What Shared Governance Way in Nursing Today

06 September 2026

Shared Governance has belonged to nursing language for several years, yet the meaning has honed in practice. The term points to something concrete, not abstract. Nurses have a formal voice in decisions about expert practice, generally through councils or a comparable decision-making structure. That definition matters because it separates true participation from the appearance of participation. An idea box is not Shared Governance. A periodic city center is not Shared Governance. A genuine model offers nurses an ongoing, acknowledged function in forming how care is provided and how requirements are carried into everyday work.

Many nursing leaders now utilize the term Professional Governance together with, or instead of, Shared Governance. That shift is not cosmetic. It reflects a stronger emphasis on nursing autonomy, responsibility, meaningful decision-making, and leadership in practice. When the language modifications from shared to expert, the center of gravity relocations. The focus is less on whether leaders are willing to hear staff input and more on whether nurses are expected to exercise professional authority in the locations they own.

That difference is especially essential today, when nursing groups are being asked to do more under consistent stress. Retention, engagement, teamwork, practice modification, and client care quality all being in the exact same environment. If nurses are expected to carry clinical accountability without a voice in practice choices, the model breaks down rapidly. Shared Governance, or Professional Governance, is one way companies attempt to close that gap.
The core idea is authority, not just attendance
One of the most typical misconceptions about Shared Governance is the belief that it merely indicates nurses rest on committees. Attendance alone does not total up to governance. The meaningful part is influence. Nurses require a formal mechanism through which their expertise affects practice decisions, policy conversations, and the requirements that organize care on the system and throughout the organization.

That is why the council structure matters. In many settings, councils are where practice problems are gone over, suggestions are formed, and decisions are moved forward through a recognized process. The style may differ, however the underlying principle stays stable: bedside nurses and other nursing professionals are not simply implementing decisions made elsewhere. They are participating in the work of defining nursing practice.

This is where Professional Governance becomes a beneficial term. It frames governance as both a structure and a philosophy. The structure offers the channels for discussion and decision-making. The approach establishes the expectation that nursing understanding should direct nursing practice. Without the structure, the approach becomes rhetoric. Without the philosophy, the structure becomes a conference calendar.

Anyone who has actually worked in or around nursing leadership has seen the difference. In weaker designs, councils exist on paper however have little impact. Minutes are taken, recommendations are made, and after that whatever stalls at the level of approval. In stronger models, nurses can see a line between discussion, choice, and application. That line constructs trust. Once trust is developed, involvement starts to feel worthwhile rather of performative.
Why the language has shifted towards Expert Governance
The relocation from Shared Governance to Professional Governance reflects a wider maturation in how nursing management talks about power and obligation. Shared Governance was traditionally essential due to the fact that it pressed versus top-down management and made room for staff nurse voice. That remains important. Still, the more recent term highlights something more particular. Nursing is not just sharing in administrative processes. Nursing is governing professional practice.

That framing brings 2 ramifications that are worthy of attention.

First, autonomy is not optional if accountability is genuine. Nurses are held to professional standards and expected to make sound judgments at the point of care. A governance design that excludes them from significant choices about practice creates a contradiction. Professional Governance acknowledges that expert accountability and professional authority should take a trip together.

Second, leadership is not restricted to title. Significant decision-making does not belong just to executives or managers. It can and ought to consist of nurses who know the work thoroughly due to the fact that they do it every day. This is not an emotional argument for addition. It is a practical acknowledgment that nursing practice improves when those closest to care have a structured method to shape it.

That helps explain why leadership organizations describe Professional Governance as supporting nursing sustainability and development. Sustainability in this context is not simply staffing numbers. It is whether the occupation can keep nurses engaged, respected, and ready to invest themselves in the work over time. Growth is not simply organizational growth. It is the advancement of stronger expert identity, stronger collaboration, and much better systems for nursing judgment to affect care.
What it appears like when it is working
When Shared Governance is healthy, people feel it before they define it. Discussions about practice become more disciplined. Unit concerns are less likely to die in disappointment or hallway talk. Personnel nurses begin to understand where a practice concern goes, who discusses it, and how choices move. Leaders stop being the sole point of entry for every single issue. Duty becomes more dispersed, which is frequently a sign that the model has moved beyond slogans.

There are visible markers of a functioning design:
nurses have an official location to discuss professional practice issues councils or representative groups are acknowledged, not symbolic decision-making is meaningful rather than purely advisory leadership anticipates responsibility together with participation collaboration extends beyond nursing while maintaining nursing voice
These markers may sound easy, however every one is harder to attain than it appears. The phrase significant decision-making is specifically demanding. It requires clarity about which choices nurses can make, which they can recommend, and which need more comprehensive organizational contract. Ambiguity in that location develops the fastest path to cynicism.

There is likewise a psychological dimension. Nurses can usually inform whether they are being welcomed to help think through practice or merely asked to back a plan that is already completed. Shared Governance loses credibility when the answer is apparent before the conversation starts. Professional Governance gains reliability when a nurse can point to a policy, practice change, or care standard and say, with accuracy, that nursing judgment shaped that outcome.
Why this matters for patient care and labor force stability
The greatest case for Shared Governance is not ideological. It is functional and ethical. Nursing leadership sources link Shared Governance and Professional Governance to nurse empowerment, engagement, retention, team effort, interprofessional partnership, and much safer, higher-quality client care. Those are not side advantages. They are central outcomes.

The link to client care quality is instinctive if you have actually hung out in scientific settings. Nurses discover patterns early. They see where workflows protect clients and where they create danger. They understand which policy language equates cleanly into practice and which language triggers confusion at the bedside. If that understanding has no reliable path into organizational choices, the company loses among its most important security resources.

The link to engagement and retention is equally essential. Nurses remain devoted to environments where their judgment is respected and where they can affect the conditions of practice. They disengage when they are dealt with as implementers without influence. Shared Governance is not a treatment for each retention problem. Workload, settlement, scheduling, and management quality still matter considerably. But an expert voice in decision-making can change how nurses experience the office. It tells them that expertise is not only anticipated, it is structurally recognized.

The team effort dimension is frequently undervalued. Strong governance designs can enhance interprofessional collaboration because they clarify nursing's contribution. When nursing speaks through organized, representative structures, the profession is more noticeable as a decision-making partner. That changes the tenor of cooperation. Instead of responding to decisions shaped somewhere else, nursing can get in the conversation with a clearer collective perspective.

The ethical case has likewise ended up being more explicit. The nursing code of principles now determines collaboration and shared decision-making as necessary to nursing's work and lists shared governance amongst labor force sustainability efforts. That positions the concept on firmer ground. This is not merely a management strategy that some organizations prefer. It is progressively tied to how the profession comprehends accountable practice and a sustainable work environment.
Shared Governance is collaborative, but it is not vague
One reason some governance efforts drift is that partnership gets specified too loosely. Open discussion is valuable, however governance needs more than discussion. It needs representation, procedure, and follow-through. Nursing governance materials highlight collective management and representative bodies that discuss practice and policy concerns in open online forum. The open online forum piece matters due to the fact that it assists avoid decisions from becoming private, opaque, or detached from staff realities. The representative body piece matters due to the fact that not everyone can be in every room, so authenticity depends on who exists and how they carry concerns back and forth.

This is where numerous organizations either strengthen the model or compromise it. Representation needs to indicate more than selecting reasonable individuals. The body needs to be trusted to emerge real issues, not simply smooth over them. Open online forum has to indicate more than listening pleasantly. It should allow practice and policy concerns to be taken a look at seriously, even when the ramifications are inconvenient.

At the same time, cooperation should not eliminate accountability. Professional Governance is not an approval slip for limitless dispute. At some point, recommendations require owners, decisions need timelines, and execution needs follow-up. The most reputable councils are not always the ones with the most conferences. They are the ones that can move from issue to action with adequate discipline that staff can see the procedure working.
The tension in between empowerment and responsibility
Empowerment is among the most typical benefits connected with Shared Governance, however the word is typically used too casually. In practice, empowerment without duty ends up being tokenism, while obligation without authority ends up being problem. A sound governance model needs to hold all three elements together: autonomy, responsibility, and influence.

That balance is challenging. If nurses are invited into governance however are not prepared to engage with policy, requirements, or practice implications, councils can end up being reactive. If they are highly engaged but organizational leaders maintain all final authority without transparency, the procedure can end up being demoralizing. If authority is decentralized without appropriate clearness, inconsistency can spread.

This is why Professional Governance resonates with lots of current leaders. It asks nursing to claim an expert role, not simply a participatory role. That means bringing judgment, evidence from practice, peer responsibility, and a determination to own results. It also suggests leaders need to be sincere about scope. Not every concern belongs wholly to nursing, and not every choice can be settled inside a nursing forum. Budget plan truths, regulatory restrictions, and interdisciplinary dependencies are genuine. Shared Governance does not get rid of those restraints. It guarantees nursing has an official voice when those restrictions shape expert practice.

That difference can save a lot of frustration. Nurses do not require to be assured unrestricted control. They require a reliable procedure in which their competence materially affects decisions that touch nursing care. Trustworthiness matters more than broad slogans.
What has altered in the current moment
The factor this discussion feels especially immediate now is that the profession is facing sustainability. Nursing leadership organizations explain Professional Governance as supporting sustainability and growth, and that language is telling. The pressure on the workforce has made concerns of voice, autonomy, and engagement harder to overlook. A workforce can not be sustained by asking experts to soak up stress while excluding them from key choices about practice.

Shared Governance today therefore carries more weight than it when did. It is no longer talked about just as a hallmark of progressive management or a preferable feature of strong culture. It is increasingly dealt with as part of the facilities of a healthy nursing environment. The ethical framing, the retention ramifications, and the link to care quality have all raised the stakes.

There is likewise a generational shift in expectations. Many nurses going into or advancing within the occupation https://angelotmuv739.timeforchangecounselling.com/how-shared-governance-helps-align-leadership-and-nursing-practice https://angelotmuv739.timeforchangecounselling.com/how-shared-governance-helps-align-leadership-and-nursing-practice expect transparency and collective management as a standard, not a benefit. They want to understand how choices are made and where professional input fits. That expectation can be uneasy for companies still counting on old command structures, but it is not unreasonable. In professions constructed on judgment, people anticipate a say in the systems that govern that judgment.
What leaders often solve, and what they frequently miss
The finest nursing leaders comprehend that Shared Governance can not be relaunched with branding alone. Renaming committees, revitalizing charters, or adopting the language of Professional Governance will not do much unless authority and accountability are genuinely redistributed. Nurses can tell rapidly whether the design has actually substance.

Leaders who get this best normally focus on a few useful truths.
structure matters because informal impact fades under pressure transparency matters since hidden decisions damage trust representative conversation matters due to the fact that not every voice can be in every room visible outcomes matter due to the fact that participation should lead somewhere philosophy matters due to the fact that councils without professional function ended up being procedural
What leaders sometimes miss out on is the amount of upkeep governance needs. Councils need support. Agents need time and clarity. Choices require interaction loops back to staff. A governance design can deteriorate silently when conferences end up being crowded with updates but light on choices, or when participants are asked to discuss problems without sufficient authority to act. It can also compromise when supervisors feel threatened by dispersed management, even if they openly back the idea.

There is a compromise here worth naming. Shared Governance can be slower than unilateral decision-making, particularly at the front end. Broader conversation requires time. Agent procedures require time. Clarifying ramifications for practice takes some time. Yet speed is not the only step of efficiency. Decisions developed with nursing input are often simpler to carry out due to the fact that the rationale is stronger, the practical barriers show up earlier, and ownership is more extensively shared. The time is not always lost time. Typically it is time shifted upstream, where it can prevent downstream resistance or rework.
Where companies struggle
Most organizations do not battle with the idea. They deal with consistency. Shared Governance sounds appealing almost everywhere. The more difficult concern is whether the structure stays active and reputable when the company is under strain.

Common friction points tend to appear in familiar methods. Councils may exist however do not have clear scope. Agents may be called but not really empowered. Open forums might take place, yet choices still feel established. Leaders may ask for accountability from staff nurses without granting sufficient control over the practice issues they are anticipated to own.

Another challenge is the range between unit-level concerns and system-level choices. Nurses might have impact on matters near to the bedside but much less on broader policy problems that still form practice. That space can produce uncertainty if the governance language is expansive but the real scope is narrow. The answer is not to overpromise. It is to define the scope honestly and make the areas of nursing authority visible.

There is also an edge case that deserves attention. Sometimes organizations utilize the language of Shared Governance to shift work onto nurses without shifting decision-making power. Nurses are asked to rest on councils, solve application issues, and help manage change, but the essential choices were made in other places. That is not empowerment. It is labor without authority, dressed up as involvement. Professional Governance is useful here since it hones the test. If nurses are expected to lead in practice, where is that management officially recognized and acted upon?
The deeper expert significance
At its finest, Shared Governance does more than enhance meetings or policy circulation. It enhances what nursing is as an occupation. Occupations are not specified only by skill or service. They are likewise specified by requirements, judgment, self-direction, and obligation to the general public. A governance design that offers nurses a formal function in forming practice lines up with that identity.

That is why the language of Professional Governance has such force. It puts nursing where it belongs, not at the margins of administrative decision-making, but at the center of nursing practice decisions. It acknowledges that management in nursing does not start just when somebody receives a management title. It begins when expert competence is arranged, heard, and delegated with real influence.

The phrase Shared Governance can still serve well, particularly where it is comprehended and operating. But the existing focus on Professional Governance works because it asks a more exacting question. Are nurses simply being included, or are they governing their practice as specialists? That concern cuts through a great deal of noise.

For nurses, this matters since expert voice affects daily work, moral pressure, and the possibility of remaining engaged over time. For leaders, it matters since governance is tied to retention, cooperation, and care quality. For patients, it matters due to the fact that more secure, higher-quality care depends in part on whether the clinicians closest to care can form the systems in which care is delivered.

Shared Governance in nursing today suggests official voice, yes. It also suggests something larger. It implies nursing is expected to bring its competence into the structures where practice is gone over, policy is formed, and accountability is carried. When that expectation is real, Professional Governance stops being a management phrase and enters into how nursing work is really governed. That is the difference between a design that sounds great and one that enhances the profession.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting organization established in 1978 by nurse leader Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps health care organizations strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>