Magnet ® Consulting Guide to the 5 Parts of the Magnet Model

17 August 2026

Hospitals and health systems do not pursue Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® status since it is easy. They pursue it since the standards are exacting, the scrutiny is genuine, and the designation signals something meaningful about nursing quality and quality patient results. The program, granted by the American Nurses Credentialing Center, did not emerge from branding alone. Its roots trace back to a 1983 study of so called "magnet" healthcare facilities, and the formal program name altered to Magnet Recognition Program ® in 2002. Ever since, the framework has grown into a disciplined model that asks companies to demonstrate how nursing management, expert practice, innovation, and results fit together.

That is where Magnet ® Consulting tends to become valuable. Not due to the fact that consultants can manufacture readiness, they can not, however because many organizations require aid equating daily quality into a coherent body of evidence. Strong groups typically do amazing work and still battle to tell the story in a manner that aligns with ANCC expectations. Others have energy and management support, yet their data, structures, or examples are irregular throughout departments. The work is rarely about producing something synthetic. More often, it has to do with sharpening governance, tightening documentation, and making sure the company can demonstrate what it already believes about nursing practice.

The present Magnet framework is constructed around 5 parts of the empirical design: Transformational Leadership, Structural Empowerment, Exemplary Expert Practice, New Understanding, Innovations, & & Improvements, and Empirical Outcomes. These elements grew out of the earlier 14 Forces of Magnetism after a 2007 statistical analysis of appraisal ratings, with the 2008 conceptual design organizing those forces into the five-component structure utilized today. For leaders considering designation or redesignation, comprehending these parts is not optional. They shape the composed paperwork, the evidence expectations, and eventually the way a nursing organization presents itself for appraisal.
Why the 5 components matter in real operations
One of the most convenient mistakes in a Magnet journey is treating the 5 parts as five separate chapters that can be designated to different people and stitched together later. On paper, that sounds efficient. In practice, it results in gaps, repetition, and a story that feels fragmented. A high operating nursing company does not experience leadership, empowerment, practice, innovation, and outcomes as disconnected domains. They overlap every day.

Consider a typical functional truth. A chief nursing officer supports shared decision-making councils, system leaders coach personnel through a practice change, interdisciplinary teams improve a care process, and the organization determines whether patient outcomes or nursing-sensitive outcomes improve. That single chain of activity can touch every part of the model. If the team preparing the Magnet application separates those pieces too rigidly, it can miss the bigger point. ANCC is not trying to find isolated examples. It is searching for proof of a system.

That is why a useful Magnet ® Consulting approach begins by mapping how work actually moves through the company. Where are choices made. Who owns practice changes. How are nurses engaged. What outcomes were tracked. Which examples are fully grown enough to stand up to examine. The strongest preparation is less about gathering every possible story and more about determining the stories that clearly show alignment with the model.
The role of proof, and why it changes the conversation
ANCC requires composed documentation tied to the Application Manual and its proof requirements, frequently talked about through Sources of Proof and related crosswalk products. That requirement sounds procedural, however it changes the entire posture of preparation. It indicates great objectives are not enough. Anecdotes alone are not enough either. Organizations have to reveal their work.

In my experience, this is generally the point where enthusiasm satisfies discipline. A nursing team might feel confident that it has strong expert practice. Then it starts collecting proof and realizes the examples are unevenly recorded, the data definitions differ by department, or the timeline of a task is harder to rebuild than anyone expected. None of that indicates the organization is weak. It suggests quality has to show up, traceable, and supported.

That is likewise why timing matters. ANCC posts separate charge schedules for application and appraisal, including an online application cost and appraisal evaluation charges due at written file submission. Even without talking about precise figures, the structure itself is useful. It reminds leaders that Magnet work is not simply philosophical. It requires financial preparation, submission discipline, and a sensible understanding of where the organization is on the road from aspiration to readiness.
Transformational Leadership
Transformational Leadership is typically the most misunderstood element since people reduce it to character. They think of a convincing chief nursing officer, a charismatic executive presence, or a refined strategic message. Those qualities might help, but they are not the essence of the element. Leadership in the Magnet design needs to reveal direction, influence, and responsiveness within the nursing enterprise.

At its finest, Transformational Management shows up in the method leaders guide the organization through change while keeping nursing values undamaged. The key word is not merely lead. It is transform. That does not mean change for change's sake. It suggests nursing leaders can articulate where the company requires to go, why it matters, and how nurses will be participated in getting there.

A beneficial test is whether frontline nurses can explain management concerns in useful terms. If staff experience executive messaging as remote or abstract, the management story might look strong in a conference room presentation but thin in a Magnet story. By contrast, when unit-based nurses can point to how leadership decisions impacted staffing support structures, expert governance, or the conditions for quality care, the story ends up being more credible.

This is often where seeking advice from assistance ends up being part training, part translation. Senior leaders normally have the method. What they need is aid drawing a direct line between tactical management and nursing practice results. The written story needs to reveal not just what leaders decided, however how those decisions moved through the company and shaped nursing excellence.

There is a judgment call here. Some companies attempt to include every tactical effort launched over numerous years. That can dilute the story. A tighter method generally works much better: select examples where management impact is clear, nursing relevance is obvious, and the downstream result can be demonstrated.
Structural Empowerment
Structural Empowerment takes the lofty concept of empowerment and asks a practical question: what structures make it genuine. This is among the most crucial shifts in the Magnet model. Culture matters, but structures are what sustain culture when leaders change, budget plans tighten, or priorities compete.

When an organization is strong in this component, nurses do not need to count on informal consent to take part, speak out, or shape practice. There are defined mechanisms that support involvement and professional contribution. Those mechanisms might include council structures, leadership pathways, official acknowledgment procedures, or systems that link nurses to broader organizational objectives. The precise kinds are less important than the proof that they function as intended.

The difficulty is that numerous healthcare facilities have structures on paper that are only partly alive in practice. A council exists, but participation is irregular. A shared governance design was introduced, but few individuals can explain how choices move from conversation to application. Expert advancement opportunities exist, yet gain access to differs dramatically throughout units. Structural Empowerment asks companies to look carefully at whether the framework really allows participation.

An experienced Magnet ® Consulting process typically reveals this space early. Not to slam the company, but to distinguish between nominal structures and efficient ones. That difference matters due to the fact that ANCC acknowledgment is awarded to organizations that fulfill Magnet requirements, and the requirements suggest durable organizational capacity, not separated brilliant spots.

There is likewise a subtle compromise in this element. Extremely central systems can create consistency, however they may deteriorate regional ownership if every decision streams from the top. Extremely decentralized systems can stimulate systems, but they might produce variation that makes proof harder to present coherently. The greatest companies usually strike a middle ground. They set enterprise expectations while protecting significant nursing voice near to practice.
Exemplary Expert Practice
If Transformational Leadership sets direction and Structural Empowerment produces the conditions, Exemplary Professional Practice asks the clearest bedside question of all: how is nursing practiced here, and what makes that practice excellent.

This component typically resonates most deeply with nurses due to the fact that it reflects the visible work of care delivery, cooperation, accountability, and professional standards in action. Yet it can be surprisingly difficult to document well. Numerous companies assume that because practice feels strong, the evidence will naturally inform the story. It hardly ever does without careful curation.

Exemplary Professional Practice requires specificity. Broad statements about teamwork or compassion do not bring much weight unless they are connected to concrete examples. What professional practice design is visible in operations. How do nurses work within interdisciplinary relationships. Where is responsibility apparent. How does practice maintain consistency while adjusting to the requirements of different client populations or settings within the organization.

A recurring difficulty is the temptation to overgeneralize from one exceptional system. Nearly every healthcare facility has standout departments with exceptional leaders and deeply engaged groups. The Magnet standard, however, concerns the company. A single remarkable area can enhance the narrative, however it can not replacement for broader evidence of expert practice.

This is where internal sincerity is important. If one service line is fully grown and another is still developing fundamental structures, leaders need to understand that early. The goal is not to conceal variation. The goal is to examine whether the organization as a whole can credibly demonstrate exemplary nursing practice. Often the ideal tactical choice is to decrease, enhance weaker areas, and send later with a more balanced story.
New Understanding, Developments, & & Improvements
Some teams approach this part with unneeded anxiety, mostly due to the fact that the title sounds extensive. New Understanding, Innovations, & Improvements can make individuals think they require remarkable breakthroughs or highly advertised tasks. The more useful analysis is simpler and more grounded. The component asks whether the organization advances practice, improves care, and discovers in a disciplined way.

Innovation in this context does not need to be flashy to matter. In lots of health centers, the most meaningful enhancements are useful. A workflow redesign that minimizes friction for nurses, a much better technique for tracking a medical change, or a procedure that assists spread out a reliable practice more reliably can all speak to the company's capability to improve. What matters is that the work is thoughtful, deliberate, and connected to nursing excellence.

The expression brand-new knowledge also deserves care. Groups sometimes end up being awkward here and assume they require to overemphasize the novelty of their work. That is an error. ANCC appraisal depends on defensible evidence. If a job is an adaptation, state so plainly. If an enhancement developed on known methods however was implemented in such a way that enhanced nursing practice in your setting, that is still valuable. Sincere framing is always more powerful than inflated claims.

This part also tends to expose how a company manages knowing. Does it deal with enhancement work as episodic, driven by a handful of inspired individuals, or does it have a repeatable way to identify opportunities, test changes, and evaluate outcomes. A consultant can help leaders frame those patterns, however the underlying ability has to be real.

One useful indication of preparedness is whether the company can explain enhancement work throughout time. Not simply a single project, but a pattern of knowing, refinement, and spread. That kind of connection typically distinguishes mature companies from those that have a couple of separated success stories.
Empirical Outcomes
Empirical Results is where the Magnet design ends up being least flexible, and appropriately so. Leadership might be persuasive. Structures might be well created. Expert practice may be thoughtfully explained. Enhancement work might be promising. However if the company can not show outcomes, the overall story weakens.

This element is also why the design is called empirical. It is not built on goal alone. ANCC explains the framework around nursing quality and quality client results, and this element makes that expectation explicit. The organization needs to reveal outcomes that support its claims.

For lots of groups, outcomes work is less about collecting data than about picking the right information, defining it regularly, and presenting it clearly gradually. The hardest conversations frequently happen here. A team might be proud of a job that improved personnel engagement on one system, but if the procedure changed halfway through the reporting duration or if comparison across settings is uncertain, the example may not be the strongest prospect for submission.

Strong outcome stories generally share a few attributes. The metric matters. The time frame is easy to understand. The relationship between intervention and result is possible. The information story does not require heroic analysis. When those conditions are present, the written paperwork becomes more confident and less defensive.

There is a deeper leadership lesson embedded here also. Organizations that carry out well on Empirical Results usually did not start with a beautiful document. They began with functional practices: measuring what matters, examining outcomes routinely, adjusting when progress stalled, and structure accountability into practice. By the time they prepare for Magnet classification or redesignation, the documents is requiring, however it is documenting a discipline that already exists.
How the five components engage throughout a Magnet journey
The five components are typically taught independently, but preparation gets simpler when leaders comprehend how they reinforce one another. Transformational Management without Structural Empowerment can produce method without involvement. Structural Empowerment without Exemplary Specialist Practice can produce activity without consistent medical meaning. Innovation without results can sound energetic however remain unverified. Results without the surrounding management and practice story can look accidental rather than repeatable.

A useful way to think of the design is to follow the course of a strong nursing effort. Leadership determines or responds to a need. Structures engage nurses and support involvement. Professional practice forms the care method. Improvement approaches improve the work. Results reveal whether the effort mattered. That sequence is not rigid, but it is frequently how the very best examples read.

For organizations using Magnet ® Consulting, this integrated view is specifically useful during evidence choice. Instead of asking,"Which examples fit each chapter," the much better question is often,"Which examples best reveal the system at work. "That small shift can enhance coherence dramatically.
Common preparedness issues that deserve candid attention
Not every company that wants Magnet classification is all set to use immediately. That is not failure. It is prudent assessment. The most efficient leaders are willing to hear where the story is thin before they commit to formal timelines and fees.

A few concerns show up consistently:
Leadership messages are strong, but frontline connection is weak. Shared structures exist, however decision paths are unclear. Practice examples are engaging on choose units, not broadly enough throughout the organization. Improvement work is active, but documents is inconsistent. Outcomes are available, but data definitions or timespan are not stable.
None of these problems immediately disqualifies a company. They do, nevertheless, impact preparedness. In a lot of cases, the difference in between a rushed and an effective application is merely the determination to invest a number of additional months strengthening the evidence base.
Designation is not completion point, and redesignation proves that
One of the most essential facts about Magnet status is that designation and redesignation stand out. Organizations that have currently made Magnet Acknowledgment are expected to pursue redesignation to continue being acknowledged. That difference matters because it reframes the work from task thinking to operational discipline.

If a health center treats Magnet as a one-time project, the momentum frequently fades after acknowledgment. Proof systems loosen up. Governance ends up being less intentional. Improvement stories become harder to recover. By the time redesignation techniques, the company is restoring muscles it need to have maintained.

The healthier technique is to utilize the Magnet design as a continuous management lens. ANCC likewise offers digital tools and guides to support the appraisal process and interim tracking throughout classification, which strengthens the idea that this is not a single submission event. The companies that deal with redesignation finest tend to keep the evidence conversation alive in between cycles. They monitor progress, protect examples, and continue connecting nursing strategy to measurable outcomes.

That is another area where Magnet ® Consulting can be practical, particularly for organizations that do not want readiness to rise and fall with one internal specialist. Sustainable systems are better than heroic efforts.
What strong preparation feels like
When a group is genuinely all set, the work still feels requiring, but not chaotic. Leaders can explain the nursing strategy in a constant method. Staff examples line https://landenlqzy814.bearsfanteamshop.com/magnet-r-consulting-comprehending-designation-versus-redesignation https://landenlqzy814.bearsfanteamshop.com/magnet-r-consulting-comprehending-designation-versus-redesignation up with what executives describe. Evidence is not best, yet it is reliable and arranged. The five elements feel less like separate compliance pails and more like an accurate description of how the company operates.

That is the real worth of the Magnet model. It offers hospitals a rigorous structure for showing what nursing quality appears like when leadership, expert practice, enhancement, and outcomes strengthen one another. The classification itself matters, certainly. So does the right to represent that recognition according to main trademark rules as soon as granted. But the much deeper benefit is the discipline needed to make it.

Organizations that do this well hardly ever depend on mottos. They count on compound, evaluated versus the five components, documented with care, and supported by outcomes. That is the basic the Magnet Recognition Program ® was designed to honor, and it is the standard any major Magnet journey should be built to meet.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a nursing consulting and education company established in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ helps nursing and clinical teams transform the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>