Professional Governance and the Sustainability of the Nursing Profession

03 September 2026

The sustainability of the nursing profession depends upon more than recruitment campaigns, tuition assistance, or stronger staffing plans. Those matter, however they do not respond to a much deeper concern that nurses ask every day, typically without saying it clearly: do nurses have genuine authority over nursing practice, or are they just expected to carry responsibility without influence?

That question sits at the center of Professional Governance. Lots of nurses still know the principle by its earlier and more familiar name, Shared Governance. The language has developed for a factor. Shared Governance in nursing has long referred to a model in which nurses have a formal voice in decisions about expert practice, often through councils or comparable representative structures. Professional Governance builds on that history and sharpens the emphasis. It points more directly to autonomy, accountability, significant decision-making, and management in practice. It is not merely a committee design. It is a declaration about who owns nursing practice, how decisions are made, and whether the occupation can stay strong over time.

That last point should have attention. Sustainability in nursing is often minimized to workforce supply, job rates, or retirement forecasts. Those are legitimate issues, however they are lagging indicators. The more immediate indications show up on units and in scientific settings every day. Nurses stay where their judgment counts. They grow where standards are established with them, not handed to them after the truth. They dedicate to a profession that treats them as professionals. If that foundation wears down, no retention slogan will repair it for long.
Why governance is a sustainability problem, not simply a management issue
It is simple to misclassify Professional Governance as an internal management initiative, helpful however optional, something that belongs in governance binders and meeting calendars. In practice, it impacts whether the work of nursing stays professionally trustworthy and personally bearable.

A sustainable profession needs a method to translate bedside expertise into organizational decisions. Without that bridge, nurses are put in an impossible position. They are accountable for care quality, client security, coordination, and clinical judgment, yet they are left out from choices that form workflows, requirements, education concerns, and practice expectations. In time, that space develops frustration, then disengagement, then turnover. It also deteriorates the profession itself, because practice choices drift away from individuals most qualified to inform them.

Professional Governance addresses that structural problem. AONL has described it as both a structure and an approach for leveraging nursing know-how and supporting the profession's sustainability and development. That difference matters. Structure without viewpoint becomes symbolic. Approach without structure ends up being rhetoric. A council structure, representative involvement, and defined decision pathways are necessary, however they just work when leaders really think that nursing knowledge should guide nursing practice.

In my experience, nurses can discriminate nearly right away. On one side is the organization that invites participation after major decisions have actually already been made. On the other is the organization that brings nurses into the work early, asks to shape the requirement, and accepts that the last answer may not be administratively convenient. Those two environments might both use the term Shared Governance, but they are not practicing it with the same integrity.
The shift from Shared Governance to Professional Governance
The language shift from Shared Governance to Professional Governance is more than branding. It shows a maturing understanding of nursing's role. Shared Governance highlighted participation and dispersed decision-making. That was, and stays, essential. Yet the phrase in some cases allowed people to hear only the word shared and miss out on the word governance. In some settings, that resulted in a diminished version of the design, where nurses were consulted but not entrusted, heard however not empowered.

Professional Governance tightens up the focus. It underscores that nursing is a profession with its own standards, competence, responsibilities, and authority. Autonomy and accountability belong together here. Nurses can not credibly declare one without the other. If nurses seek meaningful influence over practice, they must likewise accept responsibility for the quality of those choices, the outcomes they produce, and the discipline needed to sustain the model.

That is one factor the newer term has traction. It helps move the conversation beyond whether nurses might offer input. The better concern is whether nurses are governing their own expert practice in an official, long lasting, and liable way.

This is likewise why the concept resonates with current conversations about workforce sustainability. The ANA's Code of Ethics determines collaboration and shared decision-making as necessary to nursing's work and clearly consists of shared governance among labor force sustainability efforts. That is an ethical signal as much as a functional one. It says that sustainable nursing practice needs structures that appreciate expert voice and cumulative judgment.
What healthy Professional Governance looks like in daily practice
The greatest Professional Governance systems rarely feel remarkable. Their power comes from consistency. Nurses know where choices are talked about. They understand who represents their area. They understand how issues move from local issue to broader review. They see requirements, policies, and practice changes shaped in open online forum rather than appearing from nowhere.

In most companies, this takes kind through councils or similar bodies. That information is well established in the history of Shared Governance. What matters more than the label is the function. Nurses need official paths to influence practice decisions, not periodic city center or advertisement hoc listening sessions.

When the design works, several functions are usually present:
nurses have actually an acknowledged voice in choices affecting professional practice leadership treats nursing input as part of decision-making, not public relations accountability for practice is visible, not abstract collaboration with other disciplines is reinforced rather than bypassed outcomes such as engagement and retention are comprehended as connected to governance, not separate from it
Those functions sound uncomplicated, however each carries useful demands. An acknowledged voice means representation must be credible. If personnel nurses do not rely on the procedure or do not see their issues reaching action, the structure will lose authenticity quickly. Management commitment indicates nurse leaders need to resist the temptation to overcontrol choices when time is short. Accountability implies councils can not end up being grievance exchanges without any obligation to assess, focus on, and follow through. Interprofessional cooperation suggests nursing voice need to be strong enough to contribute as a profession, not simply respond to external agendas.
The relationship in between governance and retention
Much has actually been said, appropriately, about nurse retention. Yet companies in some cases search for retention responses in places that are simpler to count than to feel. Compensation matters. Scheduling matters. Benefits matter. However skilled nurses often leave for factors that are not caught nicely in payroll data. They leave when their judgment is chronically discounted. They leave when policies are enforced by people far from practice truths. They leave when they are asked to soak up consequences for choices they had no part in making.

Shared Governance, or Professional Governance, does not get rid of those pressures, however it alters the experience of working within them. A nurse who can form a practice requirement, raise a client care issue through a highly regarded structure, or affect how change is implemented experiences the work in a different way from a nurse who is anticipated just to adjust. The distinction is not cosmetic. It touches identity, pride, and professional commitment.

AONL and other nursing leadership voices have linked these governance designs to empowerment, engagement, retention, team effort, interprofessional cooperation, and safer, higher-quality care. That grouping is important since it reflects how the results show up in genuine settings. Retention does not increase in a vacuum. It rises where nurses are engaged. Engagement grows where people have impact. Influence is most durable when it is formalized, anticipated, and supported by leadership.

There is likewise a quieter retention impact that companies sometimes miss out on. Nurses who participate in governance frequently deepen their connection to the occupation itself, not just to the employer. They begin to see their work beyond task conclusion. They talk about requirements, policy ramifications, quality issues, and expert obligations. That widening of viewpoint can be energizing. It reminds individuals why nursing is a profession and not simply a role.
Patient care belongs to this, not surrounding to it
Any major discussion of Professional Governance has to come back to client care. The design is not just about staff complete satisfaction or internal democracy. Its function is connected to more secure, higher-quality care.

This connection should be user-friendly. Nurses are continuously present at the point where policy fulfills reality. They see where workflows develop hold-up, where handoffs become delicate, where documentation burdens distract from patient interaction, where education gaps result in confusion, and where useful workarounds start to change formal procedures. Leaving out that level of understanding from governance is not effective. It is risky.

When nurses formally participate in decisions about professional practice, organizations get to grounded scientific insight. Practice requirements become more reasonable. Application enhances due to the fact that individuals bring the change understand the rationale and the restrictions. Cooperation across disciplines tends to improve too, because nursing concerns the table with organized, representative input rather than fragmented concerns raised one conversation at a time.

That said, the relationship is not automatic. A council structure can exist on paper while client care decisions stay insulated from bedside proficiency. I have actually seen companies commemorate the presence of Shared Governance while nurses independently describe it as performative. The indication recognize: programs crowded with updates rather of choices, postponed action on apparent practice issues, representation that does not show existing clinical truths, and a sticking around sense that the crucial options are made in other places. When that understanding sets in, trust is tough to rebuild.
Where companies get it wrong
Professional Governance is extensively appreciated in idea, but irregular in execution. The failures are typically not philosophical. A lot of leaders can articulate the value of nurse voice. The failures are operational and cultural.

One common mistake is dealing with governance as an accessory to management instead of a core operating technique. In that model, councils exist, minutes are kept, and participation is encouraged, but last authority remains firmly centralized. Nurses rapidly recognize when their role is advisory in the weakest sense of the word. They might still attend meetings, yet the energy drains pipes out of the process.

Another error is presuming that representation alone equals empowerment. It does not. Representation without preparation, authority, or clear scope can become difficult. A personnel nurse might rest on a council and still have little capability to affect results. Worse, that nurse might become the noticeable face of a process that peers no longer trust.

A third issue is disparity from leaders. Professional Governance requires leaders who can tolerate discussion, dispute, and slower early stages of decision-making in exchange for more powerful long-lasting adoption. If leaders support the model just when recommendations align neatly with existing strategies, nurses will stop buying it.

There is likewise a subtle trap in the word shared. Shared does not indicate diffused up until no one owns anything. Healthy governance clarifies choice rights and responsibility. It needs to reduce confusion, not develop it. Nurses need to know what is within their authority, what needs interdisciplinary partnership, and what remains an executive choice with nursing input. Obscurity assists no one.
Sustainability requires more than staffing numbers
When individuals discuss sustaining nursing, the conversation frequently narrows too quickly to pipeline concerns. The number of students are going into programs? The number of nurses are retiring? How many jobs can a system take in? Those are real concerns, however they attend to supply more than sustainability.

An occupation is sustainable when it can recreate not only its workforce, however likewise its requirements, values, management capability, and sense of cumulative ownership. Professional Governance assists with that work because it gives nursing a living system for self-direction. It is among the places where less knowledgeable nurses discover how professional practice is formed. They see that requirements are talked about, that policy is not abstract, and that nursing management includes representation and open forum, not simply hierarchy.

This developmental function matters. If newer nurses experience work only as job execution under continuous operational pressure, they may never construct a strong professional identity. If they experience nursing as a discipline with voice, responsibility, and a function in policy and practice choices, they are most likely to picture a future within it. That future might consist of bedside care, specialty proficiency, education, quality work, or leadership, but it stays rooted in the profession instead of removed from it.

Professional Governance likewise supports sustainability since it distributes management. That is specifically essential in times of stress. An occupation that relies too greatly on a few formal leaders ends up being vulnerable. A profession that establishes decision-making capability across councils, practice groups, and representative bodies is more durable. It can soak up change without losing coherence.
What nurses need from leaders for this design to work
No governance model can survive on enthusiasm alone. Nurses need https://marcovvvp250.urbanvellum.com/posts/professional-governance-and-the-sustainability-of-the-nursing-occupation https://marcovvvp250.urbanvellum.com/posts/professional-governance-and-the-sustainability-of-the-nursing-occupation noticeable support from leaders, and not just from the primary nursing officer. System leaders, directors, educators, and informal clinical influencers all shape whether the model lives or stalls.

The assistance nurses require is practical:
protected time to get involved meaningfully clarity about what decisions belong in governance forums honest feedback when suggestions can not be adopted follow-through on actions that are approved recognition that involvement is expert work, not extracurricular activity
Protected time is typically the very first trustworthiness test. If participation depends upon goodwill and unpaid effort, only a narrow group will be able to sustain it. Clarity about scope prevents dissatisfaction and squandered effort. Truthful feedback matters since not every recommendation can or ought to be implemented, however dismissing ideas without explanation damages trust. Follow-through is obvious and frequently disregarded. Acknowledgment is more than praise. It is the understanding that governance work contributes to quality, culture, and professional standards.

Leaders also require judgment. Not every issue needs a council process, and not every operational obstacle is best resolved through broad governance evaluation. Straining the structure with routine matters can make it slow. Bypassing it whenever stakes are high can make it unimportant. The art is knowing what belongs where, and being consistent enough that nurses comprehend the logic.
The stress in between speed and participation
One reason some organizations fight with Shared Governance is the pressure for speed. Healthcare settings move fast. Leaders frequently deal with immediate operational needs, altering concerns, and limited capacity for prolonged deliberation. Under that pressure, inclusive decision-making can feel inefficient.

The stress is real, but it is frequently misinterpreted. Professional Governance may slow the front end of some choices, yet it can accelerate the back end by improving adoption, decreasing resistance, and appearing application barriers early. A decision made quickly without nursing input might look efficient on Monday and unwind by Friday. A decision formed with nursing involvement may take longer to frame however prove more durable.

There are limits, naturally. Emergencies require decisive action. Regulatory deadlines may compress timelines. Some strategic choices involve constraints that can not be worked out in open council process. Professional Governance should not be glamorized into a veto structure over every organizational move. That would be as dysfunctional as token participation.

The mature method is transparent triage. Leaders discuss what can be formed, what can not, what input is needed now, and what review will follow. Nurses are usually efficient in managing hard truths when those truths are stated clearly. What wears down trust is not urgency itself, but selective seriousness used to bypass expert voice whenever participation becomes inconvenient.
The future of the occupation depends upon expert voice
Nursing has actually always brought enormous obligation. What modifications gradually is whether the structures around practice honor that responsibility with matching authority. Professional Governance matters since it answers that difficulty straight. It formalizes nursing voice. It links autonomy with accountability. It creates opportunities for collaboration and shared decision-making that are essential to the work itself. It supports engagement, retention, team effort, and patient care not by motivational language, but by design.

That is why the distinction between Shared Governance and Professional Governance works. It advises the occupation that voice is inadequate if it does not reach real decisions. It reminds organizations that participation is not enough if it does not bring responsibility. And it reminds nurse leaders that sustainability is developed through structures that appreciate nursing as an occupation capable of governing its own practice.

For the nursing profession to remain strong, it should be more than staffed. It needs to be governed in a way that establishes expert identity, preserves expertise, supports ethical partnership, and keeps nurses connected to the purpose and authority of their work. That is not a side task. It is among the conditions that make sustainability possible.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a nursing consulting and education company serving hospitals since 1978 by nurse leader Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with health care organizations transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>