Magnet ® Consulting: Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® Realities Every Leader Ough

14 August 2026

Magnet ® Consulting: Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® Realities Every Leader Ought To Know

For numerous health care leaders, Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® work sits at the crossway of aspiration and operational truth. It represents an official recognition for nursing excellence and quality patient results, yet it also https://beckettvncy690.fotosdefrases.com/magnet-r-consulting-guide-to-acknowledgment-for-nursing-quality https://beckettvncy690.fotosdefrases.com/magnet-r-consulting-guide-to-acknowledgment-for-nursing-quality demands disciplined paperwork, continual management attention, and a clear understanding of what the program actually requires. That gap between track record and procedure is where confusion usually starts.

I have actually seen leaders approach Magnet as if it were a branding workout, a nursing department effort, or a once-and-done milestone. None of those views hold up well. Magnet status is granted by the American Nurses Credentialing Center, or ANCC, and it shows a company's capability to satisfy recognized standards. The recognition brings significance since it is not casual. It is structured, evidence-based, and tied to a specific framework.

That is likewise why discussions about Magnet ® Consulting tend to surface area early. Not due to the fact that outside assistance changes internal ownership, but because the work asks leaders to equate culture, practice, and results into a disciplined application and appraisal procedure. Before anyone employs assistance, releases a steering committee, or begins appointing narratives, there are a few truths every leader should have straight.
Magnet started as a response to a practical question
The roots of the program matter because they discuss its focus. The American Nurses Association traces Magnet back to a 1983 study of medical facilities that were significantly successful in bring in and keeping nurses. Those companies were described as "magnet" healthcare facilities since they appeared able to draw nursing talent even during tough labor force conditions.

That origin story still forms how major leaders should consider the classification. This was not created as a marketing project. It outgrew an effort to recognize what strong nursing environments appeared like in practice. The official name altered to Magnet Recognition Program ® in 2002, but the underlying idea remained the same: identify organizations that demonstrate nursing excellence.

That history is useful when executive groups get lost in the mechanics of the application. The handbook, the composed documents, and the appraisal procedure can end up being so consuming that leaders forget the classification is expected to reflect genuine organizational ability. If the culture does not support professional nursing practice, no amount of sleek prose will repair the issue for long.
ANCC is the granting body, and that matters more than many executives realize
Magnet status is not a peer-voted honor, a casual market label, or a generic quality badge. It is granted by ANCC, the credentialing body through which the American Nurses Association provides these programs. That distinction matters since it sets the tone for how leaders must approach the journey.

Credentialing bodies resolve specified standards, official submissions, and structured review. The process is not constructed around unclear claims such as "we value nurses" or "our culture is collective." Leaders require to reveal, through ANCC's requirements, how the organization aligns with the Magnet standards.

This is one of the first places where Magnet ® Consulting conversations can either help or injure. Practical support keeps the company anchored to ANCC's actual program structure. Unhelpful assistance turns Magnet into folklore, full of recycled design templates and borrowed language that do not show the existing framework. Leaders ought to be doubtful of any approach that sounds simpler than it should. Acknowledgment of this kind is credible specifically since it is not simplistic.
Magnet is a recognition, however it is also a roadmap
ANCC describes the program as both an acknowledgment for companies that meet Magnet requirements and a roadmap to nursing quality. That dual identity is important.

The recognition side is what boards and senior executives normally see initially. It shows up, distinguished, and public. Organizations that achieve Magnet classification might utilize main Magnet logo designs, based on trademark guidelines. That hallmark security is not a small detail. It enhances that this is a defined, managed recognition, not a generic phrase anyone can adopt.

The roadmap side is where the work ends up being tactically beneficial. A roadmap indicates instructions, series, and evidence of progress. It recommends that the value is not limited to the day the designation is granted. Leaders who comprehend this tend to make better decisions. They treat the Magnet effort as a way to strengthen leadership practice, expert structures, and measurable outcomes with time, not as a brief sprint to secure a symbol.

This difference typically changes the tenor of executive conversations. When Magnet is framed only as recognition, the planning horizon narrows. Groups focus on the due date, the file, and the website check out. When it is treated as a roadmap, the discussion gets more fully grown. Leaders ask whether the organization can sustain the requirements, whether the structures are strong enough for redesignation later on, and whether nursing quality is visible in daily operations rather than just in a composed narrative.
Leaders ought to know the current framework, not just the older language
One of the simplest methods to find a stagnant Magnet strategy is to listen for language that is no longer being used with accuracy. ANCC's existing Magnet structure is arranged around 5 components of the empirical design. Those components are:
Transformational Management Structural Empowerment Exemplary Professional Practice New Knowledge, Innovations, & & Improvements Empirical Outcomes
That five-part structure is the contemporary organizing design. It evolved from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism after a 2007 analytical analysis of appraisal scores, and the 2008 conceptual model organized those earlier forces into the 5 components above.

Leaders do not require to become historians of Magnet terms, however they do require to comprehend what this development signals. The program did not stand still. It approached an empirical design, which ought to sharpen attention on proof and outcomes. A leadership group that still talks as though Magnet is mainly about narrative goal is currently behind the curve.

Each component also carries a various sort of leadership commitment. Transformational leadership is not the exact same thing as structural empowerment. Exemplary expert practice is not interchangeable with innovation. Empirical results are not decorative. They are central. When a group blurs these differences, the application ends up being repetitive and weak due to the fact that every section starts seeming like a generic culture statement.

In useful terms, leaders should expect the Magnet effort to need both strategic coherence and disciplined differentiation. The strongest companies can explain how management habits, organizational structures, professional practice, development, and measurable outcomes connect without collapsing into one vague story.
The composed paperwork is serious work
Many executives ignore the written submission in the beginning. They assume that if the organization is strong, the application will naturally come together. Experience says otherwise.

ANCC needs candidates to send written documentation using Sources of Proof, or proof requirements, tied to the Application Manual. That means companies are not just discussing themselves. They are responding to defined expectations and aligning their paperwork accordingly.

This is where the Magnet journey ends up being extremely concrete. Groups should collect evidence, arrange it, interpret it, and present it in such a way that is both accurate and compelling. Leaders who have not been through the process are often shocked by how much discipline this takes. Great companies can still struggle if their evidence is fragmented, if accountability is scattered, or if nobody has clarified how the written record will be put together and reviewed.

The challenge is not only volume. It is judgment. A leader needs to understand what belongs where, what actually shows the requirement, and what might sound impressive internally however does not respond to the requirement easily. Strong nursing organizations are not always strong storytellers. The documentation process exposes that difference quickly.

This is one reason Magnet ® Consulting turns up so frequently in preparing conversations. Not because specialists produce the substance, but because many companies need help structuring the work, translating proof requirements, and keeping the procedure aligned to the manual instead of to internal presumptions. The key is remembering that external guidance can support the procedure, however it can not substitute for authentic organizational performance.
Redesignation is manual, and leaders ought to prepare for it from the start
A common leadership mistake is dealing with Magnet as a single campaign with a goal. ANCC makes a clear distinction in between classification and redesignation. Organizations that have actually already made Magnet Acknowledgment ought to pursue redesignation to continue being recognized.

That one fact has big implications. It implies the effort can not be developed on one-time heroics. A frantic document push, a temporary governance structure, or a temporary concentrate on outcomes might get an organization through a season of preparation, however it produces long-lasting fragility. If the recognition is implied to continue, the systems behind it need to continue too.

This changes how sensible leaders invest their time. They think about sustainability early. They do not ask just, "How do we prepare for submission?" They likewise ask, "What can we preserve after recognition?" and "Which procedures will still be standing when redesignation comes into view?"

I have seen teams are sorry for early shortcuts. For instance, if proof management lives inside a couple of overextended individuals, the company may survive the first cycle but struggle later on when those people proceed. If executive sponsorship is ritualistic rather than active, momentum tends to fade when the preliminary enjoyment passes. A redesignation mindset presses leaders toward long lasting structures, clearer ownership, and better institutional memory.
The Journey to Magnet Quality ® is not simply a slogan
ANCC safeguards the expression Journey to Magnet Excellence ® as a trademarked term. Initially look, that can appear like a branding footnote. In practice, it reflects something more significant. The program is understood as a journey, not a transaction.

That language helps leaders set expectations with boards, physicians, financing groups, and nursing staff. A journey implies phases, milestones, and continuous evaluation. It likewise implies that the company may require to grow in some areas before it is truly ready to pursue official recognition.

This is where leadership sincerity matters. Some companies aspire, but not prepared. Others are prepared in numerous domains, yet weak in one location that could jeopardize the integrity of the whole effort. The worst move in that situation is to require optimism. A much better move is to acknowledge readiness gaps and use them to improve the organization before major due dates lock the group into defensive work.

A useful executive question is not simply whether your organization desires Magnet. It is whether your leaders are prepared for the journey implied by the program's own name.
Fees and timing should have executive attention early
Another point that frequently surprises senior leaders is the structure of program fees and submission timing. ANCC posts separate Magnet application and appraisal fee schedules, including an online application fee and appraisal evaluation charges due at the time of written file submission.

Even without estimating specific amounts, this tells leaders something essential: financial preparation should not be an afterthought. The process has distinct stages, and costs connect to those stages. If executives delay budget plan discussions till the document is nearly complete, they create unnecessary friction and risk.

Timing matters simply as much. Submission is not only a content problem. It is an operational concern. If the company is aligning internal resources, coordinating customers, and preparing written documentation to fulfill ANCC expectations, leadership needs a reasonable calendar. Rushed timing tends to expose weak governance. Delayed timing can sap morale if the company has invested months mobilizing individuals without clear milestones.

The best executive groups deal with costs, timing, and internal capability as one discussion instead of 3 different ones. That does not make the procedure easier, but it does make it more governable.
Digital tools support the process, however they do not simplify the standard
ANCC supplies digital tools and guides to support the appraisal process and interim monitoring throughout designation. That works and need to be taken seriously. Good tools enhance consistency, exposure, and follow-through.

Still, leaders ought to prevent a common trap. Tools can support procedure management, however they do not make substantive readiness appear. A dashboard can reveal which materials are overdue. It can not resolve weak proof. A digital guide can support interim tracking. It can not replace engaged management or fully grown professional practice.

That may sound apparent, yet numerous companies overestimate the power of facilities and undervalue the importance of disciplined human judgment. Strong Magnet work typically mixes both. It uses tools to create order while keeping obligation where it belongs, with responsible leaders and content experts.
What leaders need to ask before launching formal Magnet work
A handful of concerns can conserve months of rework if asked early and answered honestly.
Do we comprehend Magnet as an ANCC credentialing procedure, not just an honorific? Are we arranging our work around the present five-component empirical model? Can we produce evidence that aligns with Sources of Proof requirements in the Application Manual? Are we preparing for redesignation and sustainability, not just initial recognition? Have we dealt with timing, charges, and internal ownership with the exact same rigor we apply to content?
These concerns are not attractive, but they are exposing. If a leadership team can not address them plainly, it is generally a sign that enthusiasm is ahead of planning.
Where Magnet ® Consulting fits, and where it does not
The phrase Magnet ® Consulting can mean lots of things in the market, so leaders ought to specify the requirement before they specify the vendor. Some organizations need aid analyzing the program framework. Others need disciplined job management around documents. Others are even more along and require a candid external continue reading preparedness. Those are extremely different engagements.

What consulting need to not end up being is a replacement for executive ownership. ANCC is acknowledging the organization, not the expert. The standards must be lived internally, the proof needs to be created through real practice, and the leadership structures must be trustworthy on their own.

That is why the most intelligent leaders use support selectively. They ask for know-how where expertise is needed, however they keep responsibility in-house. If the company can not discuss its own proof, can not sustain its own structures, or can not speak clearly about how the five elements show up in practice, no outdoors consultant can resolve the deeper issue.

There is also a practical trustworthiness point here. Personnel can typically tell whether Magnet work is being built with them or done around them. If the effort feels imported, enthusiasm fades. If it feels grounded in the company's real nursing practice and genuine requirements of accountability, the work gains legitimacy.
What often gets missed at the executive table
Nursing leaders typically comprehend that Magnet is demanding. What often gets missed out on is how much non-nursing leadership behavior forms the journey.

A president can affect whether Magnet is dealt with as strategic or symbolic. A finance leader can either support the work through prompt budget plan preparation or complicate it through late-stage surprises. Functional leaders can support evidence event and cross-functional coordination, or they can unintentionally piece the procedure by dealing with Magnet as "another person's initiative."

The most efficient executive teams recognize that Magnet is nursing-centered, but not nursing-isolated. ANCC's recognition is grounded in nursing quality and quality client results. For that reason, senior leaders should avoid 2 extremes. One is overreach, where non-nursing executives dominate the agenda without comprehending the structure. The other is disengagement, where they presume nursing can carry the whole burden alone.

Judgment matters here. The ideal balance shows up sponsorship, disciplined governance, and respect for nursing leadership expertise.
The real leadership test is consistency
When leaders strip away the language, the forms, and the formal turning points, Magnet work still asks a basic question: can this organization show a meaningful, continual commitment to nursing excellence through a recognized ANCC framework?

That is the test. Not whether the group can produce a polished narrative under pressure. Not whether a small group can rally around a deadline. Not whether the logo will look good in recruitment materials, although lots of companies understandably appreciate the public recognition.

The much deeper test is consistency. Can leaders maintain standards gradually? Can they link management practice, professional structures, development, and empirical results in a way that is genuine? Can they do it well enough that written paperwork ends up being the expression of organizational strength instead of an effort to compensate for its absence?

Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® has actually withstood since it is more than a label. It is a structured way of recognizing organizations that fulfill ANCC standards for nursing quality and quality patient outcomes. Leaders who understand that from the start make much better options about readiness, governance, documents, timing, and assistance. They likewise make better usage of Magnet ® Consulting when they seek it, since they know precisely what consulting can aid with, and what it can refrain from doing for them.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm established in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps hospitals, health systems, and care teams improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>