How Shared Governance Assists Nurses Impact Practice Policy Discussions

02 September 2026

Nurses live with the repercussions of practice policy in a way few other roles do. They are the clinicians who carry a new paperwork requirement through a twelve-hour shift, explain an altered medication workflow to a worried family, and adjust in genuine time when a policy looks neat on paper however develops friction at the bedside. That closeness to care is exactly why policy conversations can not be left to a little group of executives or committee chairs. If nurses are anticipated to practice safely, effectively, and morally, they need an official, credible path to influence the decisions that shape their work.

That is where Shared Governance, sometimes framed more just recently as Professional Governance, matters. In nursing, shared governance describes a design in which nurses have an official voice in decisions about their expert practice, frequently through councils or comparable structures. The newer language of Professional Governance locations sharper emphasis on autonomy, accountability, significant decision-making, and nursing management in practice. The shift in terminology is very important, but the main point remains the same: nurses are not simply implementers of policy. They are individuals in creating it.

This difference changes the tone of practice policy conversations. Instead of asking nurses to respond after the reality, a healthy governance structure brings them into the discussion while options are still open. That one move, inviting bedside know-how into formal decision-making, can change the quality of policy itself.
The difference between hearing nurses and giving them a voice
Organizations often say they worth personnel input. The real test is whether that input has actually a defined path into decision-making. There is a useful difference between a suggestion box, a fast hallway discussion, or a survey, and a standing council with authority to review, recommend, and shape nursing practice. Shared Governance produces that route.

Without a formal structure, nurse feedback tends to depend on individual relationships. A persuasive supervisor may raise an issue. A respected charge nurse may get a problem noticed. A crisis may require leaders to listen. However none of those are reliable systems. They are workarounds. They leave excessive to character, timing, and hierarchy.

Professional Governance addresses that issue by making nurse participation part of how decisions happen, not an optional courtesy. That structure matters due to the fact that practice policy discussions are hardly ever basic. They involve completing top priorities, operational limitations, client safety issues, ethical responsibilities, staffing truths, and the practical knowledge that just clinicians doing the work can provide. If nurses are not present in those conversations in a significant method, policy can end up being removed from practice extremely quickly.

In experienced nursing environments, that space shows up quickly. A policy may appear effective from an administrative viewpoint however include replicate work on the flooring. It might mean to improve standardization however get rid of required scientific judgment. It might solve one security issue while silently producing another. Nurses are often the very first to identify those compromises since they are individuals moving between policy language and lived care shipment every shift.
Why governance structures matter in policy discussions
The strongest argument for Shared Governance is not symbolic. It is functional. Practice policy improves when the people closest to patient care can shape it before implementation.

A council structure, or a comparable representative body, considers that input continuity. Instead of one-off problems, companies get recurring conversation, clearer responsibility, and a record of how choices were considered. This turns nurse influence from casual advocacy into expert participation.

That matters in a minimum of three ways.

First, it enhances the importance of policy. Bedside nurses understand workflow, handoff pressures, patient education demands, and the unintended consequences of layered requirements. Their point of view typically exposes whether a proposed practice modification is practical on a busy system, whether it will develop delays, or whether it risks moving time away from direct care.

Second, it improves authenticity. Even when a policy is not universally popular, personnel are most likely to engage with it when they know nursing voices were part of the conversation. People can accept a hard choice more readily when the procedure showed up and expertly respectful.

Third, it strengthens responsibility. Professional Governance is not only about autonomy. It is also about ownership. When nurses help shape standards of practice, they are not standing outside the system criticizing it. They are helping specify what excellent practice requires and what the occupation is willing to uphold.

This balance, voice paired with duty, becomes part of what makes the idea more resilient than a fundamental engagement initiative. It is not a morale job. It is a way of organizing expert decision-making.
What nurses in fact affect through Shared Governance
Practice policy discussions cover even more than major tactical initiatives. In lots of organizations, the most consequential conversations are frequently about the policies that touch routine care, since routine care is where workload, safety, and consistency intersect.

A nurse voice in those conversations can shape choices about documents expectations, client education workflows, unit-based practice requirements, communication procedures, and the practical rollout of quality and safety modifications. The exact structure varies by organization, however the point is consistent: governance bodies develop a location where nurses can raise concerns, review proposals, and affect how expert practice is defined.

That is specifically crucial due to the fact that policy language frequently sounds neutral while its impact is anything however. A phrase like "standardized process" can imply better consistency, or it can indicate one more stiff action in a currently overloaded shift. A requirement suggested to enhance reliability may be entirely worthwhile, but still require modification to fit genuine scientific conditions. Nurses are often individuals who can inform the difference.

This is where Shared Governance earns its credibility. It offers nurses a way to move from "this policy is hard to utilize" to "here is how we modify it so the function remains undamaged and the workflow enhances." That is a more fully grown contribution, and companies benefit when they produce the conditions for it.
Professional Governance reframes the conversation
The relocation from the historical term shared governance to Professional Governance is more than a branding exercise. It indicates a stronger view of nursing as an occupation with its own know-how, obligations, and management role. Shared Governance can sometimes be misunderstood as just sharing power broadly. Professional Governance clarifies that nursing decision-making ought to be rooted in expert knowledge, autonomy, and accountability.

That reframing helps in policy conversations because it moves the nurse role from sought advice from stakeholder to liable professional leader. The difference is subtle however crucial. Consultation can be overlooked. Expert authority is harder to dismiss.

AONL has explained Professional Governance as both a structure and a philosophy. That double nature is worth pausing on. Structure alone can become a hollow set of meetings. Philosophy alone can stay aspirational. When both exist, councils and representative online forums are not just systems for feedback. They become places where nursing competence is expected to form practice.

For frontline nurses, that can be empowering in an extremely practical way. It implies an issue about practice policy is not framed as resistance or complaining. It is framed as expert judgment. For nurse leaders, it provides a much better method to engage staff since the discussion starts from shared duty instead of top-down compliance.
Influence is not the like getting every response you want
One of the more crucial realities in governance work is that meaningful impact does not indicate nurses always get the specific policy result they choose. That misunderstanding can harm trust if it goes unspoken.

Real policy conversations involve constraints. Budget restricts exist. Regulative expectations exist. Interprofessional reliances exist. Completing security concerns exist. A strong Shared Governance model does not erase those truths. It gives nurses an official place to weigh them, difficulty assumptions, and shape the last approach as much as possible.

Sometimes the effect of nurse involvement is apparent because a policy is revised significantly. Often it is quieter. The timeline modifications so education is more sensible. Documentation language is simplified. Exceptions are built in for clinical judgment. A rollout plan is adapted to avoid stacking multiple changes onto one system simultaneously. These may sound like small edits, however at the point of care they can make the distinction in between adoption and failure.

This is where governance requires maturity from everyone included. Leaders need to tolerate truthful input that might make complex a preferred strategy. Personnel nurses have to move beyond aggravation and deal usable suggestions. Council work is most reliable when participants ask not just, "Do I like this?" but also, "Will this work, what dangers stay, and what modification would make this stronger?"

That kind of discussion is slower than decree, but it is typically smarter.
The connection to engagement, retention, and care quality
Shared Governance and Professional Governance are frequently connected to nurse empowerment and engagement, which linkage makes good sense. When nurses can affect practice policy, they are more likely to feel that their know-how matters. That feeling is not superficial. It impacts whether people see themselves as valued specialists or as labor anticipated to soak up decisions made elsewhere.

The connection to retention follows naturally. Nurses are most likely to remain in environments where they have meaningful decision-making power, where leadership treats clinical judgment as important, and where practice concerns can move through a highly regarded channel rather of stalling in aggravation. Governance alone will not fix every workforce problem, but it addresses one of the most corrosive ones, the sense that nurses bear obligation without commensurate voice.

There is also a quality and safety measurement. Nursing leadership sources have linked shared or professional governance to safer, higher-quality patient care, together with more powerful team effort and interprofessional partnership. That is a sensible relationship. Practice enhances when policies are informed by the people who need to operationalize them at the bedside, and partnership enhances when nursing goes into conversations as an occupation with structured input rather than as a group asking to be heard after choices have already been made.

The patient advantage may not always be remarkable or immediately measurable in an easy method, but it is real in the texture of care. Clearer workflows reduce confusion. Better-designed practice expectations decrease workaround habits. More sensible policies secure time and attention for patients. In medical environments, those gains matter.
Where councils and representative bodies make their keep
A representative body only works if nurses trust that it is more than ceremony. Personnel can tell rapidly whether governance is substantive or performative. If council suggestions vanish into a void, or if every major decision is efficiently settled before nurses see it, the structure loses credibility.

When it works well, councils end up being places where open online forum discussion is anticipated, where practice and policy concerns can be discussed with seriousness, and where nursing management works together rather than merely notifies. That collective intent is consistent with more comprehensive nursing governance concepts that stress representative discussion of practice and policy issues.

Good governance discussions tend to share a couple of qualities. The problem is clearly framed. The people in the room understand what is really open for influence. Clinical expertise is dealt with as evidence, not as anecdote to be pleasantly acknowledged and reserved. Follow-through occurs. If a recommendation is embraced, people understand. If it is not, they hear why.

That transparency matters as much as the vote or suggestion itself. Nurses can endure dispute more readily than they can endure opacity. Policy conversations end up being healthier when the procedure is visible enough for personnel to see that expert input had a real pathway.
The ethical measurement is easy to underestimate
There is likewise an ethical case for Shared Governance that deserves more attention. Nursing is an occupation with responsibilities to patients, to coworkers, and to the integrity of practice. Partnership and shared decision-making are not peripheral worths. They become part of how the profession carries out its work responsibly.

That ethical measurement ends up being concrete when policies affect client security, dignity, continuity, access, or fair care delivery. If nurses are anticipated to maintain standards at the bedside, they need to not be excluded from discussions that shape those requirements. Professional Governance supports that positioning between accountability and authority.

This is one reason the design has remaining power. It is not simply a management strategy to enhance spirits, though morale may enhance. It reflects a deeper belief that nursing practice need to be notified by nursing competence in a formal, sustainable way.
What this appears like in difficult moments
Governance typically proves its worth not during calm periods, however during tense ones. Practice policy conversations become more difficult when systems are strained, when workflow changes accumulate, or when staff self-confidence in leadership is thin. In those minutes, an operating governance structure can steady the conversation.

Instead of requiring concerns into rumor, grievance, or resignation, it offers nurses a recognized location to appear what is not working. That does not eliminate dispute. In truth, it may reveal more of it. However there is a profound difference in between unmanaged aggravation and structured expert disagreement.

In practical terms, nurses can advance application concerns early enough to matter. Leaders can explain the nonnegotiable parts of a policy https://eduardoagqf989.tearosediner.net/shared-governance-and-the-value-of-collaborative-decision-making https://eduardoagqf989.tearosediner.net/shared-governance-and-the-value-of-collaborative-decision-making and be sincere about where adaptation is possible. Councils can check whether a proposal appreciates both medical realities and organizational requirements. Even when the final answer is imperfect, the procedure itself is less alienating.

That is among the underrated strengths of Professional Governance. It provides a company a much better way to disagree.
What weakens Shared Governance, even when the structure exists
Not every council model lives up to its function. Some fail due to the fact that the structure exists on paper however not in culture. Nurses are invited to talk about small functional details while bigger practice decisions stay securely managed elsewhere. Meetings are held, minutes are taken, and little changes. Over time, personnel stop believing that involvement matters.

Other efforts weaken since there is confusion about role. If governance is treated as a complaint forum, it loses tactical worth. If it is treated as a rubber stamp, it loses trust. The healthiest middle ground is a professional forum where nurses examine practice questions seriously, with both candor and responsibility.

A few indication tend to appear when the design is struggling:
Nurses are requested input just after crucial decisions are successfully made. Council suggestions get little noticeable follow-through or explanation. Participation is framed as optional goodwill instead of professional responsibility. Leaders seek agreement more frequently than truthful analysis. Staff can not inform which practice policy issues belong in the governance process.
None of these issues are fatal, but they do erode self-confidence quickly. The solution is generally not another slogan. It is clearer authority, stronger interaction, and management behavior that proves nursing input will be used in a serious way.
Why the language nurses utilize matters
One of the practical benefits of Shared Governance is that it helps nurses hone how they advocate. In informal settings, concerns often come out as aggravation because aggravation is real and time is short. Governance invites a different type of language, one tied to expert requirements, patient impact, workflow, accountability, and execution risk.

That shift assists policy conversations end up being more efficient. A nurse stating, "This new procedure is difficult," may be definitely right, however the declaration is hard to work with. A nurse saying, "This process includes replicate documents throughout peak medication administration time and increases the probability of hold-up or omission," offers the group something exact to examine. Shared Governance creates more chances for that kind of disciplined contribution.

This is not about making nurses sound more polished for leadership's convenience. It has to do with gearing up expert judgment to travel farther in the organization. The more plainly nurses can link bedside truth to policy ramifications, the more impact they tend to have.
Why this model still matters
Healthcare companies have plenty of competing needs, and nursing practice sits at the center of much of them. That alone makes formal nurse influence necessary. But Shared Governance, and the development toward Professional Governance, matters for a deeper reason. It appreciates the fact that nursing is an occupation whose expertise must form the guidelines under which it practices.

When nurses have a formal voice in practice policy discussions, the advantages reach in numerous instructions simultaneously. Policy becomes more grounded. Leaders get better info. Personnel engagement becomes more reliable since it is tied to decision-making, not simply communication. Responsibility ends up being shared in the mature sense of the word, not watered down, but strengthened through participation.

The concept is basic enough to state and hard adequate to do well: if nurses are expected to carry policy into patient care, they should help develop it. Shared Governance considers that belief a structure. Professional Governance provides it a sharper professional frame. Both acknowledge something skilled clinicians have actually comprehended for a long time, that the quality of nursing practice depends not only on who offers care, however also on who gets to specify how that care is arranged, talked about, and improved.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a nursing consulting and education company founded in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps nursing and clinical teams strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>