurses recognize the term right away. However Professional Governance much better captures the expectation that nurses are not just sought advice from. They are liable participants in defining practice.

That sounds subtle on paper, but in practice it alters the posture of an unit, a council, and a leadership group. In a standard top-down environment, a practice issue typically takes a trip up, is translated elsewhere, and comes back as a settled policy. Under Professional Governance, individuals closest to practice have a formal role in recognizing the problem, evaluating alternatives, and suggesting or figuring out the expert response within the company's governance framework.

This matters because autonomy in nursing is not abstract. It shows up in day-to-day choices about care shipment, requirements of practice, workflow, client education, quality concerns, and the conditions that enable nurses to do their work securely and well. When nurses have a legitimate online forum to affect those decisions, the profession is enhanced. When they do not, frustration tends to increase, and management advancement stalls.

The greatest organizations understand that governance is not a side task. It is how professional duty is exercised in a noticeable, repeatable way.
What Shared Governance in fact looks like
In nursing, Shared Governance usually refers to a formal decision-making model. The precise style varies, but councils prevail. Those councils may concentrate on practice, quality, education, or other domains of nursing work. What matters is not the label on the council door. What matters is whether nurses have a real voice in decisions that affect nursing practice.

The expression "official voice" should have attention. Informal influence is valuable, however it is fragile. It depends on personalities, timing, and access. Formal voice suggests the organization has established structures through which nurses take part in open conversation, evaluation practice issues, and affect policy and expert requirements. That makes the work less dependent on who occurs to be in the space that week.

Representative governance likewise creates connection. Personnel nurses reoccur. Leaders change. Pressures shift. An official model assists protect expert participation through those cycles. It produces a memory for the company and a place where nursing judgment can be brought forward.

ANA's ethics and governance materials enhance the more comprehensive concept behind this. Cooperation and shared decision-making are not optional extras in nursing. They become part of the profession's work and are linked to workforce sustainability. That framing is very important due to the fact that it places governance in the exact same discussion as ethical practice, not just management technique.
Autonomy is developed through usage, not slogans
Many organizations state they support nurse autonomy. Far less develop the conditions that make autonomy long lasting. A slogan on a poster can celebrate professional judgment, however if individuals doing the work have no significant role in choices about practice, the slogan rings hollow.

Shared Governance assists convert autonomy from aspiration into running reality. It offers nurses a genuine venue to raise issues, review proof, talk about implications for client care, and influence the standards that direct their work. That procedure does not remove hierarchy. Healthcare facilities and health systems still have executive structures, legal commitments, and interdisciplinary choice paths. Governance does not remove those realities. It makes sure nursing competence is not bypassed within them.

There is likewise a discipline to this kind of autonomy. Professional voice carries responsibility. Nurses who desire influence over practice choices must be prepared to analyze trade-offs, hear opposing views, and chcm.com https://chcm.com/product-category/professional-shared-governance/ think beyond their own shift or unit. That is one reason Professional Governance is such a beneficial term. It highlights that autonomy and responsibility rise together.

A mature governance culture does not ask, "Did nurses get what they wanted?" It asks, "Did nurses get involved meaningfully in forming a sound expert choice?" Those are not the very same thing. In some cases nursing councils will support a modification. In some cases they will press back. In some cases they will improve a proposal rather than reject it. The point is that the professional judgment is active, noticeable, and consequential.
Leadership grows in a different way in a governance culture
One of the most useful advantages of Shared Governance is how it alters the pipeline for nursing management. In a simply managerial structure, management chances can be narrow. A nurse may develop scientifically for years before ever being welcomed into system-level discussions. Governance expands that path.

A bedside nurse serving on a council finds out how to frame an issue, examine a policy question, listen throughout specializeds, and move a conversation towards a decision. Those are leadership skills, even when the nurse has no official title. Gradually, that experience builds self-confidence and expert identity. It also offers companies a more sensible view of who can lead. A few of the strongest emerging leaders are not always the loudest people in the room. Governance structures can surface thoughtful, trustworthy nurses whose influence has actually been local however whose judgment takes a trip well.

This matters for nurse managers too. In healthy governance models, supervisors do not lose authority. They get partners. Instead of being the sole translator in between executive priorities and frontline issues, they work with a structured body of nurses who can test ideas, refine approaches, and help carry choices back into practice. Shared Governance (Professional Governance) https://www.washingtonpost.com/newssearch/?query=Shared Governance (Professional Governance) That frequently results in stronger implementation since the message does not get here as an external directive. It arrives with expert ownership.

Executive nursing leaders benefit also. Professional Governance uses a disciplined way to hear the profession, not simply specific viewpoints. That difference is simple to neglect. Every leader can gather feedback. Not every leader can compare isolated frustration and a practice concern with broad expert ramifications. Governance structures help make that distinction clearer.
The effect on engagement, retention, and care quality
AONL and other nursing leadership voices have actually linked shared or professional governance with nurse empowerment, engagement, retention, teamwork, interprofessional partnership, and more secure, higher-quality care. Those connections make intuitive sense to anybody who has actually operated in a system where nurses feel either invested or shut out.

When nurses think their proficiency matters, they are more likely to engage with enhancement work instead of treat it as another imposed job. Engagement is not the same as fulfillment. A nurse can be tired, under pressure, and still deeply engaged if the work feels expertly significant. Governance assists create that meaning since it acknowledges that nurses are not merely implementing care systems. They are assisting shape them.

Retention likewise has a practical side. Nurses do not stay exclusively because a council exists. Staffing, workload, settlement, and leadership habits still matter immensely. However governance can affect whether a nurse sees a future in the organization. An office where nurses have a formal voice feels different from one where issues disappear into a pecking order. Even when tough restrictions stay, nurses are most likely to stay engaged if they can see a genuine course to influence.

The connection to patient care is similarly crucial. Much safer, higher-quality care depends upon great systems, and nurses interact with those systems continuously. They observe friction points, workarounds, communication breakdowns, and unintentional repercussions rapidly. A governance model gives the company a way to capture that professional insight and translate it into choices. That does not guarantee perfect outcomes, but it improves the odds that care processes will reflect genuine scientific conditions rather than presumptions made at a distance.
Where organizations get it wrong
The most common failure is performative governance. The language sounds best. The council charter is polished. Meetings take place. Minutes are taken. Yet the actual authority is so limited, or the suggestions are so consistently disregarded, that nurses find out the structure is symbolic.

That sort of arrangement can do more damage than having no formal design at all. It raises expectations, takes in time, and after that teaches personnel that participation modifications nothing. As soon as that lesson settles in, re-engagement becomes difficult.

Another common issue is overreliance on a few committed individuals. A governance design should not make it through only due to the fact that one director, one teacher, or three high-capacity personnel nurses are carrying it. If the structure depends on extraordinary effort instead of clear support and shared duty, it is vulnerable. When those people leave or stress out, the work frequently stalls.

Some organizations also confuse info sharing with shared decision-making. Reporting out a settled plan is not governance. Asking nurses to react after the course is already set is not governance either. Significant involvement takes place early sufficient to influence the outcome.

There are also cultural barriers. A system can have councils on paper and still struggle if leaders are unpleasant with dissent, if nurses are not prepared to speak in open forum, or if expert difference is dealt with as disloyalty. Governance requires procedural structure, however it also needs psychological reliability. Individuals should think that truthful involvement is safe and worthwhile.
What healthy Professional Governance tends to include
No single plan fits every setting, but strong models usually share a couple of characteristics.
A clear structure for nurse involvement in practice decisions Representative forums, frequently councils, where issues can be discussed openly Visible responsibility for acting on suggestions or describing decisions Leadership support that deals with governance as genuine work, not additional work A culture that connects autonomy with expert responsibility
These functions sound simple, yet every one is more difficult to sustain than it appears. A clear structure avoids confusion about where problems belong. Agent forums lower the threat that just a couple of voices control. Noticeable responsibility secures the design from becoming ritualistic. Management support keeps the work from collapsing under completing concerns. The cultural link in between autonomy and obligation keeps governance from wandering into complaint management.
The tension in between speed and participation
One of the truthful trade-offs in Shared Governance is time. Participation takes longer than unilateral decision-making. Conversation can feel untidy. Councils may ask for revisions. Various nursing groups might see the very same problem differently. During durations of operational strain, leaders might feel tempted to bypass the procedure "simply this when."

Sometimes urgency is genuine. Health care settings do deal with situations where rapid decisions are needed. A reputable governance culture acknowledges that not every concern can move through the exact same pathway at the exact same speed. Still, speed must be the exception, not the default validation for bypassing professional input.

The better question is not whether governance slows choices. It is whether it enhances them. In most cases, the extra time upfront avoids downstream issues. Nurses often determine application barriers that are undetectable at the preparation stage. They capture language that will puzzle practice, workflows that contravene unit realities, or policy presumptions that do not hold at the bedside. A slightly slower decision can end up being a much smoother rollout.

That is why skilled nursing leaders tend to focus less on idealized speed and more on fit. Which issues need broad nursing deliberation? Which can be handled in your area? Which need interdisciplinary coordination? Professional Governance works best when organizations make those distinctions knowingly instead of improvising them under pressure.
Interprofessional work gets more powerful when nursing governance is strong
Some people fret that emphasizing nursing autonomy will separate the profession or produce friction with other disciplines. In practice, the opposite is frequently real. Clear nursing governance usually improves interprofessional collaboration since it clarifies how nursing point of views are formed and communicated.

When a profession can articulate its position through an established structure, interdisciplinary discussions end up being more coherent. Rather of spread objections from various units, leaders hear a more organized expert voice. That can make collaboration more efficient and more respectful. It also helps prevent a familiar pattern in healthcare, where nursing issues are recognized informally however not represented with the exact same procedural weight as other decision inputs.

Interprofessional teamwork depends on each discipline appearing with clarity and responsibility. Professional Governance supports that by assisting nursing speak as a profession, not simply as a collection of private reactions.
Signs that the design is genuine, not decorative
There is no single metric that shows a governance design is healthy, however a few patterns are telling.
Nurses can explain where practice decisions are discussed and how to participate Council suggestions are tracked, addressed, or executed visibly Leaders discuss when a recommendation can not move forward and why Staff see links in between governance conversations and actual practice changes Participation establishes brand-new leaders rather than counting on the exact same voices indefinitely
The focus here is visibility. Nurses do not require every suggestion to be accepted in order to rely on the process. They do need to see that the procedure is real. Silence wears down self-confidence faster than disagreement.
Questions leaders should ask before declaring success
An unexpected variety of organizations state triumph too early. They create councils, schedule conferences, select chairs, and presume the governance work is done. The harder work starts after that. Leaders who want a sincere view of their model should continue a few unpleasant questions.
Are nurses affecting decisions before they are settled, or only reacting afterward? Do personnel nurses believe involvement is worth their time? Is governance improving practice choices, or just producing meeting minutes? Are dissenting views welcomed as professional input, or discouraged as resistance? Can the design endure turnover in key leadership or personnel roles?
Those concerns expose whether Shared Governance is working as an approach or only as an organizational chart. A healthy answer needs more than anecdote. It needs leaders to take note of involvement patterns, choice circulation, and the reliability of the process amongst frontline nurses.
Sustaining the work over time
Professional Governance is often strongest when leaders stop treating it as a program with an endpoint. It is continuous professional infrastructure. Like any facilities, it requires upkeep. Councils need function. Members need preparation. Communication needs to remain clear. Leadership shifts need to maintain the integrity of the model instead of restarting it from scratch every couple of years.

There is also a generational element. New nurses may show up with little direct exposure to official governance, specifically if their early profession experience has been extremely task-driven. They might not immediately see why sitting on a council matters when the clinical work is heavy. That makes orientation and mentorship important. Nurses are most likely to purchase governance when they understand that it is one of the profession's main mechanisms for shaping practice collectively.

The ethical dimension need to not be downplayed. ANA's current code language places collaboration and shared decision-making squarely within nursing's expert obligations and connects shared governance to labor force sustainability initiatives. That framing helps move the discussion beyond preference. Governance is not simply a nice organizational feature for high-performing systems. It belongs to how nursing sustains itself as an occupation efficient in responsible, cumulative action.

Shared Governance, or Professional Governance, works best when everyone involved comprehends that voice is only the start. The deeper objective is stewardship. Nurses are not simply taking part in conferences. They are stewarding standards, judgment, and the conditions under which safe care becomes more likely. That is why the model continues to matter. It enhances autonomy not by separating nurses from management, however by putting professional nursing leadership where it belongs, inside the decisions that shape practice every day.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting organization established in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside health care organizations strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>