Magnet ® Consulting and the Roadmap to Magnet Acknowledgment

12 August 2026

Hospitals and health systems do not reach Magnet Recognition by mishap. The classification is awarded by the American Nurses Credentialing Center, and it shows that an organization has actually met ANCC's requirements for nursing excellence. That sounds straightforward on paper. In practice, it is a disciplined, multi-year organizational effort that asks leaders to do 2 things simultaneously: strengthen nursing practice in real time and show, with reputable written evidence, that those strengths are embedded throughout the organization.

That gap in between day-to-day excellence and recorded quality is where Magnet ® Consulting typically ends up being useful.

Consulting, at its best, does not change internal management or produce a manufactured story. It assists a company see itself plainly, align its work to the Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® framework, and move through the application and appraisal procedure with less confusion and fewer avoidable errors. The greatest engagements are not about polishing language. They have to do with constructing a roadmap that connects nursing strategy, functional discipline, and ANCC requirements.

The term "roadmap" matters here due to the fact that ANCC itself explains the program as a roadmap to nursing quality. That is not marketing language. It reflects the reality that Magnet is both a location and a structure for sustained enhancement. Organizations use it to sharpen leadership expectations, expert practice, and result accountability, not just to make a plaque.
What Magnet Acknowledgment actually asks of an organization
The Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® has roots in a 1983 study of "magnet" hospitals, and the program name officially changed to Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® in 2002. Today, the framework is arranged around 5 components of the empirical design. Those parts are:
Transformational Leadership Structural Empowerment Exemplary Professional Practice New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements Empirical Outcomes
That model did not appear out of thin air. ANCC discusses that the structure progressed from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism after statistical analysis of appraisal ratings, with the 2008 conceptual model grouping those forces into the five present elements. That history matters since it discusses why experienced Magnet leaders do not deal with the framework as 5 isolated boxes. The components are interconnected, and the evidence for one area typically strengthens another.

For example, transformational leadership without empirical outcomes is goal without evidence. Structural empowerment without excellent professional practice can feel performative. New understanding and enhancement work that never reaches bedside practice remains a job, not a cultural shift. A capable roadmap needs to hold those links together.

This is where internal teams typically strike their first wall. A nursing department might currently have strong councils, engaged leaders, quality enhancement activity, and meaningful nurse participation in governance. Yet when it is time to assemble paperwork tied to ANCC's proof requirements and Sources of Evidence in the Application Manual, the company discovers that essential work has been performed unevenly, taped inconsistently, or explained in ways that do not plainly reveal alignment to the Magnet model.

That is not a failure of practice. It is typically an indication that the organization requires a better translation layer between operations and appraisal.
The useful function of Magnet ® Consulting
There is a misunderstanding that experts go into late in the process to "write up" what the medical facility has done. In weaker engagements, that does occur, and it hardly ever works out. Organizations that wait up until the document due date to get arranged typically wind up scrambling, not enhancing. The much better use of Magnet ® Consulting is earlier and more strategic.

A seasoned specialist generally helps leaders answer a couple of tough questions before significant writing starts. Are we truly all set to apply, or are we still constructing foundational evidence? Do leaders throughout the organization have a shared understanding of the five elements? Is our information story coherent? Can frontline nurses explain how expert practice works here, or is the language restricted to the executive suite? If we were appraised today, would our examples sound genuine, repeatable, and organization-wide?

Those concerns are less glamorous than discussing classification, however they are the ones that form the whole journey.

In useful terms, seeking advice from support often aids with preparedness evaluation, interpretation of ANCC requirements, company of evidence, document development preparation, and preparation for the appraisal process. ANCC offers digital tools and guides to support the appraisal process and interim monitoring throughout designation, and organizations still require a disciplined internal structure to use those tools well. A specialist can assist create that structure, however the material needs to originate from the company's own work.

That difference is essential. Magnet Recognition is granted to the company, not to the consulting firm. If the culture, management behavior, and nursing results are not genuine, no quantity of external assistance will make the story durable.
Where companies tend to have a hard time first
The first struggle is typically not interest. The majority of organizations pursuing Magnet have lots of that. The first struggle is choosing what the journey is truly going to demand.

A healthcare facility may presume that due to the fact that it has a respected chief nursing officer, robust orientation, and active committees, it is mainly all set. Then the team begins mapping evidence to the 5 elements and realizes that what exists in one service line is not consistently real in another. A flagship unit might have outstanding shared governance involvement while a number of smaller departments are still dependent on manager-driven choice making. A quality metric may have enhanced impressively, but the narrative connecting nursing practice modifications to that improvement has actually not been plainly caught. Leaders may speak with complete confidence about innovation, while staff examples remain informal and undocumented.

None of this means the company is off track. It means the road ahead needs to be taken seriously.

Another common difficulty is timing. ANCC posts different Magnet application and appraisal charge schedules, consisting of an online application charge and appraisal evaluation fees due at written file submission. That structure forces organizations to believe beyond aspiration and into job management. It is inadequate to state, "We want Magnet." Leadership should choose when to use, how to pace preparation, and whether the organization is gotten ready for the financial and functional dedication connected to the formal process.

Consultants can be specifically beneficial here since internal leaders are often managing a complete operational load at the very same time. Staffing truths, quality initiatives, study readiness, budget plan pressure, and system-level priorities do not pause because a Magnet journey is underway. An external consultant can develop focus, however only if leaders are candid about current capacity.
Readiness is less about excellence than coherence
One of the most helpful reframes in Magnet work is that preparedness is not perfection. It is coherence.

A prepared organization does not require to be flawless in every metric at every moment. Health care is too dynamic for that. What it does require is a meaningful account of how nursing leadership functions, how professional practice is supported, how improvement takes place, and how results are kept an eye on and acted upon. The 5 Magnet components provide structure to that account. The written documentation requirements then ask the organization to prove it.

That evidence has to do more than list programs or explain policies. It needs to show that structures are active, leaders are engaged, nurses have influence, and results are not accidental. This is one reason Magnet work typically exposes the distinction in between having a council and having significant shared governance. The same is true for management advancement, innovation efforts, and quality tasks. Presence is not the like effectiveness.

A consultant with real Magnet experience usually spends a bargain of time helping teams separate signal from noise. Healthcare facilities produce massive amounts of activity. Not all of it belongs in a Magnet story. Strong consulting support assists recognize which examples really show organizational quality and which are simply busy.

That filtering process can save months of squandered effort. I have seen groups bury themselves under binders, shared drives, and spreadsheets, persuaded that more material suggests a more powerful submission. Usually the opposite holds true. A tighter, more disciplined body of evidence is simpler to defend and more devoted to the real strengths of the organization.
The written documents stage is where discipline shows
ANCC's process needs written documentation tied to proof requirements and Sources of Evidence in the Application Handbook. This stage is where the maturity of the company's preparation becomes visible.

If the organization has spent the preceding months, or years, aligning internal work to the Magnet model, the composing stage ends up being requiring but workable. If that groundwork has not been laid, the composing stage turns into a rescue operation. People begin chasing examples, retrofitting stories, and attempting to rebuild choices that need to have been documented in real time.

A disciplined technique normally consists of a couple of fundamentals:
Clear ownership for each body of evidence A constant technique for verifying examples and outcomes Real timelines for preparing, review, and revision Executive oversight without micromanaging every page A system for resolving spaces quickly
That list might sound basic. It is not. Each product requires judgment.

Take ownership, for instance. When no one owns an area, deadlines slip and quality wanders. When too many individuals own it, the material ends up being bloated and irregular. Or think about executive review. Leaders require exposure into the story being told, however if every paragraph should pass through five rounds of wordsmithing, the procedure slows to a crawl and frontline uniqueness gets modified out.

This is one area where Magnet ® Consulting can include outsized worth. An external consultant often acts as the neutral celebration who can say, with trustworthiness, "This example is strong, this one is too thin, this narrative requirements more powerful result linkage, and this section is trying to do too much." Internal teams are not always positioned to say that to one another, particularly when examples come from influential leaders or prominent departments.
Why empirical outcomes change the conversation
Of the 5 parts, empirical results often shift the tone of the work most sharply. They force companies to move from intention to demonstration.

Leadership can describe worths. Councils can describe structures. Education teams can describe programs. Outcomes require a various requirement. They ask whether all of that effort is producing quantifiable results.

That is healthy pressure. It avoids Magnet from becoming https://chcm.com/# https://chcm.com/# a purely narrative exercise.

It likewise develops pain, especially in companies where data are fragmented or where reporting practices differ throughout units. An expert can not produce outcomes, and no accountable one must attempt. What they can do is assist leaders recognize where the organization's greatest defensible results sit, where information discussion needs enhancement, and where the narrative needs to honestly acknowledge the work of enhancement rather than overstate achievement.

The best Magnet documents do not read like public relations copy. They read like the work of a major company that understands what it is trying to attain, determines progress, and gains from outcomes. That tone matters. ANCC appraisers are trying to find proof of nursing quality, not slogans.
The appraisal procedure and what preparation actually means
ANCC offers digital tools and guidance to support the appraisal procedure and interim monitoring throughout designation. Those resources are valuable, but they do not get rid of the requirement for rehearsal and internal alignment.

Preparation for appraisal is frequently misunderstood as discussion training. That is just a small part of it. Genuine preparation indicates ensuring that leaders, supervisors, and frontline staff can precisely speak with the culture and structures the organization has actually recorded. If the written submission explains transformational management, nurses at various levels ought to be able to acknowledge and discuss what that looks like in practice. If the document emphasizes structural empowerment, staff must have the ability to explain how choices are made and where nursing voice has impact. If innovation and improvement are highlighted, examples must be familiar to those who live the work.

This is where credibility becomes noticeable very rapidly. When a company's story holds true, individuals do not need scripts. They require context, self-confidence, and a clear understanding of the appraisal process. When the story is overstated or extremely centralized, discussions become strained. Staff answer in unclear generalities, leaders over-explain, and the organization appears less mature than it might really be.

One of the more practical benefits of strong consulting support is that it can emerge those disconnects early enough to resolve them. A mock discussion with frontline nurses, for example, is hardly ever about capturing individuals out. It has to do with discovering whether the official Magnet language utilized in documentation matches the lived language of the organization. If there is a mismatch, the answer is not normally to train staff to talk like the document. It is to streamline the file so it sounds like the organization.
First-time designation is not the end of the work
ANCC is clear that classification and redesignation stand out. Organizations that have currently made Magnet Recognition should pursue redesignation to continue being acknowledged. That point is easy to ignore throughout a very first journey.

The companies that deal with redesignation well generally do one thing differently from the start: they avoid treating Magnet as a one-time project. They construct practices that can be maintained after classification. They continue interim monitoring, continue gathering proof in a disciplined method, and continue utilizing the framework as a functional guide instead of a ceremonial achievement.

That state of mind alters the kind of speaking with assistance that is most beneficial. Early in a first journey, external competence may focus on education, preparedness, and structure. Later, or throughout redesignation preparation, the work typically ends up being more about sustainability, calibration, and helping the organization see where it has actually wandered from its own standards.

There is a useful factor for this. After acknowledgment, complacency can set in. The noticeable milestone has actually been reached. Leaders alter roles. Top priorities shift. The systems that when caught examples and outcomes begin to loosen. Organizations that stay strong through redesignation are normally the ones that keep Magnet principles inside typical governance and functional evaluation, rather than separating them in an unique task office.
Choosing speaking with support with great judgment
Not every company needs the exact same level of aid, and not every consultant is the right fit. Some teams require a strategic consultant for a readiness assessment and regular course correction. Others require a more hands-on partner to support work preparation, evidence organization, and appraisal preparation. The best option depends upon internal capacity, prior Magnet experience, management stability, and the maturity of existing nursing structures.

A couple of questions are worth asking before engaging Magnet ® Consulting.

How does the specialist explain their function? If the emphasis is on "getting you the designation" with little conversation of cultural readiness or proof integrity, that is a warning sign. How do they talk about the ANCC structure? Strong advisors are usually particular, grounded, and respectful of the difference between organizational reality and document development. Do they appear going to challenge presumptions? An expert who agrees with everything may feel comfortable early on and be pricey later.

The finest partnerships tend to have a particular sincerity. They permit a specialist to say, "You are stronger here than you recognize," and also, "This area is not ready, and requiring it into the timeline will create problems." That sort of honesty is better than confidence theater.
What a practical roadmap looks like
A reasonable roadmap to Magnet Acknowledgment is hardly ever linear. There are durations of visible development and periods that feel slower, especially when leadership groups are tightening governance, standardizing proof capture, or clarifying outcome reporting. Those quieter stretches are frequently where the most essential work happens.

Good roadmaps also leave room for judgment. A company might be officially qualified to progress and still choose to wait since the evidence is uneven. Another may discover that its strongest path is not to accelerate the writing, however to invest additional time enhancing empirical results or making shared governance more constant across departments. Those decisions can be irritating in the short term, but they normally settle in the reliability of the last submission and the resilience of the culture behind it.

That is ultimately the greatest case for thoughtful Magnet ® Consulting. It assists organizations resist the desire to confuse motion with readiness. It keeps the work anchored to ANCC's standards, the five elements of the empirical design, and the proof requirements that specify a major application. It likewise assists leaders bear in mind that Magnet Acknowledgment is not just about external validation. It is about structure and showing a nursing environment worthy of recognition.

When consulting serves that function, it is not a shortcut. It is a way of making the roadway clearer, more disciplined, and more loyal to the work nurses are currently doing every day.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting organization founded in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with health care organizations improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>