Competency Evaluation in Healthcare Donna Wright Approaches to Staff Ownership

14 November 2026

Competency assessment can turn into one of 2 things in a healthcare organization. It can turn into a yearly compliance ritual that drains time, annoys staff, and produces binders loaded with documents that nobody reviews. Or it can end up being a useful method to focus attention on what matters most in client care, system operations, and expert development. The distinction typically comes down to ownership.

That is why the Donna Wright Competency Evaluation Model continues to attract attention in nursing and throughout health care settings. The model, developed by Donna Wright, is widely described as strategic, outcomes-driven, and grounded in personnel involvement instead of top-down conclusion. It has actually been used for more than thirty years and is typically gone over not simply as a different kind to submit, but as a different way to think of competency altogether.

When individuals search for proficiency evaluation in health care Donna Wright, they are generally looking for more than a definition. They wish to know what modifications when team member are dealt with as active individuals in confirming skills. They wish to comprehend why a lot of annual competency efforts feel detached from everyday work, and how a more meaningful procedure can take shape without sacrificing accountability. Those are fair concerns, specifically for nurse leaders, educators, managers, and expert development professionals who have actually acquired processes that are heavy on tasks and light on impact.
Why staff ownership matters more than another annual checklist
Most clinicians can spot a low-value proficiency day from a mile away. The signs are familiar: everybody rotates through the exact same stations, shows abilities they utilize every shift, finishes modules created for the broadest possible audience, and leaves with little sense that the procedure showed real danger, modification, or discovering need. The company can say the requirement was completed. Personnel frequently feel they quit productive time for a workout that did not improve practice.

The appeal of proficiency donna wright thinking is that it challenges that pattern at the root. Instead of asking, "How do we get everyone through yearly proficiencies?" the better concern ends up being, "What truly needs competency recognition today for this function, this setting, and this team?" That shift sounds basic, however it alters the culture around accountability.

In health care, ownership matters because practice is local. A high-risk problem in one unit may not be the same in another. A procedure that changed in perioperative services may be irrelevant to ambulatory care. A new piece of equipment can alter workflows overnight in one department while leaving another untouched. When competency procedures fail to show those differences, personnel quickly comprehend that the workout is generic. As soon as that happens, engagement drops, and even great content can lose credibility.

Staff ownership restores significance. It informs clinicians that their judgment about practice truths matters. It also positions responsibility back where it belongs, with both the staff member and the leader. The worker is not a passive recipient of education. The leader is not merely a gatekeeper of kinds. Both participate in determining what needs to be confirmed and how that validation can occur in a manner that reflects real work.
What the donna wright proficiency evaluation design changes
The donna wright proficiency assessment model is related to a relocation away from one-size-fits-all yearly screening and towards a strategic procedure that identifies priority proficiencies. A frequently pointed out function of the design is the use of four concerns to determine what must be examined. Those concerns are practical, direct, and simple to bear in mind:
What is new? What is changing? What is high-risk? What is problematic?
These concerns are effective due to the fact that they force specificity. "What is brand-new?" points a group towards new items, policies, equipment, or expectations. "What is changing?" surface areas revisions in treatments or workflows. "What is high-risk?" keeps attention on the aspects of care where failure brings major effects. "What is problematic?" produces space to attend to recurring problem areas, whether those are documents problems, procedure breakdowns, or patterns in practice that require attention.

This is where lots of competency programs improve nearly instantly. When a system starts sorting topics through these lenses, the pile gets smaller sized and smarter. Groups realize that not every ability requires yearly revalidation in the very same way, and not every educational need is a proficiency concern. Some subjects belong in orientation. Some belong in updates or interaction. Some require deeper recognition because the stakes are high or the process has changed.

That difference matters. When everything is labeled a proficiency, nothing feels focused on. Employee wind up showing regular tasks repeatedly while less apparent however more considerable risks can receive insufficient attention.
The real significance of ownership in this model
Ownership is frequently gone over loosely in leadership settings, however in proficiency work it needs a sharper meaning. In this context, ownership means that employee are centered in the recognition process. The literature explaining the model emphasizes the student or employee as an active individual, rather than relying only on top-down screening. That is a meaningful departure from traditional approaches.

In practical terms, this changes the posture of the entire process. Instead of management choosing every proficiency topic and every recognition approach in isolation, staff help recognize what matters and how skills can be shown. That does not remove leader responsibility. It enhances it. Leaders still develop the structure, make sure consistency, and protect patient safety. What modifications is the assumption that proficiency can just be measured through standardized screening events run from above.

Anyone who has led clinicians knows why this resonates. Experienced nurses and other healthcare experts do not want to be dealt with like empty vessels when a year. They desire expectations to be clear, fair, and connected to practice. They likewise want recognition that skills appears in various ways. A person may show skill through directed practice, through proof ingrained in day-to-day work, through peer review, through case-based reasoning, or through return demonstration when that technique is appropriate.

This is among the strongest features associated with the model. Sources describing it keep in mind numerous validation techniques, with one often-cited description describing 11 recognition techniques. Even without listing every possible alternative, the concept is clear: there are several reputable methods to verify proficiency, and the best choice depends on the skill, the setting, and the level of risk.
Why leaders still matter, perhaps more than ever
Some individuals hear "personnel ownership" and presume that leadership steps back. In competent organizations, the opposite holds true. The design is associated https://dominicksjjf888.moderncairn.com/posts/why-the-donna-wright-competency-evaluation-design-tm-is-outcomes-driven https://dominicksjjf888.moderncairn.com/posts/why-the-donna-wright-competency-evaluation-design-tm-is-outcomes-driven with the idea that leaders produce a culture of success that supports favorable staff member habits and the company's mission. Ownership does not emerge on its own. It requires conditions.

A supervisor or teacher sets the tone by choosing whether competency evaluation is punitive, governmental, or beneficial. Staff will not engage honestly if they believe proficiency conversations are actually efficiency traps. They will not raise bothersome locations if those admissions come back as embarrassment. They will not invest energy in significant validation if they anticipate the last strategy to disregard their input.

A healthy culture treats competency assessment as part of expert practice, not as a yearly verdict. That requires sincerity and trust. It also requires discipline. Leaders have to keep the procedure from drifting into 2 common failure points. The very first is overexpansion, where every demand becomes a proficiency. The second is oversimplification, where crucial risks are lowered to a quick sign-off.

Good leaders hold the line in both instructions. They protect focus, and they demand relevance.
How prioritization looks in real healthcare settings
One factor the model has remaining power is that its classifications fit the way health care really changes. Competency topics are typically prioritized around brand-new products, policies, or devices, changes in procedures, high-risk elements of the task, and problematic aspects of the job. Those classifications give managers and educators a way to sort problems without drowning in them.

Consider the distinction between a routine job and a changed task. A nurse might carry out a common intervention every day with self-confidence. If the related policy changes, if the documentation requirement modifications, or if a brand-new device is introduced, the proficiency conversation is no longer about whether the nurse remembers a familiar job. It becomes about whether the updated process is understood and used safely. That is a smarter target.

The very same holds true for high-risk work. Not everything staff do brings the exact same consequence if done inadequately. In a mature proficiency program, high-risk activities receive out of proportion attention because that is where recognition has the best protective value. Healthcare companies already believe by doing this in many other domains, including quality review and safety surveillance. Proficiency assessment works best when it follows the very same logic.

The "bothersome" category is particularly beneficial, though in some cases uncomfortable. It asks teams to acknowledge where practice is not going as prepared. That could reflect confusion, inconsistency, workflow barriers, or repeating mistakes. The point is not to pity staff. The point is to stop pretending that generic annual education will fix a particular functional or scientific problem.
Validation methods that appreciate real practice
One of the factors people look for a donna wright competency worksheet or examples tied to the model is that they are trying to move beyond test-only methods. A worksheet can be valuable if it triggers the ideal concerns and causes sound documentation. But the worksheet is not the design. The model is the thinking behind the tool.

Its more comprehensive view of validation is where numerous organizations discover relief. Skills in healthcare can not constantly be captured by a post-test score. A score might show recall. It does not always show judgment, reliability, or efficiency in context. That is why multiple validation methods make sense.

Commonly discussed approaches connected with the design include:
Guided practice Evidence of day-to-day work Peer review Case studies Return demonstrations
Each method responds to a somewhat different question. Return presentation can be beneficial when a psychomotor ability or a procedure sequence really needs to be observed. Case studies can appear judgment and thinking. Peer review might supply insight into how performance appears in team-based care. Evidence of day-to-day work can be particularly strong when the proficiency is woven into routine practice and can be validated through real work items or efficiency patterns instead of staged events.

The essential point is not that every system must use every technique. It is that technique choice need to be intentional. A company that defaults to the same approach for every competency often winds up overtesting some locations and underexamining others.
What a more powerful proficiency conversation sounds like
When personnel ownership is genuine, the discussion changes in obvious methods. People stop asking only, "What do we have to complete?" and start asking, "What genuinely needs validation this year?" Supervisors stop presuming they must bring the whole burden of subject choice. Educators spend less time creating broad occasions for low-priority material and more time lining up recognition to risk and change.

The language of talk about proficiency evaluation ends up being more significant too. Weak remarks typically sound administrative: finished, went to, evaluated. Helpful remarks describe what was confirmed and how. They reflect real observation, proof, or reasoning. They likewise make competency assessment results more interpretable.

That matters because outcomes are only as great as the procedure behind them. If competency assessment results merely reveal that everybody went to a session or clicked through a module, they provide little functional value. If the results show prioritized topics, purposeful validation methods, and role-relevant proof, leaders can use them to understand preparedness, determine assistance requirements, and justify where follow-up is necessary.

This is where many groups experience a quiet however important enhancement. The documents starts narrating. Rather of showing that an occasion happened, it reveals why a proficiency was selected, how it was verified, and what the outcome meant.
The temptation to confuse documentation with rigor
Healthcare companies not surprisingly want documentation. Regulatory and legal truths make that non-negotiable. However documents alone is not rigor. A thick file can still show a weak procedure. One clean, well-structured record connected to a high-value recognition can be more defensible than pages of low-value sign-offs.

That is why a donna wright competency worksheet, if used, should work as a thinking tool and a record, not as a replacement for judgment. The strongest competency kinds I have actually seen in practice, regardless of brand name or template, do three things well. They recognize the factor the competency matters now, they align the recognition technique to the proficiency itself, and they record lead to plain language that someone else can comprehend later.

This is specifically important when staff relocation between units, when supervisors alter, or when a company is attempting to examine whether its competency system is doing anything more than generating conclusion rates. Great records support connection. Poor records create the illusion of control.
What counts as a meaningful result
The phrase competency evaluation results often gets minimized to pass or fail. In healthcare, that can be too blunt to be helpful. A meaningful result may reveal readiness, need for reinforcement, requirement for additional observation, or a gap linked to a new or altered process. Results ought to inform action, not merely close the loop on a requirement.

This is another place where staff-centered proficiency evaluation has a benefit. When workers comprehend why a competency was selected and how it will be verified, the outcome feels less arbitrary. If extra assistance is needed, that support is much easier to frame as advancement rather than shortage. That subtle distinction has a major effect on engagement.

Organizations that utilize the model in yearly proficiency programs or nurse residency settings typically do so since they desire competency work to support continuous practice, not simply one-time testing. That continuity matters. Skills is not fixed, particularly in environments where policies, devices, workflows, and patient needs modification regularly.
Examples that fit the model without forcing it
People often ask for donna wright proficiency examples, normally wishing for a ready-made set of subjects. The problem is that the model itself pushes against canned examples separated from context. A competency subject is suitable when it is brand-new, altering, high-risk, or bothersome for that role or unit. Without that context, an example is only a placeholder.

Even so, the pattern is simple to see. A brand-new device rollout belongs in the conversation since it is brand-new. A modified medical treatment belongs due to the fact that it is changing. A procedure with major client safety ramifications belongs because it is high-risk. A repeating problem uncovered by practice concerns belongs because it is problematic. What the design dissuades is the reflex to make every recurring task a yearly proficiency simply because that has actually always been the custom.

That can be unpleasant for organizations that equate volume with diligence. Yet volume is typically the enemy of focus. When competency systems ask staff to show excessive, they frequently prove less than they think.
Where application can get stuck
The hardest part of shifting to a staff ownership model is hardly ever the concept. A lot of clinicians understand it instantly. The friction typically appears in habits, systems, and expectations that were constructed around top-down annual programs.

Some leaders worry that staff input will produce inconsistency. It can, if the process does not have structure. But the response is not to remove personnel voice. It is to specify clear requirements for subject choice and validation. The four-question structure supplies that structure. So does leader oversight.

Others stress that flexible validation approaches compromise accountability. In practice, flexibility can enhance responsibility when used appropriately. A return presentation may be more powerful than a test for one ability. Proof of daily work might be more valid than a class activity for another. The rigor comes from fit, not from harmony alone.

There is likewise a work issue. Shifting from generic occasions to more tailored validation can feel much heavier initially. Teams have to think differently, and leaders must facilitate better conversations. But lots of organizations discover that once low-value subjects are removed, the overall problem becomes more manageable. The work gets sharper, not simply larger.
What this technique solves about expert practice
The long lasting value of the Donna Wright method is that it deals with proficiency as part of expert work rather than as an annual disturbance to it. It appreciates that clinicians find out, demonstrate, and keep skills in diverse methods. It also acknowledges that not every educational issue should be fixed with the same tool.

That is why the model continues to resonate across healthcare settings. It provides a disciplined method to select what matters, and a more reasonable method to verify it. It keeps management responsible for culture and instructions, while providing staff a genuine function in recognizing requirements and revealing competence. It also reminds companies that ownership, empowerment, and accountability are not contending concepts. In great proficiency systems, they reinforce one another.

When competency assessment is tactical, grounded in actual practice, and shared between leaders and staff, it stops feeling like a yearly difficulty. It starts doing the work it was constantly supposed to do: securing clients, supporting professionals, and focusing attention where it belongs.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization founded in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with hospitals, health systems, and care teams improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>