Magnet ® Consulting on Digital Assistance for Magnet Organizations

21 August 2026

Magnet ® Consulting has actually altered shape over the past numerous years, not because the standards for nursing excellence have actually ended up being less strenuous, however because the work required to show that excellence now lives throughout even more digital touchpoints than numerous companies expected. The Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® stays what it has actually long been, an ANCC program that acknowledges health care organizations for nursing excellence and quality client outcomes. What has actually shifted is the everyday truth of preparing for classification or redesignation. Proof is recorded, curated, reviewed, updated, kept track of, and interacted through systems that are often fragmented throughout departments.

That is where digital assistance becomes valuable, not as a substitute for nursing leadership or expert practice expertise, however as a practical discipline that assists a company handle the volume, timing, and integrity of its Magnet work. In strong companies, digital assistance is seldom flashy. It is disciplined. It brings order to documents, clearness to ownership, consistency to version control, and self-confidence to the long arc of the Journey to Magnet Excellence ®.

The organizations that manage this well normally comprehend an easy fact early. Magnet is not a one-time writing job. It is an operational commitment that has to show up in proof, outcomes, leadership practices, and enhancement work over time. The digital environment either makes that simpler or much harder.
Where digital guidance fits in the Magnet landscape
The Magnet Recognition Program ® grew from the findings of a 1983 study of"magnet"hospitals, and the program name formally changed to Magnet Recognition Program ® in 2002. ANCC awards Magnet status, and organizations that fulfill ANCC's Magnet standards are recognized for nursing quality. For leaders who are brand-new to the procedure, it helps to keep in mind that Magnet is both recognition and roadmap. ANCC explicitly describes the program as a roadmap to nursing quality, which expression matters since it recommends a continual method, not a scramble before submission.

Digital guidance ends up being relevant since the Magnet framework is structured, evidence-based, and cumulative. The existing empirical model is arranged around five components: Transformational Management; Structural Empowerment; Exemplary Expert Practice; New Understanding, Innovations, & Improvements; and Empirical Results. Those components are conceptually clear, however inside a genuine organization they touch dozens of functional areas. Nursing management may own the method, yet information might sit with quality teams, education records may live in separate systems, and unit-level examples might exist just in shared drives or email chains unless somebody imposes order.

Experienced Magnet specialists usually see the exact same pattern. The challenge is seldom a complete absence of good work. A lot of organizations pursuing recognition currently have significant practice, management engagement, and enhancement efforts underway. The obstacle is equating that work into a coherent body of written documents that aligns with the Sources of Evidence and the Application Manual requirements, without losing accuracy or tiring individuals doing the work.

A digital strategy for Magnet support starts there. It asks useful concerns. Where is the evidence stored? Who can verify it? Which documents are current? Which metrics have enough context to be defensible? What is the approval course before product is used in composed documentation? If redesignation is the objective, how is interim monitoring handled so that the company is not restoring its evidence story from scratch?
The distinction between digital activity and digital discipline
Many health care organizations currently have plenty of digital activity. They have folders, control panels, conference files, policy repositories, and reporting tools. Activity is not the same thing as discipline. I have actually seen groups spend months gathering examples only to understand late in the process that they had 3 versions of the very same story, different dates connected to the exact same metric, and no constant record of which leader authorized what.

That sort of friction does not generally originated from poor intent. It originates from a typical mistaken belief that the Magnet effort can be layered on top of existing document practices without changing the underlying workflow. In practice, Magnet work benefits from tighter governance than ordinary committee file sharing. The factor is straightforward. ANCC's appraisal procedure is connected to composed paperwork evidence requirements, and the company requires a reputable method to reveal not simply that a story sounds strong, but that it is supported, attributable, and current.

A disciplined digital approach typically improves several parts of the work at once. It reduces duplication, reduces the time it requires to locate evidence, and makes it easier to identify gaps before they end up being urgent. It also changes the psychological climate of the job. Teams end up being less reactive. Leaders stop chasing after files by memory. Subject experts can concentrate on content and judgment instead of administrative recovery.

That shift matters more than lots of people realize. When companies talk about Magnet fatigue, they are often explaining process fatigue. The requirements are strenuous, however the real drain generally comes from badly designed evidence management.
Why Magnet ® Consulting now requires fluency in systems, not just standards
Traditional Magnet ® Consulting has fixated readiness, proof analysis, writing assistance, and preparation for appraisal. Those locations stay necessary. But digital guidance now should have equivalent weight because the seeking advice from function typically sits at the joint between program requirements and organizational reality.

A consultant may comprehend the five components deeply and still stop working to assist if the organization can not produce clean documents in a functional structure. On the other hand, an expert who focuses just on system organization without valuing the standards can develop a neat archive that does not map well to Magnet expectations. The strongest support generally comes from integrating both perspectives.

That suggests equating the structure into usable digital operations. Transformational Leadership, for instance, is not simply a conceptual classification. It indicates a need to gather and protect evidence that leadership actions, decisions, and impact are visible and attributable. Structural Empowerment does not reside in a single folder. It tends to surface across councils, development activity, governance structures, and organization-wide participation. Exemplary Expert Practice and Brand-new Knowledge, Innovations, & Improvements frequently require specifically careful handling because examples can be rich, however unevenly recorded. Empirical Outcomes demand accuracy, because results work depends upon reliable measures and context.

Good digital assistance treats these distinctions seriously. Not every evidence type need to be captured, reviewed, or revitalized in the same way. A board-level presentation, a nursing council artifact, a policy-linked practice example, and a results summary each bring various recognition needs.
The written paperwork problem most teams underestimate
The most underestimated part of the Magnet journey is not the amount of work, but the quantity of synthesis. ANCC's crosswalk products describe written documentation evidence requirements connected to the Application Handbook. That means organizations are not just submitting raw files. They are constructing a coherent submission that draws from a big body of source material.

In useful terms, this produces 3 layers of work. Initially, evidence should exist. Second, it must be organized and retrievable. Third, it must be interpreted and woven into documents that deals with the requirements clearly. Lots of teams start at layer three since composing seems like visible development. Then they stall when the underlying proof is irregular or inaccessible.

Digital assistance should help prevent that pattern. A fully grown technique generally separates source control from narrative advancement. The source record requires one owner and one agreed version. The story might go through numerous drafts, however it needs to always point back to traceable evidence. That separation sounds apparent, yet it is one of the first disciplines to break down when deadlines tighten.

I as soon as enjoyed a cross-functional team invest an entire afternoon debating which of two spreadsheets represented the"final"metric set for a section that everybody believed was complete. The issue was not the data alone. It was that nobody had actually recorded the decision path. A specialist with strong digital instincts would have repaired the process upstream, not simply dealt with the dispute in the room.
Digital tools are valuable, but governance is what makes them useful
ANCC supplies digital tools and guides to support the appraisal procedure and interim monitoring during designation. That matters due to the fact that it signifies something crucial about the program environment itself. Magnet work is not disconnected from digital procedure. The acknowledgment path currently assumes a level of digital engagement.

Still, tools alone do not produce preparedness. An organization can purchase platforms, open shared areas, and designate file categories, yet stay disorganized if there is no governance around use. Governance does not have to be bureaucratic. In reality, the very best governance designs are typically quite lean. They establish clear guidelines early and secure the team from avoidable confusion later.

Here are the five governance practices that consistently make Magnet work smoother:
Define one source of fact for each proof type. Assign called owners for material, approvals, and updates. Use a consistent identifying convention before evidence collection ramps up. Separate archival product from active submission material. Track modification dates and decisions in a way nontechnical users can follow.
These are modest disciplines, however they prevent major downstream waste. When groups avoid them, they frequently compensate with heroics. Somebody keeps in mind where a file may be. Someone manually reconciles versions at the last minute. Someone writes around a missing artifact. That might get a section over the line, however it is not a sustainable technique for designation, and it is even less appropriate for redesignation.
Designation and redesignation require various digital rhythms
One of the most essential differences in Magnet work is the difference in between classification and redesignation. ANCC states plainly that companies that have actually already made Magnet Acknowledgment must pursue redesignation to continue being recognized. That fact appears uncomplicated, but it has functional effects that are easy to miss.

An organization approaching initial classification can sometimes tolerate a more project-like structure, specifically if management is constructing internal capability for the first time. Even then, I would argue for durable systems rather than short-lived workarounds. However redesignation raises the stakes for connection. The organization is no longer attempting to show that it can mount a one-time submission. It is showing that excellence is sustained and monitored.

That alters the digital rhythm. Evidence collection can not be episodic. Interim tracking matters. Governance has to survive staffing changes, leadership shifts, and the inevitable drift that takes place when a significant submission is no longer imminent. If a team shops its institutional memory in a few knowledgeable people, redesignation becomes needlessly fragile.

The more resistant method is to build a living Magnet repository and workflow, not a designation-season archive. That repository should not end up being a disposing ground. It needs to work as a working environment where ownership is clear, proof can be refreshed without confusion, and older material stays accessible for context without infecting present submission work.
Trademark awareness belongs to digital assistance, too
There is another location where digital guidance deserves more regard than it in some cases gets, and that is trademark stewardship. Magnet classification and associated marks are trademarked, and ANCC states that designated companies might utilize main Magnet logos under hallmark guidelines."Journey to Magnet Quality ® "is also a secured phrase in logo design use guidance.

This is not just a marketing footnote. In practice, companies often display Magnet-related language and imagery across intranets, public web pages, discussions, acknowledgment materials, recruitment content, and internal project possessions. Without fundamental digital oversight, inconsistent or improper usage can spread out rapidly. The exact same file can be copied into several settings long after a campaign ends or a designation duration changes.

An excellent consulting engagement need to therefore consist of guidance on where main branding assets live, who can utilize them, and how approvals are dealt with. That is not about legal posturing. It is about functional respect for the program and avoiding avoidable errors. In companies with big communications groups or decentralized service lines, this little discipline can spare a lot of clean-up later.
Fee schedules, timing, and the cost of digital disorganization
ANCC posts different Magnet application and appraisal charge schedules, including an online application charge and appraisal review charges due at written file submission. Even without pricing estimate amounts, that reality needs to sharpen executive attention. There are direct program expenses, and there are internal costs that rarely appear on a single line item.

The internal expense of digital disorganization is frequently considerable. Hours build up in file searches, replicate demands, revamp, manual version reconciliation, and delayed approvals. Leaders feel the burden in fragmented meetings and late-stage escalations. Writers feel it in narrative instability. Unit leaders feel it when they are asked for the same materials more than as soon as since no one trusts the repository.

For that reason, digital guidance is not simply administrative assistance. It is a form of cost control and risk decrease. It safeguards personnel time, preserves management bandwidth, and lowers the odds that a company reaches a fee-bearing milestone with avoidable documentation weak points still unresolved.

The organizations that see this clearly tend to deal with digital support as part of Magnet facilities, not as a clerical afterthought. They comprehend that a strong repository, sensible workflow, and disciplined interim tracking can pay back in confidence alone, even before one attempts to estimate labor savings.
What a sound digital Magnet method appears like in daily practice
In everyday practice, the best digital setups are generally less fancy than individuals expect. They do not depend upon expensive language or oversized architecture. They depend upon fit. The system needs to match the method nursing leaders, professional practice groups, quality staff, teachers, and coordinators really work.

That typically means picking structures that are instinctive under pressure. If a folder map, control panel, or file workflow requires consistent interpretation, adoption will break down. If calling conventions are so stiff that common users stop following them, the system will slowly fill with exceptions. If approvals are routed through too many hands, teams will bypass the process out of necessity.

A practical setup often includes a main proof environment, a clear division between source files and established narratives, and an easy cadence for evaluation. Monthly or quarterly refresh points can work well if they are aligned with existing leadership and committee rhythms. The goal is not to produce more conferences. The objective is to attach Magnet evidence stewardship to work the organization is currently doing.

This is where professional judgment matters. Some organizations need more structure since they are big or decentralized. Others need less structure because they are over-engineering the procedure and discouraging involvement. Magnet ® Consulting is most beneficial when it can compare those two circumstances and respond accordingly.
Common edge cases that are worthy of early attention
A couple of edge cases come up frequently enough to require early discussion. One is the tension between regional ownership and main control. Unit leaders and specialty groups typically understand their practice stories best, but central Magnet management needs consistency. If central control becomes too heavy, regional engagement drops. If it ends up being too loose, submissions lose coherence. The best balance normally involves shared templates, specified approval points, and enough flexibility for genuine examples to stay intact.

Another edge case is historic evidence that is significant however inadequately preserved. Organizations sometimes have exceptional examples of leadership action or professional practice change that took place at the correct time however were not digitally recorded in a tidy, submission-ready method. The impulse is frequently to either force the example into shape or discard it too quickly. Neither action is constantly best. In some cases the very best move is to keep the example as contextual support while preferring more powerful, better-documented proof in the official written documentation.

Data context develops a third obstacle. Empirical results are central to the model, however numbers do not interpret themselves. If a metric improves, the company still requires self-confidence in the underlying context and presentation. If a metric is blended, the response is not to conceal it. The better path is to comprehend whether the proof set is complete, current, and proper to the requirement being attended to. Digital discipline helps here due to the fact that it preserves the lineage of reports and choices instead of minimizing the discussion to whichever spreadsheet is easiest to find.
Building a Magnet-ready culture through digital habits
It is appealing to discuss digital guidance as if it were separate from culture. In practice, the two are firmly linked. A culture that values nursing quality however tolerates chaotic evidence handling produces unnecessary stress. A culture that treats documentation stewardship as part of expert accountability normally carries out much better, not since it is more administrative, but due to the fact that it lowers friction in between exceptional practice and visible proof of that practice.

That cultural shift does not need every nurse leader to become a file expert. It requires the company to make proof stewardship typical, intelligible, and shared. https://jsbin.com/fihaxupedo https://jsbin.com/fihaxupedo When that happens, the Magnet journey feels less like a routine extraction workout and more like a disciplined expression of work currently underway.

This is one of the peaceful advantages of sound Magnet ® Consulting. Great assistance does not simply press a submission throughout the goal. It leaves the company with stronger habits. Groups understand where to place crucial evidence. Leaders know how to evaluate material before it ends up being urgent. Interaction groups comprehend hallmark limits. Coordinators spend less time searching and more time curating. By redesignation, the organization is not relearning itself.
The real value of digital guidance for Magnet organizations
The greatest case for digital assistance is not technological ambition. It is organizational clarity. Magnet recognition is awarded by ANCC, and the requirements require evidence of nursing quality across a structured model. The work is considerable, the documentation expectations are genuine, and the timeline includes official application and appraisal phases with their own costs and submission points. Under those conditions, digital condition is not a problem. It is a tactical weakness.

Thoughtful digital guidance assists companies align their daily operations with the truths of the Magnet Recognition Program ®. It supports the written documentation process, reinforces interim monitoring, and offers designation or redesignation efforts a more stable structure. Most importantly, it respects the truth that outstanding nursing practice should have similarly disciplined proof management.

When that alignment is in place, the Magnet journey looks different. The group is still striving, however the effort ends up being more purposeful. The stories are more powerful due to the fact that the proof beneath them is stronger. Leadership discussions end up being more forward-looking since less energy is invested in healing and reassembly. And the company is much better positioned to demonstrate, with confidence and consistency, the excellence it has striven to build.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting organization founded in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps nursing and clinical teams strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>