donwload site

Expires in 7 months

07 February 2022

Views: 7

donwload site

Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than the next cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.

p2p 추천 Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only has to be in a folder.

You will need to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that may play sound sources within an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often cut off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. It is just a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. And when you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you must discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Aside from those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power in writing documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue to be reflected in the cloud in real time. It is a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps which might be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you are using Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it's the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, but it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Is it obvious?)

Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, if you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.

The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you are going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the priciest cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you want to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and work on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little use of the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a little slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.
Read More: https://www.asiadisk.com

Disable Third Party Ads

Share