Magnet ® Consulting and the Standards Behind Magnet Classification

12 August 2026

Hospitals and health systems do not make Magnet designation since they wrote a convincing narrative or polished a single submission. They make it due to the fact that the American Nurses Credentialing Center, or ANCC, figures out that the organization has fulfilled Magnet requirements tied to nursing quality and quality patient outcomes. That difference matters, particularly for leaders who are considering Magnet ® Consulting support. Excellent consulting does not replace the work. It assists a company understand the work, arrange the proof, and remain sincere about whether the requirements are genuinely appearing in practice.

That is where many conversations about Magnet begin to sharpen. Teams typically request help with timelines, document method, or readiness, yet beneath those demands is a more important question: what, precisely, is ANCC trying to find when it gives Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® status?

The response is grounded in the history and structure of the program itself. The Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® is an ANCC program produced to acknowledge healthcare companies for nursing quality and quality client outcomes. Its roots go back to a 1983 research study of "magnet" hospitals. The main program name altered to Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® in 2002. With time, the design progressed too. What numerous veteran nurse leaders still remember as the 14 Forces of Magnetism was reorganized after a 2007 analytical analysis of appraisal ratings, resulting in the 2008 conceptual design developed around 5 components. Those five parts stay the clearest method to comprehend the standards behind designation.
What Magnet designation really recognizes
It is easy to decrease Magnet to a reputation marker, but ANCC frames it more particularly. Magnet classification implies an organization has met ANCC's Magnet standards and is recognized for nursing quality. ANCC likewise describes the program as a roadmap to nursing excellence. That expression records something essential about how strong companies approach the procedure. Magnet is not simply an endpoint. It is a disciplined approach for showing the strength of nursing structures, expert practice, leadership, enhancement work, and outcomes.

That has useful ramifications for any executive group thinking of Magnet ® Consulting. An expert can help translate the roadmap, but the company still needs to travel it. If the nursing culture is fragmented, if leaders can not clearly link structures to results, or if evidence resides in detached files and local memory, consulting can expose those concerns quickly. In a lot of cases, that is an advantage. It is far much better to discover spaces early than to put together a submission that looks total on paper but breaks down under scrutiny.

In my experience, the healthiest Magnet discussions start when leadership stops asking, "How do we get designated?" and begins asking, "How do we reveal who we are, with proof that stands up?" That shift modifications whatever. It changes how groups gather documentation, how they discuss outcomes, and how honestly they examine readiness.
The five parts that shape the Magnet model
The existing Magnet structure is organized around five components of the empirical design. These are not marketing themes. They are the architecture behind the designation requirements, and they give shape to the written paperwork and appraisal process.
Transformational Leadership
Transformational Management asks whether nurse leaders are guiding the organization in a manner that shows up, credible, and aligned with the future. This is not an unclear standard about being inspirational. In practical terms, organizations need to show management that moves nursing practice forward and creates conditions where excellence is possible.

When consulting engagements work out, this component often becomes a base test. If senior nursing leaders can clearly articulate concerns, link those top priorities to operations, and demonstrate how management choices shaped nursing practice, the remainder of the Magnet story usually comes together more coherently. If leadership messaging is inconsistent, the company might still have strong regional work, but the general narrative ends up being harder to defend.

A typical tension appears here. Some companies have deeply appreciated nursing leaders however uneven structures listed below them. Others have strong committees and shared work, but management presence is too limited. Magnet requirements do not reward one while ignoring the other. They need adequate alignment that management impact can be seen in the organization's nursing environment and results.
Structural Empowerment
Structural Empowerment concentrates on the systems, relationships, and organizational supports that offer nurses a significant voice and a professional home. This is where numerous hospitals discover that culture alone is insufficient. Individuals may describe the company as collective, but Magnet anticipates evidence that empowerment is built into structures, not left to character or luck.

That is one reason Magnet ® Consulting frequently includes painstaking review of governance structures, professional chances, and official channels through which nurses take part in the life of the organization. A consultant can not develop empowerment. What they can do is ask whether the organization can show it consistently and whether the evidence is organized all right to show that consistency.

This part typically exposes an edge case that is easy to miss. An organization may have exceptional https://chcm.com/about/ https://chcm.com/about/ structures in one flagship school or service line, while smaller or more remote settings experience the system very in a different way. The closer a group gets to submission, the more vital it ends up being to evaluate whether structural empowerment is broad enough and steady enough to represent the organization fairly.
Exemplary Expert Practice
Exemplary Expert Practice is where the standards start to feel extremely near the bedside. It reflects how nursing practice is performed, how professional requirements are lived, and how care delivery reflects nursing quality. This is not simply a question of policy. It is about practice that can be acknowledged, described, and supported by evidence.

This is likewise where written submissions typically either gain momentum or lose it. Organizations that really understand their practice environment can tell a meaningful story. They can demonstrate how professional practice works throughout settings, how nurses contribute, and how those contributions fit within the larger nursing enterprise. Organizations that struggle here tend to overstate broad perfects and downplay specifics. They understand they worth expert nursing practice, but they can not always demonstrate how that worth ends up being everyday reality.

Good consultants typically earn their keep in this section not by writing more words, however by requiring clarity. They ask uncomfortable questions. Is this practice actually exemplary, or merely anticipated? Is this example agent, or an isolated brilliant spot? Can staff nurses and leaders explain the very same expert environment in comparable language? Those are not cosmetic concerns. They go to the core of the standard.
New Understanding, Developments, & & Improvements
New Understanding, Innovations, & Improvements is one of the most revealing elements since it exposes whether an organization deals with enhancement as occasional task work or as a long lasting professional expectation. The title itself matters. It is not practically innovation in the narrow sense of new ideas. It likewise consists of brand-new knowledge and enhancements, which makes the basic wider and more practical than many teams first assume.

Organizations often feel daunted by this component since they think it requires novelty on a grand scale. The real challenge is more disciplined. Can the organization show that nursing takes part in producing, using, or advancing understanding? Can it show improvement and innovation in such a way that is arranged, intentional, and tied to nursing quality? Those questions are demanding, but they are not theatrical.

This is one location where a consultant's judgment can safeguard a company from preventable errors. Teams in some cases gather every improvement effort they can find, hoping volume will develop strength. It rarely does. A better technique is usually to recognize work that is clearly connected to nursing practice, plainly documented, and plainly significant. Accuracy beats excess almost every time.
Empirical Outcomes
Empirical Outcomes anchors the design. The expression alone informs you that Magnet is not based upon goal or identity. ANCC's framework anticipates evidence of results. That requirement is one factor the program brings weight. It asks organizations not only to explain their nursing quality, however likewise to show it.

This component changes the tone of the entire Magnet journey. It pushes leaders beyond"we believe "and into"we can show. "In useful terms, that implies organizations need enough command of their data and outcomes to speak with confidence and properly about performance. If results are improving, teams need to understand why. If results are blended, they need to be able to describe context without wandering into excuse-making.

A skilled Magnet consultant is frequently most valuable here since this is where optimism can cloud judgment. Leaders naturally wish to present the organization in the very best possible light. However appraisal processes reward trustworthiness, not spin. A clear-eyed reading of outcomes, specifically when paired with strong proof of improvement and accountability, is generally stronger than a refined but unconvincing claim of universal excellence.
Why the older 14 Forces still matter, even though the design changed
Many nurse leaders were trained in the language of the 14 Forces of Magnetism, and that history still forms how they think about Magnet. ANCC's present model did not erase that earlier framework. It restructured it. After the analytical analysis of appraisal scores in 2007, the 2008 conceptual model organized the forces into the 5 parts used now.

That development matters for seeking advice from work since organizations often carry older instructional materials, local terminology, or committee language that still reflects the 14 Forces approach. There is absolutely nothing naturally wrong with that heritage, however submissions and strategy have to line up with the present conceptual model. A qualified consultant helps bridge that gap without discarding the company's memory. In practice, that often implies equating long-standing strengths into the language ANCC utilizes today.

I have seen this become a quiet stumbling block. A group may be doing exactly the ideal type of work, yet they frame it in outdated terms that blur the fit with present requirements. The problem is not compound. It is alignment. And alignment is among the least glamorous, many important parts of Magnet preparation.
Written documents is not the like proof, however it must bring the evidence well
ANCC needs composed documents connected to Sources of Evidence and the Application Manual's proof requirements. That is among the most crucial functional truths behind Magnet designation. The requirements are not assessed through casual conversation or a loose portfolio. The organization needs to submit paperwork that shows it fulfills the relevant requirements.

This is where Magnet ® Consulting typically becomes intensely practical. Groups need a documents technique, version control, internal review discipline, and a clear map of which examples support which proof requirements. None of that is glamorous work. All of it matters.

A helpful method to think about written documentation is this:
it must be accurate it should be lined up to the proof requirements it should be organized well enough for appraisal it needs to reflect real practice, not a short-term campaign it needs to hold together as a reliable whole
What companies in some cases underestimate is the strain this places on internal operations. Composed documentation demands more than strong content. It demands retrieval. The nurse executive may know where the greatest examples live, but if those examples are buried in old committee records, regional folders, or partial reports, the submission procedure becomes unnecessarily painful.

ANCC also supplies digital tools and guides to support the appraisal procedure and interim tracking during designation. That information might sound administrative, however it points to a larger truth. Magnet is an official program with defined processes, not an abstract recognition. Consulting can help teams utilize those processes successfully, however it can not make poor evidence carry out better than it is.
The function of Magnet ® Consulting, without puzzling consulting for qualification
Some organizations think twice to engage consultants since they stress it indicates weakness. Others presume consulting is the fastest method to secure classification. Both presumptions miss out on the mark.

Consulting is most effective when it serves judgment, structure, and discipline. The consultant needs to help leaders translate the standards accurately, assess readiness truthfully, arrange written proof, and keep the company from wasting energy on weak examples or misaligned work. In a mature company, the specialist frequently acts more like an external strategist and editor than a rescuer. In an earlier-stage company, the specialist may act as a steadying voice that helps the group understand what the standards actually ask for.

The finest consulting relationships are usually marked by candor. A specialist needs to be able to say, with proof, that a standard is not yet demonstrated highly enough. They ought to also be able to distinguish between a true gap and a documentation problem. Those are not the very same thing. In some cases a company is doing the best work but has not caught it well. In some cases the paperwork is neat, however the underlying practice is too thin. Strong Magnet recommending depends on understanding the difference.

There is likewise a trademark and program integrity dimension that leaders should not neglect. Magnet Recognition Program ®, Journey to Magnet Quality ®, and official Magnet logos are secured marks. ANCC states that designated companies may utilize official Magnet logos under trademark rules. That means organizations ought to be careful and accurate in how they describe their status, their journey, and their use of Magnet marks. A specialist with real program familiarity will appreciate those limits and help the organization do the same.
Designation is one accomplishment, redesignation is another discipline
A point that should have more attention is the distinction between classification and redesignation. ANCC explains that organizations that currently earned Magnet Acknowledgment need to pursue redesignation to continue being acknowledged. That sounds uncomplicated, yet it alters the tactical posture considerably.

A preliminary classification effort often focuses on constructing the organizational muscle to provide a meaningful Magnet story. Redesignation demands something a little different. It asks whether quality has actually been sustained and whether the organization continues to benefit acknowledgment. That introduces a hard truth. A healthcare facility can become very knowledgeable at discussing Magnet and still wander in the actual work over time. Redesignation pressures leaders to keep the standards alive beyond the event phase.

This is where consulting can either include major worth or end up being shallow. For redesignation, the specialist ought to not merely recycle previous narratives or dress up old strengths. They must challenge the company to show what has been kept, what has enhanced, and where the requirements are still apparent in present operations.

A practical sign of maturity is whether the organization deals with Magnet as a continuous operating discipline instead of a routine submission project. Teams that do this well tend to experience less panic around document assembly and interim monitoring. The evidence is still effort, however it is less most likely to seem like a historical dig.
Cost and timing should have sober planning
ANCC posts separate Magnet application and appraisal fee schedules, including an online application cost and appraisal evaluation charges due at written document submission. The exact amounts can change, which is why groups must utilize the existing ANCC schedules rather than depending on memory or previously owned estimates.

Even without calling figures, it is clear that the process needs budgeting discipline. Consulting, if utilized, sits along with those official program costs instead of replacing them. That means leaders need to prepare for both the direct fees tied to ANCC and the internal labor needed to gather proof, coordinate reviews, and handle timelines. In numerous companies, the hidden cost is not the charge schedule. It is the volume of senior nursing attention the procedure requires.

A grounded preparing discussion generally covers several truths at the same time. There is the formal ANCC timeline, there is the preparedness of the evidence, there is the workload of composing and review, and there is the opportunity expense of pulling leaders into extreme Magnet preparation while everyday operations continue. The organizations that handle this well do not glamorize the effort. They staff it, schedule it, and safeguard it.
What leaders need to ask before hiring a Magnet consultant
The quality of Magnet ® Consulting varies widely, and leaders are a good idea to be selective. A consultant may have strong composing skills and still lack the judgment to challenge weak evidence. Another may know the requirements well but struggle to adapt to the company's culture and rate. Before signing an agreement, leaders ought to ask questions that expose whether the consultant understands Magnet as a standards-based appraisal process rather than a branding exercise.

A strong assessment frequently comes down to a couple of basics:
Do they clearly understand that Magnet classification is granted by ANCC and tied to ANCC standards? Can they work within the 5 current Magnet components rather than relying on out-of-date shorthand alone? Do they understand how written documentation and Sources of Proof shape the submission process? Will they provide a sincere readiness evaluation, even if the message is difficult? Can they assist the company stay accurate about classification, redesignation, and trademarked program language?
Those concerns are easy, but they expose whether the consultant is most likely to include rigor or simply activity. In my view, the ideal specialist must make the organization sharper, not simply busier.
The standard behind the standard
For all the conversation about elements, paperwork, charges, and consulting technique, the underlying test is simple. Magnet designation recognizes organizations that have actually met ANCC's requirements for nursing quality and quality client results. Every preparation choice ought to point back to that fact.

That is the standard behind the standard. Not elegance of prose. Not the variety of examples collected. Not how confidently a group utilizes Magnet language. The real issue is whether the company can show, in a disciplined and reliable way, that its nursing environment reflects the quality ANCC recognizes.

When leaders comprehend that, Magnet ® Consulting ends up being much easier to assess. The specialist is not there to produce quality by wording it magnificently. The specialist exists to assist the company see itself plainly, emerge accurately, and move through a requiring appraisal procedure with discipline. In some cases that suggests accelerating a strong organization. In some cases it suggests telling a management team to pause, strengthen the work, and return when the evidence is genuinely ready.

That kind of suggestions is not constantly comfy. It is, nevertheless, exactly what the Magnet structure deserves.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with hospitals, health systems, and care teams improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>