The Function of Shared Governance in Meaningful Nursing Decision-Making

18 September 2026

Meaningful nursing decision-making does not happen because a mission declaration says it should. It occurs when nurses have a legitimate, recognized way to shape practice, raise concerns, affect policy, and see their know-how showed in functional options. That is the central guarantee of Shared Governance, also referred to increasingly as Expert Governance.

For lots of nursing teams, the distinction matters. Shared Governance has actually long explained a model in which nurses have a formal voice in decisions about their expert practice, often through councils or associated structures. More recently, Professional Governance has been used to emphasize something much deeper than committee involvement alone. The term indicate autonomy, responsibility, meaningful decision-making, and leadership in practice. It frames governance not only as an organizational chart, however as both a structure and a philosophy.

That shift in language is useful due to the fact that nursing decision-making has typically been gone over in ways that sound encouraging while staying vague. Nurses are informed their input matters, yet the genuine decisions might still sit somewhere else. A council can exist on paper and still have little influence. A personnel conference can welcome remarks but never ever alter a policy. Professional Governance asks a harder question: do nurses genuinely work out authority in matters that affect nursing practice, patient care, and the sustainability of the profession?

The answer depends less on whether an organization uses the old term or the more recent one, and more on whether nurses can take part in decisions in such a way that is timely, reputable, and consequential.
Why governance matters at the point of care
Nursing work is formed by hundreds of choices that are simple to undervalue from a distance. Some are visible, such as practice requirements, workflows, and paperwork expectations. Others are quieter however simply as crucial, including how a team addresses communication breakdowns, escalates security concerns, or adapts to changes that affect client care. When nurses do not have an official system to affect those choices, the gap shows up quickly. Aggravation grows. Workarounds multiply. Personnel disengage not because they do not have commitment, however due to the fact that they see little connection in between their professional judgment and the systems around them.

An operating Shared Governance design modifications that dynamic. It creates a defined path for nurses to contribute to practice and policy choices instead of depending on informal impact alone. That structure matters. In complicated medical environments, excellent objectives are inadequate. Without an agreed forum for discussion, suggestions can become irregular, extremely dependent on characters, or lost in the pressure of daily operations.

The greatest governance cultures recognize an easy fact that experienced nurse leaders learn early: nurses are not asking to be heard as a courtesy. They are asking to participate as experts whose decisions impact results, team performance, and the quality of care. That is why the language of Professional Governance resonates. It better captures the duty that includes impact. Voice without accountability is not governance. Authority without expert ownership is not governance either.

Meaningful nursing decision-making needs both.
Shared Governance as more than a committee structure
One of the most typical misconceptions about Shared Governance is that it is basically a set of councils. Councils might be the noticeable expression of the design, but they are not the design itself. A council can be active and still stop working to produce meaningful decision-making if its recommendations are routinely postponed, overthrown without description, or narrowed to low-impact problems. In those environments, personnel may attend conferences, evaluation files, and go over concerns, yet still feel that the real power lies elsewhere.

Professional Governance is stronger when it is comprehended as a method of organizing expert accountability. Nurses bring scientific competence, useful knowledge of workflow, and a close view of patient requirements. Governance gives that competence a genuine path into organizational decisions. It also makes expectations clearer. If nurses are turned over with impact over professional practice, then they are also expected to engage thoughtfully, weigh trade-offs, and assistance implementation once choices are made.

This is where governance becomes more demanding than basic assessment. Consultation can be superficial. A leader provides a nearly completed plan, requests for input, then progresses the same. Governance, by contrast, presumes nurses have a role previously while doing so and in locations that really affect practice. That difference is not semantic. It is the difference in between discussing a decision and helping shape it.

In useful terms, significant governance frequently depends on whether nurses can respond to a couple of sincere concerns. Do we understand where to bring a practice problem? Exists a forum that can examine it seriously? Are bedside issues equated into choices at the proper level? When recommendations are not adopted, is the reasoning transparent? Those concerns frequently expose more about the health of governance than any formal document.
The move from Shared Governance to Expert Governance
The more recent emphasis on Professional Governance reflects a crucial maturation in nursing management. Shared Governance remains commonly recognized, and the term still describes an official voice in professional practice choices. Yet many leaders have found that the expression can be analyzed too directly, as if governance merely suggests sharing administrative authority. Professional Governance places nursing practice itself at the center.

That language much better highlights autonomy and accountability. It acknowledges that nurses are not simply taking part in management processes. They are governing elements of their own professional work within an organizational setting. This framing helps clarify why governance is linked to sustainability and growth in the occupation. A labor force is more likely to stay engaged when it can exercise judgment, impact standards, and see leadership as part of expert identity instead of a function scheduled for titles.

There is also a practical benefit to this shift. The phrase Professional Governance tends to sharpen expectations on all sides. For staff nurses, it signals that involvement includes preparation, representation, and obligation to peers. For nurse leaders, it indicates that governance should not be dealt with as symbolic. For organizations, it enhances that nursing proficiency is not an optional point of view to collect after the truth. It belongs to how safe, premium care is created and sustained.

None of this means the older term is incorrect. In many settings, Shared Governance stays the familiar and useful label. What matters is whether the design supports meaningful decision-making in truth. Still, the more recent language assists organizations move beyond the idea of shared input toward the fuller concept of expert authority.
What meaningful decision-making looks like
Meaningful nursing decision-making is not determined by how typically nurses are invited into a room. It is determined by whether their involvement changes the quality of discussion, the stability of choices, and the practicality of implementation.

At its best, governance brings frontline knowledge into discussions that might otherwise be driven by seriousness, presumptions, or insufficient functional views. Nurses frequently discover friction points early due to the fact that they cope with them consistently. They can see when a policy reads easily on paper however produces confusion in practice. They can determine when a change meant to improve performance in fact increases risk, hold-ups care, or problems interaction across disciplines. That viewpoint is valuable not due to the fact that it is anecdotal, however because it is cumulative. It reflects repeated contact with clinical realities.

Meaningful decision-making also depends upon timing. Nurse input has less worth when it appears just after essential choices are efficiently made. A governance structure is most useful when concerns can be raised before they harden into directives. This needs discipline from management along with participation from personnel. Leaders require to trust the procedure enough to bring concerns forward early. Nurses require to engage with the understanding that choices typically involve restraints, contending priorities, and imperfect options.

That is a crucial point, since governance can be idealized. Not every issue can be fixed precisely as staff prefer. Budgets, guidelines, organizational methods, and cross-department dependences all shape what is possible. Professional Governance does not erase those truths. Rather, it assists nurses participate in weighing them. That is one factor it enhances expert maturity. Nurses are not protected from complexity. They are welcomed into it.
The connection to engagement, retention, and care quality
Leadership sources have consistently linked Shared Governance and Professional Governance with nurse empowerment, engagement, retention, teamwork, interprofessional collaboration, and safer, higher-quality client care. Those links make sense when viewed through everyday practice.

Engagement increases when nurses can connect their expertise to action. The work feels less transactional and more expert. A nurse who sees that a concern can move through a council, be discussed freely, and result in a practice modification is most likely to think the company respects nursing judgment. That belief has consequences. It shapes morale, determination to speak up, and the strength of peer leadership at the unit level.

Retention is affected for comparable factors. Nurses leave organizations for lots of factors, and governance is never the sole element. Still, the presence or absence of meaningful voice influences whether clinicians feel they can develop a sustainable expert life in a setting. People endure trouble more readily when they have agency. They stress out faster when they are held responsible for results however omitted from decisions that shape the work.

The quality and safety connection is also instinctive. Patient care improves when choices are informed by the individuals who deliver care most continuously. Nurses typically sit at the crossway of procedure, patient experience, and group coordination. If governance channels that viewpoint successfully, companies are less most likely to ignore useful dangers. Interprofessional partnership likewise tends to enhance when nursing brings a coherent, orderly voice into more comprehensive conversations rather than a patchwork of private concerns.

This is one place where the approach of Professional Governance matters as much as the structure. Groups collaborate more effectively when nursing participates from a position of recognized expert authority, not simply as a group asked to react to strategies established elsewhere.
Where governance typically falters
Even companies with sincere intents can struggle to make Shared Governance significant. The trouble normally begins when type surpasses function. A council is established, charters are written, meetings are arranged, and agents are called. On paper, everything appears noise. Yet with time participation slips, agenda products narrow, and staff stop expecting decisions to alter. The structure remains, but the energy drains pipes out of it.

This usually takes place for a couple of foreseeable factors. Sometimes the scope is uncertain, so nurses are uncertain which concerns belong in governance and which remain management decisions. In some cases recommendations are discussed but not acted upon, with little feedback about why. Sometimes the incorrect concerns are sent to councils, leaving nurses to invest scarce time on matters too small to matter or too fixed to influence. Often supervisors support governance rhetorically but bypass it when timelines tighten.

Another challenge is representation. A nurse serving on a council is not there just to use individual viewpoints. That function needs listening Shared Governance (Professional Governance) https://en.search.wordpress.com/?src=organic&q=Shared Governance (Professional Governance) to peers, advancing styles precisely, and communicating decisions back in a useful way. If agents are not supported because work, governance can end up being removed from the bedside. Staff may then see councils as remote, extremely procedural, or occupied by the exact same little group of interested people.

These are not factors to dismiss the design. They are pointers that governance needs maintenance. Like any expert system, it functions only when people believe the effort leads somewhere.
Signs that a governance model is healthy
A healthy governance design frequently reveals itself less through slogans than through day-to-day routines. The following indications are normally present when Shared Governance or Professional Governance is working as intended:
Nurses understand where expert practice concerns must be raised. Councils or representative bodies go over those problems in an open forum. Leaders deal with nursing suggestions as part of decision-making, not as an afterthought. Feedback loops show up, specifically when a proposal can stagnate forward as requested. Staff can point to practice or policy decisions that were formed through the governance process.
None of these indicators is remarkable. That becomes part of the point. Effective governance frequently feels stable instead of theatrical. Nurses understand the pathway. The company appreciates it. Choices move with sufficient openness that individuals stay happy to participate.
Ethics, cooperation, and the expert responsibility to share decisions
The ethical measurement of governance should have more attention than it normally gets. The nursing profession does not deal with collaboration and shared decision-making as optional extras. They are essential to nursing's work. Recent ethical assistance has also clearly called shared governance amongst workforce sustainability initiatives. That matters since it positions governance in a broader professional frame. This is not merely a management method to enhance spirits. It is tied to how nursing comprehends responsible practice, collaboration, and the conditions needed to sustain the workforce.

That framing is useful in hard periods. During stress, organizations can be lured to centralize decisions rapidly and narrow opportunities for participation. Some degree of seriousness is inevitable in healthcare, and not every situation permits long deliberation. Still, if urgency ends up being the default justification for bypassing nursing voice, the profession pays a price. Ethical practice depends partially on whether those closest to care can participate in forming the systems around that care.

Collaborative management models strengthen this point. Agent bodies that talk about practice and policy concerns in open online forum are not merely procedural benefits. They belong to how a profession governs itself within institutions. They help keep policy linked to practice and make management more responsible to those providing care every day.
The compromises leaders must navigate
It is easy to speak about empowerment in abstract terms. It is more difficult to lead within the tensions governance develops. Significant nursing decision-making takes time. It needs meetings, preparation, communication, and the perseverance to hear issues before securing an instructions. For busy groups, that can feel burdensome. Leaders might worry that wider involvement slows development, specifically when operational pressures are intense.

Sometimes it does slow things, a minimum of initially. However speed alone is not the right measure. A decision reached quickly and inadequately carried out can cost far more than one formed through better discussion. Frontline input frequently exposes practical barriers early, when they are cheaper and easier to attend to. Governance can for that reason feel slower at the front end while conserving time and reliability later.

There is likewise a trade-off between inclusiveness and clarity. Not every choice can be made by a big group, and not every concern should be intensified through official governance. Knowledgeable management is needed to specify what belongs where. If everything becomes a governance concern, the design ends up being heavy and scattered. If almost absolutely nothing reaches governance, the design becomes ceremonial. Discovering the balance is among the main acts of judgment in Professional Governance.

The very same is true of autonomy and accountability. Nurses not surprisingly desire meaningful authority over expert practice. Organizations rightly expect that such authority will be exercised attentively, with attention to evidence, group impact, and implementation truths. Governance works best when both expectations are specific. Professional voice is greatest when it is coupled with expert responsibility.
What frontline nurses need from the system
For nurses at the bedside, governance becomes real only when it is visible, available, and responsive. A surprise structure may also not exist. Personnel require to know who represents them, how to raise issues, what sort of decisions can be affected, and how outcomes are communicated. They also need confidence that participation will not be dismissed as performative.

What nurses normally desire is not unlimited meetings or abstract impact. They want a reputable procedure. They want to know that concerns about practice can be gone over in a forum that has standing. They want leaders who can say yes, no, or not yet, and explain why. They desire decisions to feel linked to real care shipment shared leadership synonym https://chcm.com/contact-us/ instead of separated from it.

That might sound modest, however it is fundamental. Trust in governance is developed case by case. A single problem attended to well can enhance self-confidence substantially. A series of unsolved problems, or choices made without openness, can deteriorate it simply as quickly.
What companies gain when governance is real
Organizations that invest seriously in Shared Governance or Professional Governance get more than personnel goodwill. They acquire a more reputable way to surface area functional realities, strengthen collaboration, and support the occupation's long-lasting viability. They also gain a stronger bridge in between management intent and bedside practice.

That bridge is often where excellent techniques succeed or stop working. Policies are translated through local context. Workflows are evaluated in real time. Patient care unfolds through coordination, not theory. Nurses inhabit a central position in that environment, which is why their formal role in decision-making matters a lot. Governance is not merely a method for hearing opinions. It is a method for integrating professional nursing expertise into the choices that shape care.

When it is done well, nurses do not require to depend on informal impact, corridor persuasion, or duplicated workarounds to affect practice. The organization does not need to think what frontline teams think after the truth. There is a legitimate forum, a representative process, and a shared understanding that nursing has both the right and the duty to participate.

That is the genuine role of Shared Governance in significant nursing decision-making. It turns voice into structure, competence into authority, and involvement into professional accountability. Whether an organization uses the term Shared Governance or the newer term Professional Governance, the standard is the very same. Nurses need to have an official, highly regarded, and substantial role in choices about their expert practice. When that happens, decision-making is not just more collaborative. It is more reliable, more sustainable, and more closely lined up with the realities of patient care.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting organization established in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with health care organizations improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>