Shared Governance and Leadership Development in Nursing

03 September 2026

Few concepts in nursing management produce as much hope, frustration, and misunderstanding as Shared Governance. When it works, nurses feel the difference in their day-to-day practice. Choices are not merely bied far. Practice concerns are discussed by the people closest to the work. Concerns move through an acknowledged structure rather than through corridor conversations alone. Staff nurses establish a stronger sense that their https://elliotdmxm186.raidersfanteamshop.com/professional-governance-and-collaborative-nursing-leadership https://elliotdmxm186.raidersfanteamshop.com/professional-governance-and-collaborative-nursing-leadership judgment matters, since it does.

That is the guarantee at the heart of Shared Governance, and it is the reason the language has developed. Lots of nursing leaders now utilize the term Professional Governance to describe the very same broad instructions with sharper focus on expert autonomy, accountability, significant decision-making, and leadership in practice. The shift in language matters. "Shared" can in some cases sound as if authority is simply loaned out by management. "Professional" positions the focus where it belongs, on nursing as a discipline with proficiency, responsibilities, and a legitimate role in shaping care delivery.

Whether an organization states Shared Governance, Professional Governance, or Shared Governance (Professional Governance), the main point is consistent. Nurses require an official voice in choices about their professional practice, typically through councils or similar structures. That is not a soft cultural preference. It is a major functional choice about how an organization worths nursing knowledge, sustains the labor force, and protects care quality.
The genuine significance behind the model
Shared Governance is often decreased to a meeting structure. A council exists, minutes are taken, and leaders can state the company has a governance procedure. That is the thinnest version of the idea, and nurses recognize it quickly. A calendar loaded with council meetings does not create professional authority. A voting procedure indicates little if crucial choices have actually currently been made elsewhere.

Professional Governance is much better comprehended as both a structure and an approach. The structure provides nurses a defined path to participate in decisions. The philosophy recognizes that nurses are not passive recipients of policy. They are accountable specialists whose practice insight must form standards, workflow, and care decisions that impact clients and personnel. That combination of structure and viewpoint is what makes the model durable.

This difference ends up being obvious in difficult minutes. During a routine period, almost any company can maintain a council charter. The stress test comes when pressure increases, staffing is tight, or a proposed practice change has effects at the bedside. If nurses can still question, fine-tune, and influence decisions in those moments, governance is genuine. If their function shrinks when choices end up being substantial, governance is symbolic.
Why leadership advancement belongs inside governance, not next to it
Leadership advancement in nursing is often framed too directly. Individuals think first of titles: charge nurse, supervisor, director, chief nursing officer. Those roles matter, but they catch just one lane of management. Shared Governance widens the field. It develops room for nurses to lead without waiting on a promotion and to practice leadership in the setting where their credibility is strongest, their own clinical environment.

That has useful worth. Not every excellent nurse wants a management role. Numerous wish to stay near patients while still affecting practice. A healthy governance model uses exactly that path. A nurse can find out to frame an issue, collect peer input, dispute alternatives, and assist form a suggestion. None of that requires leaving the bedside. All of it constructs leadership muscle.

This is one factor Shared Governance and management advancement should never ever be treated as different methods. Governance is one of the most reliable developmental environments nursing has, because it teaches management through real responsibility instead of abstract training alone. Nurses discover to speak in terms of client effect, personnel truths, and expert standards. They find out to represent more than their own shift or unit preference. They find out that impact is earned through preparation, consistency, and follow-through.

Those lessons are tough to teach in a class by themselves. They end up being genuine when a nurse walks into a council meeting carrying the concerns of colleagues and entrusts to the responsibility to communicate decisions back clearly.
What nurses actually learn in a working governance structure
The first visible gain is confidence, however confidence is only the surface. Underneath it, Professional Governance establishes a set of management abilities that companies state they desire, and nurses really need.
Speaking for practice issues in a clear, evidence-aware, expertly grounded way Listening across roles and systems without lowering every issue to personal preference Weighing autonomy with responsibility, particularly when decisions impact security and consistency Participating in meaningful decision-making with peers and leaders Leading modification in such a way that reinforces teamwork instead of weakening it
These are not ornamental abilities. They shape how nurses operate in interdisciplinary settings, how they advocate for safe care, and how they respond when policy and practice clash. A staff nurse who has learned to browse governance discussions is typically better prepared for charge responsibilities, preceptor impact, job work, and future official leadership roles.

There is likewise a subtler developmental result. Governance teaches nurses to believe at 2 levels at as soon as. They continue to care deeply about private clients, since that is the center of nursing practice. At the very same time, they start to think in systems. They discover how one practice choice can affect interaction, team effort, consistency, and results throughout a whole unit or organization. That shift from just specific analytical to both private and system-level thinking marks a significant step in management development.
The relationship between voice and accountability
A common misconception is that Shared Governance is primarily about providing nurses a voice. Voice is necessary, but by itself it is insufficient. Professional Governance locations equal emphasis on responsibility. If nurses want significant authority in expert practice choices, they likewise accept duty for the quality, consistency, and effects of those decisions.

That balance is one reason the more recent language resonates with lots of leaders. Professional Governance does not suggest that participation is optional or purely meaningful. It is not a venting forum. It is an expert system for decision-making. Nurses advance concerns, but they also examine compromises, consider ramifications for patient care, and assist steward the standards of their own practice.

That matters for management advancement because mature leadership always includes both impact and obligation. It is fairly simple to slam a choice from the sidelines. It is harder, and more developmental, to being in the location where contending concerns need to be weighed. A nurse serving in governance may support a modification in principle however push for a slower implementation because interaction is not prepared. Or a council may concur that a process needs revision while also acknowledging that variation across units produces threat. Those are leadership judgments. They require discipline, not simply opinion.
Why the language shift to Professional Governance is more than semantics
Terms in healthcare can become stylish, then fade, but this particular shift carries compound. The move from historic "shared governance" towards "professional governance" shows a more powerful expression of nursing's autonomy and leadership in practice. It likewise lines up with a wider acknowledgment that nursing sustainability depends on more than recruitment mottos or strength messaging. Nurses stay engaged when they can practice as specialists with genuine influence over professional matters.

That is why companies concerned about development and sustainability ought to pay very close attention. AONL has framed Professional Governance as a way of leveraging nursing know-how and supporting the occupation's sustainability and growth. The wording is necessary. Proficiency is not leveraged by praising nurses while excluding them from practice decisions. It is leveraged by developing trusted channels through which their knowledge shapes the work.

This is also where leadership development ends up being strategic rather than incidental. An unit council, practice council, or similar body is not simply a local committee. It can operate as a leadership pipeline. Nurses discover representation, interaction, and judgment in the context of real practice concerns. Over time, that strengthens the bench of emerging leaders, not just for management positions however for every role that requires impact, partnership, and accountability.
The connection to client care, teamwork, and retention
Nursing management sources have actually connected Shared Governance and Professional Governance to empowerment, engagement, retention, interprofessional partnership, team effort, and safer, higher-quality patient care. Those connections ring true because the mechanism is straightforward. When nurses get involved meaningfully in decisions about practice, they are more likely to understand, support, and sustain those choices. They are likewise most likely to recognize practical defects before a change reaches the bedside.

Consider how frequently application fails not due to the fact that the concept is bad, however due to the fact that frontline truths were missed. A workflow might look reasonable on paper and still break down in practice because timing, interaction patterns, or role boundaries were not considered. Official nursing input assists capture those gaps earlier. That does not ensure agreement or get rid of tension. It does improve the odds that decisions are workable.

Retention is affected in an associated method. Nurses do not remain merely because a council exists. They remain when the company shows that professional judgment is appreciated, that discussion can affect action, and that engagement is not performative. The emotional distinction in between those environments is considerable. In one, nurses feel handled. In the other, they feel expertly invested.

That distinction also forms team effort. Professional Governance encourages nurses to deal with one another in a more structured, representative way. Instead of every concern moving as an individual complaint, issues can be gone over in open online forum and finished suitable channels. This does not remove dispute. In fact, real governance typically surface areas argument more clearly. Yet that can be healthy. A group that can disagree honestly and still make decisions is stronger than one that prevents conflict up until frustration erupts elsewhere.
Where companies get it wrong
The most typical failure is treating Shared Governance as a branding workout. A company adopts the language, produces councils, and assumes the work is done. Nurses go to meetings, but authority stays unclear. Suggestions vanish into management silence. Representation becomes narrow, and interaction back to personnel is irregular. Over time, attendance drops, skepticism increases, and the expression itself starts to irritate people.

That pattern is familiar due to the fact that nurses fast to spot the distinction between invitation and impact. Being asked for input after a decision is finalized is not governance. Being enabled to discuss just low-stakes problems is not governance either. Professional Governance needs a trustworthy path from discussion to decision-making, even when the last response can not be yes.

Another common error is straining governance with operational debris. Every unsettled concern gets pressed into a council, no matter whether it belongs there. Then councils invest their time responding instead of governing. Nurses leave those conferences feeling that they have actually been enlisted into limitless maintenance work instead of entrusted with professional management. The design ends up being heavy, procedural, and strangely powerless.

There is also the opposite mistake, which is romanticizing the model and pretending it eliminates hierarchy. It does not. Health care companies still have executive authority, regulatory responsibilities, spending plan realities, and operational restraints. Shared Governance is not the lack of leadership. It is a more disciplined distribution of professional decision-making within a company that still need to function coherently. The healthiest systems are honest about this. They do not guarantee unrestricted autonomy. They specify where nursing judgment should lead, where cooperation is required, and how choices move.
Conditions that make governance credible
A working design has recognizable signs, and the majority of them are less glamorous than people anticipate. The problem is not whether the charter language sounds inspiring. The concern is whether nurses can see the procedure operating in ordinary practice.
Nurses have an official avenue, often councils or similar structures, to deal with expert practice decisions Participation causes significant decision-making instead of symbolic consultation Leadership habits reinforces autonomy and responsibility together Communication streams both methods, from staff into governance and back to personnel in plain language The procedure supports partnership instead of producing a different island for nursing concerns
These conditions are practical, not theoretical. Without them, governance turns into an extra obligation layered onto currently busy clinicians. With them, the structure begins to feel worth protecting.

One of the most underappreciated features is communication back to peers. A nurse who serves in governance however can not explain decisions plainly to the system compromises the entire model. Management advancement therefore consists of translation, not just involvement. Nurses learn to state, with sincerity and accuracy, what was chosen, what stays unsolved, and why specific alternatives were passed by. That level of transparent interaction builds trust even when outcomes are imperfect.
Governance as a training ground for future leaders
Some of the strongest nurse leaders are formed long before they receive a formal title. They find out in rooms where practice is disputed seriously. They discover to deal with disagreement without taking it personally. They discover that silence can be pricey, but so can speaking without preparation. Shared Governance develops those rooms.

A staff nurse who takes part in a council finds out rapidly that broad statements bring little weight unless they are connected to practice realities. "This will never ever work" is not leadership. "This part of the workflow might develop disparity since nurses on various shifts receive details in a different way" is closer to leadership, due to the fact that it determines a concern that can be gone over and enhanced. That movement from response to analysis is developmental.

The same holds true for listening. Newer nurses in governance frequently show up with strong opinions about their own unit, which is natural. Gradually, efficient structures teach them to hear perspectives outside their immediate environment. A choice that appears apparent in one specialized may land in a different way in another. Direct exposure to those distinctions matures judgment. It likewise decreases the practice of presuming that local experience is universal.

For managers and directors, this matters more than it may appear. A governance culture can either broaden or narrow the future leadership swimming pool. If only the already positive or currently linked nurses take part, advancement remains irregular. If the structure actively welcomes wider representation and provides members real deal with assistance, more nurses find that leadership is not a personality type reserved for a few. It is a practice.
The ethical and expert dimension
The conversation is not just functional. Nursing's ethical framework has actually progressively stressed collaboration and shared decision-making as important to the work of the occupation. Shared governance has also been recognized amongst labor force sustainability efforts. That framing locations governance beyond preference or pattern. It finds it within the profession's duty to arrange itself in a way that supports sound practice and a sustainable workforce.

That matters because leadership development in nursing is sometimes gone over only in regards to succession planning. Who will be the next manager? Who will fill the next director role? Those are legitimate concerns, however they are insufficient. Professional Governance reminds us that management development also worries how the profession governs itself at the point of care, how nurses deliberate together, and how they exercise cumulative responsibility for practice.

Seen by doing this, governance is not an optional enhancement for high-performing companies. It belongs to how nursing maintains integrity as an occupation. A labor force that is expected to bring enormous clinical and emotional responsibility without significant participation in practice choices will eventually show strain. The strain might look like disengagement, turnover, cynicism, or minimized trust. A trustworthy governance model does not resolve every pressure in the work environment, but it addresses among the most essential ones: whether nurses are treated as experts in matters that specify expert practice.
What experienced leaders watch for over time
The early phase of Shared Governance typically gets the most attention since it shows up. Councils are formed, terms are specified, and enthusiasm is high. The more revealing phase comes later on, when the novelty disappears. At that point, skilled leaders start asking various questions.

Are nurses still advancing meaningful problems, or just minor issues? Do council members feel empowered to challenge respectfully, or do they await leaders to signify the acceptable answer? When a suggestion is not adopted, is the rationale discussed clearly sufficient to maintain trust? Are brand-new nurses going into the procedure, or has the very same little group become irreversible stewards of governance?

These questions matter due to the fact that sustainability depends on renewal. A design that can not develop brand-new voices ultimately hardens. A design that can not endure argument becomes decorative. A design that can not link frontline knowledge with organizational decision-making loses legitimacy.

The strongest Professional Governance environments tend to hold a steady line on one concept: the better a concern is to nursing practice, the more important nursing leadership in that decision ends up being. That principle does not answer every governance concern, however it keeps the model anchored. It reminds companies that governance is not a side activity. It is a disciplined method of appreciating nursing proficiency and cultivating the leaders who will bring the profession forward.

Shared Governance has actually endured because the core requirement has actually not changed. Nurses need more than support. They require an official, trustworthy voice in decisions about their practice. Professional Governance sharpens that expectation by naming what is truly at stake, autonomy, responsibility, significant participation, and leadership in practice. When those aspects exist, management advancement is not an additional program added to nursing work. It is developed into the method nursing governs itself.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a health care consulting and education firm serving hospitals since 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside health care organizations improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>