Magnet ® Consulting Guide to the Official Magnet Structure

24 August 2026

Hospitals and health systems typically talk about Magnet Recognition as if it were a badge alone. In practice, it is even more demanding than a branding exercise. The main Magnet Recognition Program ® is an ANCC program that acknowledges healthcare companies for nursing quality and quality client outcomes. ANCC, the American Nurses Credentialing Center, is the credentialing body through which ANA offers the program, and Magnet status is granted by ANCC.

That distinction matters due to the fact that lots of internal teams start their journey with broad goals, then find they require a disciplined understanding of the real structure ANCC utilizes. A strong Magnet ® Consulting approach begins there, with the official model, the proof expectations, and the functional truth of constructing a case that withstands appraisal. The work is not merely about stating the right things about culture or leadership. It is about showing, in the regards to the program, how nursing excellence is structured, supported, practiced, improved, and measured.

The present framework is clearer than many individuals understand, yet it is typically misinterpreted in application. Leaders might know the 5 element names, but still battle to translate them into a coherent organizational story. Personnel may be living the standards every day, while documents drags their actual practice. Experts who know the Magnet structure well are useful not since they can recite the model, however due to the fact that they can assist organizations close the gap in between lived performance and formal evidence.
What the official Magnet framework is, and what it is not
The Magnet Acknowledgment Program has roots in a 1983 study of "magnet" medical facilities. According to ANA's Magnet history, the program name formally altered to Magnet Recognition Program ® in 2002. Over time, the structure developed from the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism. After a 2007 statistical analysis of appraisal ratings, the conceptual design was regrouped in 2008 into the 5 components that shape the existing empirical model.

That history works due to the fact that it explains why Magnet can feel both cultural and technical at the exact same time. The older language of the 14 Forces carried a certain descriptive richness. The newer five-component design is more consolidated and more functional as an appraisal structure. It gives companies a structure that is simpler to arrange around, but it likewise needs discipline. A hospital can no longer count on broad claims of excellence. It has to show how its work aligns with the main parts of the empirical model.

ANCC explains the program as both a recognition and a roadmap to nursing quality. Those two concepts ought to be held together. Recognition is the result. The roadmap is the operating worth. Organizations that approach Magnet only as an end point often produce stress, extreme document chasing, and a late-stage scramble to show what should have shown up the whole time. Organizations that use the framework as a management lens typically produce more powerful proof and a more stable practice environment.
The 5 parts, interpreted through a useful consulting lens
The current Magnet structure is organized around 5 components of the empirical model: Transformational Management; Structural Empowerment; Exemplary Professional Practice; New Understanding, Developments, & & Improvements; and Empirical Outcomes.

Those labels are familiar to skilled nursing leaders, however the obstacle is not memorization. It is analysis. Each element requires to be understood in main terms and after that translated into operational work that can be documented. This is where Magnet ® Consulting earns its keep. Excellent consulting does not change ownership by internal leaders. It assists those leaders check out the framework precisely and develop evidence without misshaping what the company actually does.
Transformational Leadership
Transformational Leadership sits at the top of the design for a factor. Magnet is not constructed on separated unit excellence. It depends upon leadership that can set instructions, align nursing concerns with organizational truths, and assistance change over time.

In genuine companies, this is where some of the earliest friction appears. Executive teams might seriously support nursing quality, yet discuss it in basic tactical language that does not readily transform into Magnet documents. Nurse leaders might be driving substantive change, however with uneven evidence routes throughout facilities, departments, or service lines. A consulting perspective assists by asking an easy however frequently revealing concern: where, precisely, is leadership impact visible in practice and results?

That question presses the discussion beyond mission statements. It requires companies to think of decisions, interaction, accountability, and continual instructions. Transformational leadership in the Magnet context is not theatrical. It is visible in how leaders produce conditions for professional nursing practice and how those conditions hold up under appraisal.

A useful truth worth naming is that leadership proof is frequently easier to describe than to show. Internal groups generally have abundant stories, however stories alone do not satisfy the requirement. The work depends on revealing consistency, positioning, and impact.
Structural Empowerment
Structural Empowerment addresses the systems that permit nurses to contribute, establish, and impact practice. This part can look stealthily simple due to the fact that a lot of medical facilities have committees, education structures, and kinds of shared participation. The more difficult question is whether those structures are active, meaningful, and connected to the broader objectives of nursing excellence.

In my experience, companies frequently overstate this element since the structures themselves are simple to inventory. A specialist will normally invest less time asking whether a council exists and more time asking what altered since that council existed. That subtle shift separates a descriptive submission from a compelling one.

Structural Empowerment also tends to expose organizational disproportion. One service line may have strong involvement and visible staff influence, while another operates more traditionally. That does not imply the organization does not have strengths. It suggests the evidence needs to be curated carefully and honestly. Magnet appraisal is not served by pretending all structures function equally well. It is much better to recognize where the company has authentic maturity and where its systems show clear assistance for expert nursing practice.
Exemplary Expert Practice
Exemplary Expert Practice is where lots of organizations feel the greatest sense of identity. Nurses recognize it intuitively. It is present in standards of care, interdisciplinary coordination, responsibility to patients and families, and the daily execution of professional nursing practice.

The difficulty with this element is that excellent practice is simple to applaud and harder to frame. Internal teams typically advance examples that are wholehearted but too anecdotal, or technically sound however poorly connected to the structure. Strong Magnet ® Consulting normally assists organizations tighten that link. The objective is not to flatten the richness of practice into abstract language. The goal is to show how practice is organized, supported, and performed in such a way that fits the main model.

This is among the locations where staff voice matters enormously. A refined executive narrative can not substitute for proof that nursing practice is actually excellent in lived settings. At the same time, personnel stories need structure. The very best paperwork in this location normally combines professional compound with clear positioning to what ANCC expects to see.
New Understanding, Innovations, & & Improvements
This part is often the most misinterpreted of the 5. Some organizations hear the word "development" and presume they require significant, high-visibility efforts to appear reliable. That is not a productive instinct. The main framework includes brand-new knowledge, innovations, and enhancements, which signifies a broad expectation around advancing practice and enhancing care, not a narrow demand for novelty for its own sake.

Consulting judgment matters here due to the fact that companies can easily go too far in either direction. If they present just routine modifications, they might miss the spirit of the component. If they require examples that look impressive however are disconnected from nursing practice, the submission can feel stretched. The helpful happy medium is to recognize work that genuinely reflects improvement or enhancement, then frame it in a disciplined way.

This component also exposes a common timing problem. Enhancement work might be underway, however not yet mature enough to present convincingly. That does not make the work unimportant. It just implies companies require to believe carefully about readiness, sequencing, and proof strength. Strong submissions rarely depend on capacity. They depend on demonstrated work.
Empirical Outcomes
Empirical Outcomes offers the Magnet framework its sharpest edge. It is the component that keeps the program grounded in results rather than goal. ANCC clearly connects Magnet recognition to nursing excellence and quality client outcomes, and this part of the design captures that emphasis.

From a consulting standpoint, empirical results alter the tenor of the entire task. They force clearness. They expose whether the company's greatest examples are supported by quantifiable outcomes. They also reveal whether groups have selected examples since they are meaningful or merely since they are available.

Most companies have more information than they think and less usable proof than they hope. That sounds inconsistent, but it is a familiar condition. Data might exist throughout reports, dashboards, committees, and departments without being assembled into a meaningful Magnet case. The consulting job is frequently less about discovering numbers and more about aligning them to the structure and providing them in a way that is disciplined and defensible.

Because the verified context does not specify comprehensive metrics, any company pursuing Magnet should stay near to ANCC's existing materials and avoid presumptions. What matters here is not thinking what may count. It is understanding that outcomes are main and that they must be presented in line with main proof requirements.
Why the shift from the 14 Forces still matters
Even though the five-component empirical design is the existing framework, lots of knowledgeable leaders still think in terms of the 14 Forces of Magnetism. That is not an issue in itself. In fact, institutional memory can be an asset. The issue develops when groups construct their internal discussions around tradition ideas however stop working to translate them successfully into the present model.

The 2008 conceptual model was not a cosmetic reword. It restructured the structure after a 2007 analytical analysis of appraisal scores. That implies the 5 parts are not merely a summary version of the old model. They are the official arranging structure companies must use now.

An experienced expert will frequently recognize when a team is speaking in old Magnet language without recognizing it. The fix is not to discard that language entirely. It is to map the organization's strengths into the existing structure so that the submission shows present standards, not historical familiarity.
The composed paperwork burden is real
One of the most practical pieces of main context is that Magnet candidates submit composed documentation using Sources of Proof, or proof requirements, tied to the Application Manual. ANCC's crosswalk products explain the written paperwork proof requirements for applicants.

That point deserves emphasis because many companies undervalue the writing and curation workload. The issue is not only producing narrative. It is choosing examples, aligning them to the proper proof expectations, examining consistency throughout areas, and making sure the document shows what the company can sustain under review.

The composed file phase is where internal optimism frequently fulfills functional friction. Groups discover that a fantastic story from one healthcare facility in a system does not automatically represent the business. They find that several systems fixed similar problems in various methods, which is valuable operationally but harder to tell cleanly. They understand that timelines, ownership, and variation control matter much more than expected.

This is among the greatest cases for Magnet ® Consulting. Not since outside aid needs to own the document, however since the file is a customized item with genuine tactical effects. Knowledgeable assistance can decrease squandered effort, prevent duplication, and help leaders focus on the greatest evidence rather than the loudest examples.
Designation is not the like redesignation
Another area where organizations benefit from accuracy is the distinction in between designation and redesignation. ANCC states that organizations that currently made Magnet Recognition ought to pursue redesignation to continue being recognized.

That may sound apparent, however it alters the posture of the work. A first-time applicant is constructing an acknowledgment case from the ground up. A redesignation organization is demonstrating continual excellence. Those are not identical tasks. The proof strategy, the narrative tone, and the internal concerns can differ significantly.

A redesignation effort tends to expose a different type of obstacle. The organization might have confidence based upon previous success, yet confidence can wander into complacency. Groups assume specific structures are still as effective as they remained in the previous cycle. Documents from prior work influence present thinking more than they should. The specialist's function, in those moments, is to bring a fresh reading of the present framework and present evidence, not to let the company depend on inherited assumptions.
Timing, costs, and the value of disciplined planning
ANCC posts different Magnet application and appraisal charge schedules, consisting of an online application charge and appraisal evaluation fees due at written document submission. Because charges and submission timing are operationally essential and can change, companies must rely on ANCC's present published products instead of secondhand quotes or old task plans.

This is more than an administrative note. Timing and cost affect how a Magnet journey is staffed and sequenced. If the composed documents review cost comes due at document submission, then delays in file preparedness are not simply discouraging. They can complicate spending plan planning and management confidence.

Experienced consulting groups usually try to avoid that by enforcing a more sensible rhythm than organizations may select on their own. Internal leaders typically wish to move rapidly, especially when there is executive interest. That energy works, however Magnet work penalizes rushed assembly. A slower, cleaner procedure often conserves time because it reduces rework, weak examples, and avoidable inconsistencies.
Digital tools and interim tracking are part of the picture
ANCC also provides digital tools and guides to support the appraisal procedure and interim tracking throughout classification. That is an essential pointer that Magnet work does not end when a document is sent or even when acknowledgment is achieved. The program environment includes ongoing structure and tracking expectations throughout the classification period.

For internal groups, that means the very best preparation approach is one that builds resilient practices. If a company develops a one-time scramble for proof, it may cross the instant threshold but struggle to sustain readiness later. If it uses the structure to enhance ongoing oversight and proof discipline, the program ends up chcm.com https://chcm.com/solutions/magnet-consulting/ being more manageable and more authentic.

Consultants who comprehend this tend to create work that leaves the company stronger after the engagement ends. The goal is not dependency. It is capability.
Trademark guidelines are a small information up until they are not
Organizations that attain classification may utilize official Magnet logos under hallmark guidelines. ANCC likewise protects the expression "Journey to Magnet Excellence ®" in its logo design usage guidance.

This may seem peripheral compared to the 5 parts, however it is a good example of how official the Magnet environment is. Acknowledgment brings branding value, yet that value comes with clear ownership and usage rules. Communications groups, marketing staff, and nursing leaders need to be aligned on that point early. Misconceptions here are normally easy to avoid, however just if people understand the official boundaries.
What excellent Magnet ® Consulting actually looks like
The expression Magnet ® Consulting can cover a large range of services, from tactical encouraging to record advancement assistance. The label matters less than the quality of the work. In a strong engagement, the specialist helps the organization analyze ANCC's official framework precisely, build an evidence method rooted in the Sources of Proof, and preserve discipline throughout a long, complicated process.

Good consulting is not flashy. It generally looks like mindful reading, pointed questions, truth testing, and duplicated refinement. It assists leaders distinguish between examples that are mentally engaging and examples that are appraisal-ready. It pushes groups to stay close to the official structure instead of creating their own version of Magnet.

A useful consulting relationship likewise appreciates ownership. The greatest Magnet stories are not made by outsiders. They are appeared, clarified, and structured by people who know how the official design works. When that balance is right, the submission sounds like the organization at its best, not like an obtained voice.
A grounded method to consider readiness
Readiness is often discussed too broadly. It is better comprehended as the point where the company can present a coherent, evidence-based case across the main framework without extending examples beyond what they can support.

Two questions normally cut through the noise.

First, can the organization demonstrate how its nursing quality is organized within the five parts of the empirical design, not merely described in general terms?

Second, can it support that case through the composed documents requirements tied to the Application Handbook, with proof that corresponds, reliable, and sustainable?

If the response to either concern is irregular, that is not failure. It is details. In a lot of cases, the wisest relocation is not to speed up harder but to tighten the structure. Magnet work rewards maturity more than momentum.
The framework is the strategy
Teams sometimes ask whether they need to Magnet® Consulting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/?search=Magnet® Consulting focus on culture initially, results first, or documents first. The better answer is that the official structure ties those components together. Transformational management shapes instructions. Structural empowerment creates the environment. Exemplary professional practice specifies how care is performed. New understanding, innovations, and enhancements keep the system advancing. Empirical outcomes test whether the whole effort is producing results.

That is why the official Magnet structure remains so important. It is not a collection of detached requirements. It is an integrated model for comprehending nursing quality in organizational terms. The hospitals and health systems that benefit most from Magnet are typically the ones that stop treating the model as an application requirement and start utilizing it as an operating discipline.

For leaders considering Magnet ® Consulting, that is the standard to remember. Look for support that knows the main ANCC framework, respects the limits of what can be declared, and assists your organization construct a case grounded in real nursing practice and defensible proof. When the work is succeeded, the framework does not feel like an external imposition. It ends up being an accurate method to describe what excellent nursing companies are already attempting to achieve.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a nursing consulting and education company established in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside nursing and clinical teams transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>