How Professional Governance Promotes Responsibility in Nursing

03 September 2026

Accountability in nursing is frequently discussed as a personal commitment. A nurse provides a medication, documents a modification in condition, intensifies a concern, or questions an unsafe order, and is responsible for those actions. That is true, but it is only part of the picture. Nursing responsibility also depends upon whether the practice environment offers nurses a genuine voice in the choices that form care. When nurses are anticipated to own results but have little impact over staffing conversations, practice requirements, workflow modifications, or quality priorities, responsibility becomes lopsided.

That is where Professional Governance matters. Historically, lots of companies utilized the term Shared Governance to explain a model in which nurses have an official voice in choices about their professional practice, often through councils or comparable structures. More just recently, nursing leadership has actually significantly used the term Professional Governance to emphasize something crucial: this is not simply about being sought advice from. It is about nurses working out autonomy, taking duty for practice decisions, and getting involved meaningfully in leadership. It is both a structure and a philosophy.

That difference has practical consequences. Responsibility is strongest when authority and responsibility are lined up. If a bedside nurse, charge nurse, educator, and nurse leader all comprehend how choices are made, who contributes, and what standards guide practice, accountability stops being an unclear expectation and enters into everyday professional life.
Accountability is more than compliance
Many health care companies still have problem with a narrow variation of responsibility. Because variation, accountability suggests following policy, avoiding errors, completing annual competencies, and meeting regulative expectations. Those are required pieces of expert practice, but they do not catch the full function of nursing.

Real responsibility consists of judgment. It consists of speaking out when a procedure does not work. It includes participating in practice changes that impact patient security. It includes owning the results of nursing care not only as individuals, but likewise as a profession within the organization.

Professional Governance develops the conditions for that more comprehensive form of responsibility. It provides nurses a specified avenue to weigh in on requirements, quality concerns, and practice issues. It makes it harder for decision-making to wander upward into a simply administrative workout and much easier for it to remain connected to clinical truth. Nurses who help shape practice are most likely to comprehend the thinking behind choices, safeguard those choices to peers, and notification early when a policy is not translating well at the bedside.

This is one reason the language shift from Shared Governance to Professional Governance matters. Shared Governance sometimes gets interpreted as a committee system or a conference schedule. Professional Governance points back to the expert commitments of nursing itself: autonomy, responsibility, management, and meaningful decision-making. It frames nurse involvement not as a courtesy, but as part of sound practice.
Why structure matters as much as intent
Every healthcare facility leader says nurses need to have a voice. The more difficult concern is whether that voice is formal, protected, and capable of affecting outcomes. Casual listening sessions and occasional surveys have value, however they do not replace governance. A nurse should not have to depend on a particularly receptive manager or a one-time town hall to affect practice decisions.

Professional Governance provides a structure, typically through councils or representative bodies, where nursing practice and policy concerns can be talked about honestly. That structure matters since responsibility damages when decision-making is opaque. If nobody knows where a concern belongs, who reviews it, or how suggestions move forward, nurses discover a familiar lesson: keep your head down, do the work, and let another person decide.

An official governance design modifications that vibrant. It tells nurses that expert judgment belongs in the space. It likewise clarifies that involvement brings obligations. If a unit-based council recommends a practice change, the work does not end with the recommendation. Nurses must assist interact the reasoning, screen adoption, examine unintentional impacts, and revisit the issue if results fail. Governance without follow-through ends up being symbolism. Governance with follow-through becomes accountability.

This is likewise where leaders in some cases misread the model. They presume Professional Governance slows choices or produces too many conferences. Inadequately designed structures can definitely do that. However the underlying problem is not shared decision-making. The problem is weak design, unclear scope, or absence of authority. When governance is healthy, it avoids a various type of ineffectiveness, one that is common in health care: duplicated top-down changes that stop working since they never fit the truths of patient care.
The connection between voice and ownership
People tend to protect what they assist develop. Nursing is no different.

When nurses assist develop a practice requirement, improve a workflow, or identify a quality concern, they are more likely to see the outcome as part of their expert obligation. That sense of ownership changes the tone of implementation. Rather of hearing, "Administration wants us to do this," personnel are more likely to hear, "Our council evaluated the problem, this is why the change matters, and this is what we need to enjoy."

That shift is subtle, but effective. It moves accountability from external enforcement toward internal commitment.

In practice, this often shows up in regular methods. A system might recognize a documentation step that is causing confusion during handoff. Through a Professional Governance structure, nurses can take a look at the concern, bring bedside observations forward, and assist fine-tune the procedure. As soon as the change is adopted, staff understand it came from disciplined expert discussion rather than distant decree. If issues remain, they also know where to take them. The system reinforces duty in both instructions: nurses are heard, and nurses are expected to engage constructively.

This is among the most neglected strengths of Shared Governance. It does not simply improve morale by providing nurses a seat at the table. It develops a professional expectation that nurses will utilize that seat responsibly. A voice without duty is opinion. A voice tied to practice, standards, and results is accountability.
Professional Governance makes autonomy usable
Nursing autonomy is simple to applaud and harder to operationalize. Many organizations state they worth nurses' judgment. Yet in some settings, nurses are provided autonomy in theory while essential decisions about care processes, policies, and top priorities are made elsewhere. The result is disappointment. Nurses are anticipated to believe critically, but not constantly welcomed to form the environment where that critical thinking is applied.

Professional Governance makes autonomy usable by linking it to real choice pathways. It states, in effect, that nursing knowledge is not restricted to carrying out strategies. It consists of defining, examining, and improving expert practice.

That matters for accountability since autonomy without influence can end up being defensive. Nurses might feel personally exposed to outcomes they did not meaningfully assist shape. By contrast, autonomy within a Professional Governance model is coupled with participation, presence, and duty. Nurses are not merely answerable for care. They are taken part in directing the requirements around that care.

The American Nurses Association's present ethics language strengthens the significance of cooperation and shared decision-making in nursing work, and it determines shared governance amongst workforce sustainability initiatives. That positioning is substantial. It recommends that accountability in nursing must not be separated from the environment that sustains professional practice. If the objective is a steady, ethical, high-functioning labor force, nurses need more than strength training or reminders about responsibility. They need credible mechanisms to work together, decide, and lead.
How accountability becomes noticeable in everyday practice
Professional Governance can sound abstract till it is seen in routine operations. Accountability ends up being noticeable when nurses understand where decisions live and how they can get involved. It likewise ends up being visible when leaders stop treating frontline feedback as anecdotal and begin treating it as part of governance.

A fully grown model frequently exposes itself through a few recognizable behaviors:
nurses can determine the council or body that addresses a practice concern leaders explain not just what choice was made, but how nursing input shaped it staff comprehend that participation consists of application and examination, not simply discussion practice concerns are talked about in open, representative online forums rather than closed channels outcomes such as engagement, cooperation, or care quality are linked back to governance work
These are not cosmetic features. They indicate whether accountability is embedded or simply advertised.

One practical test is whether nurses can compare a grievance and a governance problem. In a healthy environment, the difference becomes clearer gradually. A problem is typically instant and individual. A governance problem asks whether the underlying practice, policy, workflow, or standard needs evaluate. Professional Governance helps nurses move from disappointment to disciplined analytical. That is a hallmark of professional accountability.
The relationship to safety and quality
The link in between Professional Governance and safer, higher-quality patient care is not hard to comprehend. Nurses invest more continuous time with clients than a lot of other clinicians. They see where care plans satisfy reality. They notice friction points, near misses, communication gaps, and procedure workarounds. If an organization wants much better quality results, it requires an organized method to catch and act on that expertise.

Shared Governance and Professional Governance have actually been associated by nursing leadership sources with nurse empowerment, engagement, retention, interprofessional cooperation, team effort, and safer, higher-quality care. Those connections are believable due to the fact that they reflect how practice really works. When nurses are engaged and empowered, they are more likely to raise issues early, work together throughout disciplines, and stay invested in improvement efforts. When nurses feel omitted from choices that form their work, silence and disengagement end up being more likely.

Still, it is worth being exact. Professional Governance does not guarantee perfect results. A council structure alone will not repair staffing strain, resolve every interaction issue, or erase the intricacy of care delivery. Accountability can still fail in governed environments if the procedure is performative, if suggestions disappear into a black box, or if leaders reserve genuine authority for a small group while asking personnel councils to concentrate on low-stakes matters. The model supports quality and security when it is taken seriously, resourced effectively, and linked to operational decisions.

That caveat is important because companies sometimes overstate what governance can do. Professional Governance is not magic. It is an operating method that helps nursing proficiency impact practice in a disciplined method. Its worth comes from consistency and integrity, not branding.
Where leaders either strengthen or weaken accountability
Leadership assistance is one of the clearest dividing lines between genuine Professional Governance and decorative Professional Governance. Nurses might be welcomed into councils, but if their recommendations are regularly postponed, narrowed, or overridden without explanation, accountability deteriorates rapidly. Staff learn that their role is to endorse decisions currently made, not to participate in meaningful decision-making.

On the other hand, strong leaders do not disappear in a governance design. They develop the conditions for nursing involvement, clarify scope, protect time for council work, and connect nursing suggestions to broader organizational priorities. They also help distinguish which choices belong within nursing governance and which require interdisciplinary or executive action.

That last point is particularly crucial. Not every concern can or ought to be solved entirely within nursing. Some issues crossed pharmacy, medication, case management, information technology, finance, or hospital operations. Professional Governance works best when it enhances nursing's voice within that bigger system, not when it separates nursing from it.

This is where interprofessional collaboration enters into accountability. A nurse council might identify a recurring handoff problem or patient circulation barrier, however resolution may depend upon numerous departments. Governance gives nursing a reputable platform from which to enter those conversations. It enables nurses to bring arranged expert judgment, not isolated grievances. That enhances the quality of partnership and makes responsibility more https://devinkipk979.wpsuo.com/how-professional-governance-motivates-much-better-practice-choices https://devinkipk979.wpsuo.com/how-professional-governance-motivates-much-better-practice-choices well balanced across disciplines.
What nurses experience when the design is working
When Professional Governance is functioning well, nurses tend to describe a different relationship to the organization. They might still feel pressure. Health care stays demanding. But the pressure feels more practical due to the fact that there is a path to affect. Nurses can see where practice choices are gone over, how ideas move, and why some propositions advance while others do not.

That openness matters more than leaders in some cases realize. Individuals can endure challenging decisions better when the procedure is reliable. They can likewise accept compromises quicker when the thinking shows up. For example, a proposed practice change may improve consistency but include time to a currently crowded workflow. Through governance, nurses can appear that tension early. They might still support the modification, but with modifications, phased execution, or a strategy to keep track of burden. Responsibility is more powerful when compromises are called instead of ignored.

A healthy model likewise alters peer culture. Nurses start to anticipate one another to engage expertly, not simply respond mentally. Council involvement, evaluation of practice problems, and unit-level discussion all enhance that nursing is a self-respecting occupation with responsibilities to standards, proof, ethics, and clients. That does not make difference disappear. In truth, well-run governance typically surfaces argument more honestly. But it gives disagreement a professional container.
Common failure points that deserve honest attention
It is possible to utilize the language of Shared Governance without practicing it. That occurs often sufficient to require candor.

Some companies develop councils but provide little authority. Others fill seats without ensuring representative participation from bedside nurses. In some settings, conferences become dominated by updates rather than choices. In others, governance work is contributed to currently overloaded schedules without safeguarded time, which silently restricts involvement to those with uncommon flexibility or stamina. Responsibility suffers in all of these scenarios since the design loses legitimacy.

The warning signs are typically visible:
council recommendations seldom cause action or get clear responses bedside personnel can not explain how governance works or why it matters participation is concentrated amongst a little recurring group managers speak the language of Shared Governance but make essential practice decisions unilaterally outcomes are talked about, however nursing impact on those results remains vague
These problems do not indicate the concept is flawed. They mean the company has embraced the language more readily than the discipline.

One of the most useful corrections is to deal with governance work as operationally crucial instead of extracurricular. If leaders desire accountability, they must include the discussions and follow-up that accountability requires. A nurse can not be anticipated to lead practice enhancement in a meaningful way if every governance duty is squeezed into individual time or rushed between clinical demands.
Why the terminology shift matters
Some nurses still choose the familiar term Shared Governance, which preference is reasonable. The phrase has a long history in nursing and remains extensively recognized. However the approach Professional Governance is not a matter of fashion. It sharpens the intent of the model.

"Shared" can suggest that authority is being generously distributed. "Expert" centers nursing's own obligation and expertise. It stresses that nurses do not simply share in organizational decisions. They govern aspects of their professional practice through structures that support autonomy, responsibility, management, and significant participation.

That framing better matches what many nursing leaders have actually tried to build for years. It also prevents a common misunderstanding, which is that governance exists generally to increase satisfaction. Engagement and retention matter, and leadership sources do link professional governance with empowerment and workforce stability. Still, the deeper function is practice. Nurses require mechanisms to shape the requirements, policies, and choices that influence patient care.

Seen in this manner, responsibility is not an added demand placed on nurses after decisions are made. It belongs to the governance procedure itself. Nurses contribute judgment, assume duty for application, and stay answerable to the profession, the group, and the patient.
What this indicates for the future of nursing practice
Healthcare companies frequently say they want durable nurses, strong retention, and much better patient outcomes. Those goals are challenging to reach if nursing competence is underused in decision-making. Professional Governance addresses that space by dealing with nurse voice as vital infrastructure rather than optional engagement work.

That technique is specifically crucial for the sustainability and development of the profession. AONL has actually described Professional Governance as both a structure and a philosophy for leveraging nursing competence and supporting nursing's future. That concept is worthy of close attention. An occupation sustains itself when its members can exercise judgment, influence standards, and take part in leadership. It wears down when they are delegated results without significant input into the systems that produce those outcomes.

Professional Governance promotes accountability since it lines up three things that are frequently separated: authority, proficiency, and duty. Nurses are not only responsible for care. They are recognized as educated professionals whose involvement improves choices. And when that participation is genuine, accountability ends up being more than a motto. It becomes a professional norm, strengthened through councils, collaboration, open online forum conversation, and shared decision-making.

For nursing, that is not a high-end. It is a sound method to practice.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management (CHCM) is a health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with nursing and clinical teams transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>