Magnet ® Consulting Guide to ANCC Magnet Designation

16 August 2026

ANCC Magnet classification carries a particular meaning. It is recognition, awarded by the American Nurses Credentialing Center, for health care organizations that fulfill Magnet requirements for nursing quality and quality client results. That description sounds uncomplicated, but the work behind it is anything however easy. The classification process asks an organization to do more than collect files or polish a narrative. It asks leaders to show, with proof, how nursing practice is constructed, supported, improved, and measured throughout the enterprise.

That is where thoughtful Magnet ® Consulting can assist. Not by making a story, and not by dealing with designation as a branding job, however by helping a company analyze the standards correctly, arrange proof properly, and prepare its leaders and teams for a strenuous appraisal procedure. The best consulting assistance brings structure to a demanding journey without changing the tough internal work that Magnet requires.
What Magnet classification actually recognizes
A surprising quantity of confusion begins with the fundamental terms. Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® is the ANCC program that acknowledges healthcare companies for nursing quality and quality patient results. Its roots return to a 1983 research study of so called "magnet" hospitals. The program name officially altered to Magnet Recognition Program ® in 2002. Those historical information matter because they describe why Magnet still brings so much weight in nursing management circles. It is not a trend label. It is a long-standing framework that has actually evolved over time.

Organizations often discuss the "Journey to Magnet Quality ®, "and that expression is not casual shorthand. It is ANCC's trademarked phrase for the course towards classification. The journey matters since Magnet is not merely a one-time submission. ANCC distinguishes between classification and redesignation. If a company has currently earned Magnet Recognition, it should pursue redesignation to continue being recognized. That single difference changes how a consulting engagement should be approached. A newbie candidate needs assistance developing a structure. A redesignating organization requires help revealing sustained efficiency, disciplined tracking, and continued progress.

Another point that deserves clearness is ownership. ANCC is the credentialing body through which the American Nurses Association uses these programs, and Magnet status is awarded by ANCC. Any consulting firm, consultant, or independent professional operating in this area needs to anchor every recommendation to ANCC's program structure, requirements, and language. If the guidance drifts from that center, the organization typically pays for it later on in rework, weak paperwork, or misplaced effort.
The structure that shapes everything
The existing Magnet structure is organized around five parts of the empirical model. Those parts are Transformational Leadership, Structural Empowerment, Exemplary Professional Practice, New Understanding, Developments, & & Improvements, and Empirical Outcomes.

That design did not appear out of thin air. It progressed from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism. After a 2007 statistical analysis of appraisal scores, the 2008 conceptual design organized those forces into the 5 current elements. For companies getting ready for designation, that advancement matters due to the fact that it discusses the balance Magnet expects. The design is broad enough to catch leadership, expert practice, development, and results, yet particular enough to require disciplined evidence in each area.

Good Magnet ® Consulting starts with this framework, not with a generic task strategy. A consultant who understands the model can help an organization see where its evidence is strong, where it is fragmented, and where it may be describing good intents without revealing quantifiable outcomes. That distinction is where many teams battle. Leaders typically know they are doing meaningful work. The obstacle is proving that work in the format and structure ANCC expects.
Why companies look for speaking with support
Some companies have deep internal know-how and still pick outside assistance. Others are beginning almost from scratch. Both can benefit, though for different reasons.

A mature nursing management group might not require someone to describe Magnet principles. What it may require is an experienced external eye that can identify gaps the internal group can no longer see. When individuals have actually dealt with a job for months or years, weak shifts in between stories, missing context in evidence, and inconsistent terminology can vanish into the wallpaper. An outside consultant typically notices those problems in a single read.

A less skilled company deals with a different problem. It may have strong nursing practice however limited familiarity with ANCC's composed paperwork expectations. ANCC requires candidates to submit written documentation using Sources of Proof, or proof requirements, tied to the Application Handbook. That implies the job is not just assembling binders of achievements. It is matching organizational proof to specific proof requirements in a disciplined way.

The useful value of seeking advice from assistance normally falls under a couple of areas:
interpreting the Magnet structure and proof expectations accurately organizing composed paperwork around Sources of Evidence helping leaders compare anecdote, activity, and verifiable evidence preparing the company for appraisal-related concerns and review supporting connection between initial designation work and redesignation planning
Each of those points sounds procedural. In practice, every one can determine whether an application tells a meaningful story or becomes a tiring collection exercise.
The common error, dealing with Magnet like a writing project
The most costly misconstruing I see in organizations pursuing Magnet is the belief that the primary challenge is composing. Composing matters, naturally. Weak writing can obscure strong work. But the much deeper obstacle is proof integrity.

An organization might have an engaging nursing culture, engaged leaders, shared governance structures, innovation efforts, and significant results, yet still have a hard time if those aspects are not connected plainly to the Magnet design. Another organization might produce sleek prose that sounds impressive but does not line up firmly enough with the composed documentation requirements. Magnet appraisal is not a literary competition. It is a standards-based review.

That is why knowledgeable Magnet ® Consulting typically begins by slowing groups down. Before preparing, the company has to respond to a set of difficult internal concerns. Exactly what are we declaring? Which element does it support? What proof shows that this is developed practice instead of a separated example? Are we describing a procedure, a result, or both? Have we shown development in time where needed? If a claim is strong in discussion but thin on paperwork, the concern is not phrasing. The issue is readiness.

I have actually seen organizations save months of effort by facing that truth early. It is simpler to determine a missing proof chain in planning than to discover it midway through writing, when leaders are currently mentally committed to a narrative.
What the consulting process must look like
Consulting needs to not develop dependence. It ought to produce order, realism, and internal capability. The greatest engagements normally feel less like outsourcing and more like disciplined partnership.

Early work often fixates orientation to the Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® and the organization's present state. If the internal group is unfamiliar with the evolution from the 14 Forces of Magnetism to the five-component empirical model, that history can assist them translate why proof needs to be balanced across domains. Teams also need clearness on where ANCC's formal requirements live, especially the Application Handbook and the Sources of Evidence structure that drives composed documentation.

From there, the work ends up being useful. Proof needs to be collected, arranged, and evaluated against the requirements. Gaps need to be called truthfully. That can be uneasy. In some cases a department knows its work belongs in the submission, however the proof is too narrow or the outcomes too immature. Other times an organization undervalues a strength because the work feels common internally. Consultants make their keep by making those judgment calls carefully, without overemphasizing and without overlooking.

At this phase, the very best experts also bring discipline to language. Terminology needs to mirror ANCC's framework. Claims need to be concrete. A sentence like "leadership strongly supports nursing quality" may sound positive, however it is too broad to bring weight by itself. It needs evidence that demonstrates how transformational management is expressed and what results followed. Precision is not scholastic. It is the distinction in between asserting excellence and demonstrating it.
Written documentation is where technique becomes visible
Every severe Magnet effort eventually collides with the composed documents truth. ANCC's crosswalk materials explain the written paperwork proof requirements for candidates, and those requirements are connected to the Application Manual. That means there is an official architecture to the submission. Organizations overlook that architecture at their peril.

In weaker jobs, groups gather documents very first and map later. In stronger jobs, they map first and gather with purpose. That single modification decreases duplication, confusion, and last-minute scrambling. It likewise forces better executive choices. If a required area lacks adequate evidence, leaders can decide whether to reinforce the underlying work over time or reevaluate how they are framing the application.

A useful example assists. Expect a group wishes to highlight an innovation effort. The instinct might be to display the concept itself, the interest around it, and the favorable response from staff. However under the Magnet design, particularly under New Knowledge, Innovations, & & Improvements, the description has to move beyond excitement. What changed? How was the change carried out? What evidence shows enhancement? Without that progression, the material stays a good story instead of persuasive evidence.

Consulting support works here because companies are often too near to their own initiatives. Internal champions can inform the history magnificently. A consultant asks the blunt questions that appraisal reviewers will effectively ask in their own way: What is the evidence? How does this connect to the element? Why does this example matter more than another one?
The function of empirical outcomes
Of the 5 Magnet elements, Empirical Outcomes tends to sharpen the conversation quickly. Outcomes make everybody more precise. Culture, structure, and leadership are essential, but Magnet's design explains that measurable results matter. ANCC explains Magnet as acknowledgment for nursing quality and quality client outcomes. Those words are central, not decorative.

That does not imply every significant nursing achievement can be decreased to a single number. It does indicate a company ought to be able to show that its professional environment and nursing practices equate into observable performance. Strong consulting assistance assists leaders withstand two opposite mistakes here. One is overloading the submission with information that does not have a clear story. The other is leaning too greatly on narrative since the team is uncomfortable making a direct outcomes case.

Data without interpretation can feel like clutter. Interpretation without trustworthy outcomes can feel thin. The work is to bring them together.

This is also where redesignation work frequently differs from novice classification. A first-time candidate might be proving that the Magnet design is truly ingrained. A redesignating organization should also reveal that acknowledgment was not a peak followed by drift. ANCC's distinction between classification and redesignation is more than administrative. It shows the expectation that nursing quality is sustained, kept an eye on, and renewed.
Timing, costs, and the discipline of planning
No serious guide would overlook the useful side. ANCC posts separate Magnet application and appraisal fee schedules, including an online application fee and appraisal evaluation charges due at composed file submission. The precise figures and timing can change, so companies ought to always depend on present ANCC info when budgeting and scheduling.

That stated, the tactical lesson is stable. Fee timing affects readiness preparation. It is reckless to deal with the composed file submission date as an inspirational target if the hidden proof evaluation has not grown. Financial milestones and submission milestones must support preparedness, not force it. A rushed application can cost more than a postponed one if it results in comprehensive rework or an underpowered submission.

Consultants can be especially helpful in this area since they tend to see planning distortions early. A management group might be eager to reveal a timeline openly. Nursing leaders may feel pressure to meet that timeline even when paperwork mapping is insufficient. A great expert will not simply cheer the date. They will ask whether the organization is sequencing the operate in a manner in which appreciates both ANCC's requirements and the truth of internal operations.
What to search for in Magnet ® Consulting support
Not all seeking advice from support is equal, and companies must be selective. The best fit is not always the flashiest presentation or the most aggressive pledge. In this field, care is usually a virtue.

Look for an expert or firm that shows these qualities:
fluency in ANCC's Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® language and structure a disciplined technique to Sources of Proof and composed documentation comfort determining spaces without dramatizing them respect for trademarked program terms and official Magnet logo design rules a clear understanding that classification and redesignation need various planning lenses
That final point is worthy of focus. Some advisors treat every client as if the same roadmap uses. It does not. A first-cycle organization often requires considerable architecture, education, and proof mapping. A redesignating organization may need a sharper focus on interim monitoring, continuity, and continual results. ANCC also provides digital tools and guides to support the appraisal procedure and interim tracking throughout designation, and an informed consultant needs to understand how those tools fit the broader effort.
The internal team still carries the work
One truth worth saying clearly is that consulting can not alternative to management ownership. Magnet acknowledgment belongs to the company, not to the specialist. That implies the chief nursing officer, nursing leaders, and crucial stakeholders should stay active stewards of the process. When a task is handed off too totally, the end product frequently sounds separated from daily practice. Customers can pick up when a submission has been over-produced but under-owned.

The greatest companies utilize speaking with support to strengthen internal positioning. They use external proficiency to hone meanings, structure evidence, pressure test drafts, and prepare groups. But the content still comes from the organization's genuine practice environment. That matters ethically, operationally, and strategically. If the internal team can not confidently discuss its own Magnet story, then the story is most likely not ready.

I have actually seen the difference in space after room. In one organization, leaders postponed every tough concern to the consultant. The task moved, however ownership stayed shallow. In another, the expert worked more like a disciplined editor and guide. The internal group disputed evidence options, fine-tuned its claims, and discovered the structure deeply. The second group not only produced more powerful documentation, it likewise built self-confidence that lasted beyond the application cycle.
Magnet as a roadmap, not just a result
ANCC describes the program as providing a roadmap to nursing excellence. That expression matters due to the fact that it moves the worth of Magnet beyond acknowledgment alone. Designation is necessary. It signals that a company has satisfied ANCC's standards. It likewise carries useful implications, consisting of the right for designated companies to use official Magnet logo designs under hallmark rules. However the much deeper value typically lies in the disciplined reflection the framework requires.

The 5 parts ask companies to link leadership, empowerment, expert practice, development, and outcomes in a meaningful way. That is demanding work. It exposes where nursing culture is strong, where structures are irregular, and where efficiency requires clearer evidence. For some organizations, that insight is as valuable as the designation itself because it provides nursing leadership a sharper operating model.

This is another reason thoughtful Magnet ® Consulting can be worth the investment. Good consultants help organizations use the process to learn, not simply to send. They help teams avoid the trap of doing a heroic one-time push that leaves no resilient system behind. Instead, they motivate routines that support continuous monitoring, especially crucial for redesignation and for maintaining the stability of Magnet recognition over time.
A disciplined course forward
For companies considering Magnet classification, the smartest first relocation is generally not writing, and not scheduling a celebration date. It is taking a sincere inventory of preparedness versus the Magnet structure and the written paperwork requirements connected to ANCC's Application Handbook. That stock must be sober, evidence-based, and free of wishful thinking.

For organizations considering Magnet ® Consulting, the secret is to find assistance that respects the rigor of the ANCC process. Try to find advisors who can translate standards into action, who understand the five-component empirical model, who value the distinction in between classification and redesignation, and who will inform the fact about spaces before those gaps end up being expensive.

Magnet recognition is meaningful https://kameronarxk023.iamarrows.com/magnet-r-consulting-on-appraisal-review-costs-and-submission-timing https://kameronarxk023.iamarrows.com/magnet-r-consulting-on-appraisal-review-costs-and-submission-timing precisely due to the fact that it is not easy. It asks organizations to demonstrate nursing quality and quality patient outcomes in a structured, defensible way. With clear management, disciplined evidence work, and the ideal consulting support, the journey becomes more than a compliance workout. It becomes a sharper expression of what the nursing company is, how it performs, and how it means to keep improving.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a nursing consulting and education company founded in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps health care organizations transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>