Magnet ® Consulting on Digital Tools for Magnet Appraisal Support

20 August 2026

The Magnet Recognition Program ® sits at the crossway of nursing excellence, organizational discipline, and proof. It is administered by the American Nurses Credentialing Center, and it recognizes health care organizations that fulfill ANCC's Magnet standards for nursing quality and quality client outcomes. For companies pursuing designation or redesignation, the work is rarely restricted to writing. It is functional, analytical, and deeply collaborative.

That is where digital assistance becomes useful instead of fashionable.

Teams frequently start with a familiar assumption, that appraisal support implies a better filing system. In practice, the genuine need is broader. Written paperwork connected to the application manual's proof requirements has to be arranged, reviewed, upgraded, and lined up with the Magnet structure's five elements: Transformational Management, Structural Empowerment, Exemplary Expert Practice, New Knowledge, Innovations, & & Improvements, and Empirical Outcomes. On top of that, ANCC offers digital tools and guides to support the appraisal process and interim tracking during designation. The concern is not whether digital tools belong while doing so. The concern is how to utilize them without turning the Magnet journey into a technology task that distracts from nursing practice.

Experienced Magnet ® consulting work normally begins there, with restraint.
The real problem digital tools are expected to solve
A Magnet application is not just a collection of policies and success stories. It is a disciplined presentation that an organization meets ANCC's requirements. Teams need to gather evidence across departments, validate that evidence, map it correctly, keep variation control, and keep timelines visible enough that nothing critical slips. If the company is currently designated and moving toward redesignation, there is a 2nd challenge: preserving institutional memory while continuing to reveal progress.

Paper binders and shared drives can carry a group only so far. They generally break down in foreseeable ways. One leader is holding the current variation of a file in email. Another has a spreadsheet that nobody else can interpret. Result data lives in one place, narrative drafts in another, and source files in a third. By the time the team notices the issue, time has currently been lost to reconciliation.

Digital tools help most when they decrease that friction. A sound setup makes it much easier to address practical questions rapidly. Which source of evidence is complete? Which narratives still need executive evaluation? Which outcome files are final? Which exemplars require refreshed information because the measurement period has changed? Those are not attractive concerns, but they figure out whether the submission procedure feels controlled or chaotic.

In well-run organizations, digital tools also make the work less personality-dependent. If one director leaves mid-cycle, the process must not collapse. If a document owner modifications, the history of drafts, comments, and decisions should still show up. Great appraisal assistance protects continuity.
Why Magnet work demands more than generic project software
Any project platform can designate jobs. That alone does not make it helpful for Magnet appraisal support.

The Magnet framework has a particular reasoning, and digital organization should show it. Since the conceptual model groups the earlier Forces of Magnetism into five parts, proof is not just stored, it is interpreted in relation to those domains. Teams need to see the work by framework element, by evidence requirement, and by status. If the tool can not support that type of view, staff wind up building side systems. As soon as side systems appear, duplication follows, then drift, then confusion.

I have seen teams overbuild and underbuild at the exact same time. They develop sophisticated tracking dashboards with color codes, reliance rules, and approval paths, yet the control panel is disconnected from the real proof files. Or they do the opposite: they rely on a folder tree so basic that no one can tell whether a published document is draft, last, or outdated. Both approaches stop working for the exact same factor. They treat the innovation either as a substitute for judgment or as a passive storage closet. Magnet appraisal support needs something in between.

That happy medium is usually where Magnet ® consulting includes value. Not by promoting a fashionable platform, but by equating program requirements into a practical digital process that the nursing group can actually maintain.
The function of ANCC's own digital supports
ANCC does not leave companies to improvise everything. It offers digital tools and guides to support the appraisal procedure and interim monitoring during designation. That matters due to the fact that the safest digital approach is the one that remains anchored to how the credentialing body structures the journey.

When a company develops its internal process around the program's actual evidence requirements and appraisal expectations, it minimizes the danger of producing a beautifully organized system that misses out on the point. This takes place more often than individuals admit. A team becomes so soaked up in workflow design that it stops asking whether the product being gathered really talks to the required evidence.

A disciplined seeking advice from approach deals with ANCC's materials as the fixed point. Internal tools ought to support those expectations, not reinterpret them. That sounds obvious, but in practice it changes everything. It affects naming conventions, evaluation cycles, document ownership, and how teams compare material that is good to have and material that is really responsive.

It also keeps organizations from making an expensive mistake with timing. ANCC posts separate Magnet application and appraisal cost schedules, consisting of an online application cost and appraisal evaluation costs due at written file submission. Digital planning has to respect those turning points. There is no advantage in perfecting a tracking system if the organization has not aligned its work to the actual series of application, proof development, and appraisal review.
What reliable digital appraisal assistance looks like
The strongest digital setups are generally not the most complex. They are the clearest. They create one noticeable chain from proof requirement to supporting file to narrative draft to examine status.

In useful terms, that frequently suggests a shared structure where each piece of proof has an owner, an existing variation, a date of last review, and a clear relationship to one of the 5 Magnet parts. Outcome products require particular attention because they tend to be updated more frequently than policy files or fixed artifacts. If a team does not mark measurement periods thoroughly, it can end up drafting around numbers that later on shift.

Another trademark of a great setup is that it supports both writing and recognition. Lots of groups can collect examples. Fewer groups produce a system that forces the more difficult concern: does this actually demonstrate what the evidence requirement requests? That distinction matters. Anecdotes are useful, however Magnet paperwork is not a scrapbook. It is a structured case for excellence.

A useful digital environment makes spaces noticeable early. If Structural Empowerment is progressing efficiently while New Understanding, Innovations, & & Improvements stays thin, the system needs to reveal that before the composing phase becomes urgent. If Empirical Outcomes evidence is irregular throughout service lines, leaders must see it soon enough to choose, either by strengthening the analysis or by revisiting which examples are strongest.
Where organizations frequently go wrong
Most problems with digital appraisal support are not technical failures. They are judgment failures.

Sometimes the team shops excessive. Every committee minute, every education leaflet, every internal newsletter goes into the repository. The result is clutter that slows review and obscures the strongest proof. Other times the team is so selective that it loses context and can not reconstruct how a story was developed. The ideal balance takes discipline.

Another common issue is weak governance. If nobody has authority to choose what counts as last, the system fills with parallel drafts. If ownership is vague, deadlines end up being ideas. If customers comment outside the primary platform, by email or side conversations, the digital record stops being reliable.

The companies that manage this well typically agree on a few functional rules early and impose them consistently.
One source of reality for active files Clear owners for each evidence requirement A visible status system for draft, evaluation, and final Regular refresh cycles for time-sensitive outcome data Defined approval authority before submission
That is not an extensive structure, however it covers the failures I see most often. None of these guidelines are fancy. All of them conserve time.
The difference between classification and redesignation work
Digital assistance should not equal for newbie designation and redesignation.

For companies seeking first-time recognition, the digital difficulty is often assembly. They are building the evidence architecture while likewise discovering how to speak in Magnet terms. The most useful tools are the ones that assist them map what they currently have against ANCC's written documents requirements and recognize what still requires development.

For redesignation, the obstacle shifts. ANCC is clear that companies that have actually already made Magnet Recognition need to pursue redesignation to continue being recognized. That implies the digital system can not function as a frozen archive of the previous cycle. It needs to support continuity and change at the same time. Teams require access to previous organizational memory, but they likewise require a tidy way to reveal existing performance and ongoing progress.

This is where older systems can become liabilities. A repository constructed for one effective submission may be too rigid for the next cycle. Folder names show a previous manual, personnel owners have actually altered, and historic material crowds current proof. Consulting assistance is frequently most useful at this phase since redesignation teams are tempted to recycle old structures beyond their useful life. Often the very best choice is not to maintain whatever precisely as it was, but to move the core reasoning into a cleaner, more existing digital environment.
Digital tools do not change nursing judgment
One of the more subtle threats in Magnet appraisal assistance is overconfidence in control panels. If a screen shows eighty-five percent total, leaders feel reassured. However conclusion portions can hide weak analysis, unsupported claims, or evidence that is technically present but not persuasive.

The 5 components of the Magnet model are not simple categories. They represent a thorough view of nursing quality. Transformational Management, for example, can not be reduced to whether a folder contains leadership conference notes. Exemplary Expert Practice can not be proven by volume alone. Empirical Outcomes, especially, require care because outcomes are just significant when they are clearly organized and properly connected to the narrative.

That is why strong Magnet ® consulting does not stop at software setup. It stays near content quality. A helpful expert asks uneasy questions early. Is this example the greatest demonstration of Structural Empowerment, or is it simply the easiest file to obtain? Does this outcome set clarify efficiency, or does it require more context? Are we selecting proof because it is offered, or because it is compelling?

Technology speeds dealing with. It does not improve discernment on its own.
A brief story from the field, without the romance
There is a familiar minute in almost every big evidence-driven effort. Someone says, normally in month 6 or month nine, "I know we have that somewhere." The space goes peaceful. 10 individuals start searching.

That sentence is a sign that the digital structure is failing.

The issue is rarely that the organization does not have evidence. Most healthcare organizations pursuing Magnet recognition have substantial product. The problem is retrieval under pressure. If finding a final, verified file takes twenty minutes during a routine working session, picture the cumulative cost over months of preparation. The lost time is apparent. Less apparent is the impact on confidence. Groups begin to question what they have, then they overcollect, then the repository grows much heavier and less trustworthy.

A cleaner digital process alters the tone of the work. It minimizes second-guessing. It reduces meetings. It offers nursing leaders a better opportunity to focus on interpretation instead of file hunting. That may sound modest, however in complicated appraisal preparation, modest enhancements compound.
Choosing tools with the program, not the marketplace, in mind
The software market always assures more than an appraisal group needs. Most organizations do not require a remarkable platform overhaul to support Magnet documentation. They require a trustworthy structure, consent discipline, practical identifying, and review workflows that staff will really use.

When evaluating tools or existing systems, I would concentrate on a brief set of questions.
Can the system mirror the Magnet framework and proof requirements clearly? Can groups track versions and approval status without ambiguity? Can time-sensitive products be updated without breaking links to narratives? Can numerous departments contribute while protecting accountability? Can the process assistance interim monitoring throughout designation in a practical way?
If the answer to the majority of those questions is yes, the company might currently have enough technology. If the answer is no, including more users to the current setup will not fix the much deeper issue. Structure has to come before scale.

This is an area where restraint matters. A heavily tailored tool can develop dependence on a couple of technical specialists. If those people leave, the Magnet procedure becomes harder to keep. Simpler systems, when created well, are frequently more resilient.
Trademark awareness and communication discipline
A smaller sized but important point deserves attention. Magnet-related language and logos are not casual branding elements. ANCC states that designated companies might utilize main Magnet logo designs under trademark guidelines, and phrases such as Journey to Magnet Quality ® are trademark-protected in logo design usage guidance. Digital properties, shared design templates, and communication folders ought to reflect that reality.

This is not just a legal housekeeping problem. It becomes part of professional trustworthiness. Organizations must understand which products are internal working drafts, which are main interactions, and which references to Magnet status or journey language are proper at a provided stage. A mature digital environment consists of that distinction. It avoids unexpected abuse and keeps messaging consistent across nursing, marketing, and executive teams.
The finest consulting suggestions is typically operationally boring
People sometimes anticipate Magnet ® speaking with to provide a master template that resolves everything. Helpful consulting is usually more useful than that. It takes a look at who owns what, how frequently data modifications, where evaluation traffic jams occur, and whether the digital process fits the culture of the organization.

For one group, the right relocation might be simplifying a bloated repository and pruning replicate artifacts. For another, it may be presenting a disciplined review calendar connected to https://conneryfmk835.tearosediner.net/magnet-r-consulting-and-the-magnet-appraisal-process https://conneryfmk835.tearosediner.net/magnet-r-consulting-and-the-magnet-appraisal-process submission turning points. For a redesignation effort, it might indicate separating archive materials from current-cycle working files so that historical evidence remains offered without overwhelming active preparation.

The consulting worth is not in making the process appearance sophisticated. It remains in making the procedure reliable.

That reliability matters due to the fact that Magnet acknowledgment is substantial. ANCC awards Magnet status to companies that fulfill the program's requirements, and the classification is commonly comprehended as recognition for nursing quality and quality client outcomes. The roadway to that recognition, or to continued acknowledgment through redesignation, needs a level of organizational coherence that digital tools can either support or sabotage.
What leaders must get out of a sound digital support plan
By the time a digital assistance strategy is working well, the company ought to feel a couple of modifications nearly right away. Meetings end up being more focused since individuals invest less time browsing and more time choosing. Draft evaluation becomes less psychological since everybody is looking at the very same existing file. Management gains clearer presence into where evidence is strong, where it is incomplete, and where timelines require intervention.

Perhaps crucial, the technology ends up being less visible. That is normally the indication that it is serving the work correctly. The team is talking about Magnet proof, results, management, expert practice, and improvement. It is not speaking about where a file disappeared.

There is a temptation to deal with digital appraisal support as a side function, something administrative that can be fixed later on. In truth, it belongs to the facilities of Magnet readiness. ANCC's program has developed in time, from the early understanding of magnet medical facilities through the later formalization of the Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® name and the advancement of the present five-component model. Organizations preparing paperwork within that framework need systems that are similarly intentional.

A properly designed digital environment will not make Magnet acknowledgment on its own. It will, nevertheless, make it far easier for an organization to present its work faithfully, manage its deadlines smartly, and sustain momentum across a requiring procedure. That is the sort of assistance that matters, and it is precisely where thoughtful Magnet ® consulting shows its worth.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization founded in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with health care organizations strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>