Magnet ® Consulting: Structural Empowerment in the Magnet Model

19 August 2026

Structural Empowerment sits at the center of many major Magnet discussions since it forces an organization to answer a hard concern: how does nursing impact in fact work here?

That concern sounds basic till a team tries to document it. Plenty of health centers can point to a committee lineup, a management chart, or a refined tactical strategy. Far fewer can reveal, in a disciplined method, that nurses are really equipped to get involved, establish, lead, and shape care throughout the organization. The distinction matters. In the Magnet Acknowledgment Program ®, Structural Empowerment is not window dressing. It is one of the 5 components of the current Magnet design, along with Transformational Leadership, Exemplary Professional Practice, New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements, and Empirical Outcomes. ANCC awards Magnet status, and its structure asks companies to demonstrate that nursing quality is developed into the system, not based on a few remarkable individuals.

That is where Magnet ® Consulting typically ends up being helpful. Not because an outside consultant can produce a culture, and not because speaking with alternative to management discipline. It does neither. What experienced consulting can do is help a company see whether its structures actually support nursing voice, professional development, and continual responsibility, or whether those components exist just in fragments.
The shift from goal to evidence
The Magnet model did not become a branding exercise. ANA's Magnet history traces the principle back to a 1983 study of "magnet" healthcare facilities, and the formal name ended up being the Magnet Recognition Program ® in 2002. The current structure developed later, when the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism were grouped into 5 design elements after analytical analysis and conceptual redesign. That evolution matters due to the fact that it altered the method many companies think about preparation.

Older Magnet work in some settings leaned heavily on force-by-force storytelling. The existing model requires something more integrated. Structural Empowerment is not almost showing that one nursing council exists or that a professional advancement department runs classes. It has to do with showing that the company has resilient systems through which nurses are established, heard, and connected to decision-making.

In practice, this ends up being a documentation challenge and a management difficulty at the very same time. ANCC applicants send written paperwork tied to Sources of Proof and the Application Handbook. That requirement tends to expose gaps extremely rapidly. Groups discover that they have strong practices but weak records, or strong records but irregular practice, or a corporate structure that looks sound from the top and feels unattainable from the unit.

Those are not minor concerns. Structural Empowerment lives or passes away because space in between policy and lived reality.
What Structural Empowerment actually asks organizations to prove
At the bedside, nurses understand empowerment when they feel it. They can name the distinction in between a place where input is requested and a place where input changes something. In Magnet work, that intuition has to be translated into organizational proof.

Structural Empowerment, as a concept in the Magnet model, asks whether the company has actually intentionally produced channels for expert contribution and development. It is about structures, yes, however not in the narrow sense of org charts. It includes the way governance operates, the availability of leaders, the consistency of expert development opportunities, and the degree to which nursing can affect practice and organizational direction.

A useful way to think about it is this: Transformational Leadership is typically about vision and direction, while Structural Empowerment reveals whether that vision has been developed into the organization's operating system. If leaders state nurses matter, Structural Empowerment asks where that belief can be seen. If the organization says expert practice is valued, Structural Empowerment asks how nurses are supported to grow and take part. If a medical facility presents itself as devoted to excellence, Structural Empowerment asks whether the conditions for that quality are extensively available or minimal to a few high-functioning departments.

That distinction is among the first areas where Magnet ® Consulting includes value. Internal groups are frequently too near to their own structures. They understand how things are supposed to work, so they can miss where the procedure breaks down in the field. An outside customer, specifically one experienced with Magnet documents, tends to ask more pointed concerns. Who participates in? Who chooses? How typically? What evidence reveals that involvement caused a change? Is this readily available across the organization or just in separated pockets?

Those concerns can be uneasy. They are likewise productive.
The threat of mistaking activity for empowerment
One of the most typical errors in Magnet preparation is equating busyness with empowerment. A nursing organization may have councils, shared governance products, management rounds, education offerings, recognition programs, and community outreach efforts. On paper, it appears abundant and fully grown. Yet when the evidence is assembled, the story feels thin.

Why? Due to the fact that volume is not the like structural strength.

I have seen teams bring forward dozens of examples that were admirable but disconnected. A system hosted an advancement day. A primary nursing officer went to an online forum. A council modified a form. A nurse provided a poster. Each product had worth. However together they did not yet demonstrate an empowered expert environment. They revealed activity without enough connective tissue.

Structural Empowerment is greatest when those examples are not isolated occasions but noticeable expressions of a meaningful system. The company can describe not just what occurred, however how involvement is organized, how leaders are liable, how nurses access development opportunities, and how those structures continue over time.

That is why consulting operate in this area typically starts with simplification instead of growth. The instinct in lots of companies is to do more. Introduce another council. Add another acknowledgment event. Develop another communication channel. In some cases the better relocation is to step back and tighten what currently exists. Cleaner governance, clearer charters, more reliable documentation, and sharper follow-through generally produce a stronger Structural Empowerment story than a burst of new initiatives presented solely for a Magnet timeline.
Where Magnet ® Consulting helps most
The expression Magnet ® Consulting covers a vast array of support, from tactical recommending to document review. In the context of Structural Empowerment, the best consulting work usually takes place in the spaces where an organization's intentions and proof do not line up.

That assistance typically includes a few practical functions:
reading the Magnet design through a functional lens instead of a theoretical one identifying where existing structures match the Sources of Evidence and where they fall short helping leaders convert diffuse examples into a coherent composed narrative preparing teams for the difference in between initial designation and redesignation expectations creating a disciplined plan for evidence collection before submission deadlines develop panic
None of this replaces internal ownership. In reality, weak consulting often stops working for precisely that reason, it produces a refined draft without enhancing the company behind it. Strong consulting keeps the work with the organization. It clarifies, obstacles, and organizes. It does not perform authenticity.

This is especially essential because Magnet designation and redesignation are distinct. ANCC is clear that organizations that have actually already earned Magnet Acknowledgment ought to pursue redesignation to continue being recognized. Redesignation work frequently exposes a various set of Structural Empowerment concerns. A first-time applicant might be proving the existence of structures. A redesignating organization is more likely to be tested on consistency, maturity, and sustainability. It is one thing to introduce structures in the excitement of a Journey to Magnet Excellence ®. It is another to keep them through management shifts, completing priorities, and the regular tiredness of functional healthcare.
Structural Empowerment is visible in common moments
The greatest proof for Structural Empowerment hardly ever originates from grand declarations. It originates from the common mechanics of organizational life.

A nurse supervisor raises an issue that frontline nurses can not participate in a council conference because the conference time disputes with medication pass, and the council changes its schedule. That seems small, but it says something real about access and responsiveness.

An expert governance body evaluates a practice concern and makes a recommendation that moves through a specified process rather than vanishing into leadership silence. Once again, not significant, however structurally important.

An establishing nurse is provided a meaningful function in a committee, receives assistance to participate, and can later on explain how that involvement affected practice. That is not simply a professional development anecdote. It is proof that the structure welcomes development instead of simply praising it.

When groups write Structural Empowerment sections poorly, they typically overreach. They want every example to sound transformative. The better path is typically more grounded. Program the system. Show the repeatability. Show that the organization has a reliable method for nurses to engage, advance, and influence care.

This is one factor written paperwork can feel harder than expected. ANCC's process requires more than enthusiasm. It needs disciplined proof tied to Sources of Proof and application expectations. Organizations that hold off documentation till late in the cycle frequently discover that they have actually under-recorded the very work they are proudest of.
Documentation is not the point, however it is unavoidable
A great deal of nursing leaders say some version of the very same thing during Magnet preparation: "We do the work, we just do not always record it well." That is often real. It is likewise only half the story.

Poor paperwork can hide strong structures. It can also expose that the structures are more casual than leaders presumed. If decision-making depends upon the memory of one director, if committee outcomes are hard to trace, or if participation information exists in 5 different spreadsheets with different definitions, the company might not yet have the level of structural reliability it thought it had.

Magnet ® Consulting tends to be most effective when it deals with paperwork as a functional mirror. The written submission is not simply a packaging exercise. It tests whether the organization can plainly articulate how nursing structures function and what they produce.

ANCC likewise offers digital tools and guidance to support appraisal procedures and interim monitoring throughout classification. https://felixdtse444.huicopper.com/magnet-r-consulting-guide-to-ancc-magnet-costs https://felixdtse444.huicopper.com/magnet-r-consulting-guide-to-ancc-magnet-costs That matters because Magnet work is not a single occasion that ends when a file is uploaded. Organizations need systems that can sustain oversight, produce evidence, and react to ongoing expectations. Structural Empowerment needs to for that reason be built in a way that survives the submission cycle. If the process collapses the minute a coordinator takes vacation, the structure is too brittle.
The money discussion nobody must avoid
Magnet work requires financial dedication. ANCC releases different application and appraisal charge schedules, consisting of an online application charge and appraisal review charges due at composed file submission. Specific expenses can alter, and leaders must always validate existing schedules directly, but the wider point is stable: Magnet preparation is resource-intensive.

Structural Empowerment is frequently where budget worths end up being visible. Not due to the fact that every effective structure is expensive, but due to the fact that underfunded participation usually ends up being symbolic participation. Nurses can not serve meaningfully on councils if they are never eliminated to participate in. Professional advancement can not scale if it depends totally on goodwill and after-hours effort. Leadership ease of access can not be declared credibly if managers are spread so thin that every developmental conversation feels rushed.

That does not imply companies require extravagant programs. It implies they need sincere positioning in between their Magnet aspirations and their operational support. A few of the best Structural Empowerment work I have actually seen originated from organizations with modest resources but strong discipline. They were clear about concerns, secured time where they could, preserved consistent governance procedures, and resisted the temptation to overpromise. By contrast, some better-funded systems undermined themselves by creating fancy structures that frontline staff experienced as performative.

Money matters, however stewardship matters simply as much.
A useful lens for assessing readiness
When I evaluate Structural Empowerment preparedness, I listen for a specific sort of fluency. Not scripted self-confidence, however shared understanding. Can leaders at multiple levels discuss how nurses participate in governance and development? Can staff explain where choices go and how feedback returns? Can examples be traced from concern to action without heroic reconstruction?

If the answers are vague, the issue is rarely solved by better writing alone. It generally requires operational repair.

A strong preparedness review frequently explores a handful of pressure points:
whether governance structures are clear, active, and comprehended beyond leadership circles whether participation opportunities are broad enough to avoid counting on the very same familiar voices whether professional advancement assistance is visible in practice, not just in policy whether records are organized all right to support the written documentation process whether the organization can distinguish between isolated success stories and repeatable structures
Even this kind of list need to not be dealt with mechanically. Every company has edge cases. A rural facility may deal with various participation constraints than a large academic medical center. A newly integrated system might still be balancing structures across campuses. A redesignating organization might have strong tradition processes that need modernization instead of replacement. The point is not to require every healthcare facility into the very same shape. It is to understand whether the structures in location really empower nursing within that organization's context.
Trade-offs leaders require to call openly
Structural Empowerment sounds generally favorable, and in concept it is. In practice, it develops genuine compromises.

Shared governance takes time. Conferences pull clinicians and leaders far from other work. Wider participation can slow choices that used to move quickly through hierarchical channels. Expert advancement assistance needs scheduling versatility that may be tough to achieve in stretched staffing environments. Transparency invites concerns that are not always comfortable for leaders to answer.

These are not reasons to compromise empowerment. They are factors to lead it honestly.

The organizations that handle Structural Empowerment well do not pretend there are no functional costs. They acknowledge the stress and choose anyhow because they understand the long-term return. A nurse who has genuine avenues for influence is most likely to invest in the company's practice environment. A council with genuine authority can fix repeating problems upstream. An advancement culture grows future leaders rather than constantly scrambling to hire them from outside.

Consulting can assist here too, especially when leaders are captured in between Magnet goals and functional hesitation. An experienced advisor can typically translate Structural Empowerment into useful terms for executives who do not live inside nursing structures every day. The discussion ends up being less abstract and more concrete: what is the present state, what proof exists, what gaps matter most, and what changes would improve both Magnet readiness and organizational function?
Why Structural Empowerment typically anticipates the quality of the whole Magnet journey
Among the 5 Magnet design elements, Structural Empowerment frequently acts like a tension test for the wider company. If it is weak, the other elements end up being harder to sustain. Transformational Leadership struggles without channels for influence. Exemplary Professional Practice ends up being more difficult to spread without shared structures. New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements can stay localized instead of incorporated. Empirical Results become more difficult to enhance regularly when frontline engagement is uneven.

That is why Structural Empowerment deserves more than a narrow compliance frame of mind. It is not simply one area of a document to complete en route to submission. It is a visible sign of whether the organization has developed nursing excellence into the architecture of day-to-day work.

For teams pursuing Magnet Recognition, or getting ready for redesignation, this is the most useful stance to take: treat Structural Empowerment as running truth initially and written narrative 2nd. Use the Magnet framework to clarify, enhance, and show what nursing structures are doing. Bring in Magnet ® Consulting if that outdoors viewpoint will hone judgment, align proof, or accelerate disciplined preparation. But keep the center of gravity inside the organization, where empowerment either exists or does not.

The medical facilities that do this well are usually not the ones with the fanciest language. They are the ones where a nurse can discuss, in plain terms, how to get included, how to affect practice, how leaders respond, and how the system supports expert development gradually. When that story is true in the lived experience of the labor force, the paperwork checks out in a different way. It has weight. It has coherence. Most of all, it sounds like an organization that has actually made its structures rather than assembled them for appraisal.

That is the genuine pledge of Structural Empowerment in the Magnet model. Not activity. Not optics. An expert environment where nursing voice has kind, gain access to, connection, and consequence.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization founded in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps hospitals, health systems, and care teams transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>