Magnet ® Consulting on ANCC's Role in Magnet Status

20 August 2026

Hospitals and health systems often discuss Magnet status as if it were a destination. In practice, it is more detailed to a disciplined operating model, one that should be developed, recorded, defended, and sustained. That is where confusion often starts. Leaders know Magnet carries prestige, but they are not constantly clear about who specifies the standards, who approves the acknowledgment, and how the process actually works. If you are assessing the path seriously, comprehending ANCC's function is not a small administrative detail. It is the center of the entire effort.

ANCC, the American Nurses Credentialing Center, is the credentialing body through which the American Nurses Association uses the Magnet Recognition Program ®. Magnet status is granted by ANCC. That easy truth shapes whatever from technique to staffing strategies to document preparation. It also describes why skilled Magnet ® Consulting work tends to focus not just on inspiration or culture modification, but on alignment with ANCC's framework, terms, evidence expectations, and review process.

Many companies start their Magnet journey with broad goals such as improving nursing engagement, enhancing shared governance, or demonstrating quality patient outcomes. Those goals matter. Still, ANCC does not award designation based on good intentions or internal interest. Acknowledgment rests on whether the company fulfills ANCC's Magnet requirements and can reveal that performance through the required process. The difference between "we believe we are excellent" and "we can prove excellence in the method ANCC anticipates" is where most of the real work lives.
Why ANCC holds such a main role
To comprehend the practical role of ANCC, it helps to go back and take a look at what Magnet acknowledgment is designed to do. The Magnet Recognition Program ® was developed to acknowledge healthcare organizations for nursing quality and quality patient outcomes. Its roots trace back to a 1983 research study of so-called magnet hospitals, and the program name officially changed to Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® in 2002. That history matters due to the fact that the program was never ever suggested to be a vague honor roll. It was designed around recognizable organizational characteristics and later fine-tuned into an official recognition system.

ANCC is the body that translates that purpose into requirements, manuals, evaluation structures, and classification choices. To put it simply, ANCC is not a passive brand name owner. It is the program authority. When companies pursue Magnet status, they are not using to a general nursing association in the abstract. They are getting in ANCC's recognition procedure, under ANCC's requirements, utilizing ANCC's model and safeguarded program language.

That point can seem apparent up until a task gets underway. I have seen organizations spend months producing internal stories that sound engaging to their own management teams, just to realize that the material does not yet match ANCC's evidence framework. The problem was not that the medical facility did not have strong practice. The issue was translation. ANCC defines what should be shown, how it should be organized, and what counts as recognition-worthy performance within the program.
Magnet status is acknowledgment, not branding alone
There is often a temptation to decrease Magnet status to reputation, recruitment worth, or a logo design on the website. Those advantages may follow recognition, but they are not the essence of the program. ANCC states that Magnet classification implies a company has met ANCC's Magnet standards and is acknowledged for nursing quality. ANCC also explains the program as a roadmap to nursing excellence. That expression works since it records the double nature of Magnet. It is both an acknowledgment and a structured developmental framework.

That distinction matters throughout executive preparation. If management sees Magnet as mostly a communications possession, the initiative typically becomes document-heavy and culture-light. If management sees it only as a professional practice philosophy, the company may invest deeply in nursing development but miss the rigor required for official review. The healthiest method holds both realities together. The requirements are real. The acknowledgment is real. The functional transformation needed to make it is also real.

ANCC's control over official Magnet logos reinforces this point. Organizations that are designated might utilize main Magnet logos under trademark guidelines. That is not a cosmetic footnote. It indicates that Magnet is a secured recognition, not a generic term any health center can apply to itself. The same holds true of the phrase Journey to Magnet Excellence ®, which ANCC determines as a trademarked expression. For companies dealing with outside consultants, including Magnet ® Consulting firms or independent specialists, this matters. Strong experts respect trademarked language, use the right program terminology, and assist groups prevent the careless routine of speaking as though Magnet were an informal quality label.
The structure ANCC expects organizations to understand
One of ANCC's essential roles is providing the conceptual model that structures Magnet recognition. The existing framework is organized around five parts of the empirical design:
Transformational Leadership Structural Empowerment Exemplary Expert Practice New Knowledge, Innovations, & & Improvements Empirical Outcomes
This design did not appear out of no place. ANCC's structure developed from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism. After a 2007 analytical analysis of appraisal ratings, the 2008 conceptual design organized those forces into the 5 elements now used. For health center teams, that development provides a practical lesson. Magnet is not static language frozen in time. ANCC fine-tunes the program based on analysis and program advancement. Organizations that count on outdated analyses typically develop avoidable rework.

Each of the five parts brings strategic implications. Transformational Management is not practically having appreciated executives. It needs organizations to show how leadership drives nursing quality. Structural Empowerment is not merely having committees on paper. It asks whether the company has produced structures that truly support professional practice. Excellent Expert Practice presses beyond policy compliance toward the quality and consistency of care delivery. New Knowledge, Developments, & Improvements demands a severe relationship with advancement and change, not ceremonial speak about innovation. Empirical Outcomes premises the entire design in results.

That last component is where numerous teams feel one of the most pressure, and for excellent reason. Outcome discussions cut through aspiration quickly. ANCC's model makes clear that performance should be visible, not simply asserted. A common internal tension appears here. Frontline groups may feel they are being asked to" carry out for Magnet, "while leaders insist they are merely recording what currently exists. Generally both viewpoints contain some truth. If an organization has a mature professional practice environment, Magnet preparation may reveal strengths that were never methodically captured. If the environment is irregular, the process may expose gaps that have been tolerated for years.
ANCC's standards form the whole preparation strategy
When individuals outside the procedure envision Magnet work, they typically visualize binders, conferences, and celebratory banners. The less noticeable work is tactical interpretation. ANCC's standards and evidence expectations identify what organizations need to gather, how they must arrange their story, and where their weak points are likely to appear.

ANCC applicants submit composed documentation using Sources of Proof, or evidence requirements, tied to the Application Manual. That expression, Sources of Proof, should have attention. It informs you the program is not developed around opinion pieces or broad guarantees. It is developed around proof mapped to particular requirements. The composed paperwork stage is not a generic narrative workout. It is a disciplined demonstration that the organization meets the requirements in the manner ANCC prescribes.

This is where experienced Magnet ® Consulting assistance often offers the most value. The specialist's job is not to"write Magnet"in some theatrical sense. It is to assist leaders analyze ANCC expectations properly, recognize missing out on evidence early, develop reasonable timelines, and lower the drift that happens when dozens of contributors write in different voices with different assumptions. In weaker jobs, every department describes itself as exceptional, but nobody can demonstrate how the material aligns to the appropriate Sources of Evidence. In more powerful tasks, the team knows exactly why each example matters and where it belongs within ANCC's framework.

A helpful guideline is that Magnet preparation ends up being expensive when companies confuse activity with alignment. A healthcare facility may launch brand-new councils, new acknowledgment events, or brand-new educational sessions, yet still struggle if those efforts are not connected to the real standards and results ANCC evaluations. More effort does not constantly imply better preparedness. Better interpretation typically does.
What ANCC controls in the application and appraisal process
ANCC's function is likewise functional. It is not restricted to setting a framework and awaiting medical facilities to send materials. ANCC posts existing Magnet application and appraisal charge schedules, consisting of an online application cost and appraisal evaluation costs due at written document submission. Even without getting lost in line-item budgeting, leaders need to grasp the useful significance of this. The procedure has official submission points, and those points feature financial dedications and timing implications.

That truth changes how severe companies prepare the work. A Magnet initiative can not be handled like an open-ended quality project that merely progresses whenever individuals have time. Because ANCC structures the program through applications, written document evaluation, appraisal expectations, and cost schedules, the company needs to construct a meaningful task plan. Missed timing has consequences. So does submitting before the proof is mature.

ANCC likewise supplies digital tools and guides to support the appraisal procedure and interim tracking throughout classification. This is an essential but often overlooked part of ANCC's function. Acknowledgment is not just a single ritualistic choice. There is a process infrastructure around it. Good internal teams utilize these tools to maintain discipline in between major milestones instead of treating Magnet as a one-time composing sprint.

In practical terms, this suggests the strongest companies build a Magnet workplace rhythm long previously submission. They find out to keep an eye on efficiency, preserve file control, and keep leaders liable for evidence production. ANCC's tools support that effort, however tools do not produce discipline by themselves. That is why some Magnet teams gain from speaking with assistance while others manage well internally. The deciding element is not intelligence. It is functional capacity and consistency.
Magnet designation and redesignation are not the same thing
One of the more common mistakes in early preparation is to think of Magnet as an irreversible badge. ANCC is clear that designation and redesignation stand out. Organizations that have actually already made Magnet Acknowledgment need to pursue redesignation to continue being recognized.

That distinction changes the tone of the work. A newbie applicant is attempting to show readiness for recognition. A redesignating organization is trying to show that quality has been sustained and remains demonstrable. Those belong tasks, however they are not similar. The first can often rely on the energy of change. The second requires durability.

I have seen redesignation groups ignore this difference due to the fact that they assume prior success will make the next cycle easier. In some cases it does, specifically if the organization preserved strong structures, disciplined metrics evaluation, and institutional memory. Sometimes it does not. Leadership turnover, shifting concerns, and fragmented information ownership can leave a company with a proud Magnet history however a thin redesignation narrative. ANCC's role here is definitive due to the fact that the organization is not redesignating based on memory or reputation. It should continue to fulfill the standards.

For leaders considering Magnet ® Consulting assistance, redesignation work frequently requires a various type of guidance than novice designation. The expert may invest less time explaining core Magnet language and more time assisting the company test whether tradition structures still produce existing evidence. That is a subtle but essential shift. Past Magnet success can produce confidence. It can also produce blind spots.
Where companies generally have a hard time, and where ANCC's requirements clarify the problem
Most troubles in Magnet preparation are not ideological. They are practical. A hospital may really value nursing excellence and still have difficulty producing the best evidence in the ideal form. ANCC's requirements do not produce those weaknesses, however they typically expose them.

The most frequent pressure points tend to appear like this:
strong programs with weak documentation enthusiastic nursing leaders with restricted cross-department support good result stories that are not arranged around ANCC's model confusion between local accomplishments and evidence that answers a particular requirement last-minute efforts to put together material that should have been tracked over time
Each of these problems can be resolved, but they require sincerity. For instance, a shared governance structure may be active and respected, yet the company might not have tidy records demonstrating how nursing input affected choices with time. A leadership development effort might be robust, yet badly connected to the language of Transformational Leadership. A quality improvement task may have genuine impact, yet sit awkwardly between Exemplary Specialist Practice and New Understanding, Developments, & Improvements since nobody framed it properly from the start.

This is where ANCC's function ends up being clarifying instead of troublesome. The standards require accuracy. They ask organizations to separate what is significant from what is simply hectic. That can feel unpleasant, specifically in large systems where many groups assume their work must automatically count. Still, the discipline is useful. It helps organizations identify which structures truly support nursing quality and which ones survive primarily due to the fact that no one has challenged them.
The real value of disciplined Magnet ® Consulting
Consulting in the Magnet area is in some cases misconstrued. Executives under budget plan pressure might wonder why they require outside aid for a program run by their own nursing leaders. That can be a reasonable question. Not every company needs the very same level of assistance. Some have actually experienced Magnet directors, stable management, and enough internal task management muscle to navigate the procedure well.

Where Magnet ® Consulting tends to earn its keep remains in judgment, translation, and momentum. Judgment matters since ANCC's framework needs choices about what evidence is strongest, what belongs where, and what is still too thin to submit with confidence. Translation matters because internal specialists frequently understand their work deeply but explain it in local shorthand that does not take a trip well into a formal Magnet file. Momentum matters because the procedure extends throughout months and often longer, and common operational needs can derail even devoted teams.

A practical example is the distinction in between gathering examples and curating proof. Most hospitals can gather examples. Far fewer can rapidly determine which examples best demonstrate the necessary requirement, which ones duplicate each other, and which ones sound remarkable however add little value in ANCC terms. Excellent consulting support trims noise. It likewise helps avoid the typical problem of over-writing. Magnet documents become weaker, not stronger, when every paragraph tries to prove everything at once.

Another advantage of experienced consulting support is psychological steadiness. Magnet work carries symbolic weight inside companies. It touches expert identity, management reliability, and external reputation. That can make internal conversations abnormally charged. An outside specialist who comprehends ANCC's role can reframe the discussion around requirements and proof rather than characters or politics.
What leaders need to keep front and center
The clearest method to understand ANCC's role is to see it as both steward and evaluator of Magnet recognition. ANCC specifies the program, protects its terminology, sets the requirements, organizes the structure, handles the application and appraisal structure, offers process tools, and awards designation. If any part of a hospital's Magnet strategy wanders away from that truth, friction follows.

For chief nursing officers, Magnet program directors, and executive sponsors, the practical takeaway is uncomplicated. Build your effort around ANCC's expectations, not around folklore about what Magnet"generally looks like."Utilize the 5 components as a true organizing model, not as ornamental chapter titles. Deal with written documents as a formal evidence exercise connected to Sources of Evidence, not as a marketing story. Plan economically and operationally for application and appraisal milestones. And remember that redesignation is its own responsibility, not an automatic extension of prior status.

Magnet status stays one of the most reputable recognitions in nursing because it is structured, protected, and earned. ANCC's role is the factor for that reliability. Organizations that comprehend this early tend to make much better choices, speed the work more https://rowandvxd969.wpsuo.com/magnet-r-consulting-why-the-program-name-changed-in-2002 https://rowandvxd969.wpsuo.com/magnet-r-consulting-why-the-program-name-changed-in-2002 wisely, and approach Magnet ® Consulting with sharper expectations. They do not request for somebody to manufacture a story. They ask for aid demonstrating a requirement. That is a much stronger location to begin.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a nursing consulting and education company established in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps hospitals, health systems, and care teams improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>