Shared Governance in Nursing: Moving From Structure to Culture

17 September 2026

Shared Governance has actually belonged to nursing language for years, yet lots of companies still experience it more as a diagram than a lived reality. There are councils, charters, reporting lines, and conference schedules. Names are appointed. Agendas are built. Minutes are filed. On paper, the structure exists. At the bedside, though, nurses may still feel that choices show up completely formed from somewhere else.

That gap matters. In nursing, Shared Governance refers to a model in which nurses have an official voice in choices about their expert practice, frequently through councils or comparable online forums. More recently, lots of leaders have actually leaned into the term Professional Governance, which puts sharper emphasis on autonomy, accountability, meaningful decision-making, and management in practice. The language shift is not cosmetic. It signals a much deeper expectation that nurses are not simply sought advice from, however are acknowledged as professionals with both expertise and responsibility.

The central obstacle is not usually whether a company can develop a Shared Governance structure. The majority of can. The more difficult work is creating a culture where that structure in fact brings weight, where staff nurses trust it, where leaders secure it, and where choices made through it form practice in visible ways. Moving from structure to culture is where many efforts either mature or stall.
When the structure exists however the spirit is missing
A hospital can have every conventional part connected with Shared Governance and still leave nurses feeling unheard. That happens when councils exist generally to examine details that has already been decided somewhere else. It happens when participation is encouraged however authority is restricted. It takes place when bedside nurses are invited into conversation yet omitted from follow-through. In time, people observe the distinction in between involvement and influence.

This is where the difference in between Shared Governance and Professional Governance ends up being beneficial. Shared Governance historically recorded the idea of shared decision-making, however Professional Governance presses the discussion even more. It suggests that governance is not a courtesy given to nurses. It is a way of arranging the profession so that nursing understanding guides nursing practice. That framing changes the posture of everyone involved.

In useful terms, culture shows up in small signals before it appears in big results. A nurse supervisor stops briefly application of a practice modification up until the appropriate council has evaluated it. A senior executive asks what the nursing body suggests rather than what management chooses. A staff nurse speaks in a council meeting with the confidence that the space expects educated judgment, not symbolic input. Those moments are challenging to record in a policy document, however they expose whether governance is performative or real.

The reason many companies struggle here is easy. Structure is visible and buildable. Culture is relational and cumulative. You can launch a council in a month. You can not create trust on a deadline.
Why this shift matters to nursing practice
AONL has explained Professional Governance as both a structure and a viewpoint for leveraging nursing competence and supporting the sustainability and development https://daltoneizl852.raidersfanteamshop.com/why-partnership-belongs-at-the-center-of-shared-governance https://daltoneizl852.raidersfanteamshop.com/why-partnership-belongs-at-the-center-of-shared-governance of the profession. That double description is necessary. If governance is only structural, it can become procedural. If it is also philosophical, it forms how individuals consider authority, responsibility, and expertise.

That shift has ramifications well beyond committee work. Nursing practice is dynamic, and the people closest to care frequently see problems early. They observe where workflow creates danger, where policy clashes with reality, where client needs outmatch old presumptions. A culture of Shared Governance produces an official path for that understanding to influence practice. Without that course, companies lose one of their greatest sources of operational wisdom.

There is also a labor force dimension that can not be neglected. Nursing leadership sources have actually connected shared or professional governance to empowerment, engagement, retention, teamwork, interprofessional collaboration, and more secure, higher-quality patient care. Those are not small benefits. They reach into the daily experience of work and the long-term health of the occupation. The ANA's 2025 Code of Ethics goes even additional by naming collaboration and shared decision-making as necessary to nursing's work, and by clearly consisting of shared governance among workforce sustainability initiatives. That is a clear declaration that governance belongs to ethical practice and workforce stewardship, not just organizational design.

In many settings, nurses are asking a standard concern: do we have a significant voice in the practice standards we are expected to promote? Shared Governance, or Professional Governance, is one of the clearest organizational answers to that question.
The language change is telling us something
Some leaders withstand terms arguments since they can feel abstract. Yet in this case, the language change from Shared Governance to Professional Governance shows a significant evolution in nursing thought.

"Shared" can sometimes be analyzed in a diluted method, as though nursing authority exists just when borrowed from administrative structures or divided among stakeholders. "Specialist" clarifies that nurses govern matters of nursing practice due to the fact that they are the occupation equipped to do so. That does not lower collaboration. It reinforces it. Groups function best when each discipline brings its proficiency clearly, not vaguely.

Professional Governance stresses 4 ideas that are worthy of careful attention: autonomy, accountability, meaningful decision-making, and leadership in practice. These ideas produce a well balanced model. Autonomy without accountability ends up being choice. Responsibility without autonomy ends up being compliance. Significant decision-making without management in practice ends up being theory. Leadership in practice without official online forums becomes dependent on characters rather than systems.

That balance is part of what makes the model resilient when it is succeeded. It recognizes that nursing voice carries both rights and responsibilities. A professional practice environment can not ask nurses to own results while rejecting them an authentic function in the decisions that form those outcomes.
What culture appears like when governance is healthy
Healthy Shared Governance is typically less dramatic than individuals expect. It hardly ever announces itself with slogans. Rather, it becomes evident in patterns. Nurses know where practice concerns should be brought. Council work is connected to genuine concerns, not ritualistic updates. Leaders do not deal with governance online forums as optional when time is tight. Choices are interacted back to staff in plain language. The process feels worth the effort.

Just as essential, culture shows up in what does not take place. Staff do not have to rely on corridor conversations to affect clinical practice. Unit-based disappointment does not need to escalate into resignation before anybody listens. Governance is not bypassed simply since a quicker administrative route exists.

One of the clearest signs of healthy Professional Governance is that nurses begin to talk differently about their role. They move from saying, "They changed the practice," to "We reviewed the practice issue." That shift in language shows a shift in ownership. It does not suggest every nurse agrees with every decision. It indicates the process is legitimate enough that disagreement can happen inside a trusted structure.

There is a practical realism here too. Shared decision-making does not suggest every topic is chosen by consensus or that all authority becomes diffuse. Nurses who have actually operated in strong governance environments understand that some choices remain constrained by guideline, organizational policy, resources, or interdisciplinary requirements. A fully grown culture does not guarantee limitless control. It guarantees a significant, formal, expert voice where nursing practice is concerned.
The foreseeable ways structure breaks down
When governance stalls, the very same patterns tend to appear. The names might vary, however the mechanics are familiar.
Councils end up being information channels rather than decision-making bodies. Staff involvement narrows to a little group of reliable volunteers. Leaders bypass governance when timelines feel pressured. Feedback loops damage, so personnel stop seeing what changed due to the fact that of council work. Governance is described as important, but not secured in the every day life of the unit.
None of these failures happen all at once. They build gradually. A conference is canceled since staffing is difficult. A suggestion is deferred without description. A leader makes a sensible one-time exception, then another. Soon nurses conclude that governance matters only when convenient.

This is one reason culture matters more than kind. If the company sees Shared Governance as a core expression of professional nursing practice, it will defend the time and discipline needed to keep it. If it sees governance as a leadership effort or an accreditation-friendly function, it will deteriorate under pressure.
Leadership's role, without taking over
Leaders often say they want nursing voice, but the kind of that assistance matters. Shared Governance can not thrive if leaders control it. It likewise can not grow if leaders withdraw and call that empowerment. The right role is more deliberate.

In a healthy design, management produces the conditions for governance to work. That consists of securing the legitimacy of nursing councils, expecting decision-making to take place through appropriate forums, and enhancing accountability for the outcomes of those decisions. Leaders assist hold the limit around the process. They do not alternative to it.

There is a tension here that knowledgeable nurse leaders acknowledge instantly. Personnel nurses require real authority over professional practice matters, however they likewise need organizational assistance to equate concepts into action. When either side disappears, disappointment follows. Too much executive control and governance becomes hollow. Too little executive support and governance becomes symbolic, full of good discussion however short on impact.

AONL's framing helps here due to the fact that it provides Professional Governance as both approach and structure. Approach tells leaders how to consider nursing expertise. Structure tells them where and how that proficiency need to act. Together, they prevent two typical errors: decreasing governance to committee logistics, or glamorizing expert voice without building the mechanisms that sustain it.
Shared decision-making is ethical work, not simply management technique
It is appealing to speak about governance in functional language alone, but nursing has more powerful factors for appreciating it. The ANA's 2025 Code of Ethics determines cooperation and shared decision-making as necessary to nursing's work. That puts the issue squarely within expert ethics.

Why does that matter? Since principles in nursing is not limited to bedside problems. It likewise concerns the conditions under which nursing practice is arranged. If nurses are expected to promote standards of care, advocate for clients, and contribute professional judgment, then the systems around them should make room for that judgment to matter. Shared Governance supports that ethical expectation by producing representative, open online forums for talking about practice and policy issues.

This point often gets missed when governance is marketed only as a retention method or an engagement strategy. Those results matter, and they are supported by management literature. Still, they are not the entire story. Governance is also about expert integrity. It expresses regard for nursing as a discipline efficient in forming its own practice within collective systems.

That ethical dimension can consistent organizations throughout challenging durations. When staffing pressure increases or functional urgency controls, Shared Governance might be considered as something to simplify. But if it is comprehended as part of ethical professional practice, it ends up being more difficult to sideline without consequence.
Culture modifications when nurses see results
Trust in governance is developed through visible cause and effect. Nurses need to see that what enters the governance process can become action, information, or a liable rationale. Not every proposition will move forward. That is normal. What deteriorates culture is not the existence of limitations. It is opacity.

A strong Professional Governance culture tends to answer 3 staff concerns clearly. Was the issue heard? Who discussed it? What took place next? If those responses are difficult to find, staff will frequently assume that involvement is decorative.

The most effective organizations are generally disciplined about closing the loop. They make governance work understandable. That does not need flashy interaction. It requires consistency. A bedside nurse who raises a practice issue must not need to become an investigator to discover its status six weeks later.

This is where many councils either gain reliability or lose it. The meeting itself is only one part of the experience. The larger experience is whether the system interacts regard for expert input all the method through.
Moving from event-based participation to everyday expectation
Some organizations treat Shared Governance as a separate activity that happens in designated meetings. That is a beginning, but not a destination. Culture grows when governance principles shape everyday interactions, not just formal sessions.

A nurse supervisor asking personnel for input on a practice problem before a decision is settled, that is culture. A teacher framing a suggested change as something to be evaluated through nursing governance rather than presented unilaterally, that is culture. An executive leader describing council suggestions as reliable nursing guidance, that is culture.

At that phase, governance stops sensation like an additional job. It enters into how the company comprehends professional nursing work. Nurses no longer need to choose between taking care of clients and participating in practice decisions as though those are unassociated commitments. The company acknowledges that they are connected.

That perspective lines up with the more comprehensive approach Professional Governance. The more recent term asks organizations to think less about sharing power in abstract terms and more about how the profession exercises responsibility in real settings. It places nursing judgment where it belongs, inside the continuous life of practice.
Practical concerns that reveal whether culture is forming
Organizations do not need complicated diagnostics to notice whether governance is ending up being cultural rather than merely structural. A few grounded questions can surface a fantastic deal.
Do nurses believe governance decisions affect real practice? Do leaders regularly route nursing practice issues through the concurred forums? Do personnel hear back about decisions in a timely and understandable way? Is involvement treated as professional work, not extracurricular work? When tension develops, is governance enhanced or bypassed?
These concerns matter since they move beyond whether a council calendar exists. They ask whether the organization behaves as though nursing proficiency is main to nursing practice. That is the heart of Professional Governance.

Notice that none of these questions requires perfection. A healthy culture is not one where every nurse is equally engaged at every moment, or where councils never have a hard time, or where all choices are popular. It is one where the system keeps faith with the property that nurses must have an official, significant voice in choices about their expert practice.
The trade-offs are real, and worth naming
Shared Governance is often explained in purely favorable terms, which can make application more difficult instead of much easier. Any truthful conversation should acknowledge compromises.

Meaningful shared decision-making requires time. Deliberation can feel slower than top-down instruction, specifically in organizations under consistent pressure. Representative structures can appear disagreement instead of smooth it over. Accountability becomes more noticeable when expert voice is real. Nurses who request impact might also discover themselves bring more responsibility for the standards and outcomes connected to that influence.

None of that deteriorates the case for governance. It reinforces it by grounding expectations. Expert practice should involve disciplined judgment, not simply safeguarded opinion. The point is not to make every choice much easier. It is to make nursing decisions more genuine, more notified, and more connected to the experts responsible for practice.

There is also a social compromise. A mature governance culture needs leaders to endure more dialogue and staff to tolerate more intricacy. That can be uneasy in environments that are utilized to speed, hierarchy, or informal back-channel issue resolving. Yet pain is typically an indication that authority is being rearranged in a more expert way.
Where the strongest efforts tend to land
The most durable Shared Governance efforts generally stop attempting to show that the structure exists and start showing that the occupation is using it. That is a subtle but essential shift. It moves the focus from architecture to behavior.

At its best, Professional Governance produces a recognizable expert climate. Nurses are not passive receivers of practice expectations. They are liable individuals in shaping them. Leadership is not threatened by nursing authority. It depends on it. Interprofessional relationships improve since nursing talks to greater clearness and organization. Retention and engagement are supported not by slogans about voice, but by actual experience of voice.

This is why moving from structure to culture is the genuine work. Structure matters. Without it, involvement stays casual and irregular. However structure alone is only the container. Culture determines whether that container holds anything of value.

When nurses see governance dealt with as vital, not ornamental, the model ends up being more than a committee map. It becomes a professional norm. That is where Shared Governance satisfies its guarantee, and where Professional Governance makes its greatest case. It is not just about having a seat at the table. It is about nursing recognizing, organizing, and utilizing its own authority in service of practice, patients, and the future of the profession.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting and education firm established in 1978 by nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Based in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with nursing and clinical teams strengthen the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its signature Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>