Magnet ® Consulting Guide to the Magnet Empirical Design

23 August 2026

For organizations pursuing Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® designation, the Magnet empirical design is not a branding workout or a loose description of nursing quality. It is the organizing framework behind how nursing quality is comprehended, assessed, and eventually recognized by the American Nurses Credentialing Center, or ANCC. When leaders speak about a Magnet journey, they are talking about work that should show up in structures, expert practice, innovation, and results, not just in aspirations.

That difference matters. Many health centers and health systems have strong nursing groups, dedicated executives, and rewarding improvement tasks, yet still struggle when they attempt to translate daily practice into Magnet proof. This is where disciplined interpretation becomes valuable. Thoughtful Magnet ® Consulting frequently begins with a basic reality check: the empirical model is not simply something to admire, it is something to operationalize.

The present structure is constructed around 5 components. Those parts did not appear out of thin air. ANCC traces the program back to a 1983 study of "magnet" healthcare facilities, and the contemporary structure reflects the evolution of that work over time. ANCC notes that the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism were organized into the 5 existing components after a 2007 statistical analysis of appraisal ratings, with the 2008 conceptual model formalizing the structure. That history assists discuss why the model feels both broad and useful. It is rooted in observed attributes of companies recognized for nursing excellence, then refined into a framework that supports appraisal.
The model at a glance
The 5 parts of the Magnet empirical design are:
Transformational Leadership Structural Empowerment Exemplary Professional Practice New Understanding, Innovations, & & Improvements Empirical Outcomes
Those 5 headings look compact on paper. In practice, each one reaches into choices that nurse leaders make every day, from governance and staffing discussions to quality review, professional development, and cross-disciplinary collaboration. The model is called empirical for a factor. ANCC's framework is connected to proof and outcomes, not just to worths statements.

A beneficial method to comprehend the design is to think of it as both detailed and demanding. It explains the attributes of high-performing nursing companies, but it also requires evidence that those attributes are real, sustained, and connected to outcomes. Organizations submit composed documents utilizing evidence requirements connected to the Application Handbook, typically described through Sources of Proof and related materials. The core challenge is rarely the lack of good work. More frequently, the obstacle is whether the company can show, in a meaningful and disciplined method, that the work aligns with the model.
Why the empirical model alters the way leaders prepare
The organizations that struggle most with Magnet preparation typically make the very same early mistake. They deal with the empirical model like a set of independent boxes and appoint one group to each. That can produce activity, however it typically fragments the story. A nursing strategic plan ends up in one lane, shared governance in another, outcome information somewhere else, and development projects in a 4th place without any connective tissue.

Experienced Magnet preparation tends to move in the opposite direction. It asks how management choices drive empowerment, how empowerment shapes expert practice, how expert practice generates development, and how all of that appears in quantifiable results. The design is integrated by style. A strong written file typically shows that integration.

Consider a common scenario. A chief nursing officer launches an expert governance initiative since frontline nurses want more influence over practice decisions. If the organization files just the committee structure, it might have proof of Structural Empowerment, but the story remains thin. If it likewise shows that nurses used that structure to standardize a scientific practice, improve interdisciplinary interaction, and accomplish a quantifiable quality gain, the very same work begins to touch Exemplary Specialist Practice and Empirical Outcomes, with leadership support visible in Transformational Leadership. The point is not to stretch one project artificially across every category. The point is to acknowledge that meaningful nursing work in well-led companies frequently has effects in more than one component.

That is one factor Magnet ® Consulting typically focuses as much on analysis as on task management. The empirical design benefits maturity, alignment, and organizational self-awareness.
Transformational Leadership is more than executive presence
Transformational Management can be misinterpreted due to the fact that the expression sounds abstract. In the Magnet context, it is not just charisma, interaction ability, or a nurse executive's visibility. It concerns management that guides the organization through modification while keeping nursing practice and patient care at the center.

In real settings, this tends to appear in how leaders frame top priorities, respond to pressure, and build trustworthiness with staff. Throughout periods of monetary pressure, for example, personnel watch whether leaders protect expert practice structures or let them erode. During operational disturbance, they view whether nursing leaders remain concentrated on quality and client outcomes or shift entirely into reactive mode. Transformational leadership is revealed in those choices.

This is also where numerous organizations discover a practical obstacle: executives might be doing the ideal work, however the work has actually not been equated into Magnet language with sufficient specificity. A strategic initiative to enhance care coordination may clearly reflect chcm.com https://chcm.com/ management direction. Yet unless the company can describe how leaders set the vision, engaged nursing, supported execution, and kept track of impact, the evidence can feel generic.

Strong preparation asks pointed questions. What changed because leaders led in a different way, not just because a job occurred? How did nursing leadership influence strategy? How was the voice of nursing elevated in such a way that mattered? Those are the type of differences that move documentation from descriptive to compelling.
Structural Empowerment resides in the systems around nursing
Structural Empowerment is frequently where organizations have more compound than they realize. Many hospitals have professional development pathways, shared governance councils, neighborhood connections, and acknowledgment practices that support nurses in concrete ways. The issue is not whether those structures exist. The concern is whether they are working as cars for expert contribution and organizational influence.

This element is especially essential due to the fact that it reveals whether nursing excellence is embedded in the company instead of depending on a few high-performing individuals. If nurses can participate in decision-making, develop expertly, add to the community, and see their work acknowledged, the company has produced resilient conditions that support excellence.

There is a helpful tension here. Excessive focus on structure alone can lead to a checklist mentality. A council exists, an advancement program exists, an acknowledgment event exists, so the requirement needs to be covered. But ANCC's program has to do with acknowledgment for nursing excellence and quality client outcomes. Structures matter due to the fact that of what they make it possible for. The strongest evidence generally reveals that staff use those structures to form practice and enhance care.

One of the most revealing exercises in Magnet preparation is to compare the official organizational chart with the lived experience of bedside nurses. If the chart says nurses have a strong voice however nurses themselves explain councils that meet without authority, the gap will matter. If the chart looks regular however nurses can point to several examples where their suggestions altered policy or practice, that informs a more powerful story.
Exemplary Expert Practice is where the model becomes noticeable at the bedside
If Transformational Management sets direction and Structural Empowerment develops helpful systems, Exemplary Specialist Practice is where people inside and outside nursing can actually feel the distinction. This part talks to the standard of practice itself, the way care is delivered, coordinated, and advanced by expert nurses and the teams around them.

Many leaders at first think of this part as a broad narrative about nursing values. It is better to treat it as proof of disciplined, constant, high-level professional practice. How does nursing practice show professional requirements? How do nurses work together throughout disciplines? How is care collaborated? How are clients and families served through the expert judgment of nurses?

This location typically benefits from cautious storytelling grounded in actual practice changes. A short example can bring more weight than pages of basic description. Suppose a unit-based nursing team identified variation in client education, dealt with associates to standardize the method, and after that tracked whether the modification improved care consistency. Even without overemphasizing the results, that type of example demonstrates practice ownership, cooperation, and accountability. It reveals nursing not as a passive recipient of policy but as an active expert force.

There is also a typical blind area here. Organizations sometimes assume that because they deliver safe care, expert practice is self-evident. It is not. Safe care is vital, however the Magnet model asks for more than the absence of issues. It asks companies to demonstrate the strength, professionalism, and quality of nursing practice in an arranged way.
New Knowledge, Innovations, & Improvements needs more than enthusiasm
This element tends to generate either stress and anxiety or overstatement. Some teams stress that"innovation" suggests they need to produce advancement inventions. Others label every incremental change as a major development. Neither method is specifically helpful.

The expression itself is balanced. New Understanding, Innovations, & Improvements includes more than one path. Not every contribution has & to be advanced to matter. At the exact same time, the company must be careful not to pump up normal maintenance work into something it is not.

A practical reading of this component asks whether the organization is actively advancing nursing and care shipment instead of merely maintaining present practice. Are nurses associated with enhancement efforts? Is the company developing, using, or spreading knowledge in meaningful methods? Are changes purposeful and linked to better practice?

This is among the places where excellent Magnet ® Consulting can conserve an organization months of confusion. Teams frequently have rewarding quality improvement work, however they have not sorted it well. Some jobs belong primarily under professional practice. Some clearly reflect enhancement. A smaller subset may really reflect development or the application of brand-new knowledge. The task is not to force every task into this classification. It is to recognize where the company has verifiable substance and present it with discipline.

Another point worth noting is that innovation without adoption does not carry much practical significance. An concept piloted by one enthusiastic team member however never integrated into wider practice might be interesting, yet restricted. An enhancement that nurses helped design, implement, and sustain, with visible impacts on care, is typically more convincing since it reveals the company can transform understanding into practice.
Empirical Outcomes is where trustworthiness hardens
Every part matters, but Empirical Outcomes alters the tone of the whole Magnet discussion. When outcomes go into the picture, the organization is no longer speaking just about intent, worths, or structures. It is speaking about results.

This is where some organizations discover the distinction in between being busy and being effective. Committees may be active, education participation might be high, leaders may show up, and nurses might be engaged, yet the obvious next question remains: what changed?

Because the program is grounded in nursing excellence and quality client outcomes, outcome evidence is not an add-on. It is main to how Magnet standards are understood. That does not suggest every trend line will be best. Health care is too complex for that kind of simplification. But it does indicate companies require to comprehend their data, explain it honestly, and demonstrate how nursing contributes to performance.

Outcome work likewise needs judgment. Not every beneficial result can be credited to nursing alone, and mature organizations avoid declaring unique ownership when care is clearly interdisciplinary. Paradoxically, that restraint often reinforces trustworthiness. When a company can discuss nursing's function clearly, without exaggeration, reviewers are more likely to rely on the rest of the story.

A skilled preparation team typically spends considerable time on this element due to the fact that it checks the integrity of the others. If leadership is truly transformational, empowerment is genuine, professional practice is excellent, and innovation is meaningful, those strengths should appear someplace in results.
The composed documentation challenge
ANCC requires written documents connected to the Application Handbook and associated proof requirements. That is a stealthily simple declaration. For many companies, the hardest part of the Magnet procedure is not producing activity, but deciding what evidence best shows alignment with the model.

The temptation is to include whatever. That almost always compromises the submission. Thick paperwork is not instantly strong documents. Evidence works best when it is carefully picked, clearly connected to the pertinent part, and provided in such a way that permits the reviewer to see both context and significance.

A common pattern appears like this: an organization has numerous years of work, dozens of committees, many education efforts, and several quality tasks. The drafting group starts collecting files from all directions. Within weeks, they are buried in slides, minutes, screenshots, reports, policy excerpts, and stories that overlap or contradict each other. At that point, the problem is not lack of effort. It is lack of editorial discipline.

The companies that manage this well usually do 3 things. First, they specify the story they are attempting to inform before assembling every possible artifact. Second, they evaluate each example against the actual element and proof requirement rather than against internal pride. Third, they accept that some worthwhile work will stay out of the last submission because it does not reinforce the case.

That editorial discipline is frequently the clearest mark of reliable Magnet ® Consulting support, whether offered externally or established internally by a skilled team.
Designation is not redesignation
One of the more vital distinctions in Magnet planning is the difference between designation and redesignation. ANCC explains that companies which have actually already earned Magnet Acknowledgment must pursue redesignation to continue being recognized. That might sound administrative, but tactically it alters the conversation.

For a first-time candidate, much of the work includes showing that the organization has actually developed the right structures and can show nursing excellence in a structured way. For redesignation, the standard ends up being more requiring in a useful sense since the organization is no longer introducing itself. It is revealing connection, maturation, and sustained performance.

Anyone who has actually worked around redesignation knows that prior success can develop incorrect confidence. Teams may presume that because they accomplished Magnet once, they can merely update the old materials. That method generally misses out on the point. Redesignation has to do with continued acknowledgment, not preservation of a past minute. The empirical model stays the guide, but the proof must reflect the company as it is now.
Tools, timing, and useful preparation
ANCC supplies digital tools and guides to support the appraisal process and interim tracking throughout classification. That support matters because the Magnet journey is not a single occasion. It is a handled process with formal requirements, submission points, and appraisal expectations.

Fees and timing are also genuine planning concerns. ANCC posts separate Magnet application and appraisal cost schedules, consisting of an online application charge and appraisal evaluation charges due at composed document submission. For executives, that suggests Magnet preparation ought to never ever be treated as a side project moneyed and staffed at the last minute. The empirical design may explain quality, however the course towards recognition likewise needs operational planning.

A sober planning conversation generally covers a handful of concerns:
Do leaders have a shared understanding of the 5 parts, not simply the names? Can the company identify evidence that is both strong and current? Are outcome data understood well enough to be translated honestly and clearly? Is the writing procedure arranged, with clear editorial authority? Is the organization getting ready for designation or redesignation, with the ideal expectations for each?
Those concerns sound basic. In practice, they reveal most of the surprise dangers. When answers are unclear, the procedure tends to wander. When answers specify, the company typically has sufficient clarity to continue with confidence.
What great consulting support in fact looks like
The phrase Magnet ® Consulting can imply lots of things in the market, so it assists to specify the work by its value rather than by a supplier label. Excellent assistance does not make excellence. It helps a company see its own strengths and spaces through the reasoning of the empirical model. It organizes evidence. It hones stories. It protects the team from wasting energy on examples that do not really fit. And it keeps management sincere about where more work is still needed.

In my experience, the very best assistance is not fancy. It is rigorous. It asks unpleasant concerns early, especially when a valued internal initiative lacks the proof to stand as a Magnet example. It also acknowledges when modest-looking work really exposes something powerful about nursing culture. A peaceful, long lasting professional governance procedure that nurses trust may say more about excellence than a highly promoted one-time campaign.

There is also a human component that must not be underestimated. Magnet preparation locations real needs on nurse leaders, document authors, quality teams, and frontline participants. Individuals are normally doing this work together with full operational obligations. A disciplined consulting technique appreciates that reality. It simplifies where possible, prioritizes what matters, and helps the company avoid unnecessary churn.
Reading the empirical model the way appraisers do
The most productive psychological shift for numerous groups is to stop reading the model as experts protecting their work and begin reading it as appraisers looking for evidence. Appraisers are not trying to be charmed. They are trying to identify whether the company has met Magnet standards through evidence that is meaningful, credible, and aligned with ANCC's framework.

That perspective changes writing right away. Vague praise ends up being less useful. Unexplained acronyms lose value. Large accessories without narrative logic stop looking impressive. What matters instead is whether the proof shows nursing excellence and quality client results through the 5 components of the model.

When groups internalize that shift, the whole process ends up being more focused. They stop asking,"What do we wish to say about ourselves?"and begin asking,"What can we plainly reveal?" That is a better concern, and usually the one that separates a simply ambitious submission from a persuasive one.

The Magnet empirical design remains one of the clearest organizing structures in nursing recognition because it forces companies to link leadership, empowerment, expert practice, development, and results. For healthcare facilities and health systems pursuing the Journey to Magnet Quality ®, that connection is the work. The designation itself is awarded by ANCC, but the compound behind it is developed long before any official review. When companies understand the design deeply, their preparation ends up being more coherent, their documents becomes more trustworthy, and their story sounds less like goal and more like proof.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a health care consulting and education firm serving hospitals since 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside health care organizations transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>