Nurse Engagement and Shared Governance: Why the Connection Matters

07 September 2026

Nurse engagement is often gone over as if it were a soft metric, something nice to have when staffing is stable and spending plans are generous. On the flooring, it does not feel soft at all. It shows up in whether individuals speak up throughout a huddle, whether a preceptor still has the energy to teach well at the end of a demanding shift, whether practice issues are surfaced early or delegated simmer till they end up being turnover, dispute, or client risk.

That is why the connection in between nurse engagement and Shared Governance is worthy of a better look. In nursing, Shared Governance describes a model in which nurses have an official voice in choices about their professional practice, commonly through councils or comparable structures. Numerous organizations now utilize the term Professional Governance to show a stronger emphasis on autonomy, responsibility, significant decision-making, and leadership in practice. The language matters, however the hidden point matters more. Nurses are more engaged when their expertise shapes the work they are liable to deliver.

This is not simply a matter of spirits. Nursing leadership companies connect Shared Governance, or Professional Governance, with empowerment, retention, interprofessional cooperation, teamwork, and much safer, higher-quality client care. The American Nurses Association has actually likewise verified partnership and shared decision-making as important to nursing's work, and determines shared governance among labor force sustainability initiatives. When engagement is framed this way, it stops being an unclear aspiration and becomes an expert practice issue.
Engagement is not the like satisfaction
It helps to separate engagement from task satisfaction. A nurse can be pleased with a schedule, a team, or a commute and still feel expertly disengaged. That disengagement tends to sound familiar: decisions are made elsewhere, policies get here totally formed, and bedside proficiency is welcomed right up until it complicates an execution timeline. Nurses may comply, but they stop investing discretionary effort. They stop thinking that speaking out changes anything.

Engagement is various. It has more to do with ownership, impact, and connection to function. An engaged nurse sees a line in between individual judgment and organizational decisions. There is space to form practice, challenge assumptions, and add to standards that impact client care. That sort of engagement does not come from a pizza party, a motto, or a study project. It comes from reputable structures that make participation meaningful.

Shared Governance is among the couple of mechanisms designed particularly for that purpose. It develops an official route for nurses to influence expert practice instead of relying on informal workarounds, understanding managers, or private heroics. When it works, it informs nurses that their understanding is not simply sought advice from, it belongs to how decisions are made.
Why structure matters more than slogans
Most nurses have actually worked in a minimum of one setting where leaders stated they wanted personnel input. In some cases they meant it. Sometimes "input" indicated a short comment duration after the major decisions had already been made. Personnel observe the distinction quickly.

This is where structure ends up being essential. Professional Governance is not just a mindset. Nursing leadership groups describe it as both a structure and a philosophy. The structure offers involvement a place to live. Councils, representative bodies, and open forums develop regular ways to go over practice and policy concerns. The viewpoint enhances that nursing competence belongs at the center of choices about nursing practice.

Without that structure, engagement depends excessive on personalities. A strong manager might foster outstanding local participation, however the model falls apart when that manager transfers or stress out. An official governance technique is more resilient. It makes nurse involvement less depending on luck and more dependent on organizational design.

This difference matters since disengagement typically grows in environments where nurses are asked to bring responsibility without corresponding authority. They are accountable for patient results, expected to follow standards, and measured on efficiency, yet excluded from forming the very practices they must carry out. In time, that mismatch develops cynicism. Shared Governance addresses the inequality by aligning professional obligation with expert voice.
The practical link between voice and retention
Retention is often reduced to settlement, and settlement certainly matters. So do work, scheduling, benefits, and management behavior. However expert voice is part of retention too, specifically for nurses who want a career rather than simply a shift assignment.

When nurses feel that their proficiency is respected, they are more likely to envision a future within the company. They can see pathways for influence, advancement, and management that do not need leaving bedside practice. That is one of the underappreciated strengths of Shared Governance. It recognizes management as something wider than title. A personnel nurse serving on a practice council, helping review workflows, or adding to policy conversations is already working out management in a really real way.

That matters across profession stages. Early-career nurses frequently want to comprehend not just what the rules are, however why they exist and how they can be improved. Mid-career nurses desire their experience to count for something beyond merely dealing with challenging projects. Senior nurses frequently want to leave an expert tradition and enhance the environment for those following them. A healthy governance design offers each of those groups a factor to stay invested.

There is also a trust part. Nurses are more likely to stay in organizations where they think concerns can be raised in a real forum and taken seriously. Even when every request can not be approved, the presence of a legitimate process alters the emotional environment. People tolerate hard realities much better when they are dealt with as professionals rather than receivers of top-down decisions.
What Shared Governance modifications at the system level
The expression can sound abstract till you see what it changes in daily practice. On systems with working councils or similar representative structures, conversations tend to move in a few essential ways. Grievances are more likely to end up being propositions. Practice issues are most likely to be framed in terms of standards, workflow, and client effect instead of individual disappointment alone. Leaders are still accountable for choices, but they are no longer the only interpreters of what excellent practice requires.

That shift has a practical impact on engagement due to the fact that it alters the nurse's function from observer to individual. A nurse who helps shape a practice change approaches execution in a different way from a nurse who finds out about it in an e-mail. The very first nurse might still disagree on details, however there is a stronger sense of ownership. The 2nd is most likely to experience the change as another imposition.

Anyone who has actually hung around in scientific operations knows that the distinction is not cosmetic. Implementation increases or falls on trustworthiness. If personnel believe a brand-new workflow neglects bedside reality, they might comply superficially while creating workarounds to make the day survivable. If they think nursing knowledge formed the procedure, adoption is typically smoother and problems surface area earlier. Shared Governance reinforces that reliability https://devinkipk979.wpsuo.com/why-cooperation-belongs-at-the-center-of-shared-governance https://devinkipk979.wpsuo.com/why-cooperation-belongs-at-the-center-of-shared-governance due to the fact that it makes bedside knowledge part of the design instead of an afterthought.
Professional Governance and the language of accountability
The relocation from "shared governance" to "Professional Governance" is not simply branding. It signifies a more specific focus on nurses' autonomy and responsibility. That is a beneficial shift due to the fact that engagement need to not be confused with popularity or unlimited choice. Governance is not about every nurse getting exactly what they want. It has to do with developing meaningful decision-making within an expert framework.

That difference safeguards the design from ending up being performative. If engagement indicates only asking individuals how they feel, the discussion can become shallow very quickly. Professional Governance asks something more demanding. It anticipates nurses to bring judgment, evidence from practice, partnership, and accountability for results. It treats involvement as part of professional responsibility.

In strong environments, this really increases engagement because nurses are seldom looking for less obligation. More frequently, they are searching for obligation that features regard and influence. Professional Governance states, in result, if nurses are responsible for requirements of care, they should help shape those standards. That concept resonates deeply due to the fact that it matches how professionals consider their work.
Collaboration is where the model either earns trust or loses it
No governance design exists in isolation. Nursing practice is interprofessional by nature. Choices about care shipment, policy, quality, and operations intersect with medicine, therapy, drug store, case management, and administration. If Shared Governance becomes siloed or adversarial, it loses one of its major strengths.

The much better analysis is collective rather than territorial. Nursing leadership and principles guidance alike connect shared decision-making with collaboration. That suggests nurse voice should be strong, however it needs to also be connected to broader group objectives. Nurses bring an important perspective since they are continually present in client care and understand how policy lands at the bedside. That point of view enhances team choices when it is integrated, not isolated.

In practice, this frequently indicates representative bodies and open online forums need to do two things at once. They must secure nursing's professional voice, and they must help equate that voice into decisions that work throughout disciplines. That is an advanced kind of engagement. It asks nurses not just to supporter, but also to negotiate, explain, and lead.

When companies get this right, teamwork enhances for a simple reason. Less choices are made in a vacuum. Friction points are recognized earlier. The bedside implications of system changes become noticeable before rollout instead of after the first tough week. Nurses feel less like the last stop for every unresolved operational issue, which is one of the fastest paths to disengagement.
What a healthy model tends to include
No 2 companies construct governance structures in exactly the exact same way, and they should not. Size, specialized mix, management culture, and history all shape what is realistic. Still, healthy models typically share a couple of recognizable features:
clear online forums where nurses can go over practice and policy issues representative participation instead of a closed inner circle visible links in between council work and actual decision-making expectations for responsibility, follow-through, and communication support from leaders who respect nurse autonomy without withdrawing partnership
The lack of these functions is frequently what makes staff hesitant. Nurses can tell when councils exist primarily on paper. They can also tell when an online forum is technically open but almost unimportant, with little authority, poor feedback loops, or no connection to functional choices. Engagement drops fastest when a company develops the appearance of voice without the compound of influence.
Why some Shared Governance efforts fail
Shared Governance is widely admired in theory, however not every implementation works. The failures deserve talking about since they expose what engagement really needs.

One common problem is tokenism. Personnel are welcomed to join councils, but programs are securely controlled and choices have currently been formed somewhere else. Nurses quickly learn that involvement costs time without producing effect. Another issue is overburdening the same reputable individuals. A handful of high entertainers wind up carrying committee deal with top of complete medical loads, while the more comprehensive personnel sees governance as additional labor for the already overextended.

Timing matters too. A medical facility can announce Professional Governance throughout a duration of functional stress, however if nurses experience it as one more need contributed to a difficult week, the design will be related to fatigue rather than empowerment. The philosophy may be sound, yet the rollout can still stop working if there is no useful assistance for participation.

There is likewise the issue of follow-through. Engagement depends on the belief that effort leads somewhere. If nurses raise issues, establish suggestions, and never hear what occurred next, trust erodes. Silence is interpreted as dismissal, even when the genuine problem is bad communication. In my experience, numerous governance efforts do not collapse since people dislike the idea. They collapse due to the fact that the company underestimates how much discipline is required to keep the process noticeable, responsive, and worthwhile.
The patient care connection is real
Sometimes people become unpleasant when engagement is connected to client care, as if the connection is too indirect to point out with self-confidence. Yet nursing management groups explicitly link Shared Governance and Professional Governance with much safer, higher-quality care. That makes good sense on useful grounds.

Nurses are close to the points where systems prosper or stop working. They see where handoffs break down, where a policy creates confusion, where a kind duplicates work, where a communication space develops preventable danger. If those observations have no formal path into decision-making, organizations lose a significant safety resource. If they do have a route, concerns can be equated into enhancements before harm occurs.

This is not magic, and it does not indicate governance alone guarantees much better outcomes. Staffing, skill mix, management ability, resources, and organizational culture all stay important. But it is tough to deliver consistently safe, top quality care in a setting where the clinicians most continually involved in patient care have little say in expert practice choices. Shared Governance enhances care by enhancing the quality of those decisions.

There is likewise a subtler client care result. Engaged nurses are more likely to stay mentally present in improvement work. They notice patterns. They ask whether a procedure makes sense. They help newer associates comprehend not only the guideline, but the rationale. That professional energy is tough to quantify, yet anyone who has actually dealt with a strong system can feel it immediately.
Ethics, sustainability, and the future of the workforce
The connection in between engagement and Shared Governance is not only functional. It is ethical. Nursing's professional standards stress partnership and shared decision-making as important to the work. That puts governance in a much deeper classification than optional management style. It enters into how organizations honor nursing as a profession instead of merely deploy it as labor.

That ethical dimension matters for labor force sustainability. The occupation can not ask nurses to bring intensifying intricacy while diminishing their sphere of influence. Individuals will eventually protect themselves by disengaging, leaving, or both. Shared Governance provides a more sustainable alternative because it reinforces that know-how, responsibility, and voice belong together.

This is especially important during periods of stress. When staffing is tight or change is consistent, leaders might be tempted to centralize decisions for speed. Sometimes immediate conditions do need that. But as a long-term pattern, it is corrosive. Nurses who are consistently bypassed in the name of effectiveness frequently become less engaged, not more cooperative. In time, the organization pays for that speed through turnover, skepticism, and weaker implementation.

Professional Governance, understood as both structure and approach, helps counter that drift. It states nursing sustainability depends not just on filling positions, but on sustaining professional agency.
What leaders and staff must see for
If an organization would like to know whether its governance model is truly supporting engagement, a couple of questions cut through the branding. Are nurses affecting choices about practice in visible methods? Do representative bodies talk about genuine concerns in open online forum? Are autonomy and accountability dealt with as a set? Is communication strong enough that personnel can see what happened after concerns were raised? Are cooperation and team effort improving, or are councils ending up being separated talking shops?

Those concerns matter since engagement can be overemphasized. A room loaded with respectful attendance does not necessarily reflect professional financial investment. Real engagement is more requiring. It includes involvement, disagreement dealt with well, ownership of standards, and a determination to contribute beyond complaint. Shared Governance can support that, however only if the organization treats it as necessary facilities instead of ritualistic participation.

For frontline nurses, one indication of a healthy design is easy: does bringing your expertise forward feel beneficial? For leaders, the more difficult test is whether they want to share significant authority over expert practice, while still preserving accountability for the whole system. The tension is genuine. So is the payoff.
Why the connection matters so much
The connection matters since nurse engagement is not built by persuasion alone. It is constructed by experience. Nurses become engaged when the organization consistently shows that their judgment counts in the locations where it must count most, specifically choices about practice, policy, and care delivery. Shared Governance, and significantly Professional Governance, provides an official method to make that visible.

That is why the model remains pertinent. It offers shape to regard. It turns collaboration into process. It supports empowerment without abandoning responsibility. It enhances retention due to the fact that individuals are most likely to stay where their professional identity is acknowledged and utilized. It reinforces teamwork since choices enhance when nursing knowledge is present from the start. And it supports much safer, higher-quality care because the people closest to practice have a voice in forming it.

For medical facilities and health systems trying to enhance engagement, this is the point worth keeping. Nurses do not require more rhetoric about being valued. They require professional structures that prove it. Shared Governance does that when it is real. Professional Governance does it with even sharper language around autonomy, leadership, and obligation. In any case, the message is the very same: engagement grows where nurses have both a voice and a stake in the practice of their profession.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a nursing consulting and education company founded in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside health care organizations improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>