How Shared Governance Motivates Open Forum in Nursing Management

06 September 2026

Nursing management works best when the people closest to practice have a real voice in forming it. That idea sits at the center of Shared Governance, increasingly gone over as Professional Governance. The language has actually evolved, but the core concept stays clear: nurses should participate in meaningful choices about their professional practice, not merely receive decisions after they are made.

That distinction matters more than it might appear on paper. An unit can hold town halls, send surveys, and welcome comments, yet still keep authority concentrated at the top. Shared Governance changes the relationship in between bedside knowledge and organizational decision-making by offering nurses a formal role, typically through councils or comparable structures, in discussing practice and policy problems. Professional Governance hones that principle even more by emphasizing autonomy, accountability, and leadership in practice.

When this design is healthy, open forum is not a side activity. It enters into how nursing management operates.
Open online forum is more than speaking up
Many companies say they value open interaction. Less develop the conditions where nurses can question practice, raise concerns, test concepts, and impact results without feeling that participation is simply symbolic. An open forum in nursing leadership is not simply a meeting with a microphone. It is a reliable process for emerging scientific insight, disputing options, and deciding what needs to change.

That procedure is exactly where Shared Governance has its greatest impact. Because the design provides nurses a formal voice in decisions about practice, it moves discussion from informal problem to recognized contribution. Issues no longer live only in break spaces, hallway discussions, or post-shift disappointment. They get in a structure where they can be heard, challenged, refined, and acted on.

This is one factor the term Professional Governance has gotten traction. It indicates that the work is not just about sharing power in a broad or vague sense. It has to do with governing professional nursing practice with the occupation's own proficiency. That framing tends to elevate the quality of dialogue. The conversation shifts from "management versus personnel" to "what does sound nursing judgment need here, and who requires to be associated with deciding it?"

In practical terms, that shift can alter the tone of leadership meetings. Nurses are most likely to speak openly when they understand their participation is anticipated, not extraordinary. Leaders are more likely to ask better concerns when they understand frontline nurses are not present simply to validate a prewritten plan.
Why structure changes the quality of conversation
Open online forum often stops working for an easy factor: it depends too heavily on personality. If a nurse supervisor is unusually approachable, interaction circulations. If a director is comfy with argument, conferences feel more secure. If a senior leader invites questions, individuals may speak. Those traits help, however they are vulnerable. Personnel modifications, work pressures, or a period of organizational stress can silence the space quickly.

Shared Governance makes open online forum less based on charisma and more based on design. The validated understanding of shared governance in nursing describes a design where nurses have an official voice, usually through councils or comparable structures. That matters because structure produces continuity. It sets expectations about who participates, what topics belong in discussion, and how choices move from issue to action.

A council-based model also helps sort the distinction between conversation and choice. Not every question must be resolved in a broad open conference, and not every concern belongs in a personal workplace. Great governance channels concerns to the best level while maintaining transparency. Nurses can bring forward practice issues, examine policy ramifications, and discuss options in a setting meant for professional deliberation.

That is healthier than the typical option, which is leadership by escalation. In weak systems, issues move just when they become immediate, politically sensitive, or impossible to ignore. In more powerful Professional Governance systems, regular issues have a route into open online forum before they end up being crises.
The link between voice, autonomy, and accountability
One of the strongest contributions of Professional Governance is that it ties voice to responsibility. Nurses are not only invited to comment, they are recognized as responsible individuals in forming practice. AONL's framing of Professional Governance stresses autonomy, responsibility, significant decision-making, and leadership in practice. Those aspects belong together.

Autonomy without responsibility can become fragmented decision-making. Accountability without autonomy can end up being compliance dressed up as professionalism. Open online forum works best when both exist. Nurses require enough authority to affect requirements, workflows, and practice issues, and they also need to engage seriously with repercussions, compromises, and application challenges.

That combination tends to improve the quality of discussion in management settings. When nurses understand they belong to expert decision-making, they frequently move beyond determining what is frustrating and start articulating what is convenient. The conversation becomes less about venting and more about governing practice. That does not make disagreement disappear. In truth, significant disagreement frequently becomes more visible. But it is a more efficient type of tension.

A develop open forum is not one where everyone concurs quickly. It is one where individuals can disagree straight, utilize their competence, and still approach a defensible decision.
What shared governance sounds like when it is working
There is a noticeable difference in between an unit or company that has actually Shared Governance in name and one that utilizes it as a living professional design. The difference is frequently audible before it is quantifiable. In active Professional Governance settings, nurses reference requirements, client care ramifications, group coordination, and sustainability of practice. They ask what can reasonably be maintained. They question whether a policy supports quality care. They speak as owners of practice, not as passive recipients of policy.

Open forum under Shared Governance often has a number of recognizable functions:
Questions are welcomed before decisions are final. Bedside point of views are dealt with as operationally and professionally relevant. Councils or representative groups have a clear role in going over practice and policy issues. Leaders describe the reasoning behind choices, especially when not every choice can be accommodated. Follow-up shows up, so involvement feels connected to outcomes.
None of those points are significant. That belongs to their value. Shared Governance seldom transforms culture through one grand gesture. It resolves duplicated moments where nurses see that speaking out is expected, proficiency is respected, and leadership dialogue has a course to action.
Why this matters for nurse engagement and retention
The connection between Shared Governance and nurse empowerment, engagement, and retention is well developed in management conversations for good reason. People are more likely to remain invested in environments where they can affect the conditions of their practice. That does not mean every choice goes their method. It suggests they are dealt with as specialists whose judgment matters.

Nursing leaders in some cases undervalue how rapidly disengagement grows when open online forum feels performative. If conferences allow discussion but choices consistently show up from in other places, personnel often observe long previously leadership does. Participation narrows to a few outspoken people, the majority ended up being quieter, and councils run the risk of developing into procedural workouts rather than governing bodies. Over time, that can impact spirits and trust.

Professional Governance provides a stronger structure since it deals with participation as part of expert life, not an optional management style. That philosophical distinction is essential. AONL materials describe Professional Governance as both a structure and a philosophy for leveraging nursing know-how and supporting the profession's sustainability and growth. Sustainability is the keyword here. Open online forum is not sustainable when it counts on goodwill alone. It becomes more long lasting when it is developed into governance.

Retention is affected by numerous factors, and no governance design can fix every labor force difficulty. Settlement, staffing conditions, scheduling, leadership stability, and more comprehensive organizational pressures all matter. Still, leaders who dismiss the significance of shared decision-making typically miss a main reality: talented nurses want to practice in environments where their understanding counts.
The result on client care and team collaboration
Shared Governance is typically gone over as a workforce strategy, but that framing is too narrow. Its genuine significance reaches patient care. Management sources consistently connect Shared Governance and Professional Governance to safer, higher-quality care, along with more powerful team effort and interprofessional partnership. That connection is sensible. When nurses have a formal forum to discuss practice problems, issues in care shipment are most likely to surface area early and be addressed with scientific insight.

Nurses often hold details that does not appear plainly in reports or dashboards. They see where workflows create preventable danger, where communication breaks down throughout transitions, and where policies look sensible in theory however fail under actual patient care conditions. An open online forum formed by Shared Governance creates a route for that details to influence management decisions.

It also improves partnership beyond nursing. Interprofessional teams function much better when nursing input goes into the conversation in a structured, credible way. Open online forum within nursing management helps nurses clarify their position before disagreing into wider collaborative settings. That can decrease confusion and strengthen advocacy. Rather of individual nurses attempting to raise the very same issue consistently through spread channels, a Professional Governance process can advance a more meaningful, representative perspective.

There is a practical benefit here for leaders also. Decisions made with expert input often face less downstream resistance due to the fact that the concerns were resolved previously. That does not suggest application ends up being easy. It suggests the organization avoids some of the friction that comes from presenting practice modifications without meaningful clinical dialogue.
Where companies typically stumble
Shared Governance is extensively backed, however application can lose momentum. The most common failure is not open opposition. It is drift. Councils continue to fulfill, agendas fill, minutes are taped, yet the sense of impact damages. Leadership still values the design in theory, but daily pressure pushes genuine decisions into smaller circles and tighter timelines.

Another stumble occurs when open forum is puzzled with unrestricted discussion. Productive governance requires boundaries. If every concern goes everywhere, councils end up being overloaded and members lose clearness about purpose. If the forum is too narrow, nurses feel managed rather than represented. The balance is delicate. Strong leadership does not close conversation, but it does define where decisions belong and how they move.

There is also a stress in between speed and involvement. Leaders in some cases fear that shared decision-making will slow development. Sometimes, it does take longer upfront. Conversation, evaluation, and deliberation are not the fastest path. But the faster path is not always the most reliable one. Decisions made without nursing input may move rapidly initially and stall later on in practice. Shared Governance often trades some https://dominickgmmn856.opalvector.com/posts/how-shared-governance-produces-more-significant-nursing-participation https://dominickgmmn856.opalvector.com/posts/how-shared-governance-produces-more-significant-nursing-participation initial speed for much better positioning, stronger ownership, and less preventable conflicts.

The model can likewise become too symbolic if subscription is not supported. Agent bodies need adequate legitimacy to show practice concerns and sufficient connection to leadership to affect outcomes. If councils are inhabited however sidelined, the damage can be even worse than having no formal structure at all, because it teaches staff that involvement changes little.
What nursing leaders should do differently
Open forum does not emerge automatically from a governance chart. Leaders shape whether Shared Governance ends up being meaningful or simply decorative. The management task is both behavioral and operational. Leaders need to invite obstacle, and they have to produce trusted systems for that challenge to matter.

Several habits make a significant distinction:
Bring concerns forward early sufficient genuine input. Clarify which choices nurses can influence straight and which require more comprehensive approval. Respond noticeably to recommendations, even when the response is no. Protect time and attention for council work so governance is not treated as additional labor without consequence. Keep the focus on professional practice, not personality or hierarchy.
These practices sound easy, however they require discipline. One of the easiest methods to weaken open forum is to request for broad participation while reserving the real discussion for closed rooms. Another is to motivate candor however punish pain. Nurses quickly compare a leader who wants input and a leader who desires agreement.

Leaders also require to tolerate imperfect early conversations. Not every council discussion starts polished. In some cases a concern gets in the space as frustration before it becomes a well-framed practice concern. Experienced management helps convert raw concern into functional expert discussion rather than dismissing it due to the fact that it showed up without perfect language.
The ethical dimension is difficult to ignore
The profession's ethical standards enhance why this matters. The ANA's 2025 Code of Ethics determines collaboration and shared decision-making as necessary to nursing's work and explicitly consists of shared governance among workforce sustainability initiatives. That is not a minor endorsement. It positions Shared Governance within the ethical material of professional nursing, not simply within management preference.

This ethical dimension changes the discussion for leaders. Open forum is not just a culture enhancement task. It supports the profession's responsibility to team up, work out judgment, and sustain a healthy labor force. When nurses are excluded from choices about their practice, the issue is not merely discontentment. It can become an expert integrity issue.

That point deserves careful handling. Shared Governance should not be romanticized as the answer to every ethical or operational strain. But it does offer a genuine structure for honoring nursing knowledge and producing decision-making environments that line up with professional worths. When leaders take that seriously, open online forum gains depth. Discussion is no longer framed as optional feedback. It enters into ethical professional participation.
Open forum in representative bodies, not simply public meetings
One misunderstanding worth remedying is the idea that openness requires every discussion to include everybody. That is hardly ever useful and typically not useful. ANA governance materials show a collaborative management method in which representative bodies discuss practice and policy concerns in open online forum. The representative component is important.

Representation enables organizations to gather and improve input without losing manageability. It also assists move open online forum from spontaneous reaction to sustained governance. Nurses can bring problems from their areas, deliberate through established bodies, and bring information back to their peers. That cycle is what provides the procedure credibility.

For leaders, this implies listening needs to happen in more than one venue. Open online forum may happen in council conferences, representative discussions, and broader management exchanges. The quality of the system depends upon those channels being linked. If representative groups purposeful however interaction back to units is weak, governance becomes nontransparent. If systems raise issues however representative bodies have little influence, the procedure becomes frustrating.

Healthy Shared Governance closes that loop. Nurses see where issues go, who discusses them, what reasoning shaped the outcome, and what happens next. That transparency is frequently what constructs trust more than contract itself.
When the language shifts from shared to expert governance
The shift from Shared Governance to Professional Governance is more than a branding workout. It reflects an effort to call nursing's role more precisely. "Shared" can in some cases suggest borrowed authority or dispersed management. "Professional" centers the profession's knowledge, autonomy, and accountability.

That language can assist leaders and staff move beyond an outdated presumption that governance is something leaders generously share when time permits. Professional Governance provides a stronger claim. Nursing practice must be formed by professional nursing management and significant decision-making because the work itself needs it.

At the same time, the older term still carries large recognition, and lots of organizations continue to use Shared Governance successfully. In practice, the most important concern is not which label appears on a council charter. It is whether nurses truly have a formal voice in choices about practice and whether that voice is linked to leadership action.

If the answer is yes, open forum has room to grow. If the answer is no, the terminology will not save the model.
The environments where this model makes the most significant difference
Shared Governance tends to show its worth most clearly in moments of pressure. Throughout periods of policy modification, staffing pressure, workflow redesign, or interprofessional friction, leadership can easily become more centralized. That instinct is reasonable. Pressure invites speed, and speed typically invites tighter control.

Yet those are exactly the moments when open forum matters most. When the practice environment is moving, bedside nurses typically find unexpected consequences early. Professional Governance provides leaders a disciplined method to hear those concerns before issues deepen. It likewise provides personnel a legitimate avenue for impact when unpredictability is high.

This does not mean every crisis should be managed by committee. It implies organizations that already have strong governance structures are better placed to keep interaction, trust, and practical insight under stress. They have channels in location. They do not need to invent participation after aggravation has peaked.

That may be among the strongest arguments for investing in Shared Governance before it feels immediate. Structures integrated in steady periods are much more useful when the environment ends up being unstable.
What leaders ought to listen for next
If a nursing leader wants to know whether open forum is thriving under Shared Governance, the very best ideas are typically discovered in daily speech. Are nurses advancing concerns through recognized pathways, or just in personal? Do representative bodies talk about practice and policy problems with visible severity? Are leaders discussing how input formed the outcome? Is professional disagreement treated as a threat, or as part of liable decision-making?

Shared Governance, or Professional Governance, does not create open forum by announcement. It creates it by duplicated proof. Nurses see that they have an official voice. Leaders reveal that the voice matters. Councils or similar structures offer connection. Partnership and shared decision-making become part of common professional life rather than periodic gestures.

When that takes place, nursing leadership modifications in a fundamental method. Authority does not disappear, however it ends up being more reliable. Dialogue ends up being more sincere. Decisions end up being more informed by practice. And the profession ends up being stronger where it matters most, in the genuine work of taking care of clients and sustaining the nurses who do it.

<h2>Creative Health Care Management (CHCM)</h2>

Creative Health Care Management is a nursing consulting and education company established in 1978 by Primary Nursing pioneer Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey. Located in Bloomington, Minnesota, Creative Health Care Management https://chcm.com/ works alongside nursing and clinical teams improve the patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience through its flagship Relationship-Based Care® model, Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.

<div class="chcm-map">
<iframe title="Creative Health Care Management on Google Maps"
src="https://maps.google.com/maps?q=8500%20Normandale%20Lake%20Blvd%20Suite%20350%20Bloomington%20MN%2055437&t=&z=15&ie=UTF8&iwloc=&output=embed"
width="100%" height="300" style="border:0" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer-when-downgrade"></iframe>
</div>

<h3>Key Facts About Creative Health Care Management</h3>

Identity & Contact

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is also known as CHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is a health care consulting and education firm</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management operates in the health care https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care industry</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded in 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded by Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is headquartered in Bloomington, Minnesota, United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has address 8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350, Bloomington, MN 55437</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has telephone (800) 728-7766</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has email chcm@chcm.com</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has website chcm.com https://chcm.com/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management serves the United States</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has slogan “Transforming Healthcare Since 1978”</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated for more than 45 years</li>
</ul>

Leadership & People

<ul>
<li>Marie Manthey https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey founded Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is a nurse and health care pioneer</li>
<li>Marie Manthey originated the Primary Nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing model</li>
<li>Marie Manthey is documented on Wikipedia</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is a nurse author affiliated with CHCM</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis authored See Me as a Person</li>
<li>Mary Koloroutis is associated with Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Donna Wright is a competency assessment expert</li>
<li>Donna Wright created the Donna Wright Competency Assessment Model</li>
<li>Donna Wright authored The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care</li>
</ul>

Methodologies & Expertise

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management specializes in Relationship-Based Care</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a care delivery model</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care is a registered trademark of Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Relationship-Based Care was published by Creative Health Care Management in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides Primary Nursing implementation</li>
<li>Primary Nursing is a nursing care delivery model</li>
<li>Primary Nursing was originated by Marie Manthey</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers professional governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers shared governance https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers competency assessment programs</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers nursing leadership development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management offers cultural transformation consulting</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management provides education and workshops</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about nursing management https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about patient experience https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management knows about professional development https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management helps hospitals improve patient care</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with health systems</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management works with nursing and clinical teams</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management advances nursing practice</li>
</ul>

Publications

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management publishes books on nursing and health care</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was written by Mary Koloroutis</li>
<li>See Me as a Person is about the therapeutic relationship</li>
<li>See Me as a Person was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was written by Donna Wright</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care is in its 4th edition</li>
<li>The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is about creating a culture of nursing excellence</li>
<li>Feel the Pull is in its 3rd edition</li>
<li>Feel the Pull was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works is about shared governance</li>
<li>Shared Governance that Works was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>Considerations in Professional Governance was published by Creative Health Care Management</li>
<li>The Practice of Primary Nursing was published by Creative Health Care Management in 1980</li>
</ul>

History

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has operated since 1978</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published The Practice of Primary Nursing in 1980</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management published Relationship-Based Care in 2004</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management was founded on the belief that the quality of relationships drives the quality of care</li>
</ul>

Digital Presence

<ul>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on X (Twitter) https://x.com/CreativeCHCM</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on LinkedIn https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a profile on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a channel on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management has a Google Business Profile https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6</li>
<li>Creative Health Care Management is listed in the Google Knowledge Graph</li>
</ul>

<script type="application/ld+json">

"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@graph": [

"@type": ["Organization", "ProfessionalService"],
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization",
"name": "Creative Health Care Management",
"alternateName": "CHCM",
"url": "https://chcm.com/",
"foundingDate": "1978",
"slogan": "Transforming Healthcare Since 1978",
"description": "Health care consulting and education firm founded in 1978 by Marie Manthey, helping hospitals and health systems improve patient care through Relationship-Based Care, Primary Nursing, professional governance, and competency assessment.",
"email": "chcm@chcm.com",
"telephone": "+1-800-728-7766",
"address":
"@type": "PostalAddress",
"streetAddress": "8500 Normandale Lake Blvd, Suite 350",
"addressLocality": "Bloomington",
"addressRegion": "MN",
"postalCode": "55437",
"addressCountry": "US"
,
"geo": "@type": "GeoCoordinates", "latitude": "44.8534371", "longitude": "-93.3565382" ,
"hasMap": "https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"areaServed": "@type": "Country", "name": "United States" ,
"founder": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey" ,
"knowsAbout": [
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care" ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Primary Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primary_nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q7243152"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q121176"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Nursing management", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nursing_management", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q2084130"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Patient experience", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_experience", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q22907655"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Shared governance", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_governance"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Professional development", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Professional_development", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q828812"] ,
"@type": "Thing", "name": "Health care", "sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q31207"]
],
"hasOfferCatalog":
"@type": "OfferCatalog",
"name": "Health Care Consulting & Education Services",
"itemListElement": [
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Relationship-Based Care Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Primary Nursing Implementation" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Professional Governance Consulting" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Competency Assessment Programs" ,
"@type": "Offer", "itemOffered": "@type": "Service", "name": "Nursing Leadership Development"
]
,
"sameAs": [
"https://x.com/CreativeCHCM",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/272222/",
"https://www.facebook.com/creativehcm/",
"https://www.instagram.com/chcm_consulting/",
"https://www.youtube.com/user/creativehealthcare",
"https://maps.app.goo.gl/oxF5EufxJ7Zc5avb6",
"https://share.google/Du66rxCYYZmi4rzAS"
]
,

"@type": "Person",
"@id": "https://chcm.com/#marie-manthey",
"name": "Marie Manthey",
"sameAs": ["https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Manthey", "https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q21063845"],
"knownFor": "Primary Nursing",
"worksFor": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "See Me as a Person: Stories for Reflection on the Therapeutic Relationship",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Mary Koloroutis" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization" ,
"about": "@type": "Thing", "name": "Relationship-Based Care"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "The Ultimate Guide to Competency Assessment in Health Care",
"bookEdition": "4th Edition",
"author": "@type": "Person", "name": "Donna Wright" ,
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Feel the Pull: Creating a Culture of Nursing Excellence",
"bookEdition": "3rd Edition",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"
,

"@type": "Book",
"name": "Shared Governance that Works",
"publisher": "@id": "https://chcm.com/#organization"

]

</script>