Magnet ® Consulting: From the 14 Forces of Magnetism to 5 Parts

12 August 2026

Magnet ® Consulting sits at a fascinating intersection of method, nursing leadership, quality enhancement, and disciplined project management. The expression frequently gets used casually, however the work itself is not casual at all. Healthcare facilities and health systems that pursue Magnet Recognition Program ® status are engaging with an official ANCC program that recognizes nursing quality and quality patient results. That matters because Magnet designation is not a branding exercise. It is an external acknowledgment process with standards, written paperwork requirements, appraisal activity, and, for organizations that already hold the recognition, redesignation expectations to continue being recognized.

Anyone who has actually worked around a Magnet journey long enough discovers that the hardest part is rarely remembering terms. The tough part is translating a large, living company into a coherent body of evidence. That obstacle ends up being much easier to understand when you look at how the Magnet design itself progressed, from the initial 14 Forces of Magnetism to the five elements of the current empirical design. That shift altered the method lots of leaders believe, organize, and provide their work. It likewise changed what reliable Magnet ® Consulting looks like in practice.
The roots matter more than people think
The Magnet story traces back to a 1983 research study of so-called magnet hospitals, companies that had the ability to bring in and retain nurses during a period of labor force strain. Those early findings gave the field a language for what strong nursing environments looked like. Over time, that thinking was formalized into the Magnet Acknowledgment Program ®, and ANCC now grants Magnet status. The program name officially altered to Magnet Acknowledgment Program ® in 2002, which is worth keeping in mind since many experienced leaders still utilize older shorthand when they describe the program's history.

For years, the 14 Forces of Magnetism shaped how individuals understood Magnet suitables. Even now, seasoned nurse executives and specialists who showed up in earlier designation cycles will often think in regards to the forces first, then map that thinking to the current model. That is not nostalgia. It shows how companies actually discover. Structures leave finger prints on practice long after the diagram changes.

The crucial transition followed a 2007 statistical analysis of appraisal ratings. ANCC then relocated to the 2008 conceptual design, which organized the 14 forces into 5 https://penzu.com/p/3f1e79d2d4a8b3a4 https://penzu.com/p/3f1e79d2d4a8b3a4 wider elements. That evolution did not remove the older thinking. It organized it differently, in such a way that stressed relationships amongst leadership, expert practice, innovation, and quantifiable results.

That is one place where strong Magnet ® Consulting earns its keep. A great expert does not deal with the shift from 14 forces to five elements as a simple vocabulary update. They assist leaders see the tactical ramification: the current design benefits companies that can connect structure, culture, practice, and results in a persuading way.
Why the move from 14 forces to 5 components was more than simplification
At initially look, the change can look like a tidy combination exercise. Fourteen concepts become five classifications, which sounds simpler to manage. In practice, it did something more substantial. It pressed companies far from a checklist mindset and towards a more integrated narrative.

The older forces offered in-depth anchors for what excellent nursing environments must show. The more recent model asks a company to demonstrate how those qualities operate together. Instead of presenting separated strengths, a hospital has to show a pattern. Leadership shapes empowerment. Empowerment supports professional practice. Expert practice develops conditions for innovation and enhancement. Results then supply proof that the system is working.

That sounds simple on paper. It is not always straightforward inside a large healthcare company. Departments use various definitions. Data lives in numerous systems. Shared governance might be robust on one school and immature on another. Leaders often presume everyone comprehends the Magnet model the very same method, up until the very first documents workgroup meeting shows otherwise.

This is why knowledgeable Magnet ® Consulting tends to be part translator, part editor, and part realist. The consultant's function is not to invent achievements or force a refined story onto weak infrastructure. It is to assist a company recognize what is really present, where the proof is strong, where it is thin, and how the existing five-component model ought to form the method the story is told.
The 5 elements altered the center of gravity
The current empirical design is arranged around five components: Transformational Leadership, Structural Empowerment, Exemplary Expert Practice, New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements, and Empirical Outcomes.

Each of those components carries weight, however they do not run in seclusion. In genuine Magnet work, they act more like a set of linked gears. If one slips, the others frequently reveal the strain.
Transformational Leadership
Transformational Leadership is where lots of organizations think their Magnet story starts, and in one sense that holds true. Without noticeable nursing management, the rest of the model tends to flatten into fragmented activity. Yet this component is often misinterpreted. It is not merely about titles or charismatic executives. In a reputable Magnet story, leadership shows instructions, responsiveness, and influence throughout the organization.

Consulting operate in this location often involves assisting leaders move beyond broad declarations of support. A consultant may ask tough concerns that are less glamorous but even more helpful. How are decisions communicated? Where is nursing leadership noticeably shaping priorities? When the company faces pressure, what examples show that nurse leaders are still driving professional standards and results rather than responding passively?

Those concerns matter due to the fact that composed documents should do more than appreciation management. It needs to show it.
Structural Empowerment
Structural Empowerment can sound abstract up until you see what weak empowerment looks like. Conferences take place, but personnel input changes nothing. Councils exist, but their authority is unclear. Expert development is urged rhetorically, but unevenly supported. The structure is present in name, not in function.

In a strong organization, empowerment is recognizable in the machinery of daily work. Staff nurses have pathways to affect practice. Professional development is not an afterthought. Neighborhood and organizational connections show up. The culture permits nursing excellence to scale beyond a couple of standout units.

This is a location where Magnet ® Consulting frequently ends up being a mirror. Leaders may find that they have strong local engagement however irregular structures throughout sites or service lines. A specialist can assist recognize whether the issue is truly a lack of empowerment, or a failure to record and align proof currently in movement. Those are different problems, and puzzling them can lose a year.
Exemplary Professional Practice
This part tends to expose the difference between high effort and high dependability. Numerous companies work incredibly difficult. Exemplary Professional Practice asks whether that work is regularly professional, collaborated, and embedded.

Nursing leaders typically assume this area will compose itself since bedside care is central to the mission. Yet when groups start assembling evidence, they often discover that the strongest examples are buried in regional discussions, meeting files, or unit-based improvement records that were never ever meant for official appraisal. The practice may be outstanding. The proof trail may be weak.

That gap produces a typical tension in Magnet preparation. Staff can feel annoyed when they hear that fantastic work is insufficient on its own. The reality is that a recognition program needs companies to show what they do. Not since the work is doubted, but due to the fact that external evaluation depends upon verifiable evidence.
New Knowledge, Developments, & & Improvements
This component is where some companies end up being overly enthusiastic and others become too modest. The title itself welcomes grand analysis, however not every significant enhancement has to sound revolutionary. On the other hand, routine work ought to not be inflated into innovation simply to please a heading.

Good judgment matters here. A seasoned expert will usually guide groups far from flashy language and back toward disciplined evidence. What changed? Why did it alter? How was the enhancement introduced or supported? What was learned? How does it link to nursing practice and organizational advancement?

That method safeguards credibility. It likewise helps teams prevent among the more common preparing errors in Magnet work, which is explaining activity without demonstrating improvement.
Empirical Outcomes
Empirical Results changed the conversation in an enduring method. Earlier Magnet believing certainly appreciated efficiency, but the present model makes results main and explicit. This is where goal fulfills accountability.

For lots of organizations, this is the most revealing component since it removes away classy prose. You can write polished narratives about management and practice. Results still have to base on their own. If they are insufficient, inadequately trended, or detached from the story around them, the weak point shows quickly.

Strong Magnet ® Consulting does not deal with results as a final assembly step. It brings them into the discussion early. That is practical, not cynical. There is little worth in developing a gorgeous narrative around structures that have not yet produced convincing outcomes. An honest expert will state that aloud, even when it is uncomfortable.
What the 14 forces still offer skilled teams
Although the present model is built around five components, the older 14 Forces of Magnetism still have practical worth as a believing tool. Lots of veterans utilize them almost like a diagnostic lens. If the five components are the architecture, the forces can still help a group inspect the interior rooms.

That can be specifically beneficial when an organization is having a hard time to comprehend why a broad component feels weak. "Structural Empowerment" may sound too big to troubleshoot. Looking back through the more detailed reasoning of the earlier forces can assist leaders pinpoint whether the issue is participation, autonomy, professional development, leadership exposure, or another cultural and operational factor.

An expert who knows both ages of the Magnet model can be particularly practical here. Not due to the fact that the old structure is still the main structure, however since organizational problems rarely show up sorted into clean conceptual boxes. People believe in fragments, stories, and examples. An expert who can bridge older Magnet language and the current ANCC model frequently helps teams move quicker and with less confusion.
Documentation is where strategy ends up being real
One of the clearest truths about the Magnet procedure is that candidates send composed documentation tied to proof requirements in the Application Handbook. ANCC crosswalk products explain these written documentation evidence requirements as Sources of Evidence. That expression, while technical, gets to the heart of the work. A Magnet application is not a loose collection of achievements. It is proof arranged to fulfill specified expectations.

This is frequently the point where leaders discover that Magnet readiness and Magnet application readiness are not similar. An organization may have a fully grown professional practice environment and still be poorly prepared to produce paperwork effectively. Another might have typical storytelling abilities but incredibly disciplined proof management.

That is where Magnet ® Consulting frequently ends up being operational instead of conceptual. The discussion shifts from "Do we do this?" to "Where is the evidence, who owns it, what timeframe uses, and how will we present it coherently?" Those are not glamorous concerns, however they are the ones that keep projects on schedule.

In my experience, organizations typically ignore three things during documentation work: the time needed to confirm truths throughout departments, the quantity of rewriting needed to develop a consistent voice, and the effort involved in lining up examples with the actual proof requirement instead of the team's favorite story. None of that suggests the procedure is punitive. It simply shows how formal recognition works.
The practical value of external guidance
There is no guideline that states a healthcare facility should utilize a specialist to pursue Magnet classification or redesignation. Some organizations have deep internal proficiency and sufficient capability to manage the full journey themselves. Others gain from outdoors assistance since their internal leaders are balancing Magnet work with active functional demands, staffing truths, competing tactical efforts, and regular clinical pressures.

The finest use of Magnet ® Consulting is not dependence. It is velocity with discipline.

A helpful expert normally assists in a couple of particular ways:
clarifying how the five components need to form the company's narrative identifying evidence gaps early, before preparing is too far along imposing reasonable timelines for document advancement and review coaching leaders on the distinction between a strong example and a usable source of evidence helping redesignation teams avoid complacency based upon prior success
That last point should have attention. Redesignation is not simply a repeat performance. ANCC compares initial designation and redesignation, and companies that already earned Magnet Acknowledgment ought to pursue redesignation to continue being acknowledged. Groups with prior recognition typically feel both more positive and more exposed. They know the terrain much better, however they likewise understand just how much examination information can receive. A specialist who comprehends that psychology can steady the process.
The financial and timing realities belong to the strategy
It is appealing to talk about Magnet only in cultural or expert terms, however the application procedure also has clear financial and timing measurements. ANCC publishes separate fee schedules that consist of an online application cost and appraisal evaluation costs due at composed document submission. That matters due to the fact that pursuit of Magnet is not just a nursing project. It is an organizational dedication that needs budget planning, executive sponsorship, and reasonable sequencing.

This is another area where straightforward consulting can help. Leaders need to comprehend that timing choices affect more than the calendar. If an organization sends before its evidence is mature, it creates avoidable pressure. If it waits too long while outcomes and stories age out of significance, it can lose momentum and invest additional effort refreshing product. There is judgment associated with picking when to apply and when to submit written documentation.

No outside advisor can make that decision in the abstract. The ideal timing depends on the organization's real state of preparedness, the strength of its outcomes, and the quality of its paperwork systems. Still, a knowledgeable consultant can frequently recognize when optimism is outrunning infrastructure.
The appraisal procedure is not an afterthought
ANCC provides digital tools and guides to support the appraisal procedure and interim tracking throughout designation. That informs you something essential about how Magnet should be handled. The procedure does not end when the document is sent. Organizations need systems that sustain presence into progress and requirements beyond the preliminary writing phase.

This has actually altered the temperament of effective Magnet work. Ten or fifteen years ago, some groups treated the application as a heroic document sprint. That mindset can still appear, especially in companies with a strong culture of deadline-driven efficiency. It is seldom the healthiest method. Continual readiness, disciplined tracking, and ongoing interim monitoring develop a steadier path.

That is one reason the move from 14 forces to five parts lines up well with contemporary job management. The five-component design motivates broad, integrated accountability. Digital tracking tools and appraisal supports enhance that integration. Together, they press Magnet work away from episodic effort and toward a continuous operating model.
Where organizations frequently have a hard time throughout the transition in thinking
When teams move from talking about the 14 forces to writing within the five parts, several foreseeable stress appear. They are not signs of failure. They are indications that the organization is learning to think at a different level of integration.

One stress is over-categorization. People become nervous about putting every example in exactly one location, when in truth strong Magnet evidence typically reflects more than one component. Another is imbalance. Teams might have abundant stories for management and professional practice however weaker outcome presentation. A 3rd is fond memories for the older structure among experienced leaders who feel the finer distinctions have been flattened. That concern is understandable, however it normally fades when teams see how the five elements can hold intricacy without losing rigor.

The companies that adjust finest tend to do one thing well: they stop asking which heading noises best and start asking which part the evidence really advances. That is a subtle however decisive shift.
Magnet as acknowledgment, roadmap, and discipline
ANCC describes the Magnet program as both an acknowledgment for conference Magnet requirements and a roadmap to nursing quality. Those 2 ideas belong together. Acknowledgment without a roadmap would welcome performative preparation. A roadmap without recognition would lose some of its external reliability and inspirational force.

This dual nature describes why Magnet ® Consulting can be so valuable when done well therefore aggravating when done inadequately. If consulting focuses just on the plaque, it reduces the work to packaging. If it focuses only on ideals, it runs the risk of becoming removed from the application reality. The greatest assistance appreciates both sides. It assists companies develop a sincere account of nursing excellence while fulfilling the official expectations of the ANCC process.

That balance is difficult. It needs an expert, and a management group, ready to say two things at the very same time. Initially, your nursing culture may be genuinely strong. Second, the evidence still has to be assembled, fine-tuned, and defended with discipline.
The shift that still forms Magnet work today
The move from the 14 Forces of Magnetism to the 5 parts was not simply a historic modification in ANCC language. It altered the operating reasoning of Magnet preparation. It encouraged companies to show connection rather than build-up, outcomes rather than objective, and integrated leadership instead of isolated excellence.

For medical facilities and health systems pursuing classification or redesignation, that shift still shapes every significant decision. It affects how nurse leaders frame strategy, how teams gather Sources of Evidence, how they prepare for appraisal, and how they judge readiness. It also discusses why Magnet ® Consulting, when grounded in the real ANCC framework, is less about design templates and more about discernment.

The finest Magnet work always feels meaningful from the inside. The structures make sense, the professional practice is visible, improvement is more than a slogan, and the outcomes support the story being told. The existing five-component model asks companies to prove that coherence. The older 14 forces assist explain where the concepts came from. Together, they form a helpful lens for any organization severe about the Journey to Magnet Excellence ®.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

CHCM is a health care consulting organization serving hospitals since 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ partners with health care organizations improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>