Magnet ® Consulting: A Closer Take A Look At Magnet Standards

18 August 2026

Magnet ® classification carries a specific weight in health care because it is tied to nursing excellence and quality patient outcomes. That phrasing gets used typically, but the real significance is more operational than marketing. The Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® is administered by the American Nurses Credentialing Center, and organizations make designation by meeting ANCC's Magnet requirements. For nursing leaders, quality groups, and executives, that implies Magnet is not a decorative label. It is a structured framework with explicit expectations, composed documents requirements, and continuous accountability.

That is why Magnet ® Consulting, when it is done well, is less about polishing a narrative and more about helping a company understand what the requirements actually require. The work sits at the intersection of nursing practice, management, evidence, and organizational discipline. Medical facilities and health systems often discover that the hardest part is not interest for Magnet. It is translating day-to-day work into the type of meaningful, defensible proof that the program expects.

There is likewise a typical misunderstanding that Magnet is primarily about culture declarations or management messaging. Those components matter, however the existing design is wider and more requiring. ANCC's contemporary Magnet framework is organized around five components of an empirical model, and that word, empirical, matters. The standards are not pleased by aspiration alone. They require evidence.
Where Magnet requirements came from, and why that history still matters
The origin story assists discuss the standards as they exist now. ANA's Magnet products trace the program back to a 1983 research study of "magnet" health centers, those organizations that were able to bring in and retain nurses during a duration when lots of healthcare facilities struggled to do so. The main program name altered to Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® in 2002, but the central concept stayed constant: identify and acknowledge health care companies where nursing quality is visible in practice and outcomes.

Over time, the design developed. ANCC explains that the current five-component framework grew out of the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism. After a statistical analysis of appraisal scores in 2007, the conceptual model presented in 2008 organized those earlier forces into a more structured structure. That modification was not cosmetic. It shifted the discussion away from marking off a set of qualities and towards demonstrating how a company works as a system.

That system view is among the very first things an excellent Magnet ® Consulting engagement should clarify. Teams often approach Magnet as if it were a binder project, something that can be put together late in the process if enough examples are collected. In practice, the standards are much less flexible than that. A weak structure in leadership, professional practice, or outcomes tends to appear across numerous parts of the appraisal. The five components are distinct, however they are not isolated.
The 5 Magnet parts are basic to name, more difficult to live
ANCC arranges the Magnet framework around five parts: Transformational Leadership; Structural Empowerment; Exemplary Expert Practice; New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements; and Empirical Outcomes. Those titles sound straightforward. Executing them in an organization is not.

Transformational Management is frequently the most noticeable part due to the fact that it asks whether nursing leadership can direct the organization through intricacy and modification. On paper, numerous companies feel comfy here. Many can point to tactical strategies, leader rounding, or governance structures. The more difficult concern is whether management impact is in fact shown in how nursing concerns are advanced and sustained. In strong companies, personnel can generally connect executive choices to concrete modifications in practice. In weaker ones, management language sounds sleek, but the examples are thin.

Structural Empowerment turns attention to the environment around nursing practice. This is where an organization shows how nurses are supported, established, and engaged within the bigger system. It is inadequate to state that nurses have a voice. The standards press companies to show where that voice lives, how participation works, and what that involvement modifications. This is one of those areas where specialists frequently need to slow groups down. Lots of healthcare facilities have committees, councils, and shared structures, however not all of them function in manner ins which are simple to demonstrate clearly.

Exemplary Professional Practice is where the daily reliability of a Magnet journey is evaluated. Nursing leaders often recognize this right away due to the fact that it is where the work ends up being extremely specific. How is expert nursing practice expressed? How is cooperation shown? How does the company show consistency between mentioned standards and bedside care? This element typically separates companies that have truly embedded nursing quality from those that are still describing intentions.

New Understanding, Innovations, & & Improvements can make some groups anxious since the title sounds as if every company should present significant advancements. The phrasing is more comprehensive than that. ANCC clearly consists of developments and improvements, which offers organizations space to reveal disciplined advancement rather than headline-making novelty. Still, the standard requests more than maintenance. It asks whether the company is generating, applying, or advancing understanding in significant ways.

Empirical Outcomes brings the whole design back to measurable truth. This is where the requirements become particularly unforgiving of unclear claims. A medical facility may have energetic leaders, committed personnel, and compelling stories, however Magnet recognition is grounded in proof. Results are not a side note to the model. They are the evidence that the remainder of the design is functioning.
Why the requirements feel demanding even in strong organizations
One factor Magnet requirements can feel much heavier than anticipated is that they ask a company to reveal positioning across levels. Executive leadership, nursing administration, unit-based practice, interdisciplinary relationships, and quantifiable outcomes all have to point in the very same instructions. A single standout project does not do that by itself.

Another factor is that ANCC needs composed documentation tied to Sources of Proof and to the application handbook's evidence requirements. Anybody who has worked near a significant designation process understands the distinction between having good work and documenting good work. Those belong, however they are not the exact same thing. A health center can be doing significant things for nursing practice and still struggle to present them in a manner that fulfills formal evidence expectations.

This is where Magnet ® Consulting can include real value, provided the work remains anchored to the requirements rather than drifting into marketing language. Experienced support tends to be most helpful when it assists groups address practical questions such as these: What counts as proof here? Where is the greatest example? Is the example current and clearly linked to the requirement? Does the narrative program causation, or only correlation? Is the result specific sufficient to base on its own?

That type of discipline matters due to the fact that ANCC's procedure is not just about submission. The appraisal process and interim monitoring throughout designation are also supported through ANCC digital tools and guides. Simply put, Magnet is not a one-time storytelling exercise. It is a program with structure before, during, and after designation.
Designation is not redesignation, and that distinction shapes preparation
A point that deserves more attention is the distinction in between initial classification and redesignation. ANCC treats them as distinct. Organizations that have actually currently earned Magnet recognition need to pursue redesignation to continue being acknowledged. That sounds apparent, yet numerous leaders undervalue how much that alters the internal conversation.

For an organization seeking Magnet for the very first time, the work typically fixates constructing consistency, identifying prototypes, and discovering the language of the framework. For redesignation, the concern is different. The company has currently made a public claim about the quality of its nursing environment. The question then ends up being whether that claim has been preserved and renewed.

That distinction affects how Magnet ® Consulting need to be approached. An initial journey typically needs a strong focus on preparedness, interpretation of standards, and documents practices. A redesignation effort usually requires a sharper eye for drift. Groups can grow familiar with tradition structures that once worked well however no longer reflect current practice with the exact same strength. A council that was extremely engaged four years ago may now be procedural. A leadership practice that when felt transformative might have ended up being routine. The standards do not stop briefly merely due to the fact that an organization has prior recognition.

I have seen companies presume that redesignation should be simpler because they already "understand the procedure." Often the reverse is true. Familiarity https://trentonfazk132.almoheet-travel.com/magnet-r-consulting-why-the-program-name-altered-in-2002 https://trentonfazk132.almoheet-travel.com/magnet-r-consulting-why-the-program-name-altered-in-2002 can hide blind areas. Teams recycle language that no longer matches current truth, or they rely on examples that feel strong traditionally however are less convincing in today. The standards reward existing, well-substantiated evidence, not nostalgia.
What Magnet ® Consulting ought to actually help a group do
At its finest, Magnet ® Consulting creates clearness. It does not change nursing leadership, and it can not produce the conditions that Magnet is designed to recognize. What it can do is help an organization checked out the standards truthfully and organize its reaction with rigor.

That normally suggests operate in 5 useful locations:
interpreting the five Magnet elements in plain functional terms mapping available proof to ANCC's written paperwork requirements identifying spaces between existing practice and what the requirements require improving the quality and consistency of examples chosen for submission preparing groups for the discipline of classification or redesignation, not just the deadline
Notice what is missing from that list. There is no shortcut. There is no trustworthy method to "package" weak nursing structures into a strong Magnet case. Competent consulting can accelerate understanding and decrease wasted effort, but it can not substitute for substance.

The most effective support often sounds less dramatic than leaders anticipate. It may involve revamping how examples are picked so the greatest evidence is not buried. It may suggest pushing a group to clarify dates, results, or organizational importance. It might require informing a respected leader that a favorite story is engaging but does not in fact please the basic it is implied to represent. That type of judgment is not glamorous, but it is the distinction between a refined story and a persuasive one.
Written documents is where numerous projects either mature or unravel
Every significant recognition program has a point where interest satisfies structure. For Magnet, that point is the composed documentation. ANCC's crosswalk materials explain evidence requirements linked to the application handbook, and those requirements shape how organizations assemble their submission.

The obstacle is not merely volume. In fact, more product can make the problem even worse if it does not have focus. Teams frequently start with a broad sweep of examples from across the company, then discover that the genuine work lies in narrowing the field. A beneficial example is not simply impressive. It needs to be relevant to the particular proof requirement and provided with adequate clarity that reviewers can follow the logic without completing the blanks themselves.

That sounds fundamental, however it is where discipline matters. Consider the distinction in between stating a nursing council influenced practice and proving, in a clean narrative, how a council recognized an issue, engaged stakeholders, carried out a change, and produced a quantifiable outcome. The 2nd variation requires tighter thinking. It likewise usually exposes whether the example is genuinely strong.

A common mistake is overreliance on abstract language. Terms like empowerment, partnership, or innovation can quickly become too broad unless they are tied to a noticeable event, decision, or result. Another pitfall is presuming reviewers will infer significance from local context. They might not. What feels clearly essential inside a healthcare facility might need far more specific framing in an official submission.

Good Magnet ® Consulting often brings an editor's eye to this stage, but not in the shallow sense of smoothing prose. The much deeper worth depends on shaping proof so that it is specific, defensible, and aligned with the standard being addressed.
Fees and timing are worthy of sober planning, not wishful thinking
ANCC posts Magnet application and appraisal cost schedules independently, including an online application charge and appraisal evaluation fees due at the time of written file submission. Even without talking about specific figures, the ramification is clear: this process has real monetary and operational weight.

That matters because organizations often deal with Magnet timelines as versatile till they are not. When costs, documentation deadlines, and internal expectations converge, the pressure rises rapidly. The useful lesson is that readiness ought to be evaluated truthfully before major dedications are made.

A helpful planning conversation usually includes a few tough concerns:
Is the organization seeking designation due to the fact that the requirements fit its current nursing direction, or because the classification is viewed as tactically desirable? Are leaders prepared to support proof advancement throughout departments, not just within nursing administration? Does the group understand that written document submission triggers appraisal-related costs and milestones? Is the organization developing a sustainable Magnet path, or sprinting towards a date with uneven internal engagement?
These questions can feel uneasy, especially when a Magnet journey is connected to executive objectives or external exposure. Still, they are the questions that safeguard a company from treating the process as a branding exercise. ANCC describes Magnet as both recognition and a roadmap to nursing excellence. Those 2 ideas belong together. If the roadmap is neglected, the acknowledgment becomes harder to sustain.
The trademarked language is not a minor detail
There is another practical point that experienced teams take seriously: Magnet terms is not generic. Magnet Acknowledgment Program ®, Journey to Magnet Quality ®, and related logo designs are trademark-protected within ANCC's program structure. Designated organizations may use main Magnet logo designs under trademark rules.

That may look like a side issue compared to requirements and results, but it reflects something important about the program's stability. Magnet is an official ANCC acknowledgment, not a loose descriptor that organizations can adjust however they wish. The language around it indicates participation in a specified credentialing system. For healthcare facilities working with internal interactions teams, foundations, marketing departments, or external consultants, this is worth keeping in mind early. Accuracy around the requirements should be matched by precision around the program's protected terminology.
Reading the standards with a leader's eye, not just an author's eye
One of the more revealing moments in a Magnet journey comes when leaders shift from asking, "How do we write this?" to asking, "What does this standard state about how we run?" That shift modifications everything.

Take Transformational Management. A writing-focused team may search for attractive examples and executive messages. A leader-focused group asks whether nurse leaders are genuinely forming instructions in a manner personnel can feel. Take Structural Empowerment. A writing-focused team gathers council descriptions. A leader-focused group analyzes whether those structures in fact influence decisions. The very same pattern repeats throughout all 5 components.

This is why the very best preparation tends to be both reflective and exacting. Magnet requirements can act as a mirror. Organizations see not just their strengths, but likewise the locations where process has changed purpose. That is not a failure of the design. It is among its strengths.

In practical terms, Magnet ® Consulting is most important when it helps an organization utilize the standards diagnostically, not just transactionally. If the work only produces a cleaner submission, it has done something helpful however restricted. If it hones leadership judgment, enhances proof habits, and produces much better alignment between nursing practice and measurable outcomes, it has done something far more important.
A more detailed look ways appreciating both the aspiration and the discipline
There is a reason Magnet remains significant. ANCC has actually constructed the program around a clearly specified recognition process, an empirical design, written paperwork requirements, and ongoing expectations that extend beyond the very first award. The requirements ask companies to show nursing quality in manner ins which can be examined, not merely claimed.

That is the lens through which Magnet ® Consulting must be judged. Not by how classy the final story appears, but by whether the work helped the company engage truthfully with Magnet standards and present evidence that holds up under scrutiny.

For nursing leaders, that typically suggests accepting a tension that is healthy, even if it is demanding. Magnet is aspirational, since it points towards quality in culture, practice, and results. It is also exacting, since ANCC requires organizations to prove that excellence through the structure it has specified. The closer one takes a look at the requirements, the clearer that becomes.

And that is eventually the worth of taking a closer look. The standards are not an administrative challenge sitting in between a healthcare facility and a classification. They are the compound of the designation. Any major Magnet journey, whether directed internally or supported through Magnet ® Consulting, needs to begin there.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting organization established in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside nursing and clinical teams transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its proprietary Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>