Magnet ® Consulting: Understanding Trademarked Magnet Program Terms

17 August 2026

The language around Magnet recognition is specialized, and in health care settings it often gets utilized loosely. That is where confusion starts. A nurse leader might state a hospital is "on its Magnet journey." A consultant may promote help with "Magnet documents." A marketing team might wish to position the Magnet name or logo on a web page the moment an application is filed. Each of those phrases sounds familiar, however familiarity is not the very same thing as accuracy.

For anybody associated with Magnet ® Consulting, precision matters. It matters in board presentations, in nursing leadership meetings, in website copy, and in procurement files. It matters a lot more when trademarked terms become part of the discussion, since those terms describe a specific program administered by a specific organization, with requirements, processes, and classification guidelines that are not generic.

The Magnet Recognition Program ® is an ANCC program, and Magnet status is awarded by ANCC, the American Nurses Credentialing Center. That easy fact clears up an unexpected variety of misunderstandings. "Magnet" in this context is not simply shorthand for high-performing nursing culture. It is the name of an official acknowledgment program connected to nursing quality and quality client results. If an organization has actually not satisfied ANCC's requirements and got designation, it is not precise to present that organization as Magnet designated.

That difference might sound apparent on paper. In practice, it gets blurred all the time.
Why the words themselves carry weight
The Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® has a long history. ANA traces its roots to a 1983 research study of "magnet" health centers, and the main program name changed to Magnet Recognition Program ® in 2002. That history discusses why numerous clinicians utilize the word "magnet" conversationally, even when they are not talking about the formal designation. The casual routine is reasonable. The professional danger is that casual use can drift into branded program language without anybody noticing.

In my experience, this usually takes place in three locations. Initially, it happens in internal culture structure, where enthusiasm outruns legal and program accuracy. Second, it happens in external communications, particularly when recruitment groups want to highlight nursing excellence. Third, it takes place when organizations purchase advisory support and use broad terms like "Magnet consultant" as if every use of the word carries the exact same meaning.

It does not.

The Magnet Recognition Program ® is a specified ANCC program. Organizations might be candidates, designated companies, or companies pursuing redesignation, however those are not interchangeable categories. Even the expression used to explain the process has a formal, trademarked version: Journey to Magnet Quality ®. That phrasing is not just motivational language. It is part of the program's secured terminology.

If you work in Magnet ® Consulting, among the most valuable services you can offer is linguistic discipline. That sounds less attractive than method or executive coaching, but it prevents avoidable mistakes. It also signals that the team understands the difference between supporting preparedness for designation and indicating a status that has actually not been granted.
The core trademarked terms individuals most often mix up
Several terms should have careful handling due to the fact that they indicate distinct program concepts.
Magnet Recognition Program ® describes the ANCC program itself. Magnet designation refers to recognition granted by ANCC after a company fulfills the standards. Journey to Magnet Quality ® is ANCC's trademarked phrase for the course towards designation. Redesignation describes the procedure for organizations that have actually already earned Magnet Recognition and wish to continue being recognized. Magnet logos are official marks that designated companies may use under trademark rules.
That list is short, but each product fixes a various communication issue. When teams collapse them into one umbrella idea, they produce useful trouble. An expert proposition that states"we assist medical facilities end up being Magnet"might be easy to understand in daily speech, yet the real work may include preparing composed paperwork connected to ANCC proof requirements, supporting appraisal readiness, or assisting a previously recognized organization pursue redesignation. Those relate, but they are not the same.

A strong Magnet ® Consulting engagement must reflect that difference in language from the start. Statements of work, instructional decks, steering committee updates, and draft website copy ought to all use the best term for the ideal stage.
" Magnet"is not a generic adjective in this setting
One of the most common mistakes I see is using"magnet"as if it were a generic adjective meaning appealing, high quality, or nurse friendly. Historically, the roots of the program make that impulse simple to comprehend. Operationally, it is still a mistake.

If a healthcare facility has exceptional nurse retention, strong shared governance, and strong patient results, that may be evidence of nursing quality. It does not by itself justify calling the company Magnet designated. ANCC says Magnet classification suggests an https://chcm.com/# https://chcm.com/# organization has met ANCC's Magnet standards. That requirement is the line. Anything on one side of it can be discussed as preparation, aspiration, or alignment. Anything on the other side can be referred to as designation.

This is where experience helps. Lots of organizations take pride in the work they have actually done before using. They ought to be. The challenge is to commemorate the work without overstating the status. A mindful writer will say the organization is pursuing Magnet classification, getting ready for Magnet application, or advancing nursing excellence in alignment with the Magnet structure. A reckless writer might state the organization is a Magnet hospital before ANCC has actually granted classification. The first variation constructs reliability. The 2nd invites correction.

That very same principle uses to experts. Saying you supply Magnet ® Consulting can be appropriate when the work really concerns the ANCC Magnet program and related readiness or redesignation efforts. Saying or implying that you provide Magnet status is not. ANCC awards Magnet status. Consultants support the company's preparation, organization, analysis, and execution.
The program structure is specific, and your language must be too
Another place terminology wanders is in discussions of the structure itself. The current Magnet structure is organized around five parts of the empirical design: Transformational Management, Structural Empowerment, Exemplary Specialist Practice, New Understanding, Developments, & Improvements, and Empirical Outcomes.

Those five elements are not simply broad styles for discussion slides. They are the conceptual structure that organizations utilize to understand the design. ANCC describes & that this structure developed from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism after a 2007 analytical analysis of appraisal scores, with the 2008 conceptual model organizing those forces into the existing 5 components.

Why does that matter for trademarked term usage? Since lots of groups speak as if the model has never ever changed. Someone might refer to the 14 Forces as though they are still the primary existing framework. Another individual may use the word"Magnet" without any awareness of how the current empirical design is organized. Neither error is fatal, however both deteriorate the quality of preparing conversations.

When consulting on Magnet preparedness, I have found it helpful to translate this into plain working language: the trademark name matters, the designation rules matter, and the framework language matters. If your documentation team can not identify a basic aspiration from a Source of Evidence requirement, or a historical reference from the present arranging model, confusion will surface later on in the process.
Written paperwork is where inaccurate language ends up being expensive
The most useful reason to understand these terms is that ANCC needs composed documentation connected to evidence requirements in the Application Manual. ANCC crosswalk materials explain the handbook's composed documentation proof requirements for candidates. At this stage, vague expressions stop being safe. They become a drag on the entire effort.

A team may state,"we're gathering Magnet stories."That sounds productive, however it is not yet a paperwork strategy. Another group may state, "we have plenty of examples of innovation."Once again, maybe true, however still not enough. The genuine question is whether the company has the written evidence required by ANCC's structure and manual expectations.

That is why fully grown Magnet ® Consulting typically has a quiet, disciplined center. Behind the celebratory language and culture work, someone is handling specific terms, exact proof classifications, variation control, and the difference between an engaging anecdote and certifying documents. Organizations often undervalue this. They presume the obstacle is just to describe how good they are. In reality, the difficulty is to show, through the required structure, how the organization fulfills the standards.

This is also where trademarked wording can develop unexpected overreach. Internal groups might want to label every workstream"Magnet approved "or "main Magnet materials. "Those labels can become deceptive if they recommend ANCC recommendation or a status that has actually not been approved. Clear naming conventions save time and humiliation. "Magnet application working draft"is much safer and more accurate than"accepted Magnet report"unless approval has actually happened in the pertinent formal sense.
The distinction in between classification and redesignation is not semantic
Organizations that currently made Magnet Recognition have a various job from novice candidates. ANCC is specific that companies that currently made Magnet Acknowledgment should pursue redesignation to continue being recognized. In conferences, however, I still hear people use" reapply for Magnet "as a catchall expression. It gets the general concept across, but it blurs an important distinction.

Redesignation is its own phase of work. The company is not simply repeating a very first application. It is seeking to continue acknowledged status under ANCC's processes. That difference must appear in job naming, leader messaging, and external interaction. If a health system says it is"working toward Magnet classification "when it is really a previously acknowledged organization pursuing redesignation, the phrasing is less exact than it ought to be.

This matters for specialists too. A firm offering Magnet ® Consulting may support novice candidates, redesignation efforts, or both. Those engagements have overlapping functions, but they are not identical in context. Language that treats them as interchangeable can make a group noise unskilled, even when the underlying individuals are extremely capable.
Trademark rules and logo design usage are not an afterthought
Organizations frequently focus so greatly on application preparedness that they postpone conversations about hallmark guidelines till late in the process. That is in reverse. ANCC says designated companies might use main Magnet logo designs under hallmark rules. The expression"designated organizations "is the key.

The logo design is not a decorative possession to drop into products whenever the company feels aligned with the design. It is an official mark tied to designation and managed usage. The exact same caution applies to branded expressions like Journey to Magnet Quality ®. Marketing and interactions groups should comprehend early what is and is not appropriate.

I have watched otherwise mindful leadership groups get tripped up here. A recruitment pamphlet gets drafted months before formal evaluation. A social media banner is developed from an old internal file. A service line website utilizes a Magnet logo design since someone assumes"we have actually been on this path for many years."None of that changes the underlying rule. Trademarked program assets require to be used in line with ANCC guidance.

The useful lesson is basic: deal with top quality Magnet terms the method you would deal with any regulated or safeguarded institutional claim. Run it through review before publication, not after.
Where Magnet ® Consulting adds real value
The expression Magnet ® Consulting can suggest many things in the market, which is part of the factor terms requires discipline. Some organizations need tactical positioning across the five model components. Others require assistance arranging written documentation. Others require support translating ANCC procedure expectations, including application timing, appraisal preparation, or interim monitoring tools that ANCC provides during designation.

The best seeking advice from assistance usually does not start with fancy language. It begins with sorting out exactly where the organization stands. Is it exploring readiness? Preparing an application? Organizing proof for written submission? Planning for appraisal? Managing a redesignation cycle? Tightening up interaction rules for logos and trademarked expressions? Each scenario requires various work products and various wording.

That is one reason I encourage leaders to inspect proposals thoroughly. If an expert uses every Magnet term as if it means the same thing, that is a warning sign. If the proposition distinguishes the Magnet Acknowledgment Program ®, classification, redesignation, the empirical model, evidence requirements, and hallmark considerations, that usually reflects stronger command of the terrain.

An excellent consultant need to likewise understand where certainty ends. Existing charges and submission timing, for example, are posted by ANCC in separate Magnet application and appraisal cost schedules. Those details must be examined straight at the time of planning. It is far better to say"validate the present ANCC cost schedule before budgeting" than to repeat an out-of-date number from memory. Precision includes knowing when not to overstate.
A practical way to keep terms directly throughout teams
In large companies, terminology problems are hardly ever triggered by one reckless person. They come from handoffs. Nursing leadership utilizes one phrase, interactions utilizes another, legal has a third preference, and an external writer copies the least precise version since it appeared in an old slide deck. The result is a patchwork.

A basic control procedure helps.
Create one authorized terms sheet for all Magnet-related internal and external communications. Identify who reviews usage of Magnet names, logos, and status claims before publication. Separate language for candidates, designated companies, and redesignation efforts. Align project documents with ANCC's current five-component framework. Recheck charges, timelines, and submission details versus ANCC's present posted products before significant decisions.
That is not administration for its own sake. It is a little governance step that prevents bigger clean-up later. In my experience, one disciplined page of approved language can save hours of revision throughout executive memos, nursing recruitment products, board updates, and expert deliverables.
The historical roots are useful, however they must not blur the present program
There is real worth in comprehending the program's roots in the 1983 research study of"magnet"healthcare facilities. It gives context to why the program emphasizes nursing excellence and quality patient outcomes, and why the principle brings such weight in the profession. Historic literacy makes groups much better storytellers.

Still, history ought to support existing accuracy, not replace it. The official program name changed to Magnet Recognition Program ® in 2002. The design itself later on evolved from the 14 Forces of Magnetism to the present five-component empirical model. Those are not trivia points. They explain why older language still distributes and why more recent teams can get tangled in between legacy terminology and present program structure.

When a health center has veteran leaders who trained under one conceptual design and more recent leaders who know another, a specialist can play a beneficial translation role." Yes, the older structure matters historically. Yes, the current model is organized in a different way. And yes, our files must show the present ANCC framework." That type of constant information frequently prevents ineffective debates.
Careful language safeguards credibility
The much deeper concern here is not branding rules. It is reliability. Health centers and health systems pursue Magnet acknowledgment due to the fact that the classification is meaningful. It signifies that the company has met ANCC's standards and is acknowledged for nursing excellence. If the language around the effort ends up being careless, the company undermines part of the seriousness it is trying to demonstrate.

People notice this. Nurses see when management overclaims. Appraisers observe when terms is irregular. Communications teams discover when they need to backtrack released language. Professional notification when a company does not yet have actually shared understanding of basic terms. None of those observations are catastrophic, but together they create friction.

Clear language does the opposite. It assists organizations communicate aspiration without overstatement, pride without confusion, and preparedness without implying results that just ANCC can award. It likewise helps a Magnet ® Consulting engagement stay anchored to the genuine work, which is not just motivation or format, but disciplined preparation within a called program that has its own requirements, structure, and safeguarded terms.

For leaders, the practical takeaway is straightforward. Utilize the full program name when formality matters. Distinguish classification from redesignation. Treat Journey to Magnet Excellence ® as a specific trademarked expression, not generic inspirational phrasing. Use logos just under the applicable guidelines for designated organizations. Anchor your preparation and documentation discussions in the current five-component model. And when unpredictability shows up about process information such as fees or timing, verify them straight against ANCC's present materials rather than relying on routine or hearsay.

That level of care may appear small compared to the scale of the organizational work involved. In reality, it is one of the clearest marks of a group that understands what Magnet acknowledgment is, what it is not, and what it takes to discuss it responsibly.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization serving hospitals since 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps nursing and clinical teams transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>