Magnet ® Consulting on the Five-Component Magnet Framework

21 August 2026

Magnet ® Consulting is most beneficial when it stays grounded in what the Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® in fact asks organizations to show. The framework is not a branding exercise, and it is not a single nursing job dressed up as business method. It is ANCC's model for acknowledging nursing quality and quality patient results, and it asks companies to reveal that quality through a five-component empirical framework: Transformational Leadership, Structural Empowerment, Exemplary Specialist Practice, New Knowledge, Innovations, & & Improvements, and Empirical Outcomes.

That distinction matters. Many groups first experience Magnet as a designation objective, a board-level priority, or a point of market distinction. Those chauffeurs are genuine, however they are not enough to bring a company through the work. The organizations that move well through the Journey to Magnet Quality ® usually deal with the structure as an operating model, not a campaign. They understand that the composed documentation, the appraisal process, and redesignation expectations all sit on top of day-to-day professional practice.

A great consulting engagement does not try to replace that internal work. It assists leaders translate the framework precisely, line up documents with proof requirements, and construct a disciplined process around what ANCC recognizes. It also helps teams avoid among the most common and expensive errors, attempting to inform a compelling story before the underlying structures, practices, and outcomes are clearly connected.
The framework did not appear out of thin air
The Magnet Recognition Program ® traces its roots to a 1983 research study of "magnet" hospitals. With time, ANCC formalized and progressed the design. What many nursing leaders keep in mind as the 14 Forces of Magnetism was later on reorganized after analytical analysis of appraisal scores, and the 2008 conceptual model organized those forces into the 5 components now utilized in the empirical framework.

That history is more than background. It explains why the existing model feels both broad and practical. It is broad since nursing excellence can not be minimized to one metric or one leadership behavior. It is useful since the framework is suggested to show how strong companies in fact work. Management sets instructions. Structures support the profession. Practice shows up at the bedside and throughout settings. Enhancement and development keep the model alive. Results show the work is real.

Magnet ® Consulting tends to be most effective when it honors that architecture. If a consultant deals with the five elements as 5 separate chapters to fill, the last submission frequently feels fragmented. If the expert helps the company demonstrate how those components enhance one another, the narrative ends up being more reputable and far easier to defend.
Why organizations look for Magnet ® Consulting in the very first place
Even highly capable healthcare organizations can struggle to translate their strengths into Magnet language. That is not a criticism. It is a reflection of how specialized the program is. ANCC awards Magnet status, and the classification process requires written documentation connected to Sources of Proof and the Application Handbook. For redesignation, the difficulty shifts once again. The company is no longer proving it can reach a standard as soon as. It should reveal that quality has actually been sustained and advanced.

In practice, leaders usually require aid in three locations at the exact same time. First, they require analysis. Groups desire clearness on what the 5 elements indicate in functional terms. Second, they need company. Evidence exists in numerous places, across departments, councils, quality functions, education groups, and nursing units. Third, they require editorial discipline. Strong proof can be compromised by poor structure, duplication, or unsupported claims.

This is where skilled Magnet ® Consulting earns its keep. The work is hardly ever attractive. It often involves reading policies, tracing governance structures, validating timelines, lining up examples to evidence requirements, and examining whether a declared outcome really matches the story being informed. But that quiet discipline is what keeps a Magnet effort credible.
Transformational Management is where the framework ends up being visible
Transformational Management is often explained in lofty language, however in strong companies it is remarkably concrete. You can generally see it in how nurse leaders link the mission to day-to-day operations, how they respond to alter, how they communicate top priorities, and how they place nursing within the broader organization.

Consulting work around this element frequently begins with an easy concern: can the company show management actions, not simply management titles? A chart showing who reports to whom is not the same as evidence of leadership impact. A strategic plan is not the like evidence that nursing leaders drove change, addressed challenges, and sustained direction during hard periods.

One of the practical stress here is that leaders are busy and frequently under-document the very work that a lot of clearly shows transformational leadership. A primary nursing officer might have led a significant practice change, browsed staffing pressure, built more powerful alignment with executive associates, or promoted a professional governance structure, yet none of that is useful in a Magnet context unless it can be provided coherently and tied to the framework.

Magnet ® Consulting frequently includes value by assisting organizations recognize those moments, hone the chronology, and show management as habits rather than biography. Succeeded, this component ends up being the thread that describes why the rest of the framework operates as it does.
Structural Empowerment needs evidence that the company supports the profession
Structural Empowerment is one of the most misconstrued components due to the fact that it can sound abstract up until groups start pulling evidence. In reality, it is about how the company creates conditions in which nurses can take part, establish, and impact practice. The structures matter due to the fact that quality is tough to sustain when it depends upon a few heroic individuals.

This is where a consultant's judgment matters. Numerous companies have councils, committees, educational offerings, acknowledgment programs, or community-facing activities. The concern is not whether these things exist. The question is whether they clearly support nursing's voice, advancement, and reach in such a way that lines up with ANCC's expectations.

A weak method to this component turns it into a warehouse of various advantages. A stronger technique shows the reasoning of the system. How are nurses engaged? How is professional growth supported? How does involvement affect practice, culture, or decision-making? If a structure exists, what changed because it exists?

In one typical scenario, a company has robust structures but poor narrative combination. The education group can describe development paths. System leaders can describe council work. Community advantage teams can explain outreach. Yet nobody has sewn these together into a meaningful photo of empowerment. Consulting can assist by turning disconnected examples into a professional story with line of vision from structure to impact.

That view is specifically essential because Structural Empowerment must not check out like a public relations sales brochure. It needs to check out like proof that nursing has significant systems for participation and advancement.
Exemplary Professional Practice is where credibility rises or falls
If Transformational Leadership sets direction and Structural Empowerment constructs the scaffolding, Exemplary Expert Practice shows whether nursing quality is in fact lived. This part tends to draw close analysis since it speaks directly to care shipment, collaboration, standards, and professional accountability.

The challenge is that lots of organizations assume their practice is self-evidently strong. Inside the walls of the organization, that might feel real. Outside those walls, in an official Magnet submission and appraisal process, it needs to be demonstrated https://jaidenixrr203.yousher.com/magnet-r-consulting-transformational-leadership-at-the-core-of-magnet https://jaidenixrr203.yousher.com/magnet-r-consulting-transformational-leadership-at-the-core-of-magnet with accuracy. Assertions like "we offer excellent care" bring extremely little weight on their own.

Consulting in this area frequently includes assisting groups move from broad descriptions to particular examples of professional practice. Not inflated examples, not cherry-picked stories with no context, however grounded demonstrations of how practice is arranged, how nurses work with coworkers, and how requirements are translated into care.

There is a compromise here. If the narrative is too high-level, it feels generic. If it is too narrow, it runs the risk of seeming like a regional unit success rather than organization-wide exemplary practice. Experienced Magnet ® Consulting helps strike the balance. The aim is to show adequate uniqueness to be convincing, while keeping sufficient scope to show the organization as a whole.

This part also tends to expose weak handoffs in between departments. Nursing management may think interdisciplinary cooperation is a strength, while frontline examples are scattered and inconsistently documented. Or a strong practice model may exist informally however not be described in a manner that an external appraiser can clearly follow. Those are not insignificant spaces. They can make excellent work look thin on paper.
New Understanding, Innovations, & & Improvements is not a decorative section
Many teams approach New Understanding, Developments, & & Improvements with unnecessary stress and anxiety. The expression sounds big, and companies often assume they require sweeping breakthroughs to satisfy the intent of the element. That presumption can result in overstatement, which is risky. ANCC's framework does not reward exaggerated claims.

What matters is whether the company can show a meaningful relationship to enhancement, development, and the advancement of understanding. In useful terms, an expert often assists the group sort through what belongs here and what is much better positioned in other places. Enhancement work that affected outcomes may overlap with Empirical Outcomes. A leadership-driven change effort may likewise touch Transformational Management. The framework is interconnected, but the proof still needs disciplined placement.

This element benefits from fully grown judgment due to the fact that "innovation" is simple to misuse. Not every modification is ingenious, and not every improvement effort represents new understanding. Overreaching damages trustworthiness. A more professional approach is to provide the work properly, discuss the context, and show what was discovered or improved.

The finest companies I have actually seen in this location do not chase after novelty for its own sake. They construct routines of query. They check ideas, improve practice, and take notice of whether modifications produce measurable distinction. Magnet ® Consulting can support that by assisting teams frame enhancements truthfully and in a manner that lines up with the empirical model rather than with internal marketing language.
Empirical Outcomes is where the narrative needs to hold up
Empirical Outcomes is the part that often clarifies whether the rest of the submission is solid. ANCC's design is explicit in positioning results at the center of recognition. That is suitable. Management, empowerment, and practice should lead someplace observable.

This is likewise the point where consulting ends up being less about composing and more about discipline. A refined narrative can not rescue weak result logic. If an organization declares a strong professional practice environment, the results must help support that claim. If leaders describe a major practice enhancement, there ought to be a coherent account of what altered and how the company knows.

One reason this part is requiring is that outcomes are never ever translated in a vacuum. Period, interventions, and organizational context all matter. If data improved after a change, groups require to be careful not to indicate certainty beyond what they can support. If results are combined, that does not instantly undermine the submission, but it does need sincerity and thoughtful framing.

A specialist's role here is partly editorial and partly tactical. Editorial, since metrics and stories should align easily. Strategic, due to the fact that groups require to decide which examples truly represent the company's strengths. A lot of examples can muddy the message. Too few can make the proof feel thin. The sweet spot is a set of outcomes that plainly link back to the structures and practices described elsewhere in the framework.

This is likewise where redesignation typically becomes more demanding than initial classification. As soon as an organization has Magnet Recognition, continued acknowledgment is not merely about repeating the initial story. Redesignation asks the company to show continual excellence. Consulting support can assist groups avoid recycling old narratives that no longer show present performance or current priorities.
The 5 components are separate on paper, intertwined in practice
The biggest mistake I see in Magnet work is treating the 5 components as separated workstreams. That method looks arranged initially. Different leaders take various sections, evidence is gathered in parallel, and timelines seem manageable. Then the draft comes together and reads like 5 unassociated binders.

The structure works better when teams comprehend the natural flow throughout elements. Transformational Management shapes Structural Empowerment. Structural Empowerment allows Exemplary Specialist Practice. Practice and query feed New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements. All of it needs to appear in Empirical Outcomes. The borders matter, however the relationships matter more.

A strong consulting procedure generally keeps going back to a couple of grounding questions:
What is the company claiming under this component? What evidence supports that claim under ANCC's requirements? How does this connect to the remainder of the framework? What result or effect can be shown? Is the language exact adequate to be defensible?
That sort of disciplined questioning avoids both overstatement and drift. It likewise saves time. Groups that recognize spaces early can choose whether they require much better evidence, better framing, or a different example altogether.
Written paperwork is its own ability set
ANCC needs written documents tied to Sources of Evidence and the Application Handbook. That sounds straightforward until a company begins producing it. The work is both technical and narrative. Groups have to meet proof requirements while protecting clarity, consistency, and circulation across a long, comprehensive submission.

This is one location where Magnet ® Consulting often makes an outsized difference. Numerous companies have the compound but not the writing system. Different contributors compose in different voices. The exact same effort is described 3 different methods across parts. Timelines dispute. Outcomes are pointed out before the intervention is described. A strong example gets buried under generic language.

Good consulting assistance enforces order without flattening the organization's character. It develops shared definitions, validates what each example is suggested to prove, and keeps the narrative anchored to what can really be supported. That might seem like job management, and part of it is. However it is also expert interpretation. The consultant is assisting the company translate lived practice into Magnet evidence.

ANCC likewise provides digital tools and assistance to support appraisal and interim monitoring throughout designation. That means the process is not limited to a single submission occasion. Organizations advantage when seeking advice from assistance represent the complete arc of preparation, appraisal readiness, and ongoing tracking instead of treating the written file as the finish line.
Timing, costs, and the practical side of readiness
The choice to pursue Magnet status or redesignation always has an operational side. ANCC posts different application and appraisal cost schedules, consisting of an online application fee and appraisal review fees due at written document submission. I will not pretend that these details are secondary. They affect governance, staffing, and timing decisions.

That said, the more pricey mistake is normally poor preparedness. Organizations can spend months collecting products only to recognize they do not have a clear evidence map, a coherent writing strategy, or a process for validating outcomes across departments. The outcome is rework, deadline pressure, and preventable pressure on nursing leaders who are already bring full portfolios.

A practical consulting engagement should help management address a few blunt questions before momentum builds too quick. Is the company pursuing initial designation or redesignation? Who owns each element? How will proof be examined for quality, not just amount? What internal procedure will reconcile conflicting data or narratives? Those concerns are not attractive, but they are what keep a Magnet effort from ending up being chaotic.
What excellent Magnet ® Consulting appears like from the inside
From the client side, the best consulting does not create reliance. It develops internal capability. Groups should end up the procedure with sharper understanding of the structure, more powerful discipline around proof, and a clearer sense of how nursing excellence is revealed in their own setting.

You can normally tell the difference early. Weak consulting leans on design templates, generic language, and broad support. Strong consulting asks harder concerns, aspects trademarked program terms, stays close to ANCC's confirmed framework, and refuses to fill gaps with wishful writing. It helps organizations present their strengths truthfully, and it keeps them from claiming more than they can support.

That is specifically crucial in a Magnet environment due to the fact that the designation carries genuine meaning. ANCC acknowledges organizations that satisfy Magnet standards for nursing quality. The worth of that acknowledgment depends upon rigor. Consulting ought to enhance rigor, not soften it.

For leaders considering this path, the five-component framework is the right place to focus. Not due to the fact that it simplifies the work, but since it clarifies it. Every significant choice in a Magnet effort eventually returns to those 5 components and to the evidence needed to support them. When consulting is aligned to that reality, the process becomes less about producing a file and more about demonstrating who the company really is at its best.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization founded in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps nursing and clinical teams transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>