How Shared Governance Supports Safer Patient Care

05 September 2026

Patient security rarely depends on one remarkable choice. More frequently, it rises or falls on numerous smaller choices made near the bedside, inside handoffs, throughout staffing discussions, within policy evaluations, and in the minutes when a nurse decides whether a process still makes sense for the patient in front of them. That is where Shared Governance, progressively framed as Professional Governance, matters most.

In nursing, Shared Governance refers to a model in which nurses have a formal voice in choices about their professional practice, generally through councils or similar structures. The newer language, Professional Governance, puts sharper focus on autonomy, accountability, significant decision-making, and management in practice. That shift in wording is not cosmetic. It reflects a much deeper expectation that nurses are not just participants in care shipment, but likewise stewards of the requirements, policies, and practice environments that form care.

Safer client care depends upon that stewardship.

When security conversations occur just at the executive level, important information can be missed out on. Frontline nurses are often the first to notice that a policy sounds clear on paper however develops confusion at 3 a.m. Throughout an intricate admission. They see where hold-ups occur, where devices placement increases danger, where documentation problems crowd out evaluation time, and where communication in between disciplines needs tightening up. A structure that captures those insights, examines them seriously, and turns them into practice decisions is not a nice additional. It is one of the practical methods companies minimize avoidable harm.
Safety improves when decision-making relocations better to care
The central strength of Shared Governance is easy: it puts professional judgment where it belongs. Not every operational decision ought to be made by committee, and not every practice question can wait on a lengthy process. But when nurses have an official function in shaping requirements of care, patient education methods, workflow modifications, and practice expectations, the quality of those choices normally improves.

That happens for a few reasons. Initially, nurses contribute direct knowledge of how care is in fact provided. Second, they can evaluate whether proposed changes are reasonable across shifts, ability blends, and patient populations. Third, involvement produces ownership. A policy that is designed with staff nurses rather than handed to them tends to be comprehended more clearly and executed more consistently.

Consistency matters for safety. Even strong scientific assistance can fail if teams interpret it in a different way from one unit to another. Councils and representative bodies can assist line up practice by bringing concerns into open discussion, clarifying requirements, and identifying where variation is appropriate and where it is dangerous. That type of disciplined discussion often avoids 2 typical safety failures: quiet workarounds and fragmented implementation.

I have actually seen the distinction in between a guideline that staff abide by reluctantly and a requirement they think in due to the fact that they helped shape it. In the first case, individuals do the minimum needed to survive an audit. In the 2nd, they see exceptions, raise issues early, and help newer coworkers comprehend the purpose behind the process. The patient gets more reliable care, not because the policy became longer, however due to the fact that the people utilizing it acknowledged it as sound practice.
Shared Governance is not simply a committee structure
Many companies make the exact same early error. They release a set of councils, appoint members, schedule conferences, and assume they now have actually Shared Governance. What they might have is a calendar.

AONL describes Professional Governance as both a structure and a philosophy. That difference is critical. Structure offers individuals a path for participation. Approach determines whether participation has meaning. If frontline nurses advance recommendations however leadership reserves all real authority, the model becomes performative. Staff notice that quickly. Engagement fades, and trust goes with it.

For Shared Governance to support safer client care, nurses need to have a genuine voice in matters affecting professional practice. That does not indicate every suggestion is embraced. It does mean recommendations are assessed transparently, choice rights are clear, and responsibility runs in both instructions. Councils should be expected to evaluate concerns carefully, weigh trade-offs, and own the outcomes of their choices. Leaders need to be anticipated to produce the conditions in which that work can influence practice.

This is where the language of Professional Governance helps. It reminds companies that the objective is not shared sensations about governance. The objective is professional authority exercised properly. Nurses are trusted to assess, focus on, inform, advocate, and react in changing scientific conditions. It follows that they ought to also help govern the requirements and systems that frame that work.
The link between nurse voice and safer care
The verified management literature links shared and professional governance to nurse empowerment, engagement, retention, interprofessional partnership, team effort, and safer, higher-quality patient care. Those ideas relate, and in practice they reinforce one another.

An empowered nurse is more likely to speak out when something feels unsafe. An engaged nurse is more likely to take part in enhancing a process instead of working around it in isolation. A stable group, supported by retention, preserves regional understanding about what works, what fails, and where patient risk tends to conceal. More powerful interprofessional collaboration improves coordination, which is frequently the distinction in between an orderly strategy of care and a preventable miss.

Safety events are seldom brought on by a single person alone. They emerge from conditions: unclear responsibilities, poor interaction, hurried transitions, weak escalation paths, policies that conflict with workflow, or practice expectations that were never ever completely mingled. Shared Governance helps companies inspect those conditions with the people who know them best.

This is specifically crucial in nursing since nurses sit at the center of continuity. They link physician orders, patient actions, family issues, discharge planning, education, and continuous tracking. When that central role is excluded from practice choices, companies lose among their greatest security assets. When that function is formally integrated into governance, patterns become visible sooner.

A bedside nurse might observe that a documents requirement is triggering hold-ups in a time-sensitive routine. A charge nurse might see that a person handoff tool works well on day shift but breaks down during admissions in the evening. An educator might determine a repeating confusion point amongst brand-new personnel. Through Shared Governance, those observations can move from private frustration to organizational learning.
Where Professional Governance alters the everyday safety climate
Safety culture is typically gone over in broad terms, but personnel experience it in ordinary methods. They feel it when they ask a question and get a major response. They feel it when practice concerns can be raised without embarrassment. They feel it when a system standard modifications due to the fact that individuals listened to those doing the work.

Professional Governance contributes to that environment by normalizing shared decision-making. The ANA's Code of Ethics recognizes partnership and shared decision-making as essential to nursing's work, and it clearly notes shared governance among workforce sustainability efforts. That matters since sustainability and security are not separate issues. A workforce that has no voice, little impact, and low trust will have a hard time to sustain safe practice under pressure.

There is a practical side to this. Nurses who are involved in choices about their practice are most likely to comprehend why standards exist and where versatility ends. They can distinguish between thoughtful adaptation and risky drift. That difference is indispensable. Health care settings constantly require judgment, however judgment ends up being much stronger when the profession has actually gone over and defined its requirements together.

Professional Governance also sharpens accountability. In some cases people presume that offering staff more voice indicates loosening up oversight. In reality, effective governance generally makes accountability more exact. If a council suggests a practice change, it ought to also consider education needs, execution barriers, and how the modification will be monitored. That is expert accountability, not symbolic participation.
A quick example from real operations
Consider a common situation, explained at a high level instead of connected to any one organization. A system fights with irregular adherence to a client education procedure. Management might respond by sending another reminder e-mail and auditing harder. That may produce short-term https://riveryvzu153.fotosdefrases.com/shared-governance-in-nursing-advancing-teamwork-and-engagement https://riveryvzu153.fotosdefrases.com/shared-governance-in-nursing-advancing-teamwork-and-engagement compliance, but it might not fix the underlying issue.

A Shared Governance council may approach the exact same problem differently. Staff nurses might take a look at when education is supposed to occur, what parts are most often missed out on, whether the products fit the client population, and whether workflow makes the expectation sensible. A teacher may recognize where personnel requirement clearer guidance. A supervisor might clarify nonnegotiable standards. Together, they might revise the process so it matches actual care flow while still protecting the patient.

The security advantage comes from fit. A procedure that fits practice is more likely to be carried out dependably. Dependability, more than rhetoric, is what keeps clients safe.
Why cooperation throughout disciplines gets stronger
Shared Governance is centered in nursing practice, but its results are not limited to nursing. When nurses have arranged, representative online forums for talking about policy and practice, they end up being more powerful partners in interprofessional work. Issues are communicated more clearly. Suggestions step forward with more preparation and more authenticity. Dialogue shifts from private complaint to professional analysis.

That changes the tone of partnership. Physicians, pharmacists, therapists, and administrators are typically more able to engage constructively when nursing input has been gathered, discussed, and fine-tuned through a governance procedure. The nursing point of view is not decreased to separated anecdotes. It is presented as a considered position grounded in practice.

Safer care depends on this type of teamwork. Patients move across settings, disciplines, and shifts quickly. Misalignment in between professional groups develops openings for error. Shared Governance helps close a few of those openings by reinforcing how nursing adds to organizational decisions.

The ANA's governance products highlight collaborative leadership and representative bodies talking about practice and policy problems in open online forum. Open forum sounds simple, however in a clinical environment it is effective. It implies issues can be emerged before they harden into animosity or unsafe workarounds. It means disagreement can be taken a look at rather than buried. It suggests policy can be notified by the individuals anticipated to bring it out.
What good governance appears like when security is the priority
Not every governance structure is equally reliable. Some end up being slowed down in minor issues. Some overreach into decisions that belong somewhere else. Some draw in strong individuals however fail to spread out interaction back to the units. The most helpful designs normally share a few useful characteristics:
Clear choice rights, so staff know which questions councils can affect straight and which need leadership action. Representative involvement, so input reflects practice realities rather than the views of a small, familiar group. Visible feedback loops, so nurses can see what took place to suggestions and why. Connection to patient care results, so governance does not drift into abstract discussion. Shared responsibility, so autonomy is matched with responsibility for application and follow-through.
These are not ornamental functions. They secure credibility. If nurses make the effort to engage in Shared Governance however can not inform whether anything changes, the structure damages. If recommendations are accepted without thoughtful review, quality can suffer in a different method. Security advantages when governance is active, disciplined, and transparent.
The compromises leaders require to respect
Shared Governance is not the fastest way to make every decision. That is among its compromises, and fully grown organizations confess openly.

Bringing more voices into practice choices can slow the front end of change. Conferences take some time. Agreement is manual. Staff need release time to participate well. Questions may become more complex as soon as frontline realities are on the table. For leaders under pressure to implement quickly, this can feel frustrating.

Yet speed is not the only worth in security work. A decision made rapidly however poorly embraced might cost more time later on through rework, confusion, or duplicated correction. A choice formed with significant nursing input may take longer to design and less time to support. The net result can be more secure and more durable.

There are also edge cases. Throughout immediate circumstances, leaders may need to act before a complete governance cycle can happen. That does not revoke Professional Governance. It implies companies need judgment about what can be governed prospectively, what should be handled immediately, and how retrospective review will occur when the instant need passes. Shared decision-making is vital, however it should never be misinterpreted for paralysis.

Another trade-off involves representation. Council members get deep knowledge, but they can gradually end up being less linked to daily personnel issues if communication is weak. That is why great governance requires disciplined reporting back to systems, not just up reporting to executives. Safety suffers when councils become isolated from the people they represent.
Retention and sustainability are security concerns too
It is tempting to treat retention as an HR issue and client safety as a medical issue. In practice, they overlap constantly.

Leadership sources connect shared and professional governance to retention and the sustainability of the nursing profession. That connection matters because stable groups carry memory. They know where previous procedure modifications succeeded or stopped working. They keep in mind why a basic exists. They recognize subtle signs that a system is starting to drift. Regular turnover can deteriorate that institutional memory and increase the problem on those who remain.

Shared Governance supports retention in part because it verifies expert dignity. Nurses are most likely to stay in environments where their proficiency affects practice, where they can take part in resolving problems, and where management treats them as partners in care quality rather than recipients of regulations. That is not simply a spirits advantage. It is a safety investment.

A labor force that feels unheard frequently becomes peaceful in the incorrect moments. A workforce that is used to meaningful discussion is more likely to raise issues before they end up being events.
Building trust takes more than launching councils
If an organization is trying to enhance Shared Governance, trust needs to be the very first metric leaders think of, even if it is not the easiest to determine. Nurses can generally inform within a few months whether a brand-new structure is serious.

Trust grows when leaders request nursing input early, not after choices are already functionally total. It grows when council suggestions receive direct responses. It grows when personnel can trace a line from discussion to action. It likewise grows when leaders are truthful about constraints. Nurses do not expect every recommendation to be approved. They do expect candor.

One of the most destructive patterns is selective listening, accepting staff voice when it supports a favored strategy and sidelining it when it makes complex the strategy. That kind of inconsistency weakens the very conditions Shared Governance is meant to develop. Much safer patient care depends upon speaking up, and individuals speak out more when they believe the online forum is real.

A useful starting point often looks less dramatic than companies expect. It may include clarifying the function of each council, revisiting subscription to enhance representation, specifying which practice issues belong where, and making results visible to the systems. Security gains often begin with this sort of operational housekeeping due to the fact that it turns governance from a concept into a trustworthy working process.
Signs the design is assisting clients, not simply meetings
Organizations do not need grand language to understand whether Professional Governance is becoming beneficial. They can expect useful signs in daily work. Staff start bringing forward better-defined questions. Policies are discussed in terms of patient care effect instead of individual choice. Interprofessional discussions become less reactive. System communication enhances since representatives report back regularly. Practice modifications arrive with more context and meet less peaceful resistance.

A healthy governance model typically alters the quality of conversation before it changes any formal metric. Nurses begin to say, in effect, "Let's take this through the right forum and work it through correctly." That sentence reflects something crucial: a shift from specific disappointment to professional ownership.

When that ownership takes hold, client care ends up being safer because fewer problems stay casual, covert, or unsettled. Issues move into view. Standards end up being clearer. Groups collaborate with more structure. Nurses work out both voice and responsibility. That is the heart of Shared Governance and Professional Governance alike.
The bigger professional meaning
There is a factor the language has evolved from Shared Governance towards Professional Governance. Shared Governance stresses participation. Professional Governance stresses involvement with authority, accountability, and identity. It recognizes nursing as a profession that must help govern its own practice.

That idea aligns naturally with client security. Much safer care is not produced by compliance alone. It is produced by professionals who can think, question, team up, and form the systems in which they work. The nurse at the bedside is not simply performing care inside a fixed device. The nurse is also one of the people who can enhance the machine.

When companies honor that truth with real structures, real dialogue, and genuine decision-making power, safety work ends up being smarter. It becomes closer to the client. And it becomes more sustainable since individuals most accountable for continuous care are no longer outside the space when care requirements are being set.

Shared Governance supports more secure client care because it treats nursing know-how as operationally necessary, not ceremonially appreciated. That is the distinction in between hearing nurses and being governed, in part, by nursing understanding. For patients, that distinction can be profound.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization serving hospitals since 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps nursing and clinical teams strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>